rechtsanwaltsverguetungsgesetz rvg

Usual remuneration

ChatGPT and lawyers: recordings of the Weblaw launch event
Lego brick still protected as a design patent
dsgvo 1
Smart contracts in the insurance industry: contract design and regulatory compliance for InsurTech start-ups
AI content for subscription platforms
E-sports finally charitable? What the government draft of the Tax Amendment Act 2025 really brings
Clubs, photos and minors: managing consent properly
AI faces, voice clones and deepfakes in advertising: rules of the game under the EU AI Act and German law
Modding in EULAs and contracts – what applies legally in Germany?
Arbitration agreements in EULAs and developer contracts
Chain of title in game development: building a clean chain of rights
Fail-fast clauses in media productions – what are they actually?
Founder’s agreement vs. shareholder agreement: setting the course for startups at an early stage
Cheat software without code intervention: What the BGH really decided in the Sony ./. Datel case (I ZR 157/21)
Digital integrity as a (new) fundamental right: status in Germany and the EU in 2025
European Economic Interest Grouping (EEIG)
Upload filters between copyright and personal rights
On-demand transmission right in the digital space: streaming, Section 19a UrhG and licensing
Q&A: Legal issues for game developers

No products in the cart.

< Alle Themen
Drucken

Definition and legal basis

The customary remuneration is a central legal institution in German contract law, which is anchored in Section 612 and Section 632 of the German Civil Code (BGB). It describes the remuneration that is generally accepted by the parties involved for a comparable service at the time the contract is concluded at the place where the service is provided.

Key Facts
  • The customary remuneration is anchored in German contract law in § 612 and § 632 BGB.
  • It serves as a catch-all provision if no explicit remuneration agreement has been made.
  • The determination is based on industry standards, regional characteristics and market practice.
  • The usual remuneration applies to contracts for work and services and employment contracts.
  • It is particularly important in the case of acts of courtesy and unclear contractual relationships.
  • Digital technologies and artificial intelligence are revolutionizing traditional remuneration models.
  • Jurisprudence must adapt to new forms of work and business.

In legal terms, customary remuneration serves as a catch-all provision if no explicit remuneration agreement has been made. It ensures that services do not have to be provided free of charge if remuneration is to be expected under the circumstances. It is determined by taking into account industry-specific, regional and time-related factors.

Determination and determination criteria

The usual remuneration is determined according to several criteria. Industry standards, regional characteristics and comparable services at the time the contract is concluded are essential. Collective agreements, industry guidelines and market practices serve as a frame of reference.

Factors such as qualifications, scope of services and economic conditions are taken into account in the assessment. Case law examines on a case-by-case basis whether remuneration complies with the principles of good faith. If there is no tax-based remuneration, the usual remuneration is deemed to have been agreed.

Legal effects and areas of application

Customary remuneration is used in various types of contracts, in particular in the law on contracts for work and services, service contracts and employment contracts. In the law on contracts for work and services in accordance with Section 632 BGB, it applies as a catch-all provision in the absence of a remuneration agreement. In service contract law in accordance with Section 612 BGB, it ensures appropriate remuneration for services.

The customary remuneration is particularly important in the case of acts of courtesy and unclear contractual relationships. It prevents services from having to be provided free of charge. Case law is continuously developing criteria for determining what is customary.

Digital transformation and remuneration models

Digital technologies are changing traditional remuneration models. Blockchain and smart contracts enable new forms of performance evaluation. Artificial intelligence can develop objective evaluation criteria.

International economic relations require flexible remuneration concepts. Jurisdiction must continuously adapt to technological innovations. New forms of work such as crowdworking are challenging traditional remuneration models.

Future prospects

The development of standard remuneration is characterized by technological and social changes. Interdisciplinary approaches are required in order to develop fair remuneration models. The legal profession faces the challenge of adapting traditional concepts to new forms of work and business.

 

Inhaltsverzeichnis