• Areas of expertise
  • |
  • About me
  • |
  • Principles as a lawyer
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
  • info@itmedialaw.com
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Ideal partner
      • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Video series – about me
      • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
      • Principles as a lawyer
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Nerd und Rechtsanwalt
      • Ideal partner
      • How can I help clients?
    • Über die Kanzlei
      • How clients benefit from my network of colleagues, partners and service providers
      • Quick and flexible access
      • Agile and lean law firm
      • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
      • Price overview
    • How can I help clients?
    • Sonstige Informationen
      • Einwilligungen widerrufen
      • Privatsphäre-Einstellungen ändern
      • Historie der Privatsphäre-Einstellungen
      • Privacy policy
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Leistungen
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Support with the foundation
      • Games law consulting
      • Advice in e-commerce
      • Support and advice of agencies
      • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
      • Legal compliance and expert opinions
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Arbeitsschwerpunkte
      • Games and esports law
        • Esports. What is it?
      • Corporate law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Consulting for influencers and streamers
        • Influencer & Streamer
      • Contract review and preparation
      • DLT and Blockchain consulting
        • Blockchain Overview
      • Investment advice
      • AI and SaaS
  • Artikel/News
    • Langartikel / Guides
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Law on the Internet
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Online retail
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Labour law
    • Tax
    • Kanzlei News
    • Other
  • Videos/Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Kurz-Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Ideal partner
      • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Video series – about me
      • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
      • Principles as a lawyer
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Nerd und Rechtsanwalt
      • Ideal partner
      • How can I help clients?
    • Über die Kanzlei
      • How clients benefit from my network of colleagues, partners and service providers
      • Quick and flexible access
      • Agile and lean law firm
      • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
      • Price overview
    • How can I help clients?
    • Sonstige Informationen
      • Einwilligungen widerrufen
      • Privatsphäre-Einstellungen ändern
      • Historie der Privatsphäre-Einstellungen
      • Privacy policy
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Leistungen
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Support with the foundation
      • Games law consulting
      • Advice in e-commerce
      • Support and advice of agencies
      • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
      • Legal compliance and expert opinions
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Arbeitsschwerpunkte
      • Games and esports law
        • Esports. What is it?
      • Corporate law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Consulting for influencers and streamers
        • Influencer & Streamer
      • Contract review and preparation
      • DLT and Blockchain consulting
        • Blockchain Overview
      • Investment advice
      • AI and SaaS
  • Artikel/News
    • Langartikel / Guides
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Law on the Internet
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Online retail
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Labour law
    • Tax
    • Kanzlei News
    • Other
  • Videos/Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Kurz-Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Contact
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
Home Law on the Internet

AI and the law: An analysis of 47 US Code § 230 and its implications

21. May 2024
in Law on the Internet
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
0
aebe7d77 c46c 42f0 a84b e335af4bd938
Key Facts
  • 47 US Code § 230 protects platforms from liability for user-generated content and promotes Internet growth.
  • The introduction of generative AI complicates the legal responsibility for content generated by AI.
  • Critics are calling for reforms to increase the accountability of platforms and guarantee freedom of expression.
  • The Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG) requires faster deletion of illegal content than Section 230.
  • Lawyers face challenges in understanding the international regulations and technical aspects of AI.
  • The future of Section 230 and the NetzDG depends on reforms to moderation and user rights.
  • The legal framework must be adapted to technological developments in order to secure digital communication.

As you know, much has already been written on this blog about the legal issues surrounding artificial intelligence (AI). Today, however, a different but equally important topic will be highlighted: 47 US Code § 230. This section of the US Communications Act is fundamentally linked to the legal ideas from the Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG) and plays a decisive role in the blocking of accounts on platforms such as Instagram. This regulation poses considerable challenges for lawyers, particularly in the area of social media. The increasing use of generative AI to create content that is distributed on social media further exacerbates this problem. Generative AI can be used both to create fake news and to spread disinformation, which further complicates the legal framework. The question of how these technologies can be regulated and controlled is of central importance for the future of digital communication. It is therefore essential to understand and analyze the legal implications of 47 U.S. Code § 230 in the context of generative AI.

Content Hide
1. What is 47 US Code § 230?
2. Critical voices and reform proposals
3. Comparison with the Network Enforcement Act
4. Challenges for lawyers
5. Conclusion: The future of Section 230 and NetzDG

What is 47 US Code § 230?

47 US Code § 230, also known as Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, was passed in 1996 and is one of the most important legal provisions for the Internet. This regulation protects internet service providers and platforms from liability for content created by users. This means that platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and Instagram cannot be held responsible for the posts of their users. This immunity has significantly promoted the growth and development of the internet, as platforms do not have to be liable for every single user expression. However, with the introduction of generative AI, which is capable of creating large amounts of content, the importance of Section 230 is being re-evaluated. The ability of AI to generate deceptively real texts, images and videos poses new challenges for legal responsibility. Platforms now have to deal not only with user-generated content, but also with content generated by AI systems. This raises the question of whether and how Section 230 can and should be applied to AI-generated content.

Critical voices and reform proposals

Section 230 has come under increasing criticism in recent years. Politicians from both parties in the US have proposed reforms to increase the accountability of platforms. Critics argue that the current regulation allows platforms to evade their responsibilities while at the same time restricting users’ freedom of expression. In particular, the blocking of accounts on social media platforms has led to an intense debate. The introduction of generative AI has further fueled this debate, as the technology makes it possible to create and disseminate large amounts of disinformation and fake news. Some reform proposals aim to limit the immunity of platforms and make them liable for certain types of content, especially when generated by AI. Other proposals call for stronger regulation of moderation practices to ensure that platforms act transparently and fairly. These reforms could have a significant impact on the way platforms moderate content and how users can exercise their freedom of expression online.

Comparison with the Network Enforcement Act

The German Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG) has some parallels to Section 230, but differs in important respects. The NetzDG, which came into force in 2017, obliges social networks to delete or block obviously illegal content within 24 hours of receiving a complaint. The platforms face high fines for systematic violations. While Section 230 grants platforms far-reaching immunity, the NetzDG focuses on the rapid removal of illegal content. These different approaches reflect the different legal and cultural frameworks in the USA and Germany. For lawyers, this means that they must take both national and international regulations into account when advising clients, especially when it comes to blocking accounts and moderating content. The increasing use of generative AI to create content that is distributed on social media poses an additional challenge, as this content is often difficult to distinguish from human-generated content. This requires an adaptation of the existing legal framework in order to do justice to the new technological developments.

Challenges for lawyers

The application of Section 230 and the NetzDG poses considerable challenges for lawyers. On the one hand, they have to protect the rights of their clients who may have been unjustly blocked or censored. On the other hand, they need to understand the legal framework and the practices of the platforms in order to be able to take effective legal action. Another problem is the international dimension of these regulations. As many platforms operate globally, lawyers must take into account the different legal requirements in different countries. This requires a deep understanding of both national and international law and close cooperation with colleagues from other jurisdictions. The increasing use of generative AI to create content that is distributed on social media further exacerbates these challenges. Lawyers now also need to understand the technical aspects of AI in order to fully grasp the legal implications of this technology. This requires continuous training and adaptation to the rapidly evolving technological landscape.

Conclusion: The future of Section 230 and NetzDG

The debate about Section 230 and the NetzDG will certainly continue in the coming months. Both regulations play a decisive role in the moderation of content on the Internet and the protection of freedom of expression. For lawyers, this means that they must constantly keep abreast of the latest developments and adapt their strategies in order to best represent their clients. The future of Section 230 and the NetzDG will largely depend on how legislators respond to the challenges of the digital age. Reforms could fundamentally change the way platforms moderate content and how users exercise their rights. It therefore remains essential for lawyers to continuously educate themselves and closely follow legal developments. The increasing use of generative AI to create content that is distributed on social media will further fuel this debate and bring with it new legal challenges. It is therefore crucial that the legal framework is adapted to the new technological developments in order to protect the rights of users and ensure the integrity of digital communication.

Tags: AnalyseAppealsBeratungBlogCustomizationDevelopmentExpressionFacebookFairGermanyGrowthHaftungInstagraminternetKILegal challengesLegal issuesMediaNetwork Enforcement ActRegulationrightTechnologyTwitter

Beliebte Beträge

Legally compliant contract drafting for software development on no-code platforms

Legally compliant contract drafting for software development on no-code platforms
26. April 2025

No-code and low-code platforms enable start-ups and agencies to develop software and digital products quickly and without in-depth programming knowledge....

Read moreDetails

Automated pricing and dynamic pricing in e-commerce

automatisierte preisgestaltung und dynamic pricing im ee28091commerce 1
2. April 2025

In the digital economy, automated pricing and dynamic pricing strategies are now part of everyday life. Whether for online shopping,...

Read moreDetails

Growth hacking and viral marketing – legal requirements

growth hacking und virales marketing juristische anforderungen 1
1. April 2025

Growth hacking and viral marketing promise start-ups rapid growth and a wide reach with a low budget. In the digital...

Read moreDetails

Liability of website operators for user comments – When and how operators are responsible for their users’ content

Creating contracts with face models and voice models: A guide for the gaming industry
15. March 2025

Introduction The responsibility of website operators for user-generated content has become much more important in recent years, both in case...

Read moreDetails

AI editing of OnlyFans content & Instagram campaigns: Important legal tips!

ai generated g63ed67bf8 1280
23. February 2025

Copyright and original material Copyright regulations protect the intellectual property of those who create photo and video material. The OnlyFans...

Read moreDetails

Digitalization and contract law: Electronic signature in accordance with the eIDAS Regulation

Digitalization and contract law: Electronic signature in accordance with the eIDAS Regulation
3. March 2025

Introduction: Digitalization and modern contract law Advancing digitalization is changing all business processes, especially in the area of contract design....

Read moreDetails

Liability under Art. 82 GDPR for sending forged invoices!

Liability under Art. 82 GDPR for sending forged invoices!
17. February 2025

Recently, I have been able to successfully represent my clients in several similar cases that were affected by security breaches...

Read moreDetails

Right of reply on social media: Differences and comparison to press law

Right of reply on social media: Differences and comparison to press law
11. February 2025

The right of reply is a key instrument in the German legal system that enables those affected to respond to...

Read moreDetails

Schleswig-Holstein Higher Regional Court: Liability for falsified e-mails with invoices

E-invoicing obligation from 2025: BMF specifies requirements
5. February 2025

Recently, I have been working on a large number of cases involving hacked email servers and relevant financial amounts. Invoices...

Read moreDetails

5.0 60 reviews

  • Avatar Mikael Hällgren ★★★★★ vor einem Monat
    I got fantastic support from Marian Härtel. He managed to get my wrongfully suspended Instagram account restored. He was … Mehr incredibly helpful the whole way until the positive outcome. Highly recommended!
  • Avatar Lennart Korte ★★★★★ vor 2 Monaten
    Ich kann Herrn Härtel als Anwalt absolut weiterempfehlen! Sein Service ist erstklassig – schnelle Antwortzeiten, effiziente … Mehr Arbeit und dabei sehr kostengünstig, was für Startups besonders wichtig ist. Er hat für mein Startup einen Vertrag erstellt, und ich bin von seiner professionellen und zuverlässigen Arbeit überzeugt. Klare Empfehlung!
  • Avatar R.H. ★★★★★ vor 3 Monaten
    Ich kann Hr. Härtel nur empfehlen! Er hat mich bei einem Betrugsversuch einer Krypto Börse rechtlich vertreten. Ich bin sehr … Mehr zufrieden mit seiner engagierten Arbeit gewesen. Ich wurde von Anfang an kompetent, fair und absolut transparent beraten. Trotz eines zähen Verfahrens und einer großen Börse als Gegner, habe ich mich immer sicher und zuversichtlich gefühlt. Auch die Schnelligkeit und die sehr gute Erreichbarkeit möchte ich an der Stelle hoch loben und nochmal meinen herzlichsten Dank aussprechen! Daumen hoch mit 10 Sternen!
  • Avatar P! Galerie ★★★★★ vor 4 Monaten
    Herr Härtel hat uns äusserst kompetent in einen lästigen Fall mit META betreut. Er war effizient, beharrlich, aber auch mit … Mehr uns geduldig. Menschlich top, bis wir am Ende Dank ihm erfolgreich zum Ziel gekommen sind. Können wir wärmstens empfehlen. Und nochmals danke. P.H.
  • Avatar Mosaic Mask Studio ★★★★★ vor 5 Monaten
    Die Kanzlei ist immer ein verlässlicher Partner bei der Sichtung und Bearbeitung von Verträgen in der IT Branche. Es ist … Mehr stets ein professioneller Austausch auf Augenhöhe.
    Die Ergebnisse sind auf hohem Niveau und haben die interessen unsers Unternehmens immer bestmöglich wiedergespiegelt.
    Vielen Dank für die sehr gute Zusammenarbeit.
  • Avatar Philip Lucas ★★★★★ vor 8 Monaten
    Wir haben Herrn Härtel für unser Unternehmen konsultiert und sind äußerst zufrieden mit seiner Arbeit. Von Anfang an hat … Mehr er einen überaus kompetenten Eindruck gemacht und sich als ein sehr angenehmer Gesprächspartner erwiesen. Seine fachliche Expertise und seine verständliche und zugängliche Art im Umgang mit komplexen Themen haben uns überzeugt. Wir freuen uns auf eine langfristige und erfolgreiche Zusammenarbeit!
  • Avatar Doris H. ★★★★★ vor 10 Monaten
    Herr Härtel hat uns bezüglich eines Telefonvertrags beraten und vertreten. Wir waren mit seinem Service sehr zufrieden. Er … Mehr hat stets schnell auf unsere E-mails und Anrufe reagiert und den Sachverhalt einfach und verständlich erklärt. Wir würden Herrn Härtel jederzeit wieder beauftragen.Vielen Dank für die hervorragende Unterstützung
  • Avatar Philipp Skaar ★★★★★ vor 8 Monaten
    Als kleines inhabergeführtes Hotel sehen wir uns ab und dann (bei sonst weit über dem Durchschnitt liegenden Bewertungen) … Mehr der Herausforderung von aus der Anonymität heraus agierenden "Netz-Querulanten" gegenüber gestellt. Herr Härtel versteht es außerordentlich spür- und feinsinnig, derartige - oftmals auf Rufschädigung ausgerichtete - Bewertungen bereits im Keim, also außergerichtlich, zu ersticken und somit unseren Betrieb vor weiteren Folgeschäden zu bewahren. Seine Umsetzungsgeschwindigkeit ist beeindruckend, seine bisherige Erfolgsquote = 100%.Ergo: Unsere erste Adresse zur Abwehr von geschäftsschädigenden Angriffen aus dem Web.
  • ●
  • ●
  • ●
  • ●

Video-Galerie

OnlyFans management: legal pitfalls and solutions
OnlyFans management: legal pitfalls and solutions
The advantages of professional contracts
The advantages of professional contracts
Blockchain in the supply chain: legally compliant smart contracts for logistics start-ups
Blockchain in the supply chain: legally compliant smart contracts for logistics start-ups
Working capital

Working capital

28. June 2023

Introduction Working capital, also known as working capital, is an important financial indicator that measures a company's liquidity and operational...

Read moreDetails
law 447487 1280

Trademark Act (MarkenG)

25. June 2023
Withholding tax

Opt

10. November 2024
Bad Leaver

Bad Leaver

16. October 2024
Challenge

Challenge

16. October 2024

Podcast Folgen

238a909c26a0302cbd4792cbd18e4922

Global challenges for start-ups – A legal guide

10. October 2024

This informative podcast offers a comprehensive insight into the legal challenges faced by start-ups when expanding internationally. The experienced lawyer...

c9c5d7fd380061a8018074c2ca5a81bf

Startups and innovation in Germany – challenges and opportunities

26. September 2024

This insightful podcast episode takes an in-depth look at the startup and innovation landscape in Germany and Europe. The discussion...

75df8eaa33cd7d3975a96b022c65c6e4

Life as an IT lawyer, work-life balance, family and my career

26. September 2024

In this captivating episode of my IT Medialaw podcast, I, Marian Härtel, share my personal journey as a passionate IT...

3c671c5134443338a4e0c30412ac3270

“Digital law decoded” with lawyer Marian Härtel

26. September 2024

In this exciting 30-minute podcast, lawyer Marian Härtel decodes the complex world of digital law for the self-employed, start-ups and...

  • Home
  • Imprint
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • Agile and lean law firm
  • Ideal partner
  • Contact
  • Videos
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Contact
  • Leistungen
    • Support with the foundation
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Games law consulting
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
    • Investment advice
    • Booking as speaker
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Contract review and preparation
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Focus on start-ups
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus on start-ups
    • How can I help clients?
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Videos
    • Video series – about me
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos on services
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Shorts
    • Third-party videos
    • Podcast format
    • Other videos
  • Knowledge base
  • Podcast
  • Blogposts
    • Lange Artikel / Ausführungen
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Labour law
    • EU law
    • Corporate
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • Tax
    • Internally
    • Other
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung