• Areas of expertise
  • |
  • About me
  • |
  • Principles as a lawyer
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Ideal partner
      • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Video series – about me
      • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
      • Principles as a lawyer
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Nerd und Rechtsanwalt
      • Ideal partner
      • How can I help clients?
    • Über die Kanzlei
      • How clients benefit from my network of colleagues, partners and service providers
      • Quick and flexible access
      • Agile and lean law firm
      • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
      • Price overview
    • How can I help clients?
    • Sonstige Informationen
      • Einwilligungen widerrufen
      • Privatsphäre-Einstellungen ändern
      • Historie der Privatsphäre-Einstellungen
      • Privacy policy
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Leistungen
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Support with the foundation
      • Games law consulting
      • Advice in e-commerce
      • Support and advice of agencies
      • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
      • Legal compliance and expert opinions
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Arbeitsschwerpunkte
      • Games and esports law
        • Esports. What is it?
      • Corporate law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Consulting for influencers and streamers
        • Influencer & Streamer
      • Contract review and preparation
      • DLT and Blockchain consulting
        • Blockchain Overview
      • Investment advice
      • AI and SaaS
  • Artikel/News
    • Langartikel / Guides
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Law on the Internet
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Online retail
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Labour law
    • Tax
    • Kanzlei News
    • Other
  • Videos/Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Kurz-Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Ideal partner
      • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Video series – about me
      • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
      • Principles as a lawyer
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Nerd und Rechtsanwalt
      • Ideal partner
      • How can I help clients?
    • Über die Kanzlei
      • How clients benefit from my network of colleagues, partners and service providers
      • Quick and flexible access
      • Agile and lean law firm
      • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
      • Price overview
    • How can I help clients?
    • Sonstige Informationen
      • Einwilligungen widerrufen
      • Privatsphäre-Einstellungen ändern
      • Historie der Privatsphäre-Einstellungen
      • Privacy policy
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Leistungen
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Support with the foundation
      • Games law consulting
      • Advice in e-commerce
      • Support and advice of agencies
      • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
      • Legal compliance and expert opinions
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Arbeitsschwerpunkte
      • Games and esports law
        • Esports. What is it?
      • Corporate law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Consulting for influencers and streamers
        • Influencer & Streamer
      • Contract review and preparation
      • DLT and Blockchain consulting
        • Blockchain Overview
      • Investment advice
      • AI and SaaS
  • Artikel/News
    • Langartikel / Guides
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Law on the Internet
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Online retail
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Labour law
    • Tax
    • Kanzlei News
    • Other
  • Videos/Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Kurz-Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Contact
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
Home Other

15 questionable contractual clauses (often taken from English)

12. March 2025
in Other
Reading Time: 7 mins read
0 0
A A
0
lizenzvertraege fuer software startups wie sie ihr geistiges eigentum optimal schuetzen
Key Facts
  • "Your data remains your property." Legally imprecise; use and sovereignty should be clearly defined to ensure legal certainty.
  • "All rights worldwide, unlimited in time." Such clauses are often ineffective; rights must be precisely defined in order to avoid legal disputes later on.
  • "Agreement to agree" is legally ineffective. Clear agreements are necessary to create clear obligations.
  • "This contract ends automatically without notice." Clear provisions are necessary to avoid legal uncertainties; unclear wording leads to disputes.
  • "Force majeure includes delays caused by suppliers." Usually not a case of force majeure; companies should include clear definitions to avoid misunderstandings.
  • "Waiver of all legal claims." Ineffective without clear, limited regulations; transparent documentation is necessary to rule out legal problems.
  • "All disputes shall be settled exclusively by arbitration." Arbitration clauses must be clearly formulated and access to state courts must be ensured in order to be effective.

Today I would like to take a look at fifteen formulations that are often found in contracts or agreements, especially if they have been translated from English. Although they sound logical to the layman, they are often incorrect or even invalid from the perspective of German law. Such clauses create considerable legal uncertainty in the event of a dispute.

  • “Your data remains your property.” This statement sounds understandable, but is legally incorrect. According to Section 90 of the German Civil Code (BGB), only physical objects can be owned, but not data. Instead, data is subject to data protection law (e.g. GDPR) and personal rights. The term “ownership” in connection with data is therefore misleading. The Federal Constitutional Court considers data to be part of the general right of personality. In legal terms, it would be more precise to speak of rights of use or data sovereignty. Even if the term ownership is used in practice as a symbol for control, this is legally imprecise. This illustrates why precise wording is crucial in order to avoid legal ambiguities. In addition, companies should define what rights and obligations exist with regard to the data. A clear contractual regulation prevents legal disputes later on.
  • “All rights worldwide, unlimited in time and in any medium.” Such clauses are generally too vague under German copyright law (Section 31 UrhG). The Federal Court of Justice (BGH, judgment of 11.07.2002, ref.: I ZR 285/99) has ruled that blanket and indefinite transfers of rights are invalid. Rather, rights should be specified in concrete terms in order to create legal clarity. Too broad a formulation could infringe the author’s property rights. In addition, the effectiveness of such clauses is regularly questioned in international situations. Clear and precise limitations are essential for legally effective agreements. An exact designation of rights, media and periods of use prevents subsequent ambiguities. Companies should check whether special regulations are required for digital media or future technologies. The definition of the territorial scope should also be clear in order to minimize room for interpretation.
  • “Agreement to Agree” – “The parties agree to come to an agreement later.” According to Section 154 BGB, an agreement must be clear and specific. Vague future agreements have no legal effect. The BGH regularly confirms that such agreements are not enforceable. This clause would therefore be useless in the event of a dispute. Only a concrete, current agreement with clear content is legally binding. Parties should therefore either reach a binding agreement or delete the clause completely. Alternatives should also be defined in the event that negotiations fail. A contractual agreement on an arbitration procedure can also be useful. This can facilitate a constructive solution in the event of a dispute.
  • “Each party shall bear its own legal costs.” According to §§ 91 ff. ZPO, the unsuccessful party generally bears the costs. A deviating provision is possible, but is often ineffective in general terms and conditions in accordance with Sections 305c, 309 No. 7 BGB. The conditions under which deviating cost allocations are agreed should therefore be clearly regulated. In the absence of a specific provision, the statutory cost allocation rule always applies. Especially in an international context, cost regulations should be explicitly stipulated. Without clear rules, misunderstandings and disadvantages can arise in the course of the proceedings. A differentiated presentation protects both parties from unexpected costs. It should also be stipulated whether and to what extent pre-litigation costs are recoverable. Such provisions can avoid future disputes.
  • “This contract ends automatically without notice.” German law (§§ 620 ff. BGB) requires clear regulations on contract termination. Automatic endings are only valid if the time and conditions are clearly defined. Unclear formulations, such as “the contract ends automatically at some point”, regularly lead to disputes and legal uncertainty. The Federal Court of Justice has consistently ruled that the end of the contract must be clearly definable. Such formulations often result from incorrect translations of English “self-terminating clauses”. Contracting parties should therefore specify exact dates or conditions for termination. Precise clauses prevent legal uncertainties later on. It should also be stipulated whether and how the contract can be extended. The consequences of termination, such as reversals or transition periods, should also be defined.
  • “Force majeure includes delays caused by suppliers.” According to Section 275 BGB, supplier problems are generally not a case of force majeure, but an operational risk. The term “force majeure” refers to unforeseeable and unavoidable events such as natural disasters. Delays at suppliers do not automatically fall under this definition. Such clauses should clearly define which circumstances are specifically recognized as force majeure. Missing definitions often lead to disputes and legal uncertainties. Companies should define precisely which risks are excluded. This is the only way to ensure that contracts are legally compliant. In addition, an obligation to notify the occurrence of such events should be agreed. Provisions for adjusting the terms of the contract can also be useful.
  • “The contract is governed exclusively by foreign law.” In German legal transactions, especially in consumer contracts, mandatory German provisions may not be excluded (Rome I Regulation). Such clauses are often ineffective or only partially effective. Consumer protection regulations in particular cannot be waived in Germany. Companies should clearly define which legal system should apply to which area of the contract. Unclear or blanket clauses often lead to legal uncertainty. A detailed regulation protects against misunderstandings in an international context. International arbitration clauses should also be formulated precisely. The question of the applicable place of jurisdiction should also be clearly regulated. A clarification on the validity of mandatory law creates additional certainty.
  • “Waiver of all statutory claims.” A general waiver of statutory claims is invalid under Section 134 BGB and Section 276 BGB. Instead of blanket formulations, specific claims should be explicitly listed and regulated. The waiver of claims should also be clearly limited in order to exclude undue disadvantages. A transparently formulated waiver minimizes the risk of subsequent legal disputes. Case law takes a critical view of such clauses and demands clear, comprehensible provisions. Unclear clauses often lead to invalidity. A precise regulation creates legal certainty here. Companies should also check whether mandatory statutory protective provisions are affected. Clear documentation of the waiver protects both parties.
  • “Force majeure includes strikes within one’s own company.” Strikes within the company’s own operations do not count as force majeure, but as a business risk. German case law requires external causes for the assumption of force majeure. However, internal strikes can be minimized through preventive measures. Companies should therefore reconsider their own risk management. An incorrect classification of risks can lead to legal disputes. Such clauses should be carefully examined in order to avoid subsequent conflicts. A clear demarcation is necessary here. It should also be regulated how affected services are to be handled. An obligation to mitigate losses can also be agreed.
  • “The contractual penalty is ten times the order amount.” Excessive contractual penalties are invalid under Section 307 BGB if they unreasonably disadvantage the contractual partner. Contractual penalties should be proportionate to the content of the contract. Case law takes a critical view of high contractual penalties and tends to reduce excessive amounts. The amount of the contractual penalty should be justified and comprehensible. An excessive contractual penalty can not only be ineffective, but can also jeopardize the entire contractual relationship. Clear and fair regulations create legal certainty here. Alternatives such as graduated penalty amounts could also be examined. In addition, it should be specified how and under what conditions the contractual penalty is to be claimed. This promotes transparency and reduces the potential for disputes.
  • “Amendments to contracts must always be made in writing.” This clause is often used in contracts to allow changes only if confirmed in writing. Under German law (Section 125 BGB), this is generally permissible. However, a verbal amendment can be effective despite the written form clause if both parties consciously accept it. Courts often recognize informal amendments, especially if they are lived in practice. The parties should therefore specify very precisely how amendments are to be made. A digital form should be explicitly included in order to avoid misunderstandings later on. A precise and comprehensive definition of the written form contributes to legal certainty. It may also be useful to list specific examples of accepted forms of amendment in the contract.
  • “The contract is irrevocable.” A complete exclusion of revocation is not permitted under German law, especially for consumer contracts (Sections 355 et seq. BGB). In principle, a consumer has the right to revoke contracts concluded outside of business premises within 14 days. These rights cannot be excluded by contractual clauses. An irrevocable contract would therefore be ineffective, at least in consumer contracts. Companies should therefore provide correct withdrawal instructions and avoid clauses that inadmissibly restrict the right of withdrawal. Transparent and clear regulations help to avoid subsequent legal disputes. Legally sound formulations offer protection to both contracting parties. In addition, a clear presentation of the consequences of withdrawal can make it easier to understand.
  • “Compensation for damages is excluded in any case.” A complete exclusion of claims for damages is inadmissible according to § 309 No. 7 BGB. In particular, liability cannot be excluded in cases of intent and gross negligence. Such clauses are therefore often ineffective and can lead to the ineffectiveness of the entire contract. Limitations of liability must be differentiated and designed in accordance with the law. A careful differentiation between simple and gross negligence is required. Possible amounts of damage should also be clearly defined in order to create legal certainty. Transparent liability regulations prevent later conflicts. In addition, an individual agreement on the liability limit can be useful to clearly define the risk.
  • “All disputes shall be settled exclusively by arbitration.” Although arbitration clauses are permissible, they must not lead to legally guaranteed rights being undermined (Section 1031 ZPO). In consumer contracts in particular, such clauses could be classified as surprising and therefore invalid. Such a clause must be formulated clearly and comprehensibly. Furthermore, access to a state court should not be completely excluded. A combination of arbitration and ordinary jurisdiction can be useful in order to guarantee both parties a fair procedure. A clear formulation of jurisdiction protects against subsequent interpretation problems. In addition, time limits for appealing to the arbitration tribunal should be precisely defined.
  • “Signatures can be made digitally at any time.” Digital signatures are permitted under Section 126a BGB if a qualified electronic signature is used. However, simple digital signatures are not always sufficient, especially for contracts requiring notarization. Companies should therefore clearly define which form of digital signature is accepted. An incorrectly executed digital signature can lead to the invalidity of the contract. It is advisable to use recognized and certified signature services. Careful regulation of digital signature processes creates security and trust. Clear agreements prevent legal conflicts at a later date. Security precautions and control mechanisms for validating signatures should also be included in the contract.

Beliebte Beträge

The legal protection of a business plan

5b698c02ae6e02ed43d05d01c467b658
24. September 2024

A business plan is an indispensable strategic document for start-ups and company founders. It serves as a roadmap for business...

Read moreDetails

As a teenager, make e-sports men/streamers self-employed?

As a teenager, make e-sports men/streamers self-employed?
2. January 2020

The industry of streamers and e-sports enthusiasts is very young compared to other industries and therefore also for lawyers and...

Read moreDetails

Liability of influencers and agencies for advertised products – legal risks and current developments

Liability of influencers and agencies for advertised products – legal risks and current developments
10. May 2025

Influencer marketing has become an integral part of modern advertising. Influencers recommend products and services of all kinds on social...

Read moreDetails

Confidentiality strategy for startups: NDAs, trade secret law and practical measures

Confidentiality strategy for startups: NDAs, trade secret law and practical measures
28. April 2025

Start-ups thrive on innovative ideas, creative concepts and unique technologies. Whether it's a novel algorithm, a special business idea, a...

Read moreDetails

Setting up a business abroad for OnlyFans-Business: opportunities & risks

Setting up a business abroad for OnlyFans-Business: opportunities & risks
11. May 2025

Running your own OnlyFans business often raises the question for creators and agencies based in Germany: Is it worth setting...

Read moreDetails

Right of withdrawal for tradesman services: massive legal uncertainty to continue in 2025

Right of withdrawal for tradesman services: massive legal uncertainty to continue in 2025
8. May 2025

In 2025, many tradespeople and service providers still face an often underestimated problem: contracts concluded with consumers outside of business...

Read moreDetails

NIS2 compliance 2025: relevance for SaaS and media start-ups

Risks when using and offering no-code platforms as SaaS
2. May 2025

Why another contribution to the NIS2 Directive? Do we really need a separate blog post on the NIS2 Directive in...

Read moreDetails

Software development: The new concept of defects according to §§ 327 ff. BGB

Software development: The new concept of defects according to §§ 327 ff. BGB
7. May 2025

On January 1, 2022, the German legislator fundamentally reformed the regulations for consumer contracts for digital products. For software developers...

Read moreDetails

Regulation (EU) 2024/1083 – The European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) at a glance

Regulation (EU) 2024/1083 – The European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) at a glance
6. May 2025

In May 2024, the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) was published in the Official Journal of the EU with Regulation...

Read moreDetails

5.0 60 reviews

  • Avatar Mikael Hällgren ★★★★★ vor einem Monat
    I got fantastic support from Marian Härtel. He managed to get my wrongfully suspended Instagram account restored. He was … Mehr incredibly helpful the whole way until the positive outcome. Highly recommended!
  • Avatar Lennart Korte ★★★★★ vor 2 Monaten
    Ich kann Herrn Härtel als Anwalt absolut weiterempfehlen! Sein Service ist erstklassig – schnelle Antwortzeiten, effiziente … Mehr Arbeit und dabei sehr kostengünstig, was für Startups besonders wichtig ist. Er hat für mein Startup einen Vertrag erstellt, und ich bin von seiner professionellen und zuverlässigen Arbeit überzeugt. Klare Empfehlung!
  • Avatar R.H. ★★★★★ vor 3 Monaten
    Ich kann Hr. Härtel nur empfehlen! Er hat mich bei einem Betrugsversuch einer Krypto Börse rechtlich vertreten. Ich bin sehr … Mehr zufrieden mit seiner engagierten Arbeit gewesen. Ich wurde von Anfang an kompetent, fair und absolut transparent beraten. Trotz eines zähen Verfahrens und einer großen Börse als Gegner, habe ich mich immer sicher und zuversichtlich gefühlt. Auch die Schnelligkeit und die sehr gute Erreichbarkeit möchte ich an der Stelle hoch loben und nochmal meinen herzlichsten Dank aussprechen! Daumen hoch mit 10 Sternen!
  • Avatar P! Galerie ★★★★★ vor 4 Monaten
    Herr Härtel hat uns äusserst kompetent in einen lästigen Fall mit META betreut. Er war effizient, beharrlich, aber auch mit … Mehr uns geduldig. Menschlich top, bis wir am Ende Dank ihm erfolgreich zum Ziel gekommen sind. Können wir wärmstens empfehlen. Und nochmals danke. P.H.
  • Avatar Mosaic Mask Studio ★★★★★ vor 5 Monaten
    Die Kanzlei ist immer ein verlässlicher Partner bei der Sichtung und Bearbeitung von Verträgen in der IT Branche. Es ist … Mehr stets ein professioneller Austausch auf Augenhöhe.
    Die Ergebnisse sind auf hohem Niveau und haben die interessen unsers Unternehmens immer bestmöglich wiedergespiegelt.
    Vielen Dank für die sehr gute Zusammenarbeit.
  • Avatar Philip Lucas ★★★★★ 9 months ago
    Wir haben Herrn Härtel für unser Unternehmen konsultiert und sind äußerst zufrieden mit seiner Arbeit. Von Anfang an hat … Mehr er einen überaus kompetenten Eindruck gemacht und sich als ein sehr angenehmer Gesprächspartner erwiesen. Seine fachliche Expertise und seine verständliche und zugängliche Art im Umgang mit komplexen Themen haben uns überzeugt. Wir freuen uns auf eine langfristige und erfolgreiche Zusammenarbeit!
  • Avatar Doris H. ★★★★★ 11 months ago
    Herr Härtel hat uns bezüglich eines Telefonvertrags beraten und vertreten. Wir waren mit seinem Service sehr zufrieden. Er … Mehr hat stets schnell auf unsere E-mails und Anrufe reagiert und den Sachverhalt einfach und verständlich erklärt. Wir würden Herrn Härtel jederzeit wieder beauftragen.Vielen Dank für die hervorragende Unterstützung
  • Avatar Philipp Skaar ★★★★★ 9 months ago
    Als kleines inhabergeführtes Hotel sehen wir uns ab und dann (bei sonst weit über dem Durchschnitt liegenden Bewertungen) … Mehr der Herausforderung von aus der Anonymität heraus agierenden "Netz-Querulanten" gegenüber gestellt. Herr Härtel versteht es außerordentlich spür- und feinsinnig, derartige - oftmals auf Rufschädigung ausgerichtete - Bewertungen bereits im Keim, also außergerichtlich, zu ersticken und somit unseren Betrieb vor weiteren Folgeschäden zu bewahren. Seine Umsetzungsgeschwindigkeit ist beeindruckend, seine bisherige Erfolgsquote = 100%.Ergo: Unsere erste Adresse zur Abwehr von geschäftsschädigenden Angriffen aus dem Web.
  • ●
  • ●
  • ●
  • ●

Video-Galerie

Making influencer marketing legally compliant: A guide for startups
Making influencer marketing legally compliant: A guide for startups
Podcasts and the law: essential tips for content creators
Podcasts and the law: essential tips for content creators
Marian Härtel - Your expert for games law and esports
Marian Härtel – Your expert for games law and esports
Step action

Revision

25. June 2023

In this article we will deal in detail with the concept of revision in civil procedure. It is important to...

Read moreDetails
Binding Corporate Rules

Binding Corporate Rules

16. October 2024
855e2b01 13e3 4082 ab25 0967bb0c4654 202328553

Substitution

29. March 2025
Software maintenance contract

Software maintenance contract

16. October 2024

Self-organization

10. November 2024

Podcast Folgen

“Digitales Recht Entschlüsselt” mit Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel

“Digitales Recht Entschlüsselt” mit Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel

25. September 2024

In diesem spannenden 30-minütigen Podcast entschlüsselt Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel die komplexe Welt des digitalen Rechts für Selbstständige, Startups und Solopreneure....

Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

20. April 2025

In diese Episode wird die komplexe Beziehung zwischen dem 'Fail Fast'-Prinzip und den Verantwortlichkeiten der Gründer gegenüber Investoren und Mitarbeitern...

Blitzskalierung und rechtliche Herausforderungen: Der Balanceakt für Startups

Blitzskalierung und rechtliche Herausforderungen: Der Balanceakt für Startups

20. April 2025

In dieser Episode sprechen Anna und Max über die rechtlichen Herausforderungen von Blitzskalierung und disruptiven Geschäftsmodellen. Am Beispiel von Plattformen...

Rechtliche Risiken bei langen Entwicklungszeiten und der Stornierung von Crowdfundingspielen

Rechtliche Risiken bei langen Entwicklungszeiten und der Stornierung von Crowdfundingspielen

20. April 2025

In dieser Episode erörtern wir die rechtlichen Herausforderungen, denen Spieleentwickler bei der Finanzierung durch Crowdfunding gegenüberstehen. Wir beleuchten die Verpflichtungen...

  • Home
  • Imprint
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • Agile and lean law firm
  • Ideal partner
  • Contact
  • Videos
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Contact
  • Leistungen
    • Support with the foundation
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Games law consulting
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
    • Investment advice
    • Booking as speaker
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Contract review and preparation
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Focus on start-ups
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus on start-ups
    • How can I help clients?
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Videos
    • Video series – about me
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos on services
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Shorts
    • Third-party videos
    • Podcast format
    • Other videos
  • Knowledge base
  • Podcast
  • Blogposts
    • Lange Artikel / Ausführungen
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Labour law
    • EU law
    • Corporate
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • Tax
    • Internally
    • Other
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung