• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

When will the BGH finally get involved in the matter of FernUSG and coaching contracts?

24. September 2024
in Other
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
0
b41de75f28e43e4a77e9129cf8abd64c
Key Facts
  • The OLG Stuttgart declared a coaching contract null and void due to a breach of the FernUSG.
  • The provider did not have the required license pursuant to Section 12 (1) FernUSG.
  • Customers can reclaim €23,800 already paid.
  • The courts show different interpretations of the FernUSG.
  • Legal uncertainty primarily affects expensive coaching programs for entrepreneurs.
  • Clarification by the Federal Supreme Court is urgently needed.
  • There is also a need for a reform of the Distance Learning Act for digital forms of teaching.

In a recent ruling (OLG Stuttgart, judgment of 01.08.2024 – 4 U 101/24), the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart declared a coaching contract null and void due to a breach of the German Distance Learning Protection Act (FernUSG). The provider did not have the license required under Section 12 (1) FernUSG. The customer was therefore able to reclaim the remuneration of €23,800 already paid.

Content Hide
1. Physical separation also for online lessons
2. Learning success control with low requirements
3. Legal uncertainty for the coaching industry
4. High court clarification urgently needed
4.1. Author: Marian Härtel

The ruling is one of a series of recent decisions by various higher regional courts on this topic:

1 OLG Celle, judgment of 01.03.2023 – 3 U 85/22 (per applicability FernUSG)
2 OLG Hamburg, judgment of 20.02.2024 – 10 U 44/23 (contrary to applicability of FernUSG)
3 OLG Cologne, judgment of 06.12.2023 – 2 U 24/23 (contrary to applicability of FernUSG)
4 OLG Munich, judgment of 18.01.2023 – 29 U 6497/22 (contrary to applicability of FernUSG)
5 LG Hamburg, judgment of 19.07.2023 – 304 O 277/22 (per applicability FernUSG)
6 LG Munich I, judgment of 18.07.2023 – 37 O 15493/22 (contra applicability FernUSG)
7 LG Ravensburg, judgment of 11.07.2023 – 5 O 25/23 (contrary to applicability of FernUSG)
8. regional court Frankfurt a.M., judgment of 03.05.2023 – 2-06 O 256/22 (contra applicability FernUSG)
9 LG Stuttgart, judgment of 19.12.2023 – 3 O 108/23 (per applicability FernUSG)
10. regional court Heilbronn, judgment of 19.12.2023 – 3 O 108/23 (contra applicability FernUSG)

No uniform line has yet emerged with regard to the interpretation of the constituent elements of the FernUSG. In fact, the courts have come to contradictory conclusions in some cases. Clarification by the Federal Supreme Court is therefore urgently required in order to create legal certainty for providers and participants.

Physical separation also for online lessons

The Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart clarified that online teaching also constitutes physical separation within the meaning of Section 1 (1) FernUSG, even if synchronous communication between teachers and learners is possible. The decisive factor is that teaching does not take place in person. The legislator intended all forms of teaching that do not take place in person to be subject to the FernUSG. A restrictive interpretation of video conferencing is not appropriate.

Rather, there is a particular need to protect participants from dubious providers. The court thus rejected the argument that video conferencing offers a comparable level of interaction to face-to-face events. In this respect, it followed the line of the Higher Regional Court of Celle (judgment of 01.03.2023 – 3 U 85/22). In contrast, the Higher Regional Court of Hamburg (judgment of 20.02.2024 – 10 U 44/23) and the Higher Regional Court of Cologne (judgment of 06.12.2023 – 2 U 24/23) had taken a more restrictive interpretation.

Learning success control with low requirements

The Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart also considered the monitoring of learning success within the meaning of Section 1 (1) No. 2 FernUSG to be given. It was sufficient for this if the participants could ask questions in the meetings to check their understanding. Further learning control was not necessary.

The court thus agreed with the broad interpretation of the criterion by the BGH (judgment of 15.10.2009 – III ZR 310/08). However, there is no unanimity among the higher regional courts in this respect either. For example, the Higher Regional Court of Hamburg (judgment of 20.02.2024 – 10 U 44/23) and the Higher Regional Court of Cologne (judgment of 06.12.2023 – 2 U 24/23) require a review of the content of the learning material by the teacher beyond the mere possibility of asking questions. The Higher Regional Court of Celle (judgment of 01.03.2023 – 3 U 85/22) expressly left the question open. However, in view of the broad understanding of the BGH, the approach of the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart is likely to be preferable.

Legal uncertainty for the coaching industry

The ruling is a bombshell for the booming coaching industry. Many providers are unlikely to have a license under the FernUSG. Their contracts could therefore be null and void. Customers would then have a good chance of reclaiming fees already paid.

This also applies to expensive coaching programs, which are often aimed at entrepreneurs and the self-employed. Five-figure sums are quickly involved here. Providers can also not rely on the fact that their contracts will stand up to a general terms and conditions review. According to the case law of the BGH (judgment of 15.10.2009 – III ZR 310/08), the scope of application of the FernUSG is opened up if the requirements are met according to the overall picture of the contract design. Individual deviating GTC clauses cannot change this.

However, the legal situation is anything but clear. Other higher regional courts such as Hamburg and Munich take a much more skeptical view of the applicability of the FernUSG to coaching contracts. They interpret the requirements more narrowly.

For example, the OLG Munich (judgment of 18.01.2023 – 29 U 6497/22) denied the characteristic of predominant physical distance in an online coaching program. It also did not consider the requirement to monitor learning success to be fulfilled. The mere possibility of asking questions was not sufficient for this. Rather, the content of the learning material must be reviewed by the teacher.

Against this background, the courts come to different conclusions even in comparable situations. This shows the great legal uncertainty that exists here.

High court clarification urgently needed

In order to create legal certainty, the Federal Supreme Court must clarify the central issues of the FernUSG as soon as possible. This primarily concerns the following points:

– When is physical separation necessary? Are online formats sufficient or is physical distance necessary? What is the significance of synchronous communication options such as video conferencing?

– What requirements apply to the assessment of learning success? Is it sufficient to simply ask questions or must the content of the learning material be checked by the teacher? How is this to be assessed in coaching programs that are less about pure knowledge transfer and more about guidance and support?

– Does the FernUSG also apply to contracts with entrepreneurs or only to consumers? To date, the courts of lower instances have not taken a uniform line on this either. While some advocate its application only to consumers, others consider the FernUSG to also apply to business participants.

In view of the great practical significance and the inconsistent case law, there is an urgent need for clarification here. The legislator is also called upon to adapt the FernUSG to the digital age.

The law dates back to 1976 and has remained essentially unchanged since then. It does not take sufficient account of today’s technical possibilities and teaching methods. A reform is therefore overdue. This is the only way to find an appropriate balance between the protection of participants and entrepreneurial freedom.

Hopefully the BGH will soon take the opportunity to provide more clarity. The coaching industry will thank it. Until then, providers and participants can only follow the further development of case law closely.

Looking at the judgments listed, the view that the FernUSG is applicable to coaching contracts is currently roughly balanced by the opposing view. Of the 10 decisions cited, 5 are in favor and 5 against applicability. It remains to be seen how the BGH will position itself on this issue. Until then, there will unfortunately continue to be considerable legal uncertainty for the sector.

 

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: AGBBghbillCase lawCelleContract designDevelopmentEntscheidungenFederal courtFrankfurtHamburgJudgmentJudgmentsLegal certaintyolgReformVerträge

Weitere spannende Blogposts

BGH: Press organ may publish unsolicited book manuscripts

BGH: Press organ may publish unsolicited book manuscripts
7. November 2022

The Federal Court of Justice ruled that the publication of book articles by a member of the Bundestag on an...

Read moreDetails

T&Cs, regulation & compliance in blockchain & computer games: What you need to know

T&Cs, regulation & compliance in blockchain & computer games: What you need to know
14. December 2022

Introduction: why T&Cs, regulation & compliance are important in the blockchain and computer gaming space. Entering new technologies and industries...

Read moreDetails

Why ‘Payable within 14 days’ on your invoice could be legal nonsense ;-)

Why ‘Payable within 14 days’ on your invoice could be legal nonsense ;-)
13. June 2023

Introduction: In my career, I have often seen the phrase "Payable within 14 days" on invoices. It's almost as if...

Read moreDetails

New operating system at work? No right of co-determination for employees!

Twitter account needs approval of works council
7. November 2022

An interesting decision from an area that is not really considered a major IT issue was announced today by the...

Read moreDetails

Invoice for fake order? BGH says: Is anti-competitive

Online shops: Attention to advertising with EIA
23. September 2019

The Federal Court of Justice has passed a judgment that could well have the potential to cause headaches for many...

Read moreDetails

Obligation to impress: Can i link to an external website?

Social media accounts and imprint
3. December 2019

There is always controversy and uncertainty around the imprint obligation of social media profiles, but also of profiles on Twitch...

Read moreDetails

Trademark infringement through metatags and SEO plugins

51c69c04ef4a8420f3746eeb9c918284
18. September 2024

The use of third-party trademarks in meta tags or via SEO plugins is a common practice in digital marketing, but...

Read moreDetails

Right of withdrawal for sales of blockchain content

Right of withdrawal for sales of blockchain content
22. December 2022

Content from blockchain providers in particular, be it coins of various kinds, utility tokens, security tokens or NFTs, is generally...

Read moreDetails

The Future Finance Act and its significance for crypto equities

The Future Finance Act and its significance for crypto equities
8. January 2024

With today's publication of the Future Financing Act in the Federal Law Gazette, Germany is entering a new era of...

Read moreDetails
Liquidation preference

Liquidation preference

16. October 2024

A liquidation preference is a contractual provision that grants certain shareholders, usually investors, a preferential right to a portion of...

Read moreDetails
Firma

Firma

1. July 2023
GmbH & Co KG

GmbH & Co KG

25. June 2023
influencer recht

Influencer Law

26. June 2023
0a33de40 2ae4 401e 98dc b0d021b16861 204222195

Revenue-Based Financing

29. March 2025

Podcast Folgen

3c671c5134443338a4e0c30412ac3270

“Digital law decoded” with lawyer Marian Härtel

26. September 2024

In this exciting 30-minute podcast, lawyer Marian Härtel decodes the complex world of digital law for the self-employed, start-ups and...

da884f9e2769f2f96d6b74255be62c27

The role of the IT lawyer

5. September 2024

In this exciting podcast episode, we delve into the fascinating world of IT start-ups and find out why an experienced...

c9c5d7fd380061a8018074c2ca5a81bf

Startups and innovation in Germany – challenges and opportunities

26. September 2024

This insightful podcast episode takes an in-depth look at the startup and innovation landscape in Germany and Europe. The discussion...

d00527fd01b1f807a4f80c0f202069e7

Legal basics for startup founders – how to start on the safe side!

9. November 2024

In this episode of the Itmedialaw podcast, lawyer and entrepreneur Marian Härtel takes you on a journey through the legal...

  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung