e0c1c4f3 5ebb 4781 ae38 575fa47f2696 202348477

Catfishing

ChatGPT and lawyers: recordings of the Weblaw launch event
Lego brick still protected as a design patent
dsgvo 1
Smart contracts in the insurance industry: contract design and regulatory compliance for InsurTech start-ups
AI content for subscription platforms
E-sports finally charitable? What the government draft of the Tax Amendment Act 2025 really brings
Clubs, photos and minors: managing consent properly
AI faces, voice clones and deepfakes in advertising: rules of the game under the EU AI Act and German law
Modding in EULAs and contracts – what applies legally in Germany?
Arbitration agreements in EULAs and developer contracts
Chain of title in game development: building a clean chain of rights
Fail-fast clauses in media productions – what are they actually?
Founder’s agreement vs. shareholder agreement: setting the course for startups at an early stage
Cheat software without code intervention: What the BGH really decided in the Sony ./. Datel case (I ZR 157/21)
Digital integrity as a (new) fundamental right: status in Germany and the EU in 2025
European Economic Interest Grouping (EEIG)
Upload filters between copyright and personal rights
On-demand transmission right in the digital space: streaming, Section 19a UrhG and licensing
Q&A: Legal issues for game developers

No products in the cart.

Skip to main content
< Alle Themen
Drucken

Definition and manifestations of catfishing Catfishing refers to the phenomenon in which a person deliberately fakes a false identity on the internet in order to manipulate other users emotionally or financially. Perpetrators often create fake profiles on social networks or dating platforms, use fictitious details and stolen or manipulated photos to build trust. The aim of this deception can be to lead victims into emotional ties or financial dependency. Catfishing exploits the anonymity and lack of personal verifiability on the internet.

Key Facts
  • Catfishing is the deliberate faking of false identities on the Internet to manipulate users.
  • Fakes are often made through fake profiles, social networks or dating platforms.
  • German law does not have a separate criminal offense for catfishing, but several laws coincide.
  • Those affected can assert civil law claims for immoral damage.
  • Platform operators react by deleting profiles, but are only liable for content from the time they become aware of it.
  • Those affected should secure evidence and, if necessary, file criminal charges with the police.
  • Education and prevention are crucial to minimize risks in the digital age.

Legal classification and relevant offenses In German law, “catfishing” does not constitute an independent criminal offense, but often coincides with several laws:

  • If third-party images are used without consent, this regularly constitutes a violation of the right to one’s own image (Section 22 KUG) and possibly also of the general right of personality.
  • If the perpetrator deliberately misrepresents facts in order to persuade the victim to hand over money or valuables, this is generally fraud in accordance with Section 263 of the German Criminal Code (StGB), provided that the requirements of deception, error and misappropriation of assets are met.

Civil law consequences Even if emotional abuse alone is difficult to prosecute under criminal law, civil law claims can be asserted. Victims can sue for injunctive relief or damages for intentional immoral damage (Section 826 BGB). The prerequisite for this is that the perpetrator’s behavior has demonstrably led to concrete damage, for example through psychological stress or financial losses due to manipulation.

Responsibility and liability of platform operators The operators of online platforms generally respond to catfishing reports by deleting the corresponding profiles. However, their liability for third-party content is limited: According to Section 10 of the German Telemedia Act (TMG), platforms are only liable for content from the time they become aware of it. They are obliged to remove content promptly following specific indications of illegal activity, but cannot be held responsible for the existence of fake profiles.

Practical steps for those affected Those affected should secure evidence for legal protection, for example by taking screenshots and saving chat histories, as this is crucial both in civil proceedings and in the event of criminal charges. Depending on the specific case, it may be possible to file a criminal complaint with the police or public prosecutor’s office, especially in cases of suspected fraud or copyright infringement.

Preventive measures and social significance Catfishing illustrates the challenges in the digital age of effectively transferring traditional protection mechanisms such as personal acquaintances or direct verification of identities to the internet. Legal steps usually only take effect after the fact and often only to a limited extent, which is why education and awareness-raising about the risks and protection options when dealing with online contacts are of central importance. Education and prevention programs as well as technical measures for authenticity verification on platforms can help to reduce cases of catfishing.

Conclusion on the legal assessment of catfishing In summary, catfishing remains legally complex, as it affects various areas of personal, criminal and civil law without constituting a specific offense. Dealing with catfishing cases requires both legal and social solutions in order to effectively protect victims and hold perpetrators accountable.

 

Inhaltsverzeichnis