• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

Federal Court of Justice – The “Glück” vs. “LieBee” case

17. May 2024
in Competition law
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0 0
A A
0
bghurteil
Key Facts
  • The caseGlückvs.LieBeeillustrates the challenges in competition law based on product design.
  • The plaintiff considered the &strong;LieBee&strong;-presentation to be an unfair imitation of its &strong;Glück&strong;-jam products.
  • Court found a high degree of competitive originality based on the shape and design of &strong;Glück&strong;, but no deception of origin.
  • Different brand names &strong;Glück&strong; and &strong;LieBee&strong; prevented a risk of confusion for consumers.
  • The case emphasizes the importance of the overall perception of a product and the context of the presentation.
  • Protection of competitive characteristics must not lead to a restriction of legitimate competitiveness.
  • Small details in competition law can be crucial; companies should be careful and creative with designs.

Introduction

Content Hide
1. Introduction
2. Background of the case
3. Decision of the court
3.1. Conclusion

In competition law, there are always interesting cases that show how complex and multi-layered the topic of product design and branding can be. One such case that recently caused a stir concerns the jam brand “Glück” and the honey “LieBee”. This case offers exciting insights into the legal considerations surrounding the issue of competitive originality and imitation. He sheds light on the fine line between inspiration and imitation and raises important questions about originality and the protection of intellectual property. He also illustrates how courts maintain the balance between protecting trademark rights and promoting fair competition.

Background of the case

The plaintiff, manufacturer of the “Glück” jam brand, considered the design of the defendant’s “LieBee” honey jars to be an unfair imitation of its own product design. The plaintiff argued that this led to a deception about the origin of the product and exploited the reputation of its trademark “Glück”. The defendant defended itself by arguing that there was no such deception and that its product design was sufficiently independent. She emphasized that the differences in design and marking were sufficient to ensure a clear distinction for the consumer. In addition, the defendant emphasized that a certain similarity in product design was customary and unavoidable in the food market.

Decision of the court

The court had to assess several aspects in this case: the competitive character of the “Glück” jam jars, the similarity with the “LieBee” honey jars and the question of a possible deception of origin.

Interestingly, the court found that the “Glück” jam jars had a high degree of competitive originality, in particular due to their special jar shape and label design. However, the assumption of a deception of origin was ultimately not confirmed. The court emphasized that despite the similarities in design, the different brand names (“Glück” and “LieBee”) were sufficient to rule out confusion on the part of the consumer. It emphasized the importance of the overall perception of a product by the consumer, whereby not only the design, but also the marking and the context of the product presentation must be taken into account. The court recognized that certain design elements may occur more frequently in food marketing without necessarily constituting unfair imitation. It was also emphasized that the protection of competitive characteristics must not lead to legitimate competitive opportunities being unreasonably restricted. In this context, the importance of a careful balance between the protection of intellectual property and the promotion of healthy competition was emphasized. Ultimately, the case showed that in competition law, the subtleties of case design are crucial and that every decision must be based on a detailed analysis of the specific circumstances.

Conclusion

The “Glück” vs. “LieBee” case impressively illustrates that in competition law, a close examination of each individual element of a product design is crucial. Companies need to be both creative and careful in their product design to ensure that their designs are unique and distinctive without creating a risk of confusion with other companies’ existing products. This case emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive overall view that goes beyond the mere similarity of products and also includes brand names and consumer perception. It teaches that small details in competition law can have a big impact and emphasizes the need for careful brand and product policy and close legal scrutiny.

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: AnalyseBrandsCompetition lawConsumerFederal court

Weitere spannende Blogposts

Advertising with SSL encryption

abmahnung
8. February 2019

The question of whether a website nowadays, at least if it processes customer data in any way, must be SSL-encrypted...

Read moreDetails

Data protection information according to DSGVO/GDPR

Data protection information according to DSGVO/GDPR
7. November 2022

One of my clients recently received a large data protection request regarding his personal data. Since I do advise my...

Read moreDetails

Fake invoices and false IBAN transfers

004328889deb45fa8c51e99e8a347ade
10. July 2024

As an experienced lawyer for IT and media law, I regularly handle cases of invoice fraud and misdirected bank transfers....

Read moreDetails

Telephone provider must not threaten with improper blocking

International responsibility for advertising on the Internet
13. November 2019

What is it all about? If a mobile phone company threatens its customer to block its connection in the event...

Read moreDetails

Navigating AI Generators: Liability, disclosure, and the need for regulation

Navigating AI Generators: Liability, disclosure, and the need for regulation
25. May 2023

Introduction In my daily work as a technology and media law attorney, I come into contact with various forms of...

Read moreDetails

Creating podcasts: What to look out for legally

6a5c65390741e7fa10164e5a6d311e1e
29. August 2024

Podcasts are becoming increasingly popular and have become an integral part of the media landscape. They offer a great opportunity...

Read moreDetails

BGH decides in bot software/Bossland case

Small summary – Blizzard vs. Bossland
23. February 2023

The Federal Court of Justice ruled in the case i have advocated on the admissibility of bot software for the...

Read moreDetails

The growing popularity of “just chatting” among influencers and streamers

16. August 2024

The growing popularity of "just chatting" among influencers and streamers The "Just Chatting" category on the Twitch platform has become...

Read moreDetails

BGH expands civil senates

No more free tissues at the pharmacy?
7. November 2022

As of September 1, 2019, the Federal Minister of Justice and Consumer Protection established an additional Civil Panel at the...

Read moreDetails
So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an
Internally

So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

3. July 2025

Mein neuer ITMediaLaw-Shop füllt sich stetig mit Inhalten und Angeboten – von praxisnahen E-Books über umfassende Bundle-Pakete bis hin zu...

Read moreDetails
Dark Patterns: UX-Tricks im Visier von Gesetzgeber und Gerichten

Dark Patterns: UX-Tricks im Visier von Gesetzgeber und Gerichten

2. July 2025
Altersverifikation im Internet: Pflichten für Anbieter in Deutschland und Europa

Altersverifikation im Internet: Pflichten für Anbieter in Deutschland und Europa

30. June 2025
KI-Training und Urheberrecht: US-Gericht setzt auf Fair Use – was bedeutet das für KI und was gilt in Deutschland?

KI-Training und Urheberrecht: US-Gericht setzt auf Fair Use – was bedeutet das für KI und was gilt in Deutschland?

26. June 2025
KI-Codetools und Open-Source-Lizenzen: Risiken für Entwickler

KI-Codetools und Open-Source-Lizenzen: Risiken für Entwickler

25. June 2025

Podcastfolge

eda7ba83 c559 4e68 8441 41159a0751f3

Blitzskalierung und rechtliche Herausforderungen: Der Balanceakt für Startups

20. April 2025

In dieser Episode sprechen Anna und Max über die rechtlichen Herausforderungen von Blitzskalierung und disruptiven Geschäftsmodellen. Am Beispiel von Plattformen...

Read moreDetails
Globale Herausforderungen für Startups – Ein rechtlicher Leitfaden

Globale Herausforderungen für Startups – Ein rechtlicher Leitfaden

2. October 2024
Rechtskette beim Spieleentwickler

Rechtskette beim Spieleentwickler

19. April 2025
Rechtliche Herausforderungen im Gaming-Universum: Ein Leitfaden für Entwickler, Esportler und Gamer

Was wird 2025 für Startups juristisch bringen? Chancen? Risiken?

24. January 2025
Das Metaverse – Rechtliche Herausforderungen in virtuellen Welten

Das Metaverse – Rechtliche Herausforderungen in virtuellen Welten

25. September 2024

Video

Mein transparente Abrechnung

Mein transparente Abrechnung

10. February 2025

In diesem Video rede ich ein wenig über transparente Abrechnung und wie ich kommuniziere, was es kostet, wenn man mit...

Read moreDetails
Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

10. February 2025
Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

10. February 2025
Was mich wirklich freut

Was mich wirklich freut

10. February 2025
Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

10. February 2025
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung