All available in:
- The concept of reasonable remuneration is central to labor law, copyright law and contract law.
- In copyright law, Section 32 UrhG defines the author's entitlement to appropriate remuneration.
- Appropriateness is determined according to objective criteria such as duration, time and scope of use.
- The Vocational Training Act stipulates that training allowances must increase during training.
- A core criterion in contract law is remuneration, which must reflect the actual value of the service.
- Digital technologies such as blockchain and smart contracts are significantly changing traditional remuneration models.
- Technological and social changes are shaping the development of appropriate remuneration.
Definition and legal basis
The concept of reasonable remuneration is a central legal institution in various areas of law, particularly in labor, copyright and contract law. In copyright law, Section 32 UrhG defines equitable remuneration as the author’s claim for the granting of rights of use. Adequacy is determined according to objective criteria that take into account the value of the service and market conditions.
The Copyright Act stipulates that the remuneration must correspond to what is customary and fair in business transactions according to the type and scope of the possibility of use. Factors such as duration, time and scope of use are taken into account. Case law has developed differentiated principles for the assessment of appropriateness.
Areas of application in various fields of law
In labor law, the Vocational Training Act (BBiG) defines the appropriate remuneration for trainees. § Section 17 BBiG stipulates that training allowances must increase as training progresses. Adequacy is specified by minimum remuneration rates and collective agreements.
In contract law, appropriate remuneration is a core criterion for the validity of agreements. The German Civil Code (BGB) requires that remuneration must reflect the actual value of the service. Inappropriate remuneration can lead to the invalidity of contractual clauses.
Legal evaluation criteria
The assessment of appropriateness is based on several criteria. The most important criteria are customary market practice, scope of services, qualifications and industry-specific standards. In copyright law, rights of use, degree of dissemination and economic benefit are taken into account.
Collective agreements and industry standards serve as a frame of reference. Case law examines on a case-by-case basis whether remuneration complies with the principles of good faith. The economic interests of both contracting parties are taken into account.
Digital transformation and remuneration models
Digital technologies are changing traditional remuneration models. Blockchain and smart contracts enable new forms of performance evaluation and remuneration. Artificial intelligence can develop objective evaluation criteria.
International economic relations require flexible remuneration concepts. Jurisdiction must continuously adapt to technological innovations. New forms of work such as crowdworking are challenging traditional remuneration models.
Future prospects
The development of appropriate remuneration is characterized by technological and social changes. Interdisciplinary approaches are required in order to develop fair remuneration models. The legal profession faces the challenge of adapting traditional concepts to new forms of work and business.
