Marian Härtel
Filter nach benutzerdefiniertem Beitragstyp
Beiträge
Wissensdatenbank
Seiten
Filter by Kategorien
Archive
Archive - Old blogposts
Blockchain and law
Blockchain and web law
Blockchain Law
Competition law
Copyright
Corporate
Data protection Law
Esport and politics
Esport Business
Esports
EU law
Featured
Internally
Investments
Labour law
Law and Blockchain
Law and computer games
Law and Esport
Law on the Internet
Law on the protection of minors
News in brief
Online retail
Other
Tax
Uncategorized
Warning
Web3 Law
Youtube video
Just call!

03322 5078053

Image posting in closed FB group may infringe copyright

Posting an image in the closed group on Facebook may be public copying and thus infringe copyrights.

The Munich Regional Court ruled on a claim against an exhibition visitor. The latter took photos of the exhibition and published 119 of them in a Facebook group with 390 members, which dealt with the murder case depicted in the exhibition. However, as an administrator, the woman granted access to the group to anyone who was interested in the topic. Since the photos showed almost the entire exhibition, the curators of the exhibition demanded the deletion of the photos and the issuance of a cease-and-desist declaration with a penalty clause. Since Facebook deleted the photos, but the visitor did not want to issue a cease-and-desist declaration, the district court issued an injunction.
The plaintiffs are entitled to claim damages pursuant to Sec. 97 para. 1 UrhG is entitled to a claim for injunctive relief. The exhibition is a “special exhibition” according to § 4 para. 1 UrhG protected collective work. By posting the photos to the Facebook group, the defendant violated the plaintiffs’ right to make their work publicly available. Furthermore, the Facebook group, despite its limited number of members, is to be considered as public.

It is a decision that probably occurs millions of times a day. The ECJ also recently ruled similarly. The uploading of a protected photograph actually always constitutes an act of communication to the public, since an act of exploitation is performed that the author had not thought of when granting a license.

Of course, the decision can also be applied to other networks and social media channels with supposedly non-public sections!

Picture of Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel is a lawyer and entrepreneur specializing in copyright law, competition law and IT/IP law, with a focus on games, esports, media and blockchain.

Phone

03322 5078053

E‑mail

info@rahaertel.com