• Areas of expertise
  • |
  • About me
  • |
  • Principles as a lawyer
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Ideal partner
      • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Video series – about me
      • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
      • Principles as a lawyer
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Nerd und Rechtsanwalt
      • Ideal partner
      • How can I help clients?
    • Über die Kanzlei
      • How clients benefit from my network of colleagues, partners and service providers
      • Quick and flexible access
      • Agile and lean law firm
      • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
      • Price overview
    • How can I help clients?
    • Sonstige Informationen
      • Einwilligungen widerrufen
      • Privatsphäre-Einstellungen ändern
      • Historie der Privatsphäre-Einstellungen
      • Privacy policy
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Leistungen
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Support with the foundation
      • Games law consulting
      • Advice in e-commerce
      • Support and advice of agencies
      • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
      • Legal compliance and expert opinions
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Arbeitsschwerpunkte
      • Games and esports law
        • Esports. What is it?
      • Corporate law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Consulting for influencers and streamers
        • Influencer & Streamer
      • Contract review and preparation
      • DLT and Blockchain consulting
        • Blockchain Overview
      • Investment advice
      • AI and SaaS
  • Artikel/News
    • Langartikel / Guides
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Law on the Internet
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Online retail
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Labour law
    • Tax
    • Kanzlei News
    • Other
  • Videos/Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Kurz-Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Ideal partner
      • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Video series – about me
      • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
      • Principles as a lawyer
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Nerd und Rechtsanwalt
      • Ideal partner
      • How can I help clients?
    • Über die Kanzlei
      • How clients benefit from my network of colleagues, partners and service providers
      • Quick and flexible access
      • Agile and lean law firm
      • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
      • Price overview
    • How can I help clients?
    • Sonstige Informationen
      • Einwilligungen widerrufen
      • Privatsphäre-Einstellungen ändern
      • Historie der Privatsphäre-Einstellungen
      • Privacy policy
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Leistungen
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Support with the foundation
      • Games law consulting
      • Advice in e-commerce
      • Support and advice of agencies
      • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
      • Legal compliance and expert opinions
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Arbeitsschwerpunkte
      • Games and esports law
        • Esports. What is it?
      • Corporate law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Consulting for influencers and streamers
        • Influencer & Streamer
      • Contract review and preparation
      • DLT and Blockchain consulting
        • Blockchain Overview
      • Investment advice
      • AI and SaaS
  • Artikel/News
    • Langartikel / Guides
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Law on the Internet
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Online retail
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Labour law
    • Tax
    • Kanzlei News
    • Other
  • Videos/Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Kurz-Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Contact
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
Home Other

15 common misconceptions about terminology in the startup sector

13. August 2024
in Other
Reading Time: 11 mins read
0 0
A A
0
information
Key Facts
  • Company is only the official name, while the company is the economic entity.
  • Managing directors and board members have different rights and duties in a GmbH and AG.
  • Prokura confers comprehensive power of representation, whereas power of attorney is usually limited.
  • Share capital is the legally prescribed amount for GmbHs, while equity shows the economic strength.
  • Turnover is not the same as profit; both terms are crucial for sustainable growth.
  • Participation refers to shares in a company, while partnership refers to a contractual cooperation.
  • Bootstrapping uses own funds for financing, while fundraising is aimed at external investors.

As a lawyer who advises many start-ups and young entrepreneurs, I often come across errors in the use of technical terms. Here are 15 typical examples that are often misunderstood or misused:

Content Hide
1. Company vs. company
2. Managing director vs. board of directors
3. Prokura vs. power of attorney
4. Share capital vs. equity capital
5. Turnover vs. profit
6. Participation vs. partnership
7. Founder vs. shareholder
8. Pitch deck vs. business plan
9. Vesting vs. Cliff
10. Scaling vs. growth
11. Venture capital vs. private equity
12. Burn rate vs. runway
13. Bootstrapping vs. fundraising
14. MVP vs. PoC
15. Pivot vs. Persevere

Company vs. company

The term “company” is often used as a synonym for “enterprise”. In fact, however, the company is only the official name under which a company is entered in the commercial register and operates. The company itself is the economic and organizational unit that carries out business activities. The company is, so to speak, the figurehead of the company, while the enterprise comprises the organization behind it with all its resources and activities. Every company needs a company, but not every company necessarily has to correspond to an enterprise. For example, an entrepreneur can have several companies under which he operates on the market. Conversely, a company cannot exist without an associated company. It is also interesting to note that many self-employed people or partners in a GbR often talk about their “company”, although strictly speaking they cannot have a company at all. This is because a company requires registration in the commercial register, which is only the case for merchants or certain types of company such as a GmbH or AG. Freelancers or GbRs can have a company name, but not a company in the legal sense.

https://itmedialaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/15-Fehler-bei-Fachbegriffen-erklaert.mp4

Managing director vs. board of directors

In a GmbH there are managing directors, in an AG there is a management board. Although both are legal representatives of the company, they have different rights and duties. For example, the management board is independent of instructions, while managing directors may be bound by instructions from the shareholders’ meeting. The liability rules also differ: Management boards are only personally liable in cases of intent or gross negligence, whereas managing directors can also be held liable for simple negligence. On the other hand, the appointment and dismissal of managing directors is simpler than for board members. While managing directors can be dismissed at any time and without giving reasons, this is only possible for board members for good cause. There is a further difference in terms of remuneration: Management Board members are entitled to “appropriate” remuneration, whereas the remuneration of managing directors is freely negotiable. Pensions are also often more generously regulated for board members. Unlike managing directors, board members can be shareholders in the company, but must observe special rules such as reporting obligations and trading bans.

Prokura vs. power of attorney

A power of attorney gives a person comprehensive power of representation for all of the company’s ordinary transactions. A power of attorney, on the other hand, is usually limited to certain business areas or branches. In addition, a prokura must be entered in the commercial register, whereas a power of attorney does not. The authorized signatory can therefore represent the company externally almost like a managing director, whereas an authorized agent may only act within their defined area. However, the power of attorney can also contain certain restrictions, e.g. a ban on real estate transactions. The power of attorney can also be revoked at any time. It expires automatically when the authorized signatory leaves the company. However, the power of attorney can also be granted for a limited period of time and does not necessarily have to be linked to an employment relationship. A special form of power of attorney is the joint power of attorney, in which two or more persons are only authorized to represent the company jointly. This is intended to provide additional control and security, but also restricts flexibility.

Share capital vs. equity capital

The share capital is the amount that the shareholders must pay in when a GmbH is founded. It is part of the equity capital, which also includes other items such as retained earnings. The share capital serves as a liability fund for creditors, while the total equity shows the economic strength of the company. The amount of share capital is prescribed by law and is at least EUR 25,000. However, it can also be set higher. Equity capital, on the other hand, is constantly changing due to profits, losses and withdrawals. It is an important indicator of a company’s creditworthiness and credit standing. The higher the equity ratio, the better the financing structure usually is. However, it should be noted that the equity shown in the balance sheet does not always correspond to the capital actually available. Hidden reserves or intangible assets are often not fully reflected. Conversely, a company can get into difficulties despite having a high level of equity if it does not have sufficient liquid funds. It is therefore important for start-ups to ensure sufficient liquidity in addition to share capital, e.g. through investors or bank loans.

Turnover vs. profit

Turnover is the sum of all income from sales and services. However, it says nothing about whether the company is profitable. You have to deduct expenses and taxes to determine the profit. Although high turnover is impressive, it is worthless in the long term without sufficient profits. Many start-ups make the mistake of focusing too much on sales growth and losing sight of costs. However, a company can only grow sustainably if the profit margins are right. It should be noted that there are different profit concepts: From gross profit to operating profit to net profit. The decisive factor is ultimately what remains at the bottom line. Cash flow is also important, i.e. the inflow of liquid funds. After all, profits on paper are of little use if the money is not actually available, e.g. because customers pay late. Start-ups should therefore not only keep an eye on sales and profit development, but also on liquidity planning. This is the only way to ensure solvency and avoid insolvency.

Participation vs. partnership

The terms participation and partnership are often used interchangeably, but there are important differences. A shareholding means that you hold shares in a company and are therefore a co-partner. Depending on the size of the shareholding, you have certain voting and control rights. A partnership, on the other hand, is a contractual cooperation between two or more parties without a joint company being formed. These can be strategic alliances, joint ventures or distribution partnerships, for example. Here, the partners remain legally and economically independent, but work closely together in certain areas. Partnerships are more flexible than shareholdings, but also less binding. They are particularly suitable for projects that are limited in terms of time or content, while participations are designed for long-term cooperation. However, there are also mixed forms such as silent partnerships or profit-participating loans. Here, the investor receives a share of the profits but does not have a stake in the company itself. Both equity investments and partnerships can be interesting for start-ups, depending on the objectives and financing requirements. A clear contractual regulation of rights and obligations is important.

Founder vs. shareholder

The terms founder and shareholder are often equated, but there are also differences here. Founders are the people who bring a company to life and build it up. They develop the business idea, create the business plan and drive its implementation. Shareholders, on the other hand, are the owners of the company who hold shares and thus provide capital. In the start-up phase, founders are often also shareholders, but this does not always have to be the case. On the one hand, founders can sell all or part of their shares, e.g. to investors. On the other hand, new shareholders who were not involved in the start-up can be taken on. Conversely, founders can also withdraw from the operating business but continue to hold shares. One example is the so-called “shadow founders”, who are significantly involved in the development of the company but do not appear publicly. Succession arrangements or takeovers can also lead to a decoupling of founders and shareholders. It can be very important for the public image of a start-up that the founders remain on board, even if they no longer hold the majority of shares. This is because they represent the identity and values of the company.

Pitch deck vs. business plan

The pitch deck and the business plan are both important documents for start-ups, but fulfill different purposes. The pitch deck is a short presentation, usually in the form of slides, which summarizes the key points of the business model. It serves to quickly convince potential investors or partners and arouse their interest. It is therefore very visual and focuses on the unique selling points and market potential. The business plan, on the other hand, is a comprehensive document that describes all aspects of the company in detail: From the business idea to the market and competitive analysis to the financial plan and risk factors. It serves as a roadmap for implementation and is important for raising capital and managing the company. While the pitch deck has a more promotional character, the business plan is a sober analysis of the business model. Ideally, both documents complement each other: The pitch deck arouses interest, the business plan provides the details. However, it does not always make sense to disclose the complete business plan, e.g. to competitors. In this case, a light version or an executive summary may be sufficient. The target group is also different: the pitch deck is aimed at a broader audience, while the business plan is aimed more at experts such as investors or banks.

Vesting vs. Cliff

Vesting and cliff are terms that play an important role in the participation of employees and founders in start-ups. Vesting means that the shares are not transferred in full immediately, but over a certain period of time. This is intended to ensure that those involved remain committed to the company in the long term. A typical vesting period is four years, with the shares being transferred in equal steps each year. The cliff is a blocking period at the beginning of the vesting period during which no shares are transferred. The actual transfer only begins once the cliff has been exceeded. A typical cliff is twelve months. This is intended to prevent participants from leaving the company early and still taking shares with them. Vesting and cliff thus ensure a fair distribution of shares and an alignment of interests between the company and those involved. However, the regulations can be very complex in individual cases, e.g. when it comes to the valuation of shares or tax treatment. The question of what happens in the event of premature departure or termination must also be clarified. There are various models here, such as the repurchase of shares or the forfeiture of shares that have not yet been transferred (reverse vesting). In any case, the vesting conditions should be set out in writing and understood and accepted by all parties involved.

Scaling vs. growth

Scaling and growth are often used interchangeably but refer to different concepts. Growth means that a company increases its sales and profits by deploying more resources and expanding its activities. This can be done, for example, by hiring additional employees, opening up new markets or expanding the product portfolio. Scaling, on the other hand, means that a company increases its turnover disproportionately to the resources deployed. In other words, it achieves growth without

the costs grow at the same rate. Scaling requires a scalable business model in which the variable costs are low and the marginal costs fall as the output volume increases. Examples include software-as-a-service or platform models. While growth is therefore more quantitatively oriented, scaling aims to improve the quality of the business model. Growth can also be achieved through scaling, but not all growth is automatically scalable. The levers in the business model that enable a disproportionate increase in turnover and profit are decisive. These include, for example, network effects, automation or self-service components. Start-ups should therefore pay attention to scalability from the outset and align their business model accordingly. This is the only way to achieve high valuations and a successful exit.

Venture capital vs. private equity

Venture capital and private equity are both forms of equity financing, but differ in their focus and target group. Venture capital refers to the financing of young, innovative companies with high growth potential, but also high risk. Investors provide equity capital and receive shares in the company in return. They support the start-up not only financially, but also with know-how and networks. The aim is a successful exit, e.g. through an IPO or a takeover. Private equity, on the other hand, refers to investments in established, often medium-sized companies. The focus here is less on growth and more on increasing value, e.g. through restructuring or expansion. Investors usually have a longer investment horizon and aim to achieve a return by selling their shares. In contrast to venture capital, financing is often provided through debt capital, e.g. in the form of leveraged buyouts. Venture capital is the more suitable form of financing for start-ups, as they generally do not yet have any collateral or stable cash flows. However, competition for venture capital is fierce and the requirements for the business model and growth potential are high.

Burn rate vs. runway

The burn rate and runway are important key figures for start-ups to assess their liquidity and viability. The burn rate describes the speed at which a startup uses up its financial resources. It results from the difference between monthly income and expenditure. A high burn rate means that the company is losing money quickly and will soon need new capital. The runway, on the other hand, refers to the period for which the available funds are still sufficient to cover the burn rate. It results from the ratio of available capital to the burn rate. A long runway means that the startup still has a good financial reach and can concentrate on its business. Both key figures are closely linked: The higher the burn rate, the shorter the runway. Startups should therefore keep a close eye on their burn rate and optimize it by controlling costs and increasing sales. At the same time, it is important to extend the runway through forward-looking financing rounds. Because if the money runs out, there is a risk of insolvency or emergency financing on poor terms. A healthy burn rate and a sufficient runway are also important signals for investors that the startup has its finances under control.

Bootstrapping vs. fundraising

Bootstrapping and fundraising are two contrasting approaches to financing start-ups. In bootstrapping, the founders largely do without external investors and finance themselves from their own funds or current income. This can be through savings, side jobs or initial sales. The advantage is that the founders retain full control over their company and do not have to give up any shares. The disadvantage is that growth is usually slower and large investments are difficult. Fundraising, on the other hand, refers to the active search for external investors, whether through venture capital, business angels or crowdfunding. Large sums of money can be raised quickly to accelerate growth or open up new markets. However, shares must be given up and co-determination rights granted. Expectations regarding returns and exit times are also often high. Which approach is the right one depends on the business model, market dynamics and the founders’ goals. Some start-ups rely on a mixture of bootstrapping and fundraising by initially launching self-financed and later bringing targeted investors on board. In any case, careful financial planning and control is essential.

MVP vs. PoC

MVP and PoC are both concepts from the lean startup methodology for testing business ideas quickly and cost-effectively. MVP stands for “Minimum Viable Product” and refers to the first, still incomplete version of a product that is just sufficient to demonstrate the key functions and obtain customer feedback. The aim is to find out with minimal effort whether the product has a market and which features are really needed. This helps to avoid costly undesirable developments and improve the product iteratively. PoC, on the other hand, stands for “Proof of Concept” and refers to an even earlier step in the development process. The aim here is to prove the fundamental feasibility of an idea or technology without already having a concrete product. This can be done using prototypes, simulations or theoretical considerations. A PoC is the preliminary stage to an MVP, so to speak, and serves to minimize the technical and economic risk before major investments are made. Both concepts are important for start-ups to validate their ideas and use their resources efficiently. However, they also require a certain amount of discipline and focus in order to avoid getting bogged down in detail or getting bogged down.

Pivot vs. Persevere

Pivot and persevere are two options for start-ups when they realize that their original business model is not working or the hoped-for success is not materializing. Pivot means that the startup fundamentally changes its strategy and realigns itself. This may mean targeting a new market, solving a different problem or developing a completely new product. The pivot often requires a radical change to the business model and internal processes, but can also open up new opportunities. Persevere, on the other hand, means that the startup sticks to its original strategy and tries to achieve success after all by making adjustments and optimizations. This can make sense if the basic problem has been recognized and the solution is fundamentally correct, but has not yet been implemented perfectly. However, there is also a risk of holding on to a lost cause for too long and wasting valuable time and resources. The decision between pivot and persevere is often one of the most difficult for start-ups and requires an honest analysis of the situation and the chances of success. Key figures such as customer satisfaction, retention rate or conversion rate, as well as feedback from mentors and investors, can help. Ultimately, every startup has to find its own path and the right balance between perseverance and adaptability.

Of course, there are many other terms that are often misused or misunderstood in the startup context. However, the 15 examples presented here are intended to provide a good overview of the most important concepts and pitfalls. As a startup, you should familiarize yourself with the correct terminology at an early stage in order to present yourself professionally and avoid misunderstandings. At the same time, it is also important not to get lost in terminology, but to keep the focus on the essentials: The development of a convincing product, the acquisition of customers and the establishment of a viable business model. After all, it is not theory but practice that ultimately determines the success of a start-up.

Tags: AnalyseAutomationBusinessCommercial registerCreditorDevelopmentEmployeesEquityFinancingGrowthInsolvencyInvestmentsKündigungLawyerReviewRiskserviceSicherheitSoftwareStartupsTechnology

Beliebte Beträge

The legal protection of a business plan

5b698c02ae6e02ed43d05d01c467b658
24. September 2024

A business plan is an indispensable strategic document for start-ups and company founders. It serves as a roadmap for business...

Read moreDetails

As a teenager, make e-sports men/streamers self-employed?

As a teenager, make e-sports men/streamers self-employed?
2. January 2020

The industry of streamers and e-sports enthusiasts is very young compared to other industries and therefore also for lawyers and...

Read moreDetails

European Accessibility Act and BFSG: Accessibility will be mandatory for websites, online stores & software from 2025

european economic interest grouping eeig
25. April 2025

Accessibility in the digital world is no longer just a voluntary option, but is becoming a legal obligation. The European...

Read moreDetails

Coalition agreement 2025: changes to commercial law for companies, the self-employed and investors

Coalition agreement 2025: changes to commercial law for companies, the self-employed and investors
9. April 2025

The 2025 coalition agreement of the (presumably) new federal government under the leadership of the CDU/CSU and SPD contains extensive...

Read moreDetails

Modern contract design 2025 in the influencer and agency business

Modern contract design 2025 in the influencer and agency business
7. April 2025

Influencer marketing and agency collaborations have gained enormously in importance in recent years. With new technologies, global networking and changing...

Read moreDetails

Influencers abroad: no free pass from German laws

Influencers abroad: no free pass from German laws
14. April 2025

Many influencers dream of escaping the German winter and their local obligations - be it to Dubai, Madeira or the...

Read moreDetails

Influencer agency contracts and Section 627 BGB: Effectively exclude termination in a relationship of trust

Influencer agency contracts and Section 627 BGB: Effectively exclude termination in a relationship of trust
12. April 2025

Contracts between influencers and their agencies or between managers and artists are often based on a close relationship of trust....

Read moreDetails

Liability when using VibeCoding and no-code platforms – implications for legal due diligence

Liability when using VibeCoding and no-code platforms – implications for legal due diligence
31. March 2025

VibeCoding describes a current trend in which software is no longer programmed manually, but is developed almost exclusively using AI...

Read moreDetails

The romanticization of the “fail fast” principle in startups – When does failure become deception towards stakeholders?

The romanticization of the “fail fast” principle in startups – When does failure become deception towards stakeholders?
3. April 2025

"Fail fast, fail often" - hardly any other motto characterizes the start-up culture as much as the idea of trying...

Read moreDetails

5.0 60 reviews

  • Avatar Mikael Hällgren ★★★★★ vor einem Monat
    I got fantastic support from Marian Härtel. He managed to get my wrongfully suspended Instagram account restored. He was … Mehr incredibly helpful the whole way until the positive outcome. Highly recommended!
  • Avatar Lennart Korte ★★★★★ vor 2 Monaten
    Ich kann Herrn Härtel als Anwalt absolut weiterempfehlen! Sein Service ist erstklassig – schnelle Antwortzeiten, effiziente … Mehr Arbeit und dabei sehr kostengünstig, was für Startups besonders wichtig ist. Er hat für mein Startup einen Vertrag erstellt, und ich bin von seiner professionellen und zuverlässigen Arbeit überzeugt. Klare Empfehlung!
  • Avatar R.H. ★★★★★ vor 3 Monaten
    Ich kann Hr. Härtel nur empfehlen! Er hat mich bei einem Betrugsversuch einer Krypto Börse rechtlich vertreten. Ich bin sehr … Mehr zufrieden mit seiner engagierten Arbeit gewesen. Ich wurde von Anfang an kompetent, fair und absolut transparent beraten. Trotz eines zähen Verfahrens und einer großen Börse als Gegner, habe ich mich immer sicher und zuversichtlich gefühlt. Auch die Schnelligkeit und die sehr gute Erreichbarkeit möchte ich an der Stelle hoch loben und nochmal meinen herzlichsten Dank aussprechen! Daumen hoch mit 10 Sternen!
  • Avatar P! Galerie ★★★★★ vor 4 Monaten
    Herr Härtel hat uns äusserst kompetent in einen lästigen Fall mit META betreut. Er war effizient, beharrlich, aber auch mit … Mehr uns geduldig. Menschlich top, bis wir am Ende Dank ihm erfolgreich zum Ziel gekommen sind. Können wir wärmstens empfehlen. Und nochmals danke. P.H.
  • Avatar Mosaic Mask Studio ★★★★★ vor 5 Monaten
    Die Kanzlei ist immer ein verlässlicher Partner bei der Sichtung und Bearbeitung von Verträgen in der IT Branche. Es ist … Mehr stets ein professioneller Austausch auf Augenhöhe.
    Die Ergebnisse sind auf hohem Niveau und haben die interessen unsers Unternehmens immer bestmöglich wiedergespiegelt.
    Vielen Dank für die sehr gute Zusammenarbeit.
  • Avatar Philip Lucas ★★★★★ vor 8 Monaten
    Wir haben Herrn Härtel für unser Unternehmen konsultiert und sind äußerst zufrieden mit seiner Arbeit. Von Anfang an hat … Mehr er einen überaus kompetenten Eindruck gemacht und sich als ein sehr angenehmer Gesprächspartner erwiesen. Seine fachliche Expertise und seine verständliche und zugängliche Art im Umgang mit komplexen Themen haben uns überzeugt. Wir freuen uns auf eine langfristige und erfolgreiche Zusammenarbeit!
  • Avatar Doris H. ★★★★★ vor 10 Monaten
    Herr Härtel hat uns bezüglich eines Telefonvertrags beraten und vertreten. Wir waren mit seinem Service sehr zufrieden. Er … Mehr hat stets schnell auf unsere E-mails und Anrufe reagiert und den Sachverhalt einfach und verständlich erklärt. Wir würden Herrn Härtel jederzeit wieder beauftragen.Vielen Dank für die hervorragende Unterstützung
  • Avatar Philipp Skaar ★★★★★ vor 8 Monaten
    Als kleines inhabergeführtes Hotel sehen wir uns ab und dann (bei sonst weit über dem Durchschnitt liegenden Bewertungen) … Mehr der Herausforderung von aus der Anonymität heraus agierenden "Netz-Querulanten" gegenüber gestellt. Herr Härtel versteht es außerordentlich spür- und feinsinnig, derartige - oftmals auf Rufschädigung ausgerichtete - Bewertungen bereits im Keim, also außergerichtlich, zu ersticken und somit unseren Betrieb vor weiteren Folgeschäden zu bewahren. Seine Umsetzungsgeschwindigkeit ist beeindruckend, seine bisherige Erfolgsquote = 100%.Ergo: Unsere erste Adresse zur Abwehr von geschäftsschädigenden Angriffen aus dem Web.
  • ●
  • ●
  • ●
  • ●

Video-Galerie

Blockchain in the supply chain: legally compliant smart contracts for logistics start-ups
Blockchain in the supply chain: legally compliant smart contracts for logistics start-ups
Founding a company as a startup?
I can help!
Founding a company as a startup? I can help!
Influencer merchandise: New EU rules & what you need to know
Influencer merchandise: New EU rules & what you need to know
15a709c0 6010 4f76 ac22 64fa52191622 204239877

Arrest

29. March 2025

Definition and purpose of attachment Attachment, also known as collateral attachment, is a procedural security measure under German civil procedure...

Read moreDetails
Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF)

Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF)

9. February 2025
Due Dilligence

Due Dilligence

26. June 2023
New OLG rulings on product descriptions in online trade

Triple damage calculation

26. June 2023
Data economy

Data economy

16. October 2024

Podcast Folgen

247f58c28882e230e982fa3a32d34dea

Digital sovereignty: Europe’s path to a self-determined digital future

8. December 2024

In this exciting episode of the itmedialaw.com podcast, we take a deep dive into the highly topical subject of digital...

75df8eaa33cd7d3975a96b022c65c6e4

Life as an IT lawyer, work-life balance, family and my career

26. September 2024

In this captivating episode of my IT Medialaw podcast, I, Marian Härtel, share my personal journey as a passionate IT...

d5e1e6cad87cb839a9e23af79034bd94

AI in the legal system: Towards a digital future of justice

16. October 2024

In this fascinating podcast episode, we take a deep dive into the world of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact...

c9c5d7fd380061a8018074c2ca5a81bf

Startups and innovation in Germany – challenges and opportunities

26. September 2024

This insightful podcast episode takes an in-depth look at the startup and innovation landscape in Germany and Europe. The discussion...

  • Home
  • Imprint
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • Agile and lean law firm
  • Ideal partner
  • Contact
  • Videos
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Contact
  • Leistungen
    • Support with the foundation
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Games law consulting
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
    • Investment advice
    • Booking as speaker
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Contract review and preparation
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Focus on start-ups
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus on start-ups
    • How can I help clients?
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Videos
    • Video series – about me
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos on services
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Shorts
    • Third-party videos
    • Podcast format
    • Other videos
  • Knowledge base
  • Podcast
  • Blogposts
    • Lange Artikel / Ausführungen
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Labour law
    • EU law
    • Corporate
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • Tax
    • Internally
    • Other
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung