Time and again you can see that it is believed that free software, especially shareware or freeware, can be packed on your own servers/websites, as it is free of charge. This is nonsense, of course, but it feels very widespread nonsense.
Now the Federal Court of Justice has also dealt with the issue and, with its ruling at the end of last month in favour of Microsoft, has decided that the legal opinion, which is certainly not in doubt among lawyers, is correct.
In the present case, the dispute concerned the free trial version of Office offered by the operator of an internet shop on its own site and via Ebay.
By uploading the trial versions, there is a “public representation” within the meaning of copyright, which would have been permitted only with the consent of Microsoft. The fact that Microsoft also offered the trial version for free download on its own pages does not change that.
The BGH also relies on EU law, since both relevant directives must be taken into account when interpreting German copyright law. What was relevant here was that a new audience was opened up by the dealer. This would only allow a link to the download option at Microsoft – or, of course, an explicit agreement with Microsoft.
Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.
Public broadcasters are entitled to delete non-broadcast-related comments made by users in forums on their corporate social media pages. This...
Read moreDetails
In line with my article from Tuesday regarding the VAT treatment of sales from app stores, there is information today...
Read moreDetails
The I. Civil Senate of the Federal Court of Justice, which is responsible among other things for claims arising from...
Read moreDetails
I have already reported often enough about influencers and streamers and the currently very hotly disputed obligation to mark advertising...
Read moreDetails
The BGH has ruled in two cases, rejecting the delisting request in one case (confirming the first two instances) and...
Read moreDetails
Over the past year, there has been a lot of discussion in the games industry about whether professional YouTubers or...
Read moreDetails
The FDP parliamentary group has tabled an entry to amend the Telemedia Act in response to the ECJ's cookie ruling:...
Read moreDetails
According to ECJ Advocate General Szpunar, Facebook can be forced to elicit and identify all comments that are word-for-word identical...
Read moreDetails
Playing online games or mobile games is becoming more and more fashionable and already the vast majority of Germans play...
Read moreDetailsThe Distance Learning Protection Act (FernUSG) has been experiencing a renaissance for some time now. What for decades was considered...
Read moreDetails
Yeah, the first real episode with myself! In this podcast, we dive into the exciting world of IT law and...
Read moreDetails
In this video, I talk a bit about transparent billing and how I communicate what it costs to work with...
Read moreDetails
