• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
Warenkorb
Plugin Install : Cart Icon need WooCommerce plugin to be installed.
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
Home Internally

Why startups and the self-employed should not use AI-generated contracts

4. July 2024
in Internally
Reading Time: 6 mins read
0 0
A A
0
ai generated g15ccac1ec 1920
Key Facts
  • AI-generated contracts can entail risks and disadvantages, despite apparent time and cost savings.
  • Contracts must be tailored to the individual situation of the parties, which requires legal expertise.
  • Sample contracts offer no guarantee of suitability and can cause legal problems.
  • The quality of AI texts is questionable; their understanding of legal contexts is limited.
  • Without legal knowledge, users are often unable to recognize misunderstandings in contracts.
  • Legal liability for AI-generated contracts is unclear; lawyers take responsibility for their work.
  • An experienced lawyer offers comprehensive advice and develops customized solutions for companies.

Why startups and the self-employed should not use AI-generated contracts

Content Hide
1. Why startups and the self-employed should not use AI-generated contracts
2. Sample contracts are nothing new
3. AI-generated contracts are even riskier
4. More than just contracts: Holistic advice is in demand
5. Conclusion

As an IT lawyer, I advise start-ups, self-employed people and companies on a daily basis on the drafting and review of contracts. Lately, I’ve been asked more and more often whether it’s possible to simply use ChatGPT or other AI tools to get contracts quickly and cheaply. My answer to this is a resounding no – and here I explain why. In today’s fast-paced business world, the urge to automate and speed up processes is great. This also applies to the drafting of contracts. The temptation to fall back on AI-generated contracts is understandable: they promise time and cost savings. But as tempting as this may sound, the risks and disadvantages far outweigh the benefits.

As an experienced lawyer, I have seen many contracts – good and bad. And I can say with conviction that an AI-generated contract can be of high quality, but this depends crucially on the right input and experienced use of the AI tools. After more than two years of experience with AI, I know that the output is often only as good as the input. And legal expertise is needed to ensure that the input is appropriate and effective.

After all, a contract is far more than just a collection of clauses and legal phrases. It must take into account the individual situation and the objectives of the parties, avoid legal pitfalls and ensure clarity and legal certainty. All of this requires experience and judgment – skills that an AI does not (yet) have.

Even advanced language models such as GPT-4 or Anthropic’s Constitutional AI, which can deliver impressive results, are no substitute for human expertise. Because in the end, it’s not about whether the AI is good or bad – it’s about whether you as an entrepreneur want to take the risk of having to assess the quality and suitability of a contract yourself. And this risk is high, no matter how powerful the AI is.

Sample contracts are nothing new

Long before the AI hype, there were sample contracts and templates that could be found and used online. However, the use of such patterns has always been associated with risks. This is because a standard contract is never tailored to the individual situation and needs. Important clauses may be missing, inappropriate wording may be included or legal pitfalls may lurk. Even if a sample contract has been drawn up by a lawyer, this does not mean that it is suitable for every individual case. Every company has its own special features, objectives and risks that need to be taken into account in the contract. A standard contract cannot reflect this individuality. It is always just a template that has to be adapted to the specific circumstances.

And this is precisely where the problem lies: without legal expertise, it is difficult to assess whether a model contract really fits and what needs to be changed. Many freely available sample contracts are outdated, do not fit the specific situation or even contain clauses that can be disadvantageous for one party. The use of an unsuitable model can lead to misunderstandings, disputes and, in the worst case, legal consequences.

In addition, the templates are often confusing and difficult to understand, especially for legal laypersons. Important aspects can be overlooked because they get lost in the jungle of contracts. And even if you think you have understood everything: There is no guarantee that the design is really watertight and will stand up in court in the event of a dispute.

Last but not least, remember that if you use a free sample contract and problems arise later, you cannot hold anyone liable. In contrast to individual legal advice, there is no contact person who is responsible for the correctness and completeness of the contract. You bear the full risk yourself.

Of course, in some cases it can make sense to use a sample contract as a starting point. However, this should always be done with caution and with the involvement of specialist expertise. This is the only way to avoid unpleasant surprises and draft legally compliant contracts that meet individual requirements.

AI-generated contracts are even riskier

With AI tools such as ChatGPT, contract texts can now be created quickly and easily. However, the quality and accuracy of these texts is highly questionable. The AI hallucinates content based on its training data, without any real legal understanding. It cannot assess whether the contract drawn up is suitable and legally compliant for the specific application. Even advanced language models such as GPT-4 from OpenAI or the LLMs from Anthropic such as Sonnet or Opus, which can certainly provide good contract models, have their limits. Even with these models, the quality of the output depends crucially on the user’s input and instructions. Without legal background knowledge, it is difficult to formulate the right prompts and assess the results correctly.

Another problem is that AI is not able to fully grasp the context and specific requirements of a company or industry. Every contract must be tailored to individual needs and risks. An AI can generate standard clauses, but it cannot take into account the parties’ strategic objectives, negotiating position or business relationship. These subtleties require human judgment and experience.

In addition, the AI lacks an understanding of the legal implications and possible consequences of certain formulations. It cannot weigh up which clauses are appropriate or risky in which situation. The AI may also miss subtle nuances in the language that can be legally significant. An experienced lawyer, on the other hand, can recognize and eliminate potential loopholes, contradictions or ambiguities.

In addition, the AI’s training data is often outdated or incomplete. Changes in the law, current court decisions or industry-specific features may not be taken into account. This harbors the risk that AI-generated contracts do not correspond to the current legal status or omit important aspects. A lawyer, on the other hand, is always informed about the latest legal developments and can ensure that the contract covers all relevant points.
Last but not least, there is the question of liability and responsibility. If an AI-generated contract has defects or leads to disputes: Who is liable? The user who used the AI? The provider of the AI software? Or the AI itself? These questions have not yet been conclusively clarified in legal terms. In the case of legal advice, on the other hand, it is clear that the lawyer is liable and responsible for his work.

Overall, the use of AI in contract creation is therefore associated with considerable risks. Even though technology is making impressive progress, it cannot replace the expertise and judgment of an experienced lawyer. AI tools can be used to support the creation of drafts or to check certain clauses. However, the final revision and approval should always be carried out by a qualified lawyer to ensure the quality and legal certainty of the contract.

More than just contracts: Holistic advice is in demand

My job is not simply to sell standard contracts. I offer my clients comprehensive advice and support. Together, we analyze the initial situation and identify opportunities and risks. I explain the legal context and develop a strategy with the client. Based on this, I create customized contracts that are optimally tailored to your needs. This is not just about the pure content of the contract, but also about embedding it in the company’s overall strategy. Which contracts are needed at all? How do they need to be designed to support the business objectives? What risks need to be covered? I discuss all these issues with my clients in order to find a holistic solution. Because only if the legal framework is right can a company concentrate fully on its core business and grow successfully.

As a lawyer and business consultant, I see myself as a personal companion to my clients on their entrepreneurial journey. As described here, I bring my many years of experience as an entrepreneur, IT nerd and contract lawyer to every client relationship. I advise from the perspective of an entrepreneur with a deep understanding of the challenges and opportunities of the digital world. My approach goes far beyond simply drawing up contracts. I take the time to understand my clients’ situation and goals in detail. In intensive discussions, we work together to develop strategies and solutions that are perfectly tailored to the company in question. This is about trust, empathy and forward-looking planning.

An AI may be able to generate draft contracts quickly. But it can never replace the human element – the understanding of individual needs, creative problem-solving and trusting cooperation. As a lawyer, I am not just a legal service provider, but a sparring partner and advisor who speaks the language of entrepreneurs and shares their visions. This holistic, personal approach is what defines my work. And that is precisely the decisive added value that I offer my clients – far beyond what an AI could ever achieve. After all, successful corporate management requires more than just standard contracts. It needs tailor-made solutions, forward-looking advice and a trusting partnership of equals. And that is what I stand for with my expertise and passion.

Conclusion

My advice is therefore clear: do not blindly trust AI, but get the support of an experienced lawyer. Only the combination of human expertise and intelligent technology can create tailor-made, legally compliant contracts that protect and advance your company. Let’s use the possibilities of AI together – but with the necessary caution and expertise.

Model contracts and AI-generated contracts may be a temptingly simple solution. However, they are no substitute for qualified legal advice. Only in a dialog between client and lawyer can tailor-made, legally secure contracts be created. This is the only way to reliably avoid legal risks and ensure the company’s long-term success. Therefore, do not rely on AI and templates, but on the expertise of an experienced lawyer. I will be happy to support you in creating the optimum contractual basis for your company. Simply contact me for a non-binding initial consultation.

Tags: AIBeratungChatGPTContract creationHaftungKILawyerLegal certaintyNerdRiskSoftwareStartupsTechnologyVerträge

Weitere spannende Blogposts

Keyselling punishable and anti-competitive?

Small summary – Blizzard vs. Bossland
23. February 2023

On the subject of keyselling, there are two recent rulings that are causing unrest in the industry. The most unrest,...

Read moreDetails

The Digital Services Act and its impact on the games industry

The Digital Services Act and its impact on the games industry
22. June 2023

The Digital Services Act (DSA) represents a significant change in the European digital regulatory framework and has a strong impact...

Read moreDetails

My growing video section on ITMediaLaw

SmallLogo
24. September 2024

In my video section on ITMediaLaw.com you can already find some exciting videos on various legal topics. The collection currently...

Read moreDetails

OLG Braunschweig: Online gambling gives money back!

Gambling vs. Skillgaming, a small demolition
7. March 2023

Now, it seems that case law is again turning to the effect that German courts are on the side of...

Read moreDetails

Influencer agencies: contractual constellations and their effects

Legal form as an influencer? A few hints!
13. August 2024

As an influencer agency, there are various options for structuring contracts with clients and influencers. Each of these constellations has...

Read moreDetails

Are Esport Players Contracts ToS?

Are Esport Players Contracts ToS?
27. February 2019

Few people know The vast majority of people, let's say the "non-legally educated" people will probably associate the abbreviation GTC...

Read moreDetails

Merry Christmas and a look ahead to an exciting year

Merry Christmas to all
23. December 2023

Dear Readers, During the festive season, I would like to take this opportunity to wish you all a happy and...

Read moreDetails

The adequacy decision for data transfers to the US is in…

The adequacy decision for data transfers to the US is in…
10. July 2023

Everything new, makes the July? There are probably many who have already heard the news of the day. That's right,...

Read moreDetails

LG Frankfurt a.M.: Other termination options permitted in addition to the termination button on the website

LG Frankfurt a.M.: Other termination options permitted in addition to the termination button on the website
17. May 2024

Background of the judgment In a ruling dated August 30, 2023 (case no. 2-06 O 411/22), the Regional Court of...

Read moreDetails
Bad Leaver

Bad Leaver

16. October 2024

The term "bad leaver" is used in the context of startup companies and participation agreements to describe scenarios in which...

Read moreDetails
Entrepreneurial company (UG)

Entrepreneurial company (UG)

26. June 2023
Youth Protection Act

Youth Protection Act

1. July 2023
New AI feature on ITMediaLaw: Quick check of individual contract clauses

Complementary

10. November 2024
Invitatio ad offerendum

Invitatio ad offerendum

1. July 2023

Podcast Folgen

Legal challenges when implementing confidential computing: data protection and encryption in the cloud

Smart Contracts und Blockchain

22. December 2024

In dieser fesselnden Podcast-Episode tauch ich tief in die Welt der Blockchain-Technologie und Smart Contracts ein. Die 25-minütige Folge beleuchtet,...

Rechtliche Herausforderungen innovativer Geschäftsmodelle

Rechtliche Herausforderungen innovativer Geschäftsmodelle

26. September 2024

In dieser fesselnden Podcast-Episode tauche ich als IT- und Medienrechtsanwalt tief in die Welt der rechtlichen Herausforderungen ein, die mit...

“Digitales Recht Entschlüsselt” mit Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel

“Digitales Recht Entschlüsselt” mit Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel

25. September 2024

In diesem spannenden 30-minütigen Podcast entschlüsselt Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel die komplexe Welt des digitalen Rechts für Selbstständige, Startups und Solopreneure....

Rechtliche Basics für Startup-Gründer – So startest du auf der sicheren Seite!

Rechtliche Basics für Startup-Gründer – So startest du auf der sicheren Seite!

1. November 2024

In dieser Episode des Itmedialaw Podcasts nimmt euch Rechtsanwalt und Unternehmer Marian Härtel mit auf eine Reise durch den rechtlichen...

  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung