Break-Up Fee

Break-Up Fee

Transfer of Funds Regulation (ToFR
abmahnung
Games publishing contracts – once in a nutshell
E-invoicing obligation from 2025: BMF specifies requirements
shutterstock 1889907112 scaled
ECJ to decide whether consumer protection agencies may issue data protection warnings
Employment contract and entitlement to remuneration: Why “bad work” does not lead to refusal of payment
abmahnung
Liability of platform operators for illegal user content
judge 3678152 1280
DALL·E 2025 01 29 10.46.03 Ein modernes professionelles Artikelbild fuer eine Videosektion mit dem Titel Podcast Video . Das Bild sollte ein hochwertiges Mikrofon Kopfhoerer un
Games publishing contracts – once in a nutshell
iStock 1405433207 scaled
HOT/Important: Google Ads tax liability trap
copyright
New info on the status of the State Media Treaty
*Breaking?* First decision of the BGH on AI
Affiliate links for streamers and influencers

Break-Up Fee

Kategorien

All available in:

Break-Up Fee

Inhaltsverzeichnis
Wichtigste Punkte
  • Break-up fees bieten Schutz für Käufer und erhöhen das Engagement des Verkäufers in M&A-Transaktionen.
  • Wichtige Aspekte sind die Angemessenheit der Gebühr sowie die Pflichten der Unternehmensführung gegenüber den Aktionären.

A break-up fee, also known as a termination fee, is a contractual provision in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) that requires a party to pay a fixed sum if it terminates the transaction under certain circumstances. Typically, this fee is paid by the seller (target company) to the potential buyer if the transaction does not materialize due to specific reasons defined in the contract.

Main purpose and functions:

1. compensation: Compensates the buyer for time, resources and opportunity costs invested in the transaction. 2. commitment: Increases the seller’s commitment to the transaction. 3. deterrent: Prevents competing bidders from intervening in ongoing negotiations. 4. price signal: Can serve as an indicator of the value of the company.

Typical triggers for break-up fees:

– Acceptance of a higher offer from another bidder – Rejection of the transaction by the seller’s board of directors or shareholders – Material breach of representations and warranties – Failure to obtain necessary regulatory approvals (in some cases)

Structure and height:

– Usually defined as a percentage of the transaction value – Typical range: 1% to 5% of the transaction value – Can be defined as a fixed amount or staggered – Sometimes linked to specific milestones or points in time in the transaction process

Legal and regulatory aspects:

1. reasonableness: courts examine whether the amount of the fee is reasonable and not excessively dissuasive. 2. fiduciary duties: Must be consistent with the board’s duties to shareholders. 3. competition law: must not act as an unlawful restriction of competition. 4. stock exchange rules: Special rules may apply to listed companies.

Advantages and disadvantages for the buyer:

Advantages:
– Protection against financial losses if the transaction fails – Increased negotiating certainty – Possible deterrence of competing bidders Disadvantages:
– May be perceived as aggressive and put a strain on negotiations
– May not be sufficient to cover actual costs
– May lead to excessive bids to justify the fee

Advantages and disadvantages for the seller:

Advantages:
– Can signal seriousness of the buyer – Possibility to negotiate better conditions – Can serve as leverage against other bidders Disadvantages:
– Restriction of flexibility in alternative offers
– Potential financial burden if the transaction does not materialize
– Possible negative perception by shareholders

Negotiation strategies:

1. reciprocity: agreement of mutual break-up fees 2. staggering: adjustment of the amount to different scenarios or points in time 3. capping: definition of an upper limit for the fee 4. exceptions: Definition of specific circumstances under which no fee is due 5. Escalation mechanisms: Gradual increase of the fee over the course of the process

Industry-specific considerations:

– Technology: Often higher fees due to volatile market conditions and intense competition – Regulated industries: Special consideration of official approval processes – Public sector: Possible restrictions or special requirements

Alternatives and related concepts:

– Reverse break-up fee: Fee payable by the buyer to the seller – Topping fee: Fee for the right to outbid a competing offer – Lock-up agreements: Agreements to secure key assets – No-shop clauses: Prohibition of active search for alternative offers

Trends and developments:

– Increasing use in different transaction types and markets – Greater differentiation and complexity of fee structures – Increased attention from regulators and shareholder representatives – Integration into broader deal protection mechanisms

Conclusion:

Break-up fees are an important instrument in M&A transactions that harbor both opportunities and risks. Their effective use requires careful consideration of the legal, financial and strategic implications. While they can provide protection and incentives, they must be considered in the context of the overall transaction and market conditions. A balanced and well-structured break-up fee can help to align the interests of all parties and stabilize the transaction process.

 

Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist spezialisiert auf die Rechtsgebiete Wettbewerbsrecht, Urheberrecht und IT/IP Recht und hat seinen Schwerpunkt im Bereich Computerspiele, Esport, Marketing und Streamer/Influencer. Er betreut Startups im Aufbau, begleitet diese bei sämtlichen Rechtsproblemen und unterstützt sie im Business Development.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Kategorien

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Add New Playlist