• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

Exciting decision on e-mail access in civil procedure law

23. April 2024
in Law on the Internet
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0 0
A A
0
img HqHuCTsKH43hu6DoHh4JFcwp
Key Facts
  • Rostock Higher Regional Court decides on the provability of access to electronic messages in legal contexts.
  • Prima facie evidence of receipt of an e-mail is not recognized due to technical uncertainties.
  • Sending an e-mail does not guarantee its actual receipt by the recipient.
  • In the area of competition law, the sending of a warning is sufficient, not the receipt.
  • The case emphasizes the need for clear evidence in digital communication.
  • The use of secure means of communication and additional evidence such as acknowledgements of receipt is recommended.
  • The decision underlines the importance of precise documentation of legally relevant declarations of intent.

Background to the decision

Digital communication has become an integral part of modern legal transactions, but the question of the provability of access to electronic messages remains a legal challenge. In a world where emails, instant messages and other forms of digital communication dominate everyday life, the implications of these digital interactions on legal processes are of enormous importance. A recent decision by the Rostock Higher Regional Court (decision of 03.04.2024 – Ref.: 7 U 2/24) sheds light on this issue and provides important legal guidance. The case concerned the validity of a legally relevant declaration sent by email, the receipt of which was disputed by the recipient. The plaintiff took the view that the mere fact that the e-mail was sent and the absence of an error message indicated that it had been received by the addressee. Following this line of argument, the case posed a central question: Can the act of sending an email be considered sufficient proof of its receipt? The court’s decision brings clarity to the often confusing legal situation regarding digital communication channels and their legal recognition as evidence.

Legal assessment by the OLG Rostock

The court stated that prima facie evidence – i.e. evidence based on typical sequences of events – cannot be assumed for the receipt of an email. The Senate emphasized this:

“The Senate sees no basis for the assumption of prima facie evidence for the receipt of an email that has been sent (simply, in particular without confirmation of receipt or read receipt).”

This position is based on the prevailing opinion, which is also supported by supreme court case law and commentary in the literature. Consequently, for technical and procedural reasons, the receipt of a simple e-mail cannot be ensured in such a way that proof of receipt could be assumed.

The court went on to explain the specific nature of digital communication, which makes it difficult to provide clear evidence:

“The technical conditions of the internet and the diversity of email systems do not provide a sufficient guarantee that an email, once sent, has actually reached the recipient.”

This emphasizes the need for a critical examination of each individual case, taking into account the specific circumstances and technical details.

The court also refers to comparable case law to support its opinion:

“As has already been established in previous judgments, the fact that an email was sent from the sender’s server without an error message does not prove that it also reached the recipient’s server.”

This clarification underlines the legal challenge associated with digital messaging and makes it clear why the mere sending of an email is not considered sufficient to prove receipt.

Specific regulations in the UWG

However, it is important to note that this does not always apply, particularly in the area of competition law. According to § 13 Abs. 1 UWG, only the sending of a warning is required for it to be effective, not the actual receipt by the person being warned. This provision takes account of the fact that in certain legal constellations, proving access would cause disproportionate difficulties or unnecessarily complicate the enforcement of legal claims. In practice, this means that in the context of the UWG, the sender of a warning letter does not have to prove that the warning letter was received by the opponent, but only that it was sent.

Conclusion

This legal nuance underlines the complexity of providing evidence in digital communication and the need to be aware of the specific legal framework. The Higher Regional Court of Rostock clarifies that it cannot be inferred from a simple e-mail that it has been received by the recipient. This underlines the need to resort to more secure means of communication in legally significant cases or to use additional means of proof such as acknowledgements of receipt. In conclusion, the decision of the Higher Regional Court of Rostock is further proof of the importance of proper documentation of signatures and declarations of intent. In times of increasing digitalization, it is crucial not only to rely on the technical possibilities, but also to pay close attention to the legal framework and take appropriate precautions.

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: billCase lawDigitizationE‑mailMailolgServerUwgWarning

Weitere spannende Blogposts

YouTube: What to do about copyright extortion?

YouTube: What to do about copyright extortion?
7. November 2022

A new scam among criminals is probably becoming popular and is based on YouTube's automatic Content ID functions or the...

Read moreDetails

Attention: Vouchers to existing customers can be advertising!

Attention: Vouchers to existing customers can be advertising!
12. December 2018

In the case of a gaming chair, the District Court of Frankfurt (Az.: 2-03 O 372/17) has decided that sending...

Read moreDetails

Make participation in the competition dependent on advertising?

Make participation in the competition dependent on advertising?
27. August 2019

The Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main recently ruled that in a case where participation in a competition is...

Read moreDetails

Federal Patent Court does not delete trademark “Black Friday” completely!

Federal Patent Court does not delete trademark “Black Friday” completely!
7. November 2022

The Federal Patent Court has ruled that the disputed word mark "Black Friday" must be cancelled for some services in...

Read moreDetails

No tax exemption according to § 11 para. 1 Sentence 2 InvStG for foreign investment funds

Risk Social Security / Tax audit for streamers, esports enthusiasts, etc.
7. November 2022

The tax exemption provision of Section 11 para. 1 sentence 2 InvStG old version is compatible with the free movement...

Read moreDetails

Can Cloudflare be used permissibly?

Can a fine for a data protection breach be levied against a corporation?
7. November 2022

The issue of whether US SaaS providers can be used permissibly or whether products such as Jira, Zendesk, various CRM...

Read moreDetails

No “right to be forgotten” for press archives

Federal Constitutional Court: Right to Be Forgotten I
7. November 2022

The 2nd Chamber of the First Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court did not accept for decision a constitutional complaint...

Read moreDetails

Federal Court of Justice and “climate neutral”

BGH considers Uber Black to be anti-competitive
10. July 2024

The Federal Court of Justice has ruled that advertising with an ambiguous environmental term (here: "climate neutral") is only permissible...

Read moreDetails

LG Hamburg on Influencer Advertising and “Sponsored Content”

Brief reminder: Influencer as target of warning letters
24. May 2019

The problem of influencer sneaking advertising The District Court of Hamburg agrees with the rulings on influencers and sneaky advertising....

Read moreDetails
Eigentum an Software – Wem gehört eigentlich der Code?
Copyright

Eigentum an Software – Wem gehört eigentlich der Code?

14. July 2025

Während ich an meinem eigenen WordPress-Plugin code, taucht immer wieder eine Frage auf: Gehört mir diese Software wirklich? Im Alltagsverständnis...

Read moreDetails
Startup ohne Entwickler?

Startup ohne Entwickler?

8. July 2025
Keine stillschweigende AGB-Änderung – Schweigen gilt nicht als Zustimnung

Keine stillschweigende AGB-Änderung – Schweigen gilt nicht als Zustimnung

7. July 2025
So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

3. July 2025
Dark Patterns: UX-Tricks im Visier von Gesetzgeber und Gerichten

Dark Patterns: UX-Tricks im Visier von Gesetzgeber und Gerichten

2. July 2025

Podcastfolge

Auf der dunklen Seite? Ein Rechtsanwalt im Spannungsfeld innovativer Startups

Auf der dunklen Seite? Ein Rechtsanwalt im Spannungsfeld innovativer Startups

25. September 2024

In dieser persönlichen und fesselnden Episode taucht der erfahrene IT- und Medienrechtsanwalt tief in die Grauzone seiner beruflichen Tätigkeit ein....

Read moreDetails
Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

20. April 2025
“Digitales Recht Entschlüsselt” mit Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel

“Digitales Recht Entschlüsselt” mit Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel

25. September 2024
Globale Herausforderungen für Startups – Ein rechtlicher Leitfaden

Globale Herausforderungen für Startups – Ein rechtlicher Leitfaden

2. October 2024
KI im Recht: Chancen, Risiken und Regulierung – der IT Media Law Podcast Episode 3

KI im Recht: Chancen, Risiken und Regulierung – der IT Media Law Podcast Episode 3

28. August 2024

Video

Mein transparente Abrechnung

Mein transparente Abrechnung

10. February 2025

In diesem Video rede ich ein wenig über transparente Abrechnung und wie ich kommuniziere, was es kostet, wenn man mit...

Read moreDetails
Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

10. February 2025
Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

10. February 2025
Was mich wirklich freut

Was mich wirklich freut

10. February 2025
Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

10. February 2025
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung