- Weighted Average Ratchet is an anti-dilution protection that takes into account the price and size of new financing rounds.
- The formula for calculating the new conversion price combines old prices and new investments.
- For investors, it offers moderate protection against dilution and maintains fair company shares.
- Startups benefit from less dilution and greater attractiveness for future investors.
- The complexity of calculation and implementation can present challenges.
- Market trends show an increasing preference for weighted average ratchet in many startup ecosystems.
- Clear communication and understanding of the mechanics are crucial for all stakeholders.
Weighted average ratchet is a more moderate form of anti-dilution protection in venture capital financing. In contrast to the full ratchet, this method takes into account both the price and the size of a new financing round when adjusting the conversion price for existing investors.
Definition and concept:
In a weighted average ratchet, the conversion price of an investor’s preference shares is adjusted based on a weighted average calculation. This calculation takes into account the price and the number of newly issued shares as well as the original conversion price and the number of outstanding shares before the new financing round.
How it works:
The formula for calculating the new conversion price is typically as follows:
New conversion price = (A + B) / (A + C), where:
A = Old conversion price x number of shares outstanding before the new round
B = Total amount of new investment
C = Number of new shares issued at the lower price
Example:
Assume a company has 1,000,000 shares outstanding and the old conversion price is EUR 1. A new round issues 500,000 shares at 0.50 euros.
New conversion price = (1,000,000 x 1 + 500,000 x 0.50) / (1,000,000 + 500,000) = 0.83 Euro
Importance for startups and investors:
For investors:
– Moderate protection against dilution in down rounds
– More balanced adjustment that takes into account the size of the new round
– Maintaining a fair share in the company
For startups:
– Less dilution for founders and early employees compared to full ratchet
– More attractive for future investors due to the more balanced structure
– Better balance between investor protection and company interests
Variants and related concepts:
1. broad-based weighted average: takes into account all outstanding shares and options
2. narrow-based weighted average: takes into account only certain share categories
3. pay-to-play commissions: Can be combined with weighted average ratchet
Negotiating points:
1. definition of the shares to be considered (broad-based vs. narrow-based)
2. exceptions for certain share issues (e.g. employee stock options)
3. time limit or staggering of the ratchet protection
4. linkage with other investor protection clauses
5. treatment of convertible bonds or other financing instruments
Advantages and disadvantages:
Advantages:
– More balanced protection for investors
– Less dilution for founders and other stakeholders
– More flexible and fairer structure for future financing rounds
– Better acceptance in the startup community
Disadvantages:
– More complex calculations and implementation
– Possibly insufficient protection in extreme down-round scenarios
– Potential inconsistencies in the interpretation of the calculation bases
Market trends and developments:
1. increasing preference: weighted average ratchet is becoming the standard in many startup ecosystems
2. adaptation to new forms of financing: Integration with SAFE notes and other innovative instruments
3. global harmonization: alignment of practices in different startup hubs worldwide
4. transparency initiatives: Efforts to achieve standardized and easily understandable formulations
Legal and financial aspects:
– Precise definition of the calculation method in investment contracts
– Consideration of disclosure obligations towards all investors
– Possible effects on the accounting and valuation of the company
– Compliance with local company law and stock exchange regulations
Strategic considerations for start-ups:
1. long-term planning: analysis of the impact on future financing rounds and exit scenarios
2. capital structure management: balancing different investor interests
3. negotiation strategy: use of weighted average as a compromise in investor discussions
4. transparency: clear communication of the mechanics and implications to all stakeholders
Best practices for investors:
1. risk-return assessment: Evaluation of whether weighted average offers sufficient protection
2. flexibility: willingness to adapt in later financing rounds
3. holistic approach: consideration of the weighted average ratchet in the context of other safeguard clauses
4. due diligence: careful examination of the specific formulation and calculation method
Conclusion:
Weighted average ratchet represents a balanced approach to anti-dilution protection that attempts to reconcile the interests of investors, founders and the company itself. This method offers investors appropriate protection against dilution without placing an excessive burden on the capital structure of the start-up or making future financing more difficult.
For startups, weighted average ratchet offers the advantage of a more flexible and fairer capital structure, which makes it possible to attract new investors even in challenging times without putting existing investors at too much of a disadvantage. The lower dilution for founders and early employees compared to more aggressive protection clauses can also keep the team motivated and engaged.
In an evolving startup ecosystem that increasingly emphasizes sustainability and fair practices, weighted average ratchet is establishing itself as a standard tool that balances investor protection and company growth. Careful structuring and negotiation of this clause remains an important aspect of designing successful and sustainable startup financings.