• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
Warenkorb
Plugin Install : Cart Icon need WooCommerce plugin to be installed.
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
Home Other

Trademark infringement through metatags and SEO plugins

18. September 2024
in Other
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
0
51c69c04ef4a8420f3746eeb9c918284
Key Facts
  • The use of third-party trademarks in metatags entails legal risks and may be considered trademark infringement.
  • In 2006, the Federal Court of Justice ruled that non-visible meta tags are legally relevant.
  • In 2010, the BGH confirmed that non-visible trademark uses are trademarkable.
  • Frankfurt Higher Regional Court ruled in 2014 that the use of third-party trademarks in metatags is permitted under certain conditions.
  • The main criteria for trademark infringement are: unauthorized use and likelihood of confusion.
  • Warnings for the use of third-party trademarks are frequent and can result in high costs.
  • Companies should seek legal advice and regularly review their SEO strategy.

The use of third-party trademarks in meta tags or via SEO plugins is a common practice in digital marketing, but one that carries legal risks. Under certain circumstances, these methods can constitute trademark infringement and be subject to a warning. The legal assessment of this practice is complex and has been addressed in several court rulings that have defined the boundaries of what is permissible over time. It is important to understand that case law in this area is dynamic and evolves with the development of technology and online marketing.

Content Hide
1. Basic ruling of the BGH from 2006
2. Recent case law
3. Current legal assessment
4. Risk of warnings
5. Recommendations for practice
6. Conclusion

Basic ruling of the BGH from 2006

The German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) issued a groundbreaking ruling on this issue on May 18, 2006 (case no. I ZR 183/03). The BGH ruled that the use of a third-party trademark as a metatag can constitute a trademark infringement. The court argued that although metatags are not visible to the average Internet user, they can still fulfill a function of identifying the origin of goods or services. This decision was groundbreaking, as it clarified for the first time that non-visible elements of a website can also be legally relevant. The BGH emphasized that the use of third-party trademarks in metatags is likely to exploit or impair the distinctive character or reputation of the trademark.

Recent case law

In the following years, courts have largely confirmed and clarified this line, taking into account changing technical circumstances and marketing practices:

1) In 2010, the Federal Court of Justice confirmed (case no. I ZR 51/08) that the use of a third-party trademark in the part of a website that is not immediately visible generally constitutes trademark use. This decision extended the scope of protection to other non-visible elements of a website, such as hidden texts or keyword stuffing. The court emphasized that it is not the perceptibility by the user that is important, but the function of the trademark as an indication of origin.

2 The Frankfurt Higher Regional Court clarified in 2014 (case no. 6 W 12/14) that the use of third-party brands in metatags is generally permitted if products of this brand are actually offered on the website. However, it is not permitted if users are to be redirected to other products. This decision differentiated the previous case law and created a framework for the legitimate use of trademarks in metatags. The court recognized that in certain cases there may be a legitimate interest in referring to the offer of branded products.

Current legal assessment

The use of third-party trademarks in metatags or SEO plugins can constitute trademark infringement if certain criteria are met. These criteria have emerged from the case law of recent years and provide a guideline for legal assessment:

1. the trademark is used without authorization. This is the case if the website operator is neither the owner of the trademark rights nor has a license to use them.

2. there is a likelihood of confusion on the part of the consumer. This may be the case if the type of use gives the impression that there is an economic or organizational connection to the trademark owner.

3. the use is not purely descriptive. Descriptive use, for example to indicate compatibility with products of the trademark, may be permissible.

It is important to note that not every use of another person’s trademark automatically constitutes an infringement. The context and type of use are decisive. Courts consider the overall circumstances of the individual case, including what is customary in the industry and the expectations of the average internet user.

Risk of warnings

Companies that use third-party brands in metatags or SEO plugins run the risk of being warned. Trademark owners can take action against such practices if they suspect an infringement of their rights. Warning letters in this area are not uncommon and can incur considerable costs. They usually include a request to cease and desist, the submission of a cease and desist declaration with a penalty clause and often also claims for damages. The costs of defending against an unjustified warning or fulfilling justified claims can be considerable. It is therefore advisable to carefully check the use of third-party trademarks in SEO measures and to seek legal advice in case of doubt.

Recommendations for practice

To minimize legal risks while implementing effective SEO strategies, companies should consider the following recommendations:

1. only use trademarks to which you own the rights or for whose use you have express permission. This is the safest way to avoid trademark infringements.

2. only use third-party trademarks in a descriptive context if you actually offer their products or provide services related to these products. Make sure that the use is fair and appropriate.

3. avoid using trademarks that have nothing to do with your offer. This could be seen as an attempt to profit from the brand’s reputation and is legally problematic.

4. regularly check your meta tags and SEO settings, especially if you use plugins or external service providers for your SEO. Brands are often inserted into meta tags unconsciously or automatically.

5. document your SEO strategy and the reasons for using certain keywords. This can be helpful in the event of a legal dispute to prove your intentions.

Conclusion

The use of third-party trademarks in metatags and SEO plugins remains a legally sensitive issue that requires careful consideration. While there are legitimate use cases, companies should be cautious and seek legal advice when in doubt to avoid warning letters and potential litigation. Case law in this area is constantly evolving and it is important to stay up to date. A balanced SEO strategy that considers both legal aspects and marketing objectives is the key to success in the digital age. Companies should always bear in mind that short-term SEO benefits from using other people’s trademarks can bring long-term legal and financial risks.

Tags: BghBrandsCase lawConsumerDeclaration of injunctionDevelopmentFairFederal courtFrankfurtJudgmentLizenzmarketingReviewRiskTechnologyWarning

Weitere spannende Blogposts

Repackaging of medicines is trademark violation!

Attention with Black Friday advertising!
17. October 2019

In the preliminary injunction procedure for the repackaging of a cancer drug by a drug importer, the 6th Civil Senate...

Read moreDetails

Are rules of the game protected in Germany?

Are rules of the game protected in Germany?
17. September 2019

Time and again, the question arises in the area of computer game tenants whether game rules are protected or whether...

Read moreDetails

OLG Düsseldorf cancels BKartA decision on Facebook

Facebook pages, data protection and August 1, 2019
13. September 2019

On 26 August 2019, the 1st Cartel Senate of the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf, chaired by Prof. Dr. Jürgen...

Read moreDetails

Slicing the Pie Agreements at Startups

Slicing the Pie Agreements at Startups
16. September 2019

There is currently a start-up trend in Germany that has evolved from the need for collaborative development of software and/or...

Read moreDetails

Warning letters due to missing basic prices

abmahnung
7. November 2022

In the business of warning letters, there are always ups and downs and certain topics are more topical than others....

Read moreDetails

When will the BGH finally get involved in the matter of FernUSG and coaching contracts?

b41de75f28e43e4a77e9129cf8abd64c
24. September 2024

In a recent ruling (OLG Stuttgart, judgment of 01.08.2024 - 4 U 101/24), the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart declared...

Read moreDetails

Constitutional appeal against adblock ruling rejected

Federal Constitutional Court: Right to Be Forgotten I
8. October 2019

The Federal Constitutional Court rejected a constitutional appeal by Axel Springer against the judgment of the Federal Court of Justice...

Read moreDetails

Competition law in digital marketing

Competition law in digital marketing
10. October 2024

Digital marketing offers start-ups a wide range of opportunities to advertise their products and services and reach their target groups...

Read moreDetails

OLG Cologne: Jameda partially inadmissible

OLG Cologne: Jameda partially inadmissible
15. November 2019

To the overview Yesterday, the Higher Regional Court of Cologne issued an exciting ruling that also provides information on the...

Read moreDetails
legal framework for crowd sensing projects data protection and remuneration models for participatory sensor networks

Warranty (liability for material defects)

11. April 2025

Most important points Warranty refers to the statutory liability for defects of the seller or contractor vis-à-vis the buyer or...

Read moreDetails

Personality law

25. June 2023
force majeure

Limited partner

10. November 2024
6d8826e370a7cb18f15dc7bd0ad68f10

Employee Inventions Act (ArbnErfG)

9. November 2024
gmbh co kg 4

GmbH & Co KG

25. June 2023

Podcast Folgen

Innovative Geschäftsmodelle – Risiko und Chance zugleich

Innovative Geschäftsmodelle – Risiko und Chance zugleich

10. September 2024

In dieser spannenden Folge unseres Podcasts tauchen wir tief in die Welt der innovativen Geschäftsmodelle ein. Unser Host Marian Härtel,...

Der unkonventionelle Anwalt: Ein Nerd im Dienste des Rechts

Der unkonventionelle Anwalt: Ein Nerd im Dienste des Rechts

25. September 2024

In dieser fesselnden Episode des Podcasts "Der Unkonventionelle Anwalt" tauchen wir ein in die Welt eines Juristen, der die traditionellen...

Blick in die Zukunft: Wie Technologie das Recht verändert

Blick in die Zukunft: Wie Technologie das Recht verändert

18. February 2025

In der letzten Folge der ersten Staffel des ITmedialaw.com Podcasts werfen wir einen Blick in die Zukunft des Rechts im...

Der IT Media Law Podcast. Folge Nr. 1: Worum geht es hier eigentlich?

Der IT Media Law Podcast. Folge Nr. 1: Worum geht es hier eigentlich?

26. August 2024

Yeah, die erste richtige Folge mit mir selbst! In diesem Podcast tauchen wir ein in die spannende Welt des IT-Rechts...

  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung