ChatGPT and lawyers: recordings of the Weblaw launch event
Lego brick still protected as a design patent
dsgvo 1
Smart contracts in the insurance industry: contract design and regulatory compliance for InsurTech start-ups
AI content for subscription platforms
E-sports finally charitable? What the government draft of the Tax Amendment Act 2025 really brings
Clubs, photos and minors: managing consent properly
AI faces, voice clones and deepfakes in advertising: rules of the game under the EU AI Act and German law
Modding in EULAs and contracts – what applies legally in Germany?
Arbitration agreements in EULAs and developer contracts
Chain of title in game development: building a clean chain of rights
Fail-fast clauses in media productions – what are they actually?
Founder’s agreement vs. shareholder agreement: setting the course for startups at an early stage
Cheat software without code intervention: What the BGH really decided in the Sony ./. Datel case (I ZR 157/21)
Digital integrity as a (new) fundamental right: status in Germany and the EU in 2025
European Economic Interest Grouping (EEIG)
Upload filters between copyright and personal rights
On-demand transmission right in the digital space: streaming, Section 19a UrhG and licensing
Q&A: Legal issues for game developers

No products in the cart.

Be careful not to offer only binary login options!

In this insightful video, we shed light on an often overlooked topic: gender information in registration forms on websites.
First, we use illustrative examples to show why the common practice of only offering “male” and “female” is problematic.
Many people with diverse gender identities feel excluded and discriminated against as a result.
But then I myself, as a lawyer, have my say and give urgent advice on the legal situation.
I explain that the General Equal Treatment Act (AGG) prohibits discrimination on the basis of gender – and not just for binary options, but also for diverse gender identities.
Website operators who only offer “male” and “female” run the risk of violating the AGG.
I illustrate the possible consequences using the example of Deutsche Bahn, which was sued and had to pay a hefty fine.
I emphasize that this risk not only affects large companies, but all providers of goods and services – including start-ups with online stores and digital platforms.
I urge viewers to take this issue seriously and check their registration forms thoroughly.
My advice: offer at least a third option such as “diverse” or do without the gender query altogether if it is not absolutely necessary.
This will help you avoid legal pitfalls and show your appreciation for diversity at the same time.
Finally, I would like to refer you to our detailed blog post on this topic, which you can find here.
There we go into even more detail and provide further valuable tips for a non-discriminatory design of your website.
This video is a must for all website operators who want to be legally compliant and inclusive.
Take a look and find out more about this important topic!

Key Facts
  • Ungleichbehandlung aufgrund von Geschlecht ist laut AGG verboten; es sollten mehr als nur "männlich" und "weiblich" angeboten werden.
  • Die Nichtbeachtung dieser Bestimmungen kann zu rechtlichen Konsequenzen führen, wie im Fall von Deutsche Bahn, die hohe Geldstrafen zahlen musste.

Weitere spannende Blogposts

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.