Swatting

Swatting is a particularly dangerous form of cybercrime in which perpetrators make an emergency call with false information about a serious crime or threat situation in order to provoke the deployment of special units (such as SWAT teams in the USA) at the address of an innocent victim. The term is derived from the English “SWAT” (Special Weapons and Tactics).

Legal classification in Germany

In Germany, there is no specific criminal offense for swatting. However, such actions can fall under various existing criminal offenses: 1. Misuse of emergency calls and impairment of accident prevention and emergency aid (Section 145 StGB)
2. Pretending to commit a crime (Section 145d StGB)
3. Disturbing the public peace by threatening to commit a crime (Section 126 StGB)
4. Coercion (Section 240 StGB)
5. In serious cases: Dangerous bodily harm (Section 224 StGB) or even manslaughter (Section 212 StGB)

Features and procedure

1. false emergency call report: perpetrators report a serious crime or threatening situation. 2. credible representation: The report is designed in such a way that it triggers an immediate police operation. 3. destination address: The report contains the address of the unsuspecting victim. 4th police operation: Special units are deployed to the alleged crime scene. 5. endangerment: The victim is confronted with a potentially dangerous police operation.

Motives of the perpetrators

1. revenge or personal feuds 2. attention and “entertainment” 3. disruption of live streams or online events 4. demonstration of power or technical skills 5. political or ideological motives

Consequences and risks

1. psychological stress for the victims 2. physical danger from the police operation 3. waste of resources by the police and emergency services 4. possible traumatization of uninvolved persons 5. undermining trust in emergency call systems

Prevention and countermeasures

1. raising public awareness of the phenomenon of swatting 2. training control centre staff to recognize swatting attempts 3. improving the traceability of emergency calls 4. international cooperation in law enforcement 5. technical measures to verify emergency calls

Challenges for law enforcement

1. anonymity of the perpetrators through the use of VoIP services and concealment techniques 2. cross-border nature of many swatting cases 3. difficulty of providing evidence 4. trade-off between responding quickly to emergency calls and avoiding false alarms

Significance for the digital society

Swatting poses a serious threat to public safety and trust in emergency call systems. It highlights the downsides of increasing digitalization and networking and underlines the need to continuously develop digital skills and security measures.

Conclusion

Swatting is a complex problem that occurs at the interface between cybercrime and the real world. Combating it requires a combination of legal, technical and social measures. In Germany, there is a need for action to explicitly record the phenomenon of swatting under criminal law and to facilitate prosecution. At the same time, preventive measures and raising public awareness are of great importance in order to minimize the risks and consequences of swatting attacks.