• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

Ritter-Sport square shape continues with trademark protection

7. November 2022
in Other
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0 0
A A
0
fotolia 55335452 subscription monthly m
Key Facts
  • The First Civil Senate of the Federal Court of Justice has rejected the applications for cancellation of two trademarks for chocolate bars.
  • The trademarks have been registered as three-dimensional shape trademarks for chocolate bars since 1996 and 2001.
  • The Federal Patent Court had originally ordered the cancellation of the trademarks, which the Federal Supreme Court has now overturned.
  • The ground for refusal under Section 3 (2) No. 1 MarkenG does not apply; the packaging does not give the chocolate any significant value.
  • The square shape of the packaging has no particular artistic value or leads to price differences compared to similar products.
  • The brand owner's marketing strategy emphasizes that the shape provides an indication of origin and quality, but does not add any significant value.
  • The findings of the Federal Patent Court show that the applicant's fears are unfounded.

The I. Civil Senate of the Federal Court of Justice, which is responsible among other things for trademark law, today dismissed the applications for cancellation of two trademarks registered for chocolate bars in the form of square packages. It is thus clear that these packages continue to be protected as trademarks.

Content Hide
1. Facts
2. Course of proceedings to date
3. The decision of the Federal Court of Justice
3.1. Author: Marian Härtel

Facts

Two three-dimensional shape marks have been registered for the trademark owner since 1996 and 2001 as signs enforced in the course of trade for the product “chocolate bars”. In two different sizes, they each show the front and back of a package with a square base and two side closure flaps and another closure flap on the back. These are the neutralized wrappers of the “Ritter Sport” and “Ritter Sport Minis” chocolate bars.

Course of proceedings to date

The applicant has applied to the German Patent and Trademark Office for cancellation of the trademarks in two proceedings each. The German Patent and Trademark Office rejected the applications. Upon the appeals of the trademark owner, the Federal Patent Court ordered the cancellation of the trademarks. It assumed that the signs are protected under § 3 para. 2 No. 1 MarkenG were excluded from registration because they consisted exclusively of a shape which was determined by the nature of the goods themselves. On appeal by the trademark owner, the Federal Court of Justice reversed these decisions and referred the proceedings back to the Federal Patent Court. He stated that the ground for refusal of § 3 para. 2 No. 1 MarkenG did not exist; the Federal Patent Court therefore had to examine the question left open by it as to whether the ground for refusal under Section 3 (1) of the German Trademark Act was applicable. 2 No. 3 MarkenG exists. Accordingly, signs consisting exclusively of a shape which gives substantial value to the product are not eligible for protection as a trademark. The Federal Patent Court held that this ground for refusal did not exist and dismissed the applicant’s appeals. The applicant has now lodged an appeal against this with the Federal Court of Justice.

The decision of the Federal Court of Justice

The Federal Court of Justice dismissed the appeals. The requests for cancellation are not substantiated. Registered trademarks do not consist exclusively of a shape that gives substantial value to the product. The only essential feature of the goods packaging registered as trademarks is their square base. These do not add significant value to the chocolate bars sold in the packages. The assessment required in this respect is based on evaluation criteria such as the nature of the category of goods in question, the artistic value of the shape in question, its different nature compared to other shapes commonly used on the market in question, a significant price difference compared to similar products, or the elaboration of a marketing strategy that mainly emphasizes the aesthetic qualities of the product in question. The ground for refusal exists if it is clear from objective and reliable evidence that the consumer’s decision to buy the product in question is determined to a large extent by that characteristic.

On the basis of the findings made by the Federal Patent Court, it cannot be assumed that the decision of consumers to purchase the chocolate bars marketed in the square packaging is determined to a large extent by the fact that this packaging shape gives the chocolate a substantial value. According to the findings of the Federal Patent Court, the square shape of the packaging has no particular artistic value and does not lead to significant price differences compared to similar products. It is true that the trademark owner pursues a marketing strategy in which it associates the square shape of the packaging with the well-known advertising slogan “Quadratisch. Practical. Good.” It is true that this may result in consumers’ decision to purchase the chocolate being determined by the square shape of the packaging, because consumers see in it an indication of the chocolate’s origin from a certain company and associate certain quality expectations with it. However, this is not the point. According to Sec. 3 (2) No. 3 MarkenG, the shape of a product or packaging is excluded from trademark protection only if it gives the product substantial value. There are no indications of this in the case of the square chocolate bar packaging at issue here.

 

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: ConsumerEntscheidungenFederal courtLegal appealPatentTrademarks

Weitere spannende Blogposts

Customer reviews through sweepstakes? Warning!

Customer reviews through sweepstakes? Warning!
19. June 2019

Sweepstakes are a tried and tested means of marketing for many online retailers, both on their own website and in...

Read moreDetails

Consumer protection and computer games in Italy

Consumer protection and computer games in Italy
27. September 2019

The following article was originally written by Andrea Rizzi from www.insightlegal.it and is published here in German and in an...

Read moreDetails

Red, Red, Red blooms only the savings bank…

23. February 2023

After almost six years of litigation, the savings banks have prevailed against the Santander banking group at the Federal Court...

Read moreDetails

Amazon sellers and duplicate product pages

Attention: Vouchers to existing customers can be advertising!
12. December 2018

The issue and case law are from last year, but there still seem to be sellers at Amazon who don't...

Read moreDetails

Planned legal changes in 2023 in the area of digitization

Planned legal changes in 2023 in the area of digitization
5. January 2023

In its coalition agreement, the German government has firmly committed itself to fundamental strengthening in the area of digitization. Almost...

Read moreDetails

Price adjustment clauses in general terms and conditions: A critical look at the example of the Netflix ruling

Price adjustment clauses in general terms and conditions: A critical look at the example of the Netflix ruling
24. November 2023

Introduction: In a recent ruling, the Court of Appeal in Berlin declared the price adjustment clause in Netflix's General Terms...

Read moreDetails

Finally, an end to “Known From” faux ads on purchased items!

Finally, an end to “Known From” faux ads on purchased items!
30. October 2023

In a landmark ruling of September 21, 2023 (case reference: 15 U 108/22), the Higher Regional Court (OLG) of Hamburg...

Read moreDetails

Make and offer respirators yourself?

Make and offer respirators yourself?
7. November 2022

0Currently, there is demand everywhere for protective clothing such as respirators and, in addition to professional suppliers, numerous self-employed people...

Read moreDetails

Frankfurt district court a.M. softens influencer jurisdiction

15. July 2019

The Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main has appealed against the vast majority of German regional and regional courts and...

Read moreDetails
Eigentum an Software – Wem gehört eigentlich der Code?
Copyright

Eigentum an Software – Wem gehört eigentlich der Code?

14. July 2025

Während ich an meinem eigenen WordPress-Plugin code, taucht immer wieder eine Frage auf: Gehört mir diese Software wirklich? Im Alltagsverständnis...

Read moreDetails
Startup ohne Entwickler?

Startup ohne Entwickler?

8. July 2025
Keine stillschweigende AGB-Änderung – Schweigen gilt nicht als Zustimnung

Keine stillschweigende AGB-Änderung – Schweigen gilt nicht als Zustimnung

7. July 2025
So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

3. July 2025
Dark Patterns: UX-Tricks im Visier von Gesetzgeber und Gerichten

Dark Patterns: UX-Tricks im Visier von Gesetzgeber und Gerichten

2. July 2025

Podcastfolge

8315f1ef298eb54dfeed2f5e55c8b9da 1

Erste Testfolge des ITMediaLaw Podcast

26. August 2024

Erste TestfolgeLiebe Leserinnen und Leser,ich freue mich, heute den ersten Testlauf unseres brandneuen IT Media Law Podcasts zu präsentieren! In diesem Podcast...

Read moreDetails
Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

20. April 2025
Auf der dunklen Seite? Ein Rechtsanwalt im Spannungsfeld innovativer Startups

Auf der dunklen Seite? Ein Rechtsanwalt im Spannungsfeld innovativer Startups

25. September 2024
KI im Rechtssystem: Auf dem Weg in eine digitale Zukunft der Justiz

KI im Rechtssystem: Auf dem Weg in eine digitale Zukunft der Justiz

13. October 2024
Rechtskette beim Spieleentwickler

Rechtskette beim Spieleentwickler

19. April 2025

Video

Mein transparente Abrechnung

Mein transparente Abrechnung

10. February 2025

In diesem Video rede ich ein wenig über transparente Abrechnung und wie ich kommuniziere, was es kostet, wenn man mit...

Read moreDetails
Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

10. February 2025
Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

10. February 2025
Was mich wirklich freut

Was mich wirklich freut

10. February 2025
Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

10. February 2025
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung