• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

*Breaking?* First decision of the BGH on AI

4. July 2024
in Other
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0 0
A A
0
dba9cf7dafed05d4f61f1dc8a5a2760d
Key Facts
  • The Federal Court of Justice rules: Only natural persons can be recognized as inventors under patent law.
  • Artificial intelligence is not a legal entity and cannot act as an inventor.
  • The designation of an AI as inventor leads to the rejection of the patent application.
  • The human developer can be named as the inventor if he makes a significant contribution.
  • The decision fits with the view that AI cannot be an author under copyright law either.
  • The use of AI tools does not change the authorship of the human developer.
  • Generative AI offers increased productivity in creative areas despite legal restrictions.

The Federal Court of Justice confirms: AI cannot be an inventor

Content Hide
1. Key statements of the BGH
2. Implications for authorship
2.1. The DABUS case and international perspectives
2.2. Impact on developers and creatives
3. Conclusion and outlook
3.1. Author: Marian Härtel

In its most recent decision X ZB 5/22 of 11 June 2024, the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) made a clear statement: Artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be recognized as an inventor within the meaning of patent law. This groundbreaking decision is in line with previous case law and confirms the prevailing opinion that only natural persons can be considered inventors.

Key statements of the BGH

The BGH formulated several important guiding principles in its ruling:

(1) “Only a natural person may be designated as an inventor within the meaning of the Patent Act.”

2. “An artificial intelligence does not meet the requirements to be recognized as an inventor because it is not a legal entity.”

3. “The designation of an AI as inventor leads to the rejection of the patent application.”

(4) “The human developer or user of an AI may be designated as the inventor if he or she has made a substantial creative contribution to the invention.”

These guiding principles underline the position of the BGH that the human mind is still at the center of the invention process.

Implications for authorship

The decision of the BGH is in line with the view that AI cannot be an author within the meaning of copyright law. Both areas of law require human, intellectual creation, which a machine – however intelligent it may be – cannot achieve. This has far-reaching consequences for creatives and developers who use generative AI in their work processes.

The DABUS case and international perspectives

At the center of the debate is the AI system DABUS (Device for the Autonomous Bootstrapping of Unified Sentience), developed by Dr. Stephen Thaler. DABUS has been named as an “inventor” for patent applications in various countries, including a new type of food container and a flashing light for emergencies. These applications have caused a worldwide stir and raised the question of whether AI can be recognized as an inventor.

Patent offices and courts worldwide have rejected applications with DABUS as the inventor. The European Patent Office (EPO) has confirmed in its decision that the inventor named in a patent application must be a human being under the European Patent Convention (EPC). Similar decisions were made in the USA and Great Britain.

Impact on developers and creatives

This case law has important implications for game developers, software developers and authors who use generative AI in their creative processes:

1. authorship and inventorship: The use of AI tools does not change the fact that the human developer or author is considered the author or inventor. AI remains a tool, similar to a word processing program or graphics software.

2. responsibility for output: Developers and authors are responsible for the output generated by the AI. You must ensure that no third-party rights are infringed and that the output meets the desired quality standards.

3. documentation of the creative process: It may be advisable to document the use of AI tools in the creative process in order to be able to prove the human contribution in case of doubt.

4. new testing methods: In software development in particular, the use of generative AI requires new approaches to testing in order to ensure the quality and reliability of the generated code.

5. increasing productivity: Despite legal restrictions, generative AI offers enormous potential for increasing productivity in creative areas.

Conclusion and outlook

The decision of the BGH and similar rulings worldwide underline that the human mind is still at the center of the innovation and creation process. Generative AI is a powerful tool that can support and enrich the work of developers and creatives, but it does not replace human creativity and ingenuity.

It will be interesting to see how case law develops in the future, especially in view of the rapid advances in AI technology. For the time being, however, one thing remains clear: AI can be neither inventor nor creator – these roles are reserved for humans. Developers and creatives should always keep this in mind when using AI tools and document and highlight their own creative contribution accordingly.

 

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: Artificial intelligenceBghCase lawDeveloperEntscheidungenFederal courtGame developerJudgmentJudgmentsKINatural personPatentTechnology

Weitere spannende Blogposts

LG Stuttgart: GDPR violations cannot be warned

GDPR: Download pairing with newsletter/registration?
28. May 2019

The dispute between different courts over whether data breaches can be warned by competitors is somewhat similar to whether and...

Read moreDetails

Data protection consent with cookie alternatives?

Data protection consent with cookie alternatives?
7. November 2022

Last year, the ECJ ruled that numerous types of cookies must be expressly authorized by the user before they can...

Read moreDetails

Activity as a registered trader: The liability traps

Activity as a registered trader: The liability traps
7. November 2022

Here on the blog I have already presented numerous legal forms and the corresponding risks, but also advantages. However, there...

Read moreDetails

Is an artist’s name sufficient in the imprint?

Imprint and social media: A few stumbling blocks
5. April 2019

Basically, there are clear rules in Germany about what belongs in an imprint. For Twitch I have written something about...

Read moreDetails

Vision of contract execution: how smart contracts could shape the future of payments and legal processes

Vision of contract execution: how smart contracts could shape the future of payments and legal processes
19. October 2023

Introduction Technology is rapidly evolving and opening doors to new opportunities in the legal field, a development that always fascinates...

Read moreDetails

NFT and esports: an additional income opportunity or high legal hurdles?

What is “digital property” and how can I benefit from it?
16. May 2023

Introduction to NFTs and Digital Assets Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are an emerging area of digital assets based on blockchain technology....

Read moreDetails

ECJ: How is “legitimate interest” to be interpreted in the GDPR?

privacy policy 3583612 1920
2. January 2023

The ECJ, on the basis of a reference for a preliminary ruling under Art. 98 para. 1 of the Rules...

Read moreDetails

Even true statements about competitors only possible to a limited extent!

Even true statements about competitors only possible to a limited extent!
5. August 2019

On Friday I published an article on statements on websites and the danger of misinformation, see here, which received quite...

Read moreDetails

Reaction videos allowed on YouTube/Twitch?

Interstate Broadcasting Treaty: Probably no gamer privilege for streamers!
9. February 2023

If you follow my blog regularly, you will have noticed that I always like to include real proceedings or legal...

Read moreDetails

Preclusion

26. June 2023

Introduction Preclusion is a term from procedural law that refers to the loss of procedural rights due to lapses, such...

Read moreDetails
Non-solicitation clause

Non-solicitation clause

16. October 2024
e0c1c4f3 5ebb 4781 ae38 575fa47f2696 202348477

Negligence

29. March 2025
District Court Frankfurt a.M. on the right to be forgotten

Processing directory

26. June 2023
Action for performance

Action for performance

28. June 2023

Podcast Folgen

Rechtliche Herausforderungen im Gaming-Universum: Ein Leitfaden für Entwickler, Esportler und Gamer

Was wird 2025 für Startups juristisch bringen? Chancen? Risiken?

24. January 2025

In dieser spannenden Episode des itmedialaw-Podcasts tauchen wir tief in die rechtlichen Entwicklungen ein, die die Startup-Welt im Jahr 2025...

Das Metaverse – Rechtliche Herausforderungen in virtuellen Welten

Das Metaverse – Rechtliche Herausforderungen in virtuellen Welten

25. September 2024

In dieser faszinierenden Episode tauchen wir tief in die rechtlichen Aspekte des Metaverse ein. Als Rechtsanwalt und Technik-Enthusiast beleuchte ich...

“Digitales Recht Entschlüsselt” mit Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel

“Digitales Recht Entschlüsselt” mit Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel

25. September 2024

In diesem spannenden 30-minütigen Podcast entschlüsselt Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel die komplexe Welt des digitalen Rechts für Selbstständige, Startups und Solopreneure....

Der unkonventionelle Anwalt: Ein Nerd im Dienste des Rechts

Der unkonventionelle Anwalt: Ein Nerd im Dienste des Rechts

25. September 2024

In dieser fesselnden Episode des Podcasts "Der Unkonventionelle Anwalt" tauchen wir ein in die Welt eines Juristen, der die traditionellen...

  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung