ChatGPT and lawyers: recordings of the Weblaw launch event
Lego brick still protected as a design patent
dsgvo 1
Smart contracts in the insurance industry: contract design and regulatory compliance for InsurTech start-ups
AI content for subscription platforms
E-sports finally charitable? What the government draft of the Tax Amendment Act 2025 really brings
Clubs, photos and minors: managing consent properly
AI faces, voice clones and deepfakes in advertising: rules of the game under the EU AI Act and German law
Modding in EULAs and contracts – what applies legally in Germany?
Arbitration agreements in EULAs and developer contracts
Chain of title in game development: building a clean chain of rights
Fail-fast clauses in media productions – what are they actually?
Founder’s agreement vs. shareholder agreement: setting the course for startups at an early stage
Cheat software without code intervention: What the BGH really decided in the Sony ./. Datel case (I ZR 157/21)
Digital integrity as a (new) fundamental right: status in Germany and the EU in 2025
European Economic Interest Grouping (EEIG)
Upload filters between copyright and personal rights
On-demand transmission right in the digital space: streaming, Section 19a UrhG and licensing
Q&A: Legal issues for game developers

No products in the cart.

< Alle Themen
Drucken

The written preliminary proceedings are an important component of German civil procedure law. In this article, we will take an in-depth look at the concept of written pre-trial proceedings, explain its legal basis and elaborate on its significance for the conduct of proceedings in civil litigation.

Key Facts
  • Written preliminary proceedings are an essential part of German civil procedure law.
  • It allows parties to submit their claims and objections in writing before an oral hearing takes place.
  • The legal basis can be found in the Code of Civil Procedure(ZPO), in particular in Sections 276 to 283.
  • The procedure clarifies the factual and legal situation and structures the arguments of the parties.
  • It contributes to procedural efficiency by improving the efficiency of oral proceedings.
  • Despite the advantages, there are challenges, such as the time required and the effectiveness of written communication.
  • Parties must understand the importance of the written preliminary proceedings in order to represent their interests.

Definition

The written preliminary proceedings refer to the part of a court proceeding in which the parties submit their claims, objections and other statements in writing to the court before an oral hearing takes place. It is used to prepare for the hearing and enables the parties to clarify their positions and provide the court with the relevant information.

Legal basis

The legal basis for the written preliminary proceedings can be found in the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO). Sections 276 to 283 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in particular, govern the written preliminary proceedings. Pursuant to Section 276 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the defendant has the opportunity to respond to the action in writing after service of the action. This is called a statement of defense. The parties may then continue to submit written comments until the court schedules a hearing.

Significance in civil proceedings

Clarification of the factual and legal situation

One of the main functions of the written preliminary proceedings is to clarify the factual and legal situation. The parties have the opportunity to set out their claims and objections in writing, to name evidence and to present legal arguments.

Preparation of the oral proceedings

The written preliminary proceedings serve as a preparatory phase for the oral proceedings. The written exchange allows the parties to structure their arguments and the court to get an overview of the facts.

Procedural economy

The written preliminary proceedings contribute to procedural economy by helping to streamline the oral proceedings and make them more efficient. By clarifying points of dispute in advance, time-consuming discussions during the oral proceedings can be avoided.

Challenges and criticism

Despite the advantages of the written pre-procedure, there are also challenges. One challenge is that the written pre-trial process can be time-consuming, especially when the parties submit extensive briefs. In addition, the written form of communication may mean that certain aspects of the case cannot be communicated as effectively as in an oral hearing.

Conclusion

The written preliminary proceedings are an essential part of civil proceedings, serving to effectively prepare for the oral hearing and to clarify the factual and legal situation. It contributes to procedural economy and enables the parties to present their positions in detail. Still, there are challenges, especially in terms of the time required and the effectiveness of written communication. It is important that parties understand the importance of the written pre-trial process and prepare effectively to best represent their interests in the court proceedings.

Inhaltsverzeichnis