• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

Investing quietly: Typical and atypical silent partnerships for startups

14. March 2023
in Corporate
Reading Time: 13 mins read
0 0
A A
0
business g5973cc862 1920
Key Facts
  • Silent partnerships are private written contracts without a notary or commercial register, which allows for many variations.
  • There are typical and atypical silent partnerships, which differ in terms of profit and loss responsibility.
  • Typical silent partnerships offer no liability for company debts and have a fixed term.
  • Atypical silent partnerships allow a say, but with a higher risk and liability for company losses.
  • The choice between typical and atypical participations should take into account tax aspects and effects on the tax burden.
  • Silent partnerships can be combined well with the business angel concept for support and know-how.
  • Before entering into a silent partnership, it is advisable to consult a lawyer or tax advisor.

Notice:

Content Hide
1. Silent partnerships: Typical and Atypical
1.1. Typical silent partnership
1.2. Atypical silent partnership
2. Advantages and disadvantages
3. Connection with business angel concept
4. Tax aspects
5. Advantages and disadvantages of the typical silent partnership
6. Advantages and disadvantages of the atypical silent partnership
6.1. Author: Marian Härtel

Before you get into the differences between typical and atypical silent partnerships, I would like to point out that this construct is a private written contract that is concluded without the involvement of a notary and commercial register. This means that, in principle, very many variants are possible, all of which can have advantages and disadvantages and must therefore be discussed with the client. It is therefore advisable to obtain thorough information before concluding a silent partnership agreement and, if necessary, to consult a lawyer or tax advisor

Silent partnerships: Typical and Atypical

Silent partnerships are a popular form of investment in companies. They offer investors the opportunity to invest their capital in a company without being actively involved in its management. However, there are two types of silent partnerships: typical and atypical. This blog post explains the differences between the two types of silent partnerships.

Typical silent partnership

A typical silent partnership is an investment in which the investor participates only in the profits of the company. He has no say in the management and is not liable for the debts of the company. The amount of participation is usually fixed and cannot be changed. Typical silent partnerships usually have a fixed term and the investor has no influence on the management.

Atypical silent partnership

An atypical silent partnership is an investment in which the investor also participates in the loss of the company. The investor also has a say in the management and can make decisions that affect the company. In contrast to the typical silent partnership, the investor in an atypical silent partnership can be held liable if the company has debts. The amount of the participation may vary and atypical silent partnerships may be open-ended.

Advantages and disadvantages

Typical silent partnerships offer investors a way to put their capital into a company without having to worry about management. They are also not liable for the debts of the company. Atypical silent partnerships offer investors more influence on management and the opportunity to make decisions that affect the company. However, they are also associated with a higher risk, as the investor also participates in the loss of the company and can be held liable

Connection with business angel concept

Silent partnerships can also be interesting for young startups, game developers and esport teams, as they can be well combined with a business angel concept. Business angels are experienced investors who support and advise startups and young companies. They can offer investors in a silent partnership valuable advice and contacts to make the company successful. By combining silent partnerships and business angels, young companies can benefit from the financial support and expertise to build and grow their business.

Tax aspects

When choosing between a typical or atypical silent partnership, the tax aspects should also be taken into account. The different types of investments are each assessed differently for tax purposes and may affect the investor’s tax burden. It is therefore advisable to consult a tax advisor to understand and plan for the tax implications of the investment. A tax advisor can also help determine the best structure for the investment to minimize the tax burden.

Advantages and disadvantages of the typical silent partnership

Advantages:

  1. No say in the management: The investor does not have to worry about the management and can concentrate on his investment.
  2. No liability for debts: The investor is not liable for the debts of the company and thus bears no financial risk.
  3. Fixed term: The term of the investment is fixed, which gives the investor a certain degree of planning security.
  4. Fixed amount of participation: The amount of participation is fixed and cannot be changed, which gives the investor a clear idea of his investment.
  5. Simple structure: The typical silent partnership has a simple structure, which facilitates management and implementation.

Disadvantages:

  1. No say in the management: The investor has no say in the management and thus cannot actively participate in the development of the company.
  2. No influence on decisions: The investor has no influence on decisions affecting the company, which can lead to frustration.
  3. No possibility to influence the company: The investor cannot influence the company to protect or improve his investment.
  4. No flexibility: The amount of the investment and the term are fixed, which gives the investor no flexibility.
  5. No possibility to increase profits: The investor cannot actively contribute to increase the profits of the company.

Advantages and disadvantages of the atypical silent partnership

Advantages:

  1. Right to a say in the management: The investor has a say in the management and can thus actively participate in the development of the company.
  2. Influence on decisions: The investor has influence on decisions that affect the company, which gives him more control.
  3. Possibility to influence the company: The investor can influence the company to protect or improve his investment.
  4. Flexibility: The amount of the investment and the term can vary, which gives the investor more flexibility.
  5. Opportunity to increase profits: the investor can actively contribute to increasing the company’s profits

Disadvantages:

  1. Liability for debts: The investor can be held liable in the case of an atypical silent partnership if the company has debts.
  2. Higher risk: The atypical silent partnership involves a higher risk, as the investor also participates in the loss of the company.
  3. More complex structure: The atypical silent partnership has a more complex structure, which can make it more difficult to manage and implement.
  4. Unclear responsibilities: The responsibilities between investor and management may be unclear in the case of an atypical silent partnership.
  5. Conflicts with other investors: In the case of an atypical silent partnership, conflicts may arise with other investors who have a different idea of the company’s development.
Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: BlogBusinessCommercial registerDevelopmentEntscheidungenEsportGame developerHaftungInvestmentInvestorSicherheitStartupsTax consultant

Weitere spannende Blogposts

LG Frankfurt: Online portal must offer more than just woman/man to choose from

Activity as a registered trader: The liability traps
7. November 2022

At the beginning of December last year, the Frankfurt Regional Court made an interesting decision for all online providers who,...

Read moreDetails

E-commerce law: legally compliant design of online stores for the self-employed

E-commerce law: legally compliant design of online stores for the self-employed
10. October 2024

Creating an online store offers self-employed people enormous opportunities, but also harbors numerous legal pitfalls. A legally compliant design is...

Read moreDetails

Play from 4 p.m. to stream only from 10 p.m.? The JusProg Dilemma

Streamers and airtime restrictions? KJM declares JusProg ineffective
23. May 2019

On 15 May 2019, the Commission for the Protection of Youth Media (KJM) declared the JusProg youth protection programme ineffective...

Read moreDetails

2x Gamesrecht at the Federal Court of Justice, supervised by RA Marian Härtel

Small summary – Blizzard vs. Bossland
23. February 2023

So nine years I am now admitted to the bar and next week, 6/10/2016 to be exact, I will be...

Read moreDetails

Consumer’s right of withdrawal for teak trees in Costa Rica with a Swiss company

BGH considers Uber Black to be anti-competitive
17. May 2024

On the right of withdrawal of a consumer residing in Germany when concluding "purchase and service contracts" for teak trees...

Read moreDetails

AI in the legal system: Towards a digital future of justice

AI in the legal system: Towards a digital future of justice
16. October 2024

In this fascinating podcast episode, we take a deep dive into the world of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact...

Read moreDetails

IDO acts in abuse of rights?

Online retailer: Notice of warranty of defects
7. November 2022

The Heilbronn Regional Court has issued an interesting ruling, deciding that the IDO, which is well-known in circles of competition...

Read moreDetails

Smart Contracts: Neither Smart nor Contracts ;-)

Smart Contracts: Neither Smart nor Contracts ;-)
1. November 2023

The quote "Smart contracts are neither smart nor contracts" comes from a legal perspective and is thought-provoking, especially for the...

Read moreDetails

Revocation instruction must include address

Attention: Vouchers to existing customers can be advertising!
12. August 2019

On the subject of "loadable address", information in the imprint but also information in the revocation declaration, I have already...

Read moreDetails
d05f2367 adba 436f b9f9 b77892754071 202725299

Immorality

29. March 2025

Definition and legal basis (Section 138 BGB) In civil law, immorality refers to a violation of a legal transaction against...

Read moreDetails
District Court Frankfurt a.M. on the right to be forgotten

Data Protection Officer (DPO)

11. April 2025
Social Media Accounts und Impressum

Impressumspflicht

11. April 2025
zivilprozessordnung zpo 3

Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO)

25. June 2023
Restoration to the previous status

Restoration to the previous status

30. June 2023

Podcast Folgen

Der IT Media Law Podcast. Folge Nr. 1: Worum geht es hier eigentlich?

Der IT Media Law Podcast. Folge Nr. 1: Worum geht es hier eigentlich?

26. August 2024

Yeah, die erste richtige Folge mit mir selbst! In diesem Podcast tauchen wir ein in die spannende Welt des IT-Rechts...

Startups und Innovation in Deutschland – Herausforderungen und Chancen

Startups und Innovation in Deutschland – Herausforderungen und Chancen

25. September 2024

In dieser aufschlussreichen Podcast-Episode wird ein tiefgreifender Blick auf die Startup- und Innovationslandschaft in Deutschland und Europa geworfen. Die Diskussion...

Rechtliche Grundlagen und Praxis von Open Source in der Softwareentwicklung

Rechtliche Grundlagen und Praxis von Open Source in der Softwareentwicklung

19. April 2025

In dieser Episode werfen Anna und Max einen Blick auf die rechtlichen Grundlagen rund um den Einsatz von Open-Source-Software in...

Rechtliche Risiken bei langen Entwicklungszeiten und der Stornierung von Crowdfundingspielen

Rechtliche Risiken bei langen Entwicklungszeiten und der Stornierung von Crowdfundingspielen

20. April 2025

In dieser Episode erörtern wir die rechtlichen Herausforderungen, denen Spieleentwickler bei der Finanzierung durch Crowdfunding gegenüberstehen. Wir beleuchten die Verpflichtungen...

  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung