880085a7e6ef3e5c780e702f73241a53

silent partnership

ChatGPT and lawyers: recordings of the Weblaw launch event
Lego brick still protected as a design patent
dsgvo 1
Smart contracts in the insurance industry: contract design and regulatory compliance for InsurTech start-ups
AI content for subscription platforms
E-sports finally charitable? What the government draft of the Tax Amendment Act 2025 really brings
Clubs, photos and minors: managing consent properly
AI faces, voice clones and deepfakes in advertising: rules of the game under the EU AI Act and German law
Modding in EULAs and contracts – what applies legally in Germany?
Arbitration agreements in EULAs and developer contracts
Chain of title in game development: building a clean chain of rights
Fail-fast clauses in media productions – what are they actually?
Founder’s agreement vs. shareholder agreement: setting the course for startups at an early stage
Cheat software without code intervention: What the BGH really decided in the Sony ./. Datel case (I ZR 157/21)
Digital integrity as a (new) fundamental right: status in Germany and the EU in 2025
European Economic Interest Grouping (EEIG)
Upload filters between copyright and personal rights
On-demand transmission right in the digital space: streaming, Section 19a UrhG and licensing
Q&A: Legal issues for game developers

No products in the cart.

Skip to main content
< Alle Themen
Drucken

A silent partnership is a form of corporate finance in which an individual or entity invests capital in a company without receiving a direct ownership interest in the management of the company or a voting interest. This article will explain the various aspects of silent partnership, its advantages and disadvantages, and the legal framework.

Key Facts
  • Silent partnership: A form of corporate financing without management participation or voting rights.
  • Typical silent partnership: Pure equity participation, without co-determination rights.
  • Atypical silent partnership: Profit participation with additional co-determination rights, e.g. access to books.
  • Flexibility: Conditions can be negotiated individually.
  • No dilution: Existing shareholders retain control.
  • Liability: Atypical silent partners can be held liable.
  • Contract design: Clear agreements on capital contribution and participation are crucial.

Definition and basics

A silent partnership is an equity investment in which the investor, also known as a silent partner, provides capital to the company and in return shares in its profits and losses. As a rule, the silent partner does not receive any voting rights and is not involved in the day-to-day management of the company. The participation takes place in the background, hence the name “silent participation”.

Types of silent partnership

There are two main types of silent partnership:

  1. Typical silent partnership: This is a pure equity investment in which the silent partner participates in the profit and loss of the company but has no say in the matter.
  2. Atypical silent partnership: In this form of participation, the silent partner also receives certain co-determination rights in addition to his profit and loss participation. This may be, for example, the right to inspect the books or the right to participate in certain decisions.

Legal basis

In Germany, silent partnerships are regulated in the German Commercial Code (HGB) in sections 230 et seq. The regulations provide that the silent partner provides capital and in return participates in profits and losses. The exact conditions of the participation, such as the amount of profit sharing, are specified in the partnership agreement.

Advantages of silent partnership

  • Flexibility: Silent partnerships are often more flexible than other financing options because the terms can be negotiated individually.
  • No dilution of ownership rights: The existing shareholders retain control of the company as no voting rights are surrendered.
  • Tax advantages: In some cases, silent partnerships may offer tax advantages, as profit sharing may be deductible as a business expense.

Disadvantages of silent partnership

  • Cost: Profit sharing can be costly, especially if the company is successful.
  • Liability: In the case of atypical silent partnerships, the silent partner may also be held liable under certain circumstances.
  • Complexity: The structuring of a silent partnership can be complex and often requires legal advice.

Application areas

Silent partnerships are frequently used by start-ups and small companies as a financing instrument. They are also popular with investors who want to provide capital without actively participating in the management of the company. In addition, they are often considered as an alternative to bank loans.

Contract design

The drafting of the contract for a silent partnership is crucial. Clear agreements should be made on the amount of the capital contribution, participation in profits and losses, the term, termination conditions and, if applicable, co-determination rights. It is advisable to seek legal assistance in drafting the contract.

Termination of a silent partnership

A silent partnership may be terminated in various ways, such as by notice of termination, expiration of the agreed term, or by reaching a certain event specified in the contract. Upon termination, the silent partner’s capital is generally returned, less any losses incurred during the term.

Conclusion

Silent partnership is a versatile financing instrument that can offer advantages for both companies and investors. By providing capital without assuming management tasks, it enables a flexible structuring of the shareholding relationships. However, it also involves risks and costs and requires careful contract design.

Inhaltsverzeichnis