• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

BGH: Copyright infringement even if authorship is denied only against the author himself

10. July 2024
in Copyright
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0 0
A A
0
urheberrecht
Key Facts
  • In its ruling of 27.06.2024, the BGH clarifies the scope of protection of the right of recognition under copyright law.
  • The ruling significantly strengthens the position of authors in copyright disputes.
  • An infringement of § 13 UrhG also applies to statements made to the author himself.
  • The BGH contradicts previous case law and rejects a restrictive interpretation.
  • The moral right applies comprehensively against the denial of authorship.
  • The decision encourages increased caution in internal disputes over authorship.
  • The ruling will have a lasting impact on the legal landscape in copyright law.

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has made an important clarification on the scope of protection of the right of recognition under copyright law in a groundbreaking ruling dated 27.06.2024 (Ref. I ZR 102/23). The decision significantly strengthens the position of authors and has far-reaching implications for the handling of copyright disputes. In essence, the question is whether the author’s right to recognition of his authorship enshrined in Section 13 sentence 1 UrhG is also infringed if the denial or presumption of authorship is only made against the author himself. The BGH now expressly affirms this and thus contradicts the previous case law of the lower courts. This decision is one of a series of rulings that have strengthened the moral rights of authors in recent years.

Content Hide
1. Background to the case and lower courts
2. BGH: No restriction of § 13 UrhG
3. Significance and impact of the decision
4. Conclusion and outlook
4.1. Author: Marian Härtel

Background to the case and lower courts

The case on which the BGH ruling was based concerned a dispute between an author and an editor over the authorship of a book. The author had negotiated with the editor about the editing of his new book, which he self-published a year later under the title “Der verratene Himmel”. Six years after publication, the editor wrote to the author claiming authorship of the book and asking him to stop referring to himself as the author of the work. After an unsuccessful warning, the author sued for injunctive relief against third parties. Both the Regional Court and the Higher Regional Court dismissed the action. The Higher Regional Court based its decision on the fact that a violation of the right to recognition of authorship pursuant to Section 13 UrhG requires that the denial or claim of authorship is not only made inter partes vis-à-vis the author, but that the statement is disseminated and thereby made public or at least that there is a risk of such dissemination occurring for the first time.

BGH: No restriction of § 13 UrhG

The BGH did not follow this restrictive interpretation of Section 13 UrhG. In its reasoning, the court emphasized that neither the wording nor the meaning and purpose of Section 13 UrhG justify such a restrictive interpretation of the right of recognition. The BGH clarified that the moral right of the author represents a comprehensive right of defense against any form of denial and presumption of authorship. This applies irrespective of whether the disputing or presumptuous statement is made only to the author himself or also to third parties. The court also emphasized that the right of recognition under copyright law – similar to the protection of honour against insults under personality law – is also guaranteed in the two-person relationship between the person making the statement and the legal entity concerned.

Significance and impact of the decision

The decision of the BGH is significant in several respects and has far-reaching consequences for practice. It considerably strengthens the position of authors by extending the scope of protection of Section 13 UrhG. Statements made in a two-person relationship between the author and the disputing party can now also constitute an infringement. This underlines the importance of the right of recognition as a central element of moral rights. In practice, this means that greater caution will be required in future, even in internal disputes about authorship. The decision is one of a series of rulings that have strengthened the moral rights of authors in recent years. For example, the Federal Court of Justice emphasized the importance of moral rights in the context of sampling in its ruling “Metall auf Metall III” (case no. I ZR 115/16).

Conclusion and outlook

The ruling of the BGH represents an important step towards strengthening the rights of authors and will have a lasting impact on the legal landscape in the area of copyright law. It underlines the importance of moral rights and their comprehensive nature. At the same time, the decision raises new questions, such as the distinction between justified criticism and inadmissible denial of authorship. It remains to be seen how case law will treat these borderline cases in the future. For authors, the ruling strengthens their position, while potential deniers of authorship must now also expect legal consequences for non-public statements. In practice, this should lead to increased sensitivity in dealing with copyright issues. Overall, the decision is part of a series of rulings that underline the importance of moral rights in the digital era and continuously expand their scope of protection.

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: BghCase lawCopyright infringementFederal courtJudgmentLawsuitolgrightWarning

Weitere spannende Blogposts

B2B contracts: Link reference to GTC is sufficient

Lego brick still protected as a design patent
27. March 2023

Since I create many software contracts, the question arises again and again whether and how GTC can be included in...

Read moreDetails

Liability trap BFH judgments on VAT in case of warnings

Tax treatment of Upwork in Germany?
16. May 2019

Before i go to the University-Augsburg to the Esport-Recht Institute today, to attend the first meeting tomorrow with other experts...

Read moreDetails

ECJ: Online order button also mandatory if consumer only enters into payment obligation under one condition

Lego brick still protected as a design patent
31. May 2024

Online orders: The order button or the corresponding function must clearly indicate that the consumer enters into a payment obligation...

Read moreDetails

Risk of a GbR becoming an OHG

Risk of a GbR becoming an OHG
7. November 2022

As you can tell from reading my posts regularly, there are more than enough stumbling blocks to fall into legally....

Read moreDetails

Esport Contracts: Professional Players

Small summary – Blizzard vs. Bossland
21. December 2016

Just before Christmas, part two of my remarks on esport and the related contracts. As announced, this part of the...

Read moreDetails

Website operators are liable for data processing of like buttons

Facebook pages, data protection and August 1, 2019
29. July 2019

At the end of last year, I reported that the Advocate General of the ECJ had recommended that the ECJ...

Read moreDetails

DDOS attacks: Criminal liability, warning and compensation?

DDOS attacks: Criminal liability, warning and compensation?
18. July 2023

In the digital world, distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks are a common form of cybercrime. They aim to cripple...

Read moreDetails

Exciting decision on e-mail access in civil procedure law

Exciting decision on e-mail access in civil procedure law
23. April 2024

Background to the decision Digital communication has become an integral part of modern legal transactions, but the question of the...

Read moreDetails

BGH on bakeries and Sunday sales

No more free tissues at the pharmacy?
17. October 2019

The Federal Court of Justice has ruled that the sale of baked goods in bakery branches with café operations on...

Read moreDetails
So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an
Internally

So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

3. July 2025

Mein neuer ITMediaLaw-Shop füllt sich stetig mit Inhalten und Angeboten – von praxisnahen E-Books über umfassende Bundle-Pakete bis hin zu...

Read moreDetails
Dark Patterns: UX-Tricks im Visier von Gesetzgeber und Gerichten

Dark Patterns: UX-Tricks im Visier von Gesetzgeber und Gerichten

2. July 2025
Altersverifikation im Internet: Pflichten für Anbieter in Deutschland und Europa

Altersverifikation im Internet: Pflichten für Anbieter in Deutschland und Europa

30. June 2025
KI-Training und Urheberrecht: US-Gericht setzt auf Fair Use – was bedeutet das für KI und was gilt in Deutschland?

KI-Training und Urheberrecht: US-Gericht setzt auf Fair Use – was bedeutet das für KI und was gilt in Deutschland?

26. June 2025
KI-Codetools und Open-Source-Lizenzen: Risiken für Entwickler

KI-Codetools und Open-Source-Lizenzen: Risiken für Entwickler

25. June 2025

Podcastfolge

Rechtssichere Influencer-Agentur-Verträge: Strategien zur Vermeidung unerwarteter Kündigungen

Rechtssichere Influencer-Agentur-Verträge: Strategien zur Vermeidung unerwarteter Kündigungen

19. April 2025

Anna und Max sprechen in dieser Episode über typische Fallstricke und Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten bei Verträgen zwischen Influencern und Agenturen. Im Mittelpunkt...

Read moreDetails
Rechtskette beim Spieleentwickler

Rechtskette beim Spieleentwickler

19. April 2025
Rechtliche Herausforderungen und Chancen durch KI-Influencer und virtuelle Mitarbeitende

Rechtliche Herausforderungen und Chancen durch KI-Influencer und virtuelle Mitarbeitende

19. April 2025
Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

20. April 2025
Web3, Blockchain und Recht – Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme

Web3, Blockchain und Recht – Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme

25. September 2024

Video

Mein transparente Abrechnung

Mein transparente Abrechnung

10. February 2025

In diesem Video rede ich ein wenig über transparente Abrechnung und wie ich kommuniziere, was es kostet, wenn man mit...

Read moreDetails
Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

10. February 2025
Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

10. February 2025
Was mich wirklich freut

Was mich wirklich freut

10. February 2025
Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

10. February 2025
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung