• Latest
  • Trending
Legally compliant archiving of emails: legal requirements and practical implementation

Legally compliant archiving of emails: legal requirements and practical implementation

14. March 2025
ChatGPT and lawyers: recordings of the Weblaw launch event

Private AI use in the company

24. October 2025
Lego brick still protected as a design patent

App purchases, in-app purchases and sales tax

21. October 2025
dsgvo 1

What belongs in a DPA? Data processing agreement in accordance with Art. 28 GDPR

17. October 2025
Smart contracts in the insurance industry: contract design and regulatory compliance for InsurTech start-ups

Contract for work vs. service contract in software, AI and games projects

15. October 2025

Influencer contract: performance profile, rights/buyouts, labeling and AI content

13. October 2025
AI content for subscription platforms

AI content for subscription platforms

29. September 2025
E-sports finally charitable? What the government draft of the Tax Amendment Act 2025 really brings

E-sports finally charitable? What the government draft of the Tax Amendment Act 2025 really brings

23. September 2025
Clubs, photos and minors: managing consent properly

Clubs, photos and minors: managing consent properly

22. September 2025
AI faces, voice clones and deepfakes in advertising: rules of the game under the EU AI Act and German law

AI faces, voice clones and deepfakes in advertising: rules of the game under the EU AI Act and German law

17. September 2025
Modding in EULAs and contracts – what applies legally in Germany?

Modding in EULAs and contracts – what applies legally in Germany?

8. September 2025
Arbitration agreements in EULAs and developer contracts

Arbitration agreements in EULAs and developer contracts

7. September 2025
Chain of title in game development: building a clean chain of rights

Chain of title in game development: building a clean chain of rights

6. September 2025
Fail-fast clauses in media productions – what are they actually?

Fail-fast clauses in media productions – what are they actually?

5. September 2025
Founder’s agreement vs. shareholder agreement: setting the course for startups at an early stage

Founder’s agreement vs. shareholder agreement: setting the course for startups at an early stage

12. August 2025
Cheat software without code intervention: What the BGH really decided in the Sony ./. Datel case (I ZR 157/21)

Cheat software without code intervention: What the BGH really decided in the Sony ./. Datel case (I ZR 157/21)

11. August 2025
Digital integrity as a (new) fundamental right: status in Germany and the EU in 2025

Digital integrity as a (new) fundamental right: status in Germany and the EU in 2025

10. August 2025
European Economic Interest Grouping (EEIG)

EU Digital Decade 2030: Data law, Data Act & eIDAS 2 – what needs to be implemented in 2025

8. August 2025
Upload filters between copyright and personal rights

Upload filters between copyright and personal rights

7. August 2025
On-demand transmission right in the digital space: streaming, Section 19a UrhG and licensing

On-demand transmission right in the digital space: streaming, Section 19a UrhG and licensing

6. August 2025
Q&A: Legal issues for game developers

5-day guide: Founding a game development studio

5. August 2025
  • Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Kurzberatung

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact

Legally compliant archiving of emails: legal requirements and practical implementation

14. March 2025
in Data protection Law
Reading Time: 8 mins read
0 0
A A
0
d8f1c831 8411 47e8 99cf d96405fa4a96 17165142

It is impossible to imagine modern corporate communication without e-mail. It is not only used for the rapid exchange of information, but also plays a central role in the documentation of business processes. However, the business use of emails is accompanied by extensive legal obligations, particularly with regard to archiving. Companies are obliged to store certain emails for specified periods of time in an audit-proof manner in order to meet legal requirements and to be able to provide the necessary evidence in the event of tax or legal audits. Failure to comply with these obligations can have serious consequences, ranging from financial penalties to criminal prosecution. The legal requirements for email archiving arise not only from commercial law and tax law, but also from data protection regulations and industry-specific regulations. The requirements of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which regulates the handling of personal data, are particularly relevant. Companies that do not comply with these obligations risk high fines and considerable reputational damage. The relevance of these regulations has been confirmed in recent years by various court rulings in which companies have been sanctioned for inadequate archiving practices. In addition, tax audits are increasingly demanding proof of proper email archiving, which underlines the need for legally compliant documentation practices.

Content Hide
1. Additional challenges: Dealing with claims from the past and protection against abuse
2. Legal basis for e-mail archiving
3. Emails from employees (including former employees)
4. Emails from customers in the SaaS sector and former customers
5. Technical and organizational measures for e-mail archiving
6. Conclusion
6.1. Author: Marian Härtel
Key Facts
  • Email is central to corporate communication and plays an important role in documenting business processes.
  • Companies are obliged to store emails in an audit-proof manner for certain periods of time in order to comply with legal requirements.
  • Non-compliance can lead to financial penalties and criminal prosecution.
  • The GDPR requires responsible handling of personal data in emails.
  • Archiving must be audit-proof to ensure immutability and completeness.
  • Data protection and archiving should include clear guidelines and protocols to ensure compliance.
  • Special requirements for archiving and deleting customer emails are necessary to ensure GDPR compliance.

Additional challenges: Dealing with claims from the past and protection against abuse

An often underestimated risk is dealing with emails that relate to potential claims from the past. Companies must ensure that emails that could be relevant to potential legal proceedings or claims for damages are properly archived and remain accessible. This applies in particular to documents relating to long-standing contractual relationships or former business relationships. In practice, this means that companies should carry out a risk analysis to identify potentially contentious emails and secure them accordingly. An example from case law shows that companies that had not archived relevant contractual correspondence had considerable problems providing evidence in court and suffered considerable disadvantages as a result.

Another important aspect concerns protection against potential misuse by departing employees. It is necessary for companies to define clear processes and access restrictions to prevent unauthorized access to business-relevant data after an employee has left. This includes the prompt deactivation of access and a careful review of email communication for potential risks. Companies should ensure that no confidential information leaves the company unnoticed. It is also advisable to implement control mechanisms to document access to particularly sensitive email data and to be able to trace it if necessary. This significantly minimizes the risk of data leakage and loss of know-how.

By combining proactive archiving guidelines and a structured approach to former employees, companies can ensure that they both comply with legal requirements and minimize operational risks. Early advice from a specialist lawyer in the field of IT and data protection law can offer additional protection here.

Legal basis for e-mail archiving

The archiving of business emails is comprehensively regulated by law in Germany. The main principles are set out in the German Commercial Code (HGB) and the German Fiscal Code (AO). According to § 257 HGB and § 147 AO, companies are obliged to retain certain documents – which may also include emails – for specified periods of time. The periods are either six or ten years, depending on the type of document in question. Emails containing commercial or business letters are generally subject to a six-year retention period. If emails are part of bookkeeping or contain tax-relevant information, a ten-year period applies.

Archiving must also be audit-proof. This means that emails must be stored in such a way as to ensure that they cannot be altered, are complete and are available at all times. The requirements for archiving electronic documents are specified in the Principles for the Proper Keeping and Storage of Books, Records and Documents in Electronic Form and for Data Access (GoBD). This also includes the technical assurance that archived emails cannot be changed or deleted unnoticed. A tamper-proof archiving system is essential here.

Companies should also keep clear deletion logs to prove when and why certain emails were deleted. These logs are particularly important with regard to the GDPR, as they ensure that personal data is properly deleted after the retention period has expired. The documentation of these deletion processes should be regularly reviewed and updated to meet compliance requirements.

Companies should ensure that email archives are encrypted and that access to this data is strictly controlled. The implementation of access rights and logging systems is therefore essential. In addition, regular internal audits should be carried out to ensure that archiving complies with legal requirements. If deficiencies are identified, they must be rectified immediately.

The technical and organizational implementation of audit-proof email archiving should be part of a comprehensive data protection concept. This concept should also include measures to ensure data security, particularly with regard to external attacks and data loss. The implementation of such a strategy not only contributes to legal certainty, but also minimizes the risk of fines and liability cases.

Emails from employees (including former employees)

Archiving emails from employees, especially former employees, poses particular challenges for companies. In principle, all business emails, regardless of the sender, must be archived if they are to be classified as subject to retention in accordance with legal requirements. After an employee leaves the company, it is therefore essential to carry out a thorough review of their mailbox. Business-related emails must continue to be archived in accordance with the legal deadlines. Private emails, on the other hand, if their use was permitted in the company, must be deleted immediately, as otherwise there could be a breach of data protection regulations, in particular the GDPR.

Companies should also ensure that employees are already informed of clear guidelines regarding the separation of private and business emails during the employment relationship. This helps to avoid conflicts afterwards and facilitates the subsequent separation of relevant and non-relevant data. Proactive communication of these guidelines supports compliance and raises awareness of the responsible handling of data.

In addition, the archiving of emails should also include regulations for the protection of trade secrets and sensitive business information. It is advisable to establish special measures, particularly with regard to protection against potential misuse by former employees. These include access restrictions and the logging of data access in order to prevent the misuse of sensitive information.

In addition, all business-related emails should be extracted and stored properly. Companies must pay particular attention to the protection of personal data and ensure that no private information is stored or processed unlawfully. Compliance with the GDPR requires comprehensive documentation that shows what data is stored, for what purpose and for how long. This documentation should be regularly reviewed and updated to comply with legal requirements.

Last but not least, it is advisable to introduce a procedure for the regular review of archived data. This ensures that data that is no longer required is deleted properly and in good time. This not only minimizes data protection risks, but also contributes to the efficiency of data storage. Training for employees on the subject of data protection and archiving can help to raise awareness of this issue.

Emails from customers in the SaaS sector and former customers

The archiving of emails from customers is also subject to strict legal requirements. Especially in the SaaS sector, where many services are handled online and customer contracts are often created digitally, proper archiving is essential. For example, emails that document contractual agreements, arrangements or relevant business processes must be archived in accordance with the general retention periods. If an email contains tax or legally relevant information, it must be stored for ten years.

Particular attention must be paid to emails from former customers. Once a business relationship has ended, companies must ensure that personal data that is no longer required is deleted in accordance with the GDPR. At the same time, data that is relevant under tax or commercial law must continue to be stored. It is important to keep detailed documentation of which data has been stored or deleted and for what reason. Deletion logs are a key instrument for ensuring traceability vis-à-vis supervisory authorities. These logs should document exactly which data was deleted, when the deletion took place and on what legal basis this decision was based.

In addition, companies should establish automated processes to ensure the deletion of personal data once the legal deadlines have expired. Such processes minimize the risk of human error and help to efficiently comply with legal requirements. Companies should also ensure that they use systems to identify relevant emails in order to correctly fulfill the legally prescribed archiving burden.

Data migration also plays a role: if a company changes its archiving systems, all relevant customer data and emails must be transferred securely and completely to the new system. The integrity of the data must be guaranteed. Care must also be taken to ensure that no deletion deadlines are breached during the migration process. Training the responsible employees is of great importance here.

Further attention should be paid to the question of how companies deal with requests from former customers who request information about their stored data or wish it to be deleted. Companies are obliged to comply with these requests and must provide processes and documentation that meet these requirements.

The GDPR also requires that data must not be stored for longer than necessary. Companies should therefore carry out regular internal audits to ensure that data storage complies with legal requirements. It must also be ensured that data in different systems is deleted correctly and that the deletion process is documented.

It must also be ensured that the archived data is adequately protected. This includes encrypted storage solutions, access controls and logging of access. In the event of security incidents, those affected and the supervisory authorities must be informed quickly and transparently.

In summary, the proper archiving of emails in the SaaS sector and the GDPR-compliant management of data from former customers requires a clear and documented process. This is the only way to minimize legal risks and ensure compliance.

Technical and organizational measures for e-mail archiving

The legally compliant archiving of emails requires both technical and organizational measures. Companies should use specialized archiving systems that enable audit-proof storage. These systems must ensure that emails are stored in an unalterable, complete and orderly manner. In particular, systems that enable automatic recognition of emails requiring archiving and can assign them directly to the appropriate categories are recommended.

In addition, companies should create detailed procedural documentation that describes the email archiving processes. This documentation should be regularly reviewed and updated to ensure that it complies with current legal requirements. It is also important to implement deletion logs that document in detail when and why certain emails were deleted. These logs are a central component of the evidence provided to data protection authorities.

Another key element is ensuring access controls that prevent unauthorized persons from accessing archived emails. Access rights should be regularly checked and documented. The introduction of a role and authorization concept contributes to legal certainty. In addition, systems should be set up that log every access to archived data and make it evaluable if necessary.

The physical and digital security of archive systems is also of great importance. This includes encrypted storage media and regular security audits that identify and eliminate potential vulnerabilities. Companies should also pay attention to the implementation of back-up systems that guarantee data recovery in the event of a system failure or attack.

Furthermore, employee training is essential in order to raise awareness of the requirements for email archiving. In particular, topics such as the identification of emails requiring archiving, compliance with deletion deadlines and the handling of personal data should be taught. Case studies and practical exercises can help to raise awareness of potential risks. Employees should also be trained in how to correctly categorize emails and which criteria are used to determine the archiving obligation. Regular training and workshops are recommended here to ensure that knowledge remains up to date and new legal developments are taken into account.

Conclusion

The legally compliant archiving of emails is of crucial importance for companies. In addition to complying with legal obligations, such as those prescribed by the GDPR, the German Commercial Code (HGB) or the German Tax Code (AO), companies also minimize considerable liability risks with a structured archiving strategy. Missing or inadequate archiving can not only lead to financial penalties, but can also result in the loss of important business documents, which can be detrimental in legal proceedings.

In addition, proper archiving protects against reputational damage that can result from data breaches or data protection violations. A transparent and documented archiving process shows customers and business partners that the company takes data protection seriously and handles sensitive information responsibly.

As a specialized lawyer, I will be happy to assist you with the individual and legally compliant implementation of your email archiving. I will support you in analyzing existing systems, implementing legally compliant processes and creating the necessary procedural documentation. Benefit from my in-depth expertise in IT and data protection law and secure your company’s compliance in the long term. Let’s work together to develop an archiving strategy that protects your company from legal risks and strengthens it in the long term.

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Weitere spannende Blogposts

EU adopts copyright reform

7. November 2022

The more than controversial copyright reform were finally implemented today and a majority of the states of the EU have...

Read moreDetails

Berlin District Court bans baseless Twitter ban

Berlin District Court bans baseless Twitter ban
24. May 2019

In a preliminary injunction, the Landgericht Berlin has prohibited the unfounded blocking of a Twitter account on the basis of...

Read moreDetails

Federal Court of Justice and “climate neutral”

BGH considers Uber Black to be anti-competitive
10. July 2024

The Federal Court of Justice has ruled that advertising with an ambiguous environmental term (here: "climate neutral") is only permissible...

Read moreDetails

OLG Cologne on the identification of affiliate links

Attention: Affiliates on YouTube, gaming websites and other networks
7. November 2022

On the question of whether and how affiliate links on websites must be identified, there have already been several decisions...

Read moreDetails

Right of withdrawal for sales of blockchain content

Right of withdrawal for sales of blockchain content
22. December 2022

Content from blockchain providers in particular, be it coins of various kinds, utility tokens, security tokens or NFTs, is generally...

Read moreDetails

2x Gamesrecht at the Federal Court of Justice, supervised by RA Marian Härtel

Small summary – Blizzard vs. Bossland
23. February 2023

So nine years I am now admitted to the bar and next week, 6/10/2016 to be exact, I will be...

Read moreDetails

Epic Games’ victory in the antitrust dispute against Google Play Store: a turning point for the app economy?

Epic Games’ victory in the antitrust dispute against Google Play Store: a turning point for the app economy?
12. December 2023

Oh wow: Epic Games, the developer behind the world-famous game Fortnite, has scored a remarkable victory in an unprecedented antitrust...

Read moreDetails

Protect streamers from warnings

youtube 3503481 960 720
21. November 2018

As I have pointed out several times in posts, the risk of running into the warning trap, especially from young,...

Read moreDetails

Selling a craft business – legal, tax and practical tips for succession

handwerksbetrieb verkaufen rechtliche steuerliche und praktische tipps zur nachfolge
21. April 2025

A profitable craft business cannot be sold overnight. Over the next few years, thousands of skilled crafts businesses in Germany...

Read moreDetails
Achtung mit Black Friday Werbung!
Uncategorized

Firmennamen schützen: Domainrecht, Markenrecht und Namensrecht in Deutschland

11. December 2025

Die Wahl eines Unternehmensnamens ist für Gründerinnen und Gründer eine strategische Entscheidung – kreativ, aber vor allem auch rechtlich. Domainname,...

Read moreDetails
ai generated g63ed67bf8 1280

Urheberrecht und KI-Training vor Hamburger Gerichten

11. December 2025
BGH hält Uber Black für wettbewerbswidrig

Britische Anbieter, deutscher Gerichtsstand

10. December 2025
LogoRechteck

LawOMate startet in den Alphatest: Legal Automation wird zur Infrastruktur

3. December 2025
EU-Chatcontrol und Digital Services Act: Was sich für Spieleentwickler und Online-Plattformen wirklich ändert

EU-Chatcontrol und Digital Services Act: Was sich für Spieleentwickler und Online-Plattformen wirklich ändert

2. December 2025

Podcastfolge

Rechtliche Basics für Startup-Gründer – So startest du auf der sicheren Seite!

Rechtliche Basics für Startup-Gründer – So startest du auf der sicheren Seite!

1. November 2024

In dieser Episode des Itmedialaw Podcasts nimmt euch Rechtsanwalt und Unternehmer Marian Härtel mit auf eine Reise durch den rechtlichen...

Read moreDetails
Der IT Media Law Podcast. Folge Nr. 1: Worum geht es hier eigentlich?

Der IT Media Law Podcast. Folge Nr. 1: Worum geht es hier eigentlich?

26. August 2024
“Digitales Recht Entschlüsselt” mit Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel

“Digitales Recht Entschlüsselt” mit Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel

25. September 2024
Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

20. April 2025
Rechtliche Beratung für Startups – Investitionen, die sich lohnen

Rechtliche Beratung für Startups – Investitionen, die sich lohnen

17. November 2024

Video

Mein transparente Abrechnung

Mein transparente Abrechnung

10. February 2025

In diesem Video rede ich ein wenig über transparente Abrechnung und wie ich kommuniziere, was es kostet, wenn man mit...

Read moreDetails
Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

10. February 2025
Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

10. February 2025
Was mich wirklich freut

Was mich wirklich freut

10. February 2025
Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

10. February 2025
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung