• Areas of expertise
  • |
  • About me
  • |
  • Principles as a lawyer
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Ideal partner
      • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Video series – about me
      • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
      • Principles as a lawyer
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Nerd und Rechtsanwalt
      • Ideal partner
      • How can I help clients?
    • Über die Kanzlei
      • How clients benefit from my network of colleagues, partners and service providers
      • Quick and flexible access
      • Agile and lean law firm
      • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
      • Price overview
    • How can I help clients?
    • Sonstige Informationen
      • Einwilligungen widerrufen
      • Privatsphäre-Einstellungen ändern
      • Historie der Privatsphäre-Einstellungen
      • Privacy policy
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Leistungen
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Support with the foundation
      • Games law consulting
      • Advice in e-commerce
      • Support and advice of agencies
      • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
      • Legal compliance and expert opinions
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Arbeitsschwerpunkte
      • Games and esports law
        • Esports. What is it?
      • Corporate law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Consulting for influencers and streamers
        • Influencer & Streamer
      • Contract review and preparation
      • DLT and Blockchain consulting
        • Blockchain Overview
      • Investment advice
      • AI and SaaS
  • Artikel/News
    • Langartikel / Guides
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Law on the Internet
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Online retail
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Labour law
    • Tax
    • Kanzlei News
    • Other
  • Videos/Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Kurz-Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Ideal partner
      • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Video series – about me
      • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
      • Principles as a lawyer
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Nerd und Rechtsanwalt
      • Ideal partner
      • How can I help clients?
    • Über die Kanzlei
      • How clients benefit from my network of colleagues, partners and service providers
      • Quick and flexible access
      • Agile and lean law firm
      • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
      • Price overview
    • How can I help clients?
    • Sonstige Informationen
      • Einwilligungen widerrufen
      • Privatsphäre-Einstellungen ändern
      • Historie der Privatsphäre-Einstellungen
      • Privacy policy
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Leistungen
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Support with the foundation
      • Games law consulting
      • Advice in e-commerce
      • Support and advice of agencies
      • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
      • Legal compliance and expert opinions
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Arbeitsschwerpunkte
      • Games and esports law
        • Esports. What is it?
      • Corporate law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Consulting for influencers and streamers
        • Influencer & Streamer
      • Contract review and preparation
      • DLT and Blockchain consulting
        • Blockchain Overview
      • Investment advice
      • AI and SaaS
  • Artikel/News
    • Langartikel / Guides
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Law on the Internet
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Online retail
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Labour law
    • Tax
    • Kanzlei News
    • Other
  • Videos/Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Kurz-Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Contact
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
Home Other

AI-generated content: Who owns the rights?

18. June 2024
in Other
Reading Time: 15 mins read
0 0
A A
0
a7476826606eddf6e6711ec857b02593
Key Facts
  • According to the Copyright Act, only personal intellectual creations are protected by copyright; purely AI-generated content is not protected.
  • The human contribution determines authorship; greater participation leads to greater chances of copyright.
  • There is a risk of copyright infringements through AI content, especially if it is similar to existing works.
  • Unclear contractual regulations can restrict the use of AI content; user contracts should be carefully reviewed.
  • International differences in the legal situation require attention for companies that operate internationally.
  • Users are responsible for carefully checking AI content for legal violations and ethical defensibility.
  • In the long term, copyright law needs to be adapted to the realities of AI development so as not to hinder innovation.

Copyright for AI content: Current legal situation and open questions

Content Hide
1. Copyright for AI content: Current legal situation and open questions
2. Human contribution as a prerequisite for authorship
3. Risk of copyright infringements through AI content
4. But beware: contractual pitfalls when using AI services
5. Conclusion: Legal gray areas require vigilance and expert advice

The nuuse of artificialartificial intelligence (AI) for thecreation of textstexts, images, videos and other creative content weraises many legallegal questions. One of the importanthe most important thing isWho actually ownshe actually owns thecopyright and managementrights to AI-generated inhold? Can I as a user of an AI freely over the results or door do I have to restrictionspay attention? Here a Overview of the current legalsituation in Germanyd.

According to the German Copyright Act (UrhG) only “personal gecreations” of a person are protected by copyright protected. The means: Pure KI-generated contentscontent does not enjoyprotection, since the AI itself is not as the author ofis seen. Also the user who only requestsrequests to the KI is not is not considered as the creator of the content.The lack ofprotection has advantages and disadvantagesdisadvantages: On the one handon the one hand use of KI images you do not name the author or request permission forragen. On the other hand but also exclusive management rightsrights – WApplicants couldcould use the sameuse the same contentzen. This can be problematicif you use the AI-generated inhold commercially usedwould like to no controlabout it haswho still needs the contents used. In additionis the dangerahr that AI-generated inhold against bestExisting copyrightsthe AI with copyright protectedprotected material we traind. The more similar the AI output one existing plant is, the wamore likely is a copyright infringementing.

As a user you shouldshould thereforecheck whether with the use ofthe use of AI contentrights of thirdrights of third partiesrights. Overall, theefindet the copyright due to the emergence of AI in a spfield. EOn the one hand, it should creators and their creativecreations, on theon the other hand, it must innovations too restrictive. It It remains to be seen whether the legislator will in the futureand clearer rulesfor the handling KI-generated inhold. Until there is the use of suchof such contentcaution is advised.

Human contribution as a prerequisite for authorship

Authorship of AI-generated content can only be considered if a human has had a significant influence on the creation of the work. The greater the human contribution, the more likely a copyright can arise. Examples would be the subsequent editing of AI images or the merging of AI texts into a new work. Where exactly the border runs, however, has not yet been conclusively clarified.

To date, there have only been a few court rulings on this topic, so many questions remain unanswered. Different approaches are emerging, particularly at international level. While a court in China recently ruled that AI-generated images can also be protected by copyright, courts in the USA and Europe have so far taken a more restrictive stance. For companies and creative professionals operating internationally, it is therefore important to keep an eye on the legal situation in different countries.

In Germany, the decisive factor is likely to be whether the human contribution reaches the required “level of creation”, i.e. whether it has a certain originality and individuality. This is always a question of the individual case and depends on the type and extent of human involvement. Pure technical support activities such as the selection of training data or the configuration of the AI will probably not be sufficient. It remains to be seen how courts will judge these issues in the future.

Another interesting aspect is the question of whether the use of AI in the creation of works changes the requirements for the level of creativity. Some experts argue that the support of AI would have to raise the bar for human creativity in order to establish authorship. Others see this as an unjustified disadvantage for AI-supported works and argue for a technology-neutral approach. The distinction between copyrights and ancillary copyrights could also play a role in AI-generated content. While copyright is based on personal intellectual creations, ancillary copyrights are linked to investments and entrepreneurial achievements. It is conceivable that special ancillary copyrights could be created for AI-generated content in order to protect the investments behind it, even if the requirements for copyright are not met. Finally, the question arises as to the ownership of copyright and exploitation rights if several people and AI systems were involved in the creation of a work. Similar principles could apply here as for joint works or associated works. The decisive factor is likely to be the creative contribution made by the individual participants and whether a division of rights is possible and reasonable.

Overall, it is clear that the development of AI poses major challenges for copyright law. The previous categories and demarcation criteria do not always fit the new technical possibilities. A careful analysis and possibly also a cautious adaptation of the legal framework is therefore required in order to find an appropriate balance between the interests of all parties involved.

Risk of copyright infringements through AI content

Since KI systems with copyrighted worksprotected worksare trained, there isthere is a fundamental danger that generated contentcontent infringescopyrightslast. The more similar the Output of an existing plant is, the moremore likely is an injury. Groovetors should thereforeI content before publication of thecheck. Pure zual similarities arebut rather unprobably. Problcan become when the AI characteristic elements of a copyrightedwork withoutwithout that this is instruction of the userlooks. Here arestands theof an unconsciousunknowing copyright infringementtion.

On the other hand it should be borne in mind that AI systems with a large number of worksare trained andtherefore rarely exexact copies perduce. Often newindependent contentscontent that from theworkseiden. Nevertheless Caution is advisedoten, especially when you want to use AI contentwant to use AI content commercially.tion. A careful tests examination for possiblecopyright infringements is in any case advisable. If necessary it may be usefulto contractually agreeto ensure that the provider of the AI provider has all the necessaryrights to the trainings data.tion. Also a Exemption from liability for the case of unintentional infringements may come into considerationcome into consideration.Anotherproblem isis that the exact traing data from AI systems are often are often not disclosed. For users It is therefore difficultto understand whichwhich works may have been the generationhave been includedd. Also the funcof the AI itself is often a “black box”, soso that it is not alwaysalways clear according to which criteria contentcontent is generated.

This complicates the check for copyrightcopyright infringementsfurther. In additionis that many KI systems are based on publicly accessibleaccessible data on the Internetare trained without that the rightsholders have have consented to this. This is where the question of whether this is consideredlawful use for the purpose of text and data mining can be considered or whether the rights of the authors losebe used. The The legal situation is on this point not yetfinalizedclarified. Some expare calling foran adaptation of the copyright law in order to the use of protected worksworks for training of AI more clearly regulate. Conceivable wWould legal exceptions forlegal exceptions for certain nucertain uses or the introduction of licenses that remuneration of the rights holders vsee. Also a labeling requirement for AI-generated contentcontent is beingtion to achieve more transparency create more transparency.

Ultimately but it is also responsibility of the users to handle AI contentand to minimizepossible risks in the to keep an eye on. DIn addition to the Testing for originalviolations also the question of whether the generated inhold ethicalretable and inhare correct in the oldd. Especially with sensitive themen or the Creation of Fake news beis the dangerahr that AI systems are problematic contents perduce the uncontrolledwide. Here is a criticalreflection andreview of the results isessential.All in allit is evident that the use of AI for the creation of content not not only legal, butbut also ethicalethical and socialsocial issuesraises questions. It requires a broad discourseand a carefulof the variousinterests in order to a responsible responsible use of this technology find. Thereby must respect both the rights of thetors as well as the innovation potential and the benefits for the general publicare taken into account.

But beware: contractual pitfalls when using AI services

Anyone using AI systems to create content should not only keep an eye on the copyright framework, but also carefully check the contractual agreements with the provider. There are a number of pitfalls lurking here that can restrict the use of the generated content.

It has not yet been conclusively clarified whether and under what conditions providers of AI services may limit the use of the content created in their general terms and conditions. Some clauses stipulate, for example, that users may only use the content for private purposes or may not exploit it commercially unless they have taken out a paid premium subscription. Whether such restrictions are legally permissible depends on a case-by-case assessment. However, users should be aware that by agreeing to the GTC, they may be relinquishing rights that copyright law would actually grant them. Similar problems can arise if you contribute AI-generated content to projects yourself as a contractor or licensee.

As I have already explained in previous blog posts, many contracts contain clauses that grant the client or licensor extensive rights of use to the content created. If you are not careful here, you may be transferring rights that you don’t even have because the content is purely AI-generated. In the event of a dispute, this can lead to liability risks, and agreements that exclude or restrict the use of AI systems in order fulfillment are not uncommon. Particularly in creative industries such as advertising or journalism, some clients insist on a purely human performance. Anyone who secretly resorts to AI here risks not only legal consequences, but also reputational damage. To avoid such pitfalls, it is advisable to check the contractual framework conditions carefully and, if necessary, renegotiate them before using AI systems. Open communication with clients and contractual partners about the use of AI can also help to avoid misunderstandings and conflicts.

Ultimately, everyone involved benefits from a legally compliant and transparent approach to this pioneering technology.

Conclusion: Legal gray areas require vigilance and expert advice

The rapid development of AI systems poses major challenges for copyright law. The existing regulations do not always fit the new technical possibilities, so many questions remain unanswered. This leads to considerable uncertainty for all parties involved, but one thing is certain: purely AI-generated content does not enjoy copyright protection in Germany. Users therefore have a great deal of freedom, but also have to reckon with competition. You can establish copyrights through your own creative contributions, but the boundaries are fluid. In addition, there is always the risk that AI content may infringe third-party copyrights – often without the user’s knowledge.

The situation is exacerbated by unclear contractual regulations. Many providers of AI services try to restrict the use of the generated content, which can lead to conflicts with copyright law. There are also pitfalls lurking in order and license agreements if AI content is introduced carelessly, so great vigilance is required to avoid legal problems. Companies and creative professionals should not only familiarize themselves with the copyright framework, but also carefully review their contracts. It is advisable to seek expert advice at an early stage. Especially in complex or international matters, the expertise of a specialized lawyer can be decisive in minimizing liability risks.

In the long term, there is no way around adapting copyright law to the new circumstances. For example, special ancillary copyrights for AI-generated content or clearer liability rules would be conceivable. Legislators are called upon to facilitate innovation and at the same time create a fair balance of interests. Courts will also be dealing with AI-related disputes and setting precedents more frequently in the future, and as a lawyer I see it as my task to advise clients competently and proactively in this dynamic environment. Because only those who are aware of the opportunities and risks of AI and are on the safe side legally can exploit the full potential of this fascinating technology. I am convinced that with the right strategy and expert support, companies and creative professionals can continue to benefit from AI in the future – in a legally compliant and innovative way.

 

Tags: AdvertisingAGBAnalyseBeratungCopyright infringementCreation heightCustomizationDevelopmentGermanyinternetInvestmentsKILawyerRiskTechnologyTransparencyUrheberrechtVerträge

Beliebte Beträge

The legal protection of a business plan

5b698c02ae6e02ed43d05d01c467b658
24. September 2024

A business plan is an indispensable strategic document for start-ups and company founders. It serves as a roadmap for business...

Read moreDetails

As a teenager, make e-sports men/streamers self-employed?

As a teenager, make e-sports men/streamers self-employed?
2. January 2020

The industry of streamers and e-sports enthusiasts is very young compared to other industries and therefore also for lawyers and...

Read moreDetails

European Accessibility Act and BFSG: Accessibility will be mandatory for websites, online stores & software from 2025

european economic interest grouping eeig
25. April 2025

Accessibility in the digital world is no longer just a voluntary option, but is becoming a legal obligation. The European...

Read moreDetails

Coalition agreement 2025: changes to commercial law for companies, the self-employed and investors

Coalition agreement 2025: changes to commercial law for companies, the self-employed and investors
9. April 2025

The 2025 coalition agreement of the (presumably) new federal government under the leadership of the CDU/CSU and SPD contains extensive...

Read moreDetails

Modern contract design 2025 in the influencer and agency business

Modern contract design 2025 in the influencer and agency business
7. April 2025

Influencer marketing and agency collaborations have gained enormously in importance in recent years. With new technologies, global networking and changing...

Read moreDetails

Influencers abroad: no free pass from German laws

Influencers abroad: no free pass from German laws
14. April 2025

Many influencers dream of escaping the German winter and their local obligations - be it to Dubai, Madeira or the...

Read moreDetails

Influencer agency contracts and Section 627 BGB: Effectively exclude termination in a relationship of trust

Influencer agency contracts and Section 627 BGB: Effectively exclude termination in a relationship of trust
12. April 2025

Contracts between influencers and their agencies or between managers and artists are often based on a close relationship of trust....

Read moreDetails

Liability when using VibeCoding and no-code platforms – implications for legal due diligence

Liability when using VibeCoding and no-code platforms – implications for legal due diligence
31. March 2025

VibeCoding describes a current trend in which software is no longer programmed manually, but is developed almost exclusively using AI...

Read moreDetails

The romanticization of the “fail fast” principle in startups – When does failure become deception towards stakeholders?

The romanticization of the “fail fast” principle in startups – When does failure become deception towards stakeholders?
3. April 2025

"Fail fast, fail often" - hardly any other motto characterizes the start-up culture as much as the idea of trying...

Read moreDetails

5.0 60 reviews

  • Avatar Lennart Korte ★★★★★ vor 2 Monaten
    Ich kann Herrn Härtel als Anwalt absolut weiterempfehlen! Sein Service ist erstklassig – schnelle Antwortzeiten, effiziente … Mehr Arbeit und dabei sehr kostengünstig, was für Startups besonders wichtig ist. Er hat für mein Startup einen Vertrag erstellt, und ich bin von seiner professionellen und zuverlässigen Arbeit überzeugt. Klare Empfehlung!
  • Avatar R.H. ★★★★★ vor 3 Monaten
    Ich kann Hr. Härtel nur empfehlen! Er hat mich bei einem Betrugsversuch einer Krypto Börse rechtlich vertreten. Ich bin sehr … Mehr zufrieden mit seiner engagierten Arbeit gewesen. Ich wurde von Anfang an kompetent, fair und absolut transparent beraten. Trotz eines zähen Verfahrens und einer großen Börse als Gegner, habe ich mich immer sicher und zuversichtlich gefühlt. Auch die Schnelligkeit und die sehr gute Erreichbarkeit möchte ich an der Stelle hoch loben und nochmal meinen herzlichsten Dank aussprechen! Daumen hoch mit 10 Sternen!
  • Avatar P! Galerie ★★★★★ vor 4 Monaten
    Herr Härtel hat uns äusserst kompetent in einen lästigen Fall mit META betreut. Er war effizient, beharrlich, aber auch mit … Mehr uns geduldig. Menschlich top, bis wir am Ende Dank ihm erfolgreich zum Ziel gekommen sind. Können wir wärmstens empfehlen. Und nochmals danke. P.H.
  • Avatar Philip Lucas ★★★★★ vor 8 Monaten
    Wir haben Herrn Härtel für unser Unternehmen konsultiert und sind äußerst zufrieden mit seiner Arbeit. Von Anfang an hat … Mehr er einen überaus kompetenten Eindruck gemacht und sich als ein sehr angenehmer Gesprächspartner erwiesen. Seine fachliche Expertise und seine verständliche und zugängliche Art im Umgang mit komplexen Themen haben uns überzeugt. Wir freuen uns auf eine langfristige und erfolgreiche Zusammenarbeit!
  • Avatar Mosaic Mask Studio ★★★★★ vor 5 Monaten
    Die Kanzlei ist immer ein verlässlicher Partner bei der Sichtung und Bearbeitung von Verträgen in der IT Branche. Es ist … Mehr stets ein professioneller Austausch auf Augenhöhe.
    Die Ergebnisse sind auf hohem Niveau und haben die interessen unsers Unternehmens immer bestmöglich wiedergespiegelt.
    Vielen Dank für die sehr gute Zusammenarbeit.
  • Avatar Mikael Hällgren ★★★★★ vor einem Monat
    I got fantastic support from Marian Härtel. He managed to get my wrongfully suspended Instagram account restored. He was … Mehr incredibly helpful the whole way until the positive outcome. Highly recommended!
  • Avatar Doris H. ★★★★★ vor 10 Monaten
    Herr Härtel hat uns bezüglich eines Telefonvertrags beraten und vertreten. Wir waren mit seinem Service sehr zufrieden. Er … Mehr hat stets schnell auf unsere E-mails und Anrufe reagiert und den Sachverhalt einfach und verständlich erklärt. Wir würden Herrn Härtel jederzeit wieder beauftragen.Vielen Dank für die hervorragende Unterstützung
  • Avatar Philipp Skaar ★★★★★ vor 8 Monaten
    Als kleines inhabergeführtes Hotel sehen wir uns ab und dann (bei sonst weit über dem Durchschnitt liegenden Bewertungen) … Mehr der Herausforderung von aus der Anonymität heraus agierenden "Netz-Querulanten" gegenüber gestellt. Herr Härtel versteht es außerordentlich spür- und feinsinnig, derartige - oftmals auf Rufschädigung ausgerichtete - Bewertungen bereits im Keim, also außergerichtlich, zu ersticken und somit unseren Betrieb vor weiteren Folgeschäden zu bewahren. Seine Umsetzungsgeschwindigkeit ist beeindruckend, seine bisherige Erfolgsquote = 100%.Ergo: Unsere erste Adresse zur Abwehr von geschäftsschädigenden Angriffen aus dem Web.
  • ●
  • ●
  • ●
  • ●

Video-Galerie

Esports contracts for professionals: legal principles and pitfalls
Esports contracts for professionals: legal principles and pitfalls
Legal advice for AI start-ups and SaaS providers: Lawyer Marian Härtel explains
Legal advice for AI start-ups and SaaS providers: Lawyer Marian Härtel explains
Marian Härtel - Esports lawyer
Marian Härtel – Esports lawyer
e0c1c4f3 5ebb 4781 ae38 575fa47f2696 202348477

Negligence

29. March 2025

Definition and basic principle of negligence In the legal context, negligence describes the failure to exercise due care in traffic....

Read moreDetails
Howey test

Howey test

30. June 2023
File sharing warning: How to react correctly

Appeal against denial of leave to appeal

25. June 2023
GTCs are not invalid solely because of their length!

Terms

23. June 2023

Local court

25. June 2023

Podcast Folgen

Globale Herausforderungen für Startups – Ein rechtlicher Leitfaden

Globale Herausforderungen für Startups – Ein rechtlicher Leitfaden

2. October 2024

Dieser informative Podcast bietet einen umfassenden Einblick in die rechtlichen Herausforderungen, denen sich Startups bei ihrer internationalen Expansion gegenübersehen. Der...

Rechtssichere Influencer-Agentur-Verträge: Strategien zur Vermeidung unerwarteter Kündigungen

Rechtssichere Influencer-Agentur-Verträge: Strategien zur Vermeidung unerwarteter Kündigungen

19. April 2025

Anna und Max sprechen in dieser Episode über typische Fallstricke und Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten bei Verträgen zwischen Influencern und Agenturen. Im Mittelpunkt...

Innovative Geschäftsmodelle – Risiko und Chance zugleich

Innovative Geschäftsmodelle – Risiko und Chance zugleich

10. September 2024

In dieser spannenden Folge unseres Podcasts tauchen wir tief in die Welt der innovativen Geschäftsmodelle ein. Unser Host Marian Härtel,...

Web3, Blockchain und Recht – Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme

Web3, Blockchain und Recht – Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme

25. September 2024

  In dieser aufschlussreichen Episode des ITmedialaw-Podcasts wird ein tiefgehender Blick auf die Schnittstelle von Web3, Blockchain-Technologie und Recht geworfen....

  • Home
  • Imprint
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • Agile and lean law firm
  • Ideal partner
  • Contact
  • Videos
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Contact
  • Leistungen
    • Support with the foundation
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Games law consulting
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
    • Investment advice
    • Booking as speaker
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Contract review and preparation
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Focus on start-ups
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus on start-ups
    • How can I help clients?
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Videos
    • Video series – about me
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos on services
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Shorts
    • Third-party videos
    • Podcast format
    • Other videos
  • Knowledge base
  • Podcast
  • Blogposts
    • Lange Artikel / Ausführungen
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Labour law
    • EU law
    • Corporate
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • Tax
    • Internally
    • Other
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung