• Home
  • Imprint
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • Agile and lean law firm
  • Ideal partner
  • Contact
  • Videos
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Ideal partner
      • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Video series – about me
      • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
      • Principles as a lawyer
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Nerd und Rechtsanwalt
      • Ideal partner
      • How can I help clients?
    • Über die Kanzlei
      • How clients benefit from my network of colleagues, partners and service providers
      • Quick and flexible access
      • Agile and lean law firm
      • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
      • Price overview
    • How can I help clients?
    • Sonstige Informationen
      • Einwilligungen widerrufen
      • Privatsphäre-Einstellungen ändern
      • Historie der Privatsphäre-Einstellungen
      • Privacy policy
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Leistungen
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Support with the foundation
      • Games law consulting
      • Advice in e-commerce
      • Support and advice of agencies
      • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
      • Legal compliance and expert opinions
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Arbeitsschwerpunkte
      • Games and esports law
        • Esports. What is it?
      • Corporate law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Consulting for influencers and streamers
        • Influencer & Streamer
      • Contract review and preparation
      • DLT and Blockchain consulting
        • Blockchain Overview
      • Investment advice
      • AI and SaaS
  • Artikel/News
    • Langartikel / Guides
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Law on the Internet
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Online retail
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Labour law
    • Tax
    • Kanzlei News
    • Other
  • Videos/Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Kurz-Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Ideal partner
      • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Video series – about me
      • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
      • Principles as a lawyer
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Nerd und Rechtsanwalt
      • Ideal partner
      • How can I help clients?
    • Über die Kanzlei
      • How clients benefit from my network of colleagues, partners and service providers
      • Quick and flexible access
      • Agile and lean law firm
      • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
      • Price overview
    • How can I help clients?
    • Sonstige Informationen
      • Einwilligungen widerrufen
      • Privatsphäre-Einstellungen ändern
      • Historie der Privatsphäre-Einstellungen
      • Privacy policy
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Leistungen
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Support with the foundation
      • Games law consulting
      • Advice in e-commerce
      • Support and advice of agencies
      • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
      • Legal compliance and expert opinions
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Arbeitsschwerpunkte
      • Games and esports law
        • Esports. What is it?
      • Corporate law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Consulting for influencers and streamers
        • Influencer & Streamer
      • Contract review and preparation
      • DLT and Blockchain consulting
        • Blockchain Overview
      • Investment advice
      • AI and SaaS
  • Artikel/News
    • Langartikel / Guides
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Law on the Internet
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Online retail
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Labour law
    • Tax
    • Kanzlei News
    • Other
  • Videos/Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Kurz-Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Contact
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
Home Data protection Law

BGH ruling on damages for data protection breaches

8. December 2024
in Data protection Law
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
0
dsgvo 3669706 1280
Key Facts
  • The BGH ruled that loss of control over personal data constitutes immaterial damage that justifies a claim for damages.
  • The decision puts an end to inconsistent court rulings on data protection violations and creates clear guidelines for lower courts.
  • Compensation of 100 euros was set, which leaves many of those affected disappointed and makes their legal proceedings unattractive.
  • The era of mass proceedings in data protection law could end as financial interest in such proceedings declines.
  • The leading decision of the BGH is binding for all lower courts and creates legal certainty for companies.
  • Consumers benefit from recognition of loss of control, but suffer from low compensation.
  • The future remains uncertain; legal adjustments may be necessary to ensure balance.

The ruling by the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) on November 18, 2024 has put an abrupt end to years of uncertainty regarding the legal consequences of data breaches. The BGH ruled that even the mere loss of control over personal data constitutes immaterial damage that justifies a claim for damages. This decision marks a turning point in German data protection law and is also the first landmark decision by the BGH in this area. This not only means that the ruling is binding for all future proceedings, but also that it serves as a clear guideline for the lower courts. This ends a period of legal uncertainty in which courts have ruled differently on claims for damages in the event of data protection breaches.

Content Hide
1. The loss of control as damage: A clear cut
2. 100 euros in compensation: a Pyrrhic victory for those affected?
3. The end of mass proceedings: A new chapter in data protection law
4. The landmark decision: What does it mean for future cases?
5. For consumers: a mixed result
6. Conclusion: An ending with mixed feelings

The loss of control as damage: A clear cut

With this decision, the BGH has clarified that no specific misuse of the data is required in order to claim non-material damage. The mere loss of control over personal data is sufficient to justify a claim under Art. 82 GDPR. This clarification puts an end to a long discussion about whether data subjects must first prove that their data has actually been misused or that they are suffering the specific consequences of a data breach. With this ruling, the BGH has significantly strengthened consumer protection and paved the way for numerous claims for damages. At the same time, however, it has also set the amount of compensation at 100 euros – an amount that is likely to disappoint many of those affected. Although they are now entitled to compensation in principle, the sum is so low that it is hardly perceived as real compensation.

100 euros in compensation: a Pyrrhic victory for those affected?

Setting the compensation at just 100 euros raises questions: Is this amount really sufficient to compensate for the loss of control over personal data? For many of those affected, this amount is unlikely to justify the expense of legal proceedings. In the past, some higher regional courts have awarded higher sums, especially if sensitive data was affected or the breach had serious consequences. However, the new ruling by the BGH makes it clear that the days of high claims for damages are over. This also puts an end to the practice of some law firms that had advertised claims for damages of up to 3,000 euros in mass proceedings. These proceedings will become much less attractive in future – both for lawyers and for those affected.

The end of mass proceedings: A new chapter in data protection law

With the BGH ruling, the age of mass litigation in the area of data protection law should finally be over. In recent years, large law firms have increasingly brought class actions against companies, holding out the prospect of high compensation sums. However, with compensation set at just 100 euros per case, the financial interest in such proceedings will fall drastically. For many lawyers, it will simply no longer be worthwhile pursuing such proceedings on a large scale. The question also arises for the affected persons themselves as to whether they want to take on the expense of proceedings for a comparatively small amount of compensation. The ruling could therefore lead to fewer lawsuits being filed and companies being confronted with mass claims less frequently.

The landmark decision: What does it mean for future cases?

It is particularly noteworthy that this ruling is a landmark decision – the first of its kind in the area of data protection law by the Federal Court of Justice. A landmark decision has a special significance: it not only provides a clear guideline for all future decisions, but is also binding for all lower courts. In concrete terms, this means that regional and higher regional courts will have to follow this decision in future and will no longer be able to issue divergent rulings. For companies, this brings long-awaited legal certainty: they now know exactly what risk they run in the event of a data breach and can adapt their compliance measures accordingly.

For consumers: a mixed result

For consumers, the ruling is a double-edged sword: on the one hand, their position has been strengthened by recognizing the loss of control as damage – they no longer have to prove that their data has been misused or that they have suffered a specific breach. On the other hand, the awarded compensation of 100 euros is so low that many of those affected will probably refrain from filing a lawsuit. The question remains as to whether this sum is really sufficient to adequately compensate for the loss of control over personal data – especially when sensitive data is involved or the breach had serious consequences.

Conclusion: An ending with mixed feelings

The ruling of the Federal Court of Justice marks the end of an era in German data protection law and puts a clear end to the discussions about compensation for data protection breaches. With the first landmark decision in this area, the BGH has created legal certainty and at the same time put an end to the practice of mass lawsuits with high compensation claims. This is a relief for companies: they now know exactly what risk they are taking and can take appropriate measures. However, consumers are left with a mixed feeling: although their position has been strengthened, it remains questionable whether 100 euros is really enough to compensate for the loss of control over personal data.

The future will show whether further adjustments by the legislator or the European Court of Justice will be necessary in order to strike a balance between consumer protection and economic reality.

 

Beliebte Beträge

Data leak in startup practice: GDPR reporting and damage limitation

dsgvo
29. April 2025

Young start-ups and solopreneurs often focus on agile development and rapid growth - but a data leak can put an...

Read moreDetails

Data protection, anonymity and third-party chatter: GDPR risks and solutions for OnlyFans Creator

Data protection, anonymity and third-party chatter: GDPR risks and solutions for OnlyFans Creator
12. May 2025

OnlyFans has revolutionized the income opportunities for adult content creators - but with success comes legal challenges. In particular, data...

Read moreDetails

Data protection and anonymity for OnlyFans creators, agencies, brokers and chatter agencies

Data protection and anonymity for OnlyFans creators, agencies, brokers and chatter agencies
10. May 2025

OnlyFans and similar platforms for erotic content are booming - but as their popularity grows, so do the data protection...

Read moreDetails

Legally compliant archiving of emails: legal requirements and practical implementation

Legally compliant archiving of emails: legal requirements and practical implementation
14. March 2025

It is impossible to imagine modern corporate communication without e-mail. It is not only used for the rapid exchange of...

Read moreDetails

Risks when hosting personal data on US cloud servers

Risks when hosting personal data on US cloud servers
18. February 2025

Hosting personal data on cloud servers from US providers poses significant risks for European companies, particularly with regard to compliance...

Read moreDetails

SaaS contract for marketing tools

da785cff1bca5b6897d0d4cacf7359ff
15. November 2024

When I helped set up CPMStar, one of the first major gaming marketing agencies in Germany, a few years ago,...

Read moreDetails

New cookie regulation: a step towards simplifying digital consent?

Esport: Sports Committee of the BT meets Wednesday
8. December 2024

On September 4, 2024, the Federal Government adopted the Consent Management Ordinance (EinwV). This new ordinance is based on Section...

Read moreDetails

Multi-tenant architectures in the SaaS sector: data separation and compliance requirements

6e405ef66c83bf9de2066fb73a1deafc
9. November 2024

Multi-tenant architectures are the backbone of modern SaaS solutions, as they enable efficient use of resources and scalability. However, they...

Read moreDetails

Federal Court of Justice plans landmark decision on Facebook data scandal

BGH considers Uber Black to be anti-competitive
9. November 2024

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has announced that it intends to issue a landmark ruling in the form of...

Read moreDetails
  • Home
  • Imprint
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • Agile and lean law firm
  • Ideal partner
  • Contact
  • Videos
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Contact
  • Leistungen
    • Support with the foundation
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Games law consulting
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
    • Investment advice
    • Booking as speaker
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Contract review and preparation
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Focus on start-ups
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus on start-ups
    • How can I help clients?
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Videos
    • Video series – about me
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos on services
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Shorts
    • Third-party videos
    • Podcast format
    • Other videos
  • Knowledge base
  • Podcast
  • Blogposts
    • Lange Artikel / Ausführungen
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Labour law
    • EU law
    • Corporate
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • Tax
    • Internally
    • Other
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung