Disturbing liability

Disturbing liability

Virtual employees, AI influencers and synthetic content – legal classification and international perspectives
Pay-to-win or pay-to-lose? Monetization in gaming between business and consumer deception
Flash scaling and aggressive business models: Innovation between progress and evasion
The romanticization of the “fail fast” principle in startups – When does failure become deception towards stakeholders?
Automated pricing and dynamic pricing in e-commerce
Growth hacking and viral marketing – legal requirements
Liability when using VibeCoding and no-code platforms – implications for legal due diligence
Alternative financing models in Germany and other countries – admissibility and design
Legal organization and entrepreneurial structuring of influencer start-ups and personal brands
Taking on investors in a startup: timing, risks and legal framework
81aec81e ad3a 49cd b1b1 8d43b8e59145 24528606
Startups in the legal gray area: permissibility and limits of innovative business models
Moral and legal aspects of “Trust among founders”
Honesty and fair pricing for start-ups (SaaS, mobile apps and digital services)
Creating contracts with face models and voice models: A guide for the gaming industry
Legally compliant archiving of emails: legal requirements and practical implementation
License agreements for software start-ups
iStock 1405433207 scaled
Support with the foundation
Arbitration and alternative dispute resolution in corporate disputes
< Alle Themen
Drucken
Key Facts
  • Interference liability describes liability without perpetrator or participant status for legal infringements by third parties.
  • This is a form of strict liability without any unlawful conduct on your part.
  • Areas of application are copyright law, trademark law and internet law, with specific liability scenarios.
  • Under copyright law, platform operators are liable for illegal distribution of protected works without consent.
  • Legal reforms have limited liability in Internet law, especially for WLAN operators.
  • Breach of contract liability can lead to disproportionate liability, which is often criticized.
  • Companies and individuals should be aware of the liability risks and take preventive measures.

Stoererhaftung (Breach of Duty of Care) is a legal term used in various legal systems to describe the liability of a person or company for legal infringements committed by third parties. In this article, we will focus on “Stoererhaftung” (Breach of Duty of Care) in German law.

Definition and basics

Breach of duty refers to the liability of a person who, without being a perpetrator or participant, in some way intentionally and adequately causally contributes to the infringement of an absolute right by a third party. This is a form of strict liability in which it is irrelevant whether the interferer itself has engaged in unlawful or culpable conduct.

Application areas

Stoererhaftung (Breach of Duty of Care) applies in various areas of law, such as:

Copyright

In the area of copyright, “Stoererhaftung” (Breach of Duty of Care) can come into play if, for example, copyrighted works are made publicly accessible on an Internet platform without the consent of the rights holder. Under certain circumstances, the operator of the platform may be held liable as a tortfeasor if it has not taken sufficient measures to prevent the infringement.

Trademarks

In trademark law, a platform operator may be liable as a tortfeasor if counterfeit products are sold on its platform and it has not taken sufficient action against them.

Internet law

In Internet law, “Stoererhaftung” (Breach of Duty of Care) is particularly relevant, especially in connection with WLAN networks. In the past, the operator of an open WLAN could be liable as a “Stoerer” (interferer) under certain circumstances if third parties carried out illegal activities via his network. However, this has changed due to the Telemedia Act, which limits the liability of WLAN operators.

Restrictions and reforms

In the past, “Stoererhaftung” (Breach of Duty of Care) has often been criticized because it can lead to disproportionate liability. In Germany, there have been several legal reforms and court decisions in recent years that have restricted “Stoererhaftung” (Breach of Duty of Care), particularly in the area of Internet law.

Conclusion

Breach of Duty of Care is a complex legal concept that applies in various areas of law. It is important for companies and individuals to be aware of the potential liability risks and to take appropriate measures to prevent infringement by third parties.

Inhaltsverzeichnis