• Areas of expertise
  • |
  • About me
  • |
  • Principles as a lawyer
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Ideal partner
      • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Video series – about me
      • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
      • Principles as a lawyer
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Nerd und Rechtsanwalt
      • Ideal partner
      • How can I help clients?
    • Über die Kanzlei
      • How clients benefit from my network of colleagues, partners and service providers
      • Quick and flexible access
      • Agile and lean law firm
      • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
      • Price overview
    • How can I help clients?
    • Sonstige Informationen
      • Einwilligungen widerrufen
      • Privatsphäre-Einstellungen ändern
      • Historie der Privatsphäre-Einstellungen
      • Privacy policy
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Leistungen
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Support with the foundation
      • Games law consulting
      • Advice in e-commerce
      • Support and advice of agencies
      • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
      • Legal compliance and expert opinions
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Arbeitsschwerpunkte
      • Games and esports law
        • Esports. What is it?
      • Corporate law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Consulting for influencers and streamers
        • Influencer & Streamer
      • Contract review and preparation
      • DLT and Blockchain consulting
        • Blockchain Overview
      • Investment advice
      • AI and SaaS
  • Artikel/News
    • Langartikel / Guides
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Law on the Internet
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Online retail
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Labour law
    • Tax
    • Kanzlei News
    • Other
  • Videos/Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Kurz-Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Ideal partner
      • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Video series – about me
      • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
      • Principles as a lawyer
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Nerd und Rechtsanwalt
      • Ideal partner
      • How can I help clients?
    • Über die Kanzlei
      • How clients benefit from my network of colleagues, partners and service providers
      • Quick and flexible access
      • Agile and lean law firm
      • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
      • Price overview
    • How can I help clients?
    • Sonstige Informationen
      • Einwilligungen widerrufen
      • Privatsphäre-Einstellungen ändern
      • Historie der Privatsphäre-Einstellungen
      • Privacy policy
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Leistungen
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Support with the foundation
      • Games law consulting
      • Advice in e-commerce
      • Support and advice of agencies
      • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
      • Legal compliance and expert opinions
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Arbeitsschwerpunkte
      • Games and esports law
        • Esports. What is it?
      • Corporate law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Consulting for influencers and streamers
        • Influencer & Streamer
      • Contract review and preparation
      • DLT and Blockchain consulting
        • Blockchain Overview
      • Investment advice
      • AI and SaaS
  • Artikel/News
    • Langartikel / Guides
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Law on the Internet
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Online retail
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Labour law
    • Tax
    • Kanzlei News
    • Other
  • Videos/Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Kurz-Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Contact
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
Home Copyright

Landmark ruling on AI training data – Hamburg Regional Court sets standards

1. October 2024
in Copyright
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0 0
A A
0
*Breaking?* First decision of the BGH on AI
Key Facts
  • The Hamburg Regional Court dismissed the action brought by a photographer against the LAION e.V. association.
  • Ruling allows the use of copyrighted images for AI training purposes without consent, subject to certain conditions.
  • The court referred to the limitation provision of Section 60d UrhG for scientific research.
  • The ruling is considered a precedent in Germany for the use of copyrighted works in AI research.
  • It strengthens the position of research organizations and promotes the development of AI technologies.
  • The court emphasized the relevance of technological developments in the interpretation of the term "machine readability".
  • Expectations: more legal certainty, discussions on intellectual property protection and possible legal adjustments.

On September 27, 2024, the Hamburg Regional Court issued a groundbreaking ruling (case no. 310 O 227/23) in the area of AI training data. This ruling could have far-reaching implications for the use of copyrighted works for the training of AI systems.

Content Hide
1. Key points of the ruling
2. Reason
3. Significance of the judgment
4. Other important aspects of the judgment
5. Conclusion and outlook

Key points of the ruling

1 The court dismissed the action brought by a photographer against the LAION e.V. association.
2. it was decided that the use of copyrighted images for training AI systems without the consent of the rights holders may be permissible under certain circumstances.
3. the court considered the use of the images to train the AI to be covered by the limitation provision of Section 60d UrhG (text and data mining for scientific research).

Reason

Applicability of the research barrier:
The court affirmed the application of the research barrier (Section 60d UrhG). It argued that the creation of a data set for AI training can be considered scientific research as long as it is aimed at gaining knowledge at a later date. The court stated:

Scientific research generally refers to the methodical-systematic pursuit of new knowledge […] The term scientific research, by allowing the methodical-systematic “pursuit” of new knowledge to suffice, is not to be understood so narrowly that it would only cover the work steps directly associated with the acquisition of knowledge; rather, it is sufficient that the work step in question is aimed at a (later) acquisition of knowledge, as is the case, for example, with numerous data collections that must first be carried out in order to subsequently draw empirical conclusions.

Non-commercial purpose:
The court considered the defendant’s activity to be non-commercial because the data set created was made publicly available free of charge.

No decisive influence by companies
The court denied a decisive influence of private companies on the defendant that would exclude the application of the research barrier.

Significance of the judgment

1. precedent: This is one of the first judgments in Germany to deal specifically with the use of copyrighted works for AI training.

2. strengthening AI research: The ruling strengthens the position of research organizations and promotes the development of AI technologies.

3. interpretation of the research barrier: It provides an important interpretation of the research barrier in the context of AI training.

Other important aspects of the judgment

The court also dealt intensively with the question of whether the limitation provision of Section 44b UrhG (text and data mining) was applicable. Although this was not relevant to the decision in the specific case, the court provided important information on the interpretation of this provision

Finally, insofar as it is argued for a teleological reduction of the limitation provision of Section 44b UrhG that the European legislator “simply did not yet have the AI problem” “on its radar” in 2019 when the underlying directive provision (Art. 4 DSM Directive) was created […], this finding alone is clearly not sufficient for a teleological reduction.

The court also emphasized the importance of technological development for the interpretation of the term “machine readability” in the context of reservations of use:

In the Chamber’s view, it would also be a certain contradiction of values to allow the providers of AI models to develop increasingly powerful text-understanding and text-creating AI models via the barrier in Section 44b (2) UrhG on the one hand, but not to require them to use existing AI models within the framework of the barrier in Section 44b (3) sentence 2 UrhG on the other.

Conclusion and outlook

This ruling by Hamburg Regional Court sets an important precedent in the legal assessment of AI training data. It shows that the development of AI technologies can be possible under certain circumstances without the explicit consent of the authors, as long as it is carried out in the context of scientific research.

It is expected that in the future:

1. research organizations could have more legal certainty in the use of training data.
2. there will continue to be discussions about the balance between technological progress and the protection of intellectual property.
3. there may be further legal clarifications or legal adjustments to meet the specific challenges of AI technology in copyright law.

However, the ruling underlines the need for a differentiated view of the use of copyrighted works in the context of AI development. It remains to be seen whether the decision will be upheld in higher instances and how it will influence the further development of the AI sector and copyright law.

 

Tags: DevelopmentGermanyHamburgHamburg District CourtJudgmentJudgmentsKILawsuitLegal certaintyReviewTechnologyUrheberrecht

Beliebte Beträge

Erotic content on OnlyFans: Copyright and personality rights protection for creators

Erotic content on OnlyFans: Copyright and personality rights protection for creators
20. May 2025

OnlyFans has established itself as a platform on which content creators - often in the erotic sector - offer their...

Read moreDetails

Memes, remixes and reaction videos legal? – Copyright 2025: Parody and pastiche exception

Memes, remixes and reaction videos legal? – Copyright 2025: Parody and pastiche exception
9. May 2025

Memes, remix videos and reaction videos have become an integral part of online culture - but are such memes legal...

Read moreDetails

Legally compliant contract drafting for software development on no-code platforms

Legally compliant contract drafting for software development on no-code platforms
26. April 2025

No-code and low-code platforms enable start-ups and agencies to develop software and digital products quickly and without in-depth programming knowledge....

Read moreDetails

Open source in software development: legal principles and practice

Open source in software development: legal principles and practice
17. April 2025

Open source software has become an integral part of modern software development - whether in the development of computer games(game...

Read moreDetails

Contracts with co-development studios: IP splitting, rights allocation and risk allocation

Contracts with co-development studios: IP splitting, rights allocation and risk allocation
23. April 2025

International collaboration in software and game development offers great opportunities - from shared expertise to faster product creation. However, co-development...

Read moreDetails

Unjustified IP warning: What to do with strikes on social media?

copyright
23. January 2025

Content creators on platforms such as Instagram, YouTube or Twitch are increasingly confronted with legal challenges that go far beyond...

Read moreDetails

Property rights to algorithms: Typical questions and legal answers

ECJ: Advocate General assesses sampling as copyright infringement
15. January 2025

Time and again, clients ask the question: "Who actually owns the rights to an algorithm?" This question is not only...

Read moreDetails

Influencer marketing contracts & content creator law

cc4cbb3206a631e8b56c3bdf22a57e6c
8. December 2024

When I founded JustGamers 25 years ago, "influencers" were still the gaming magazines that reported on new computer games in...

Read moreDetails

License agreements for software start-ups

License agreements for software start-ups: How to optimally protect your intellectual property
13. October 2024

For software start-ups, intellectual property is often the most valuable asset. The correct drafting of license agreements is therefore crucial...

Read moreDetails

5.0 60 reviews

  • Avatar Mikael Hällgren ★★★★★ vor einem Monat
    I got fantastic support from Marian Härtel. He managed to get my wrongfully suspended Instagram account restored. He was … Mehr incredibly helpful the whole way until the positive outcome. Highly recommended!
  • Avatar Lennart Korte ★★★★★ vor 2 Monaten
    Ich kann Herrn Härtel als Anwalt absolut weiterempfehlen! Sein Service ist erstklassig – schnelle Antwortzeiten, effiziente … Mehr Arbeit und dabei sehr kostengünstig, was für Startups besonders wichtig ist. Er hat für mein Startup einen Vertrag erstellt, und ich bin von seiner professionellen und zuverlässigen Arbeit überzeugt. Klare Empfehlung!
  • Avatar R.H. ★★★★★ vor 3 Monaten
    Ich kann Hr. Härtel nur empfehlen! Er hat mich bei einem Betrugsversuch einer Krypto Börse rechtlich vertreten. Ich bin sehr … Mehr zufrieden mit seiner engagierten Arbeit gewesen. Ich wurde von Anfang an kompetent, fair und absolut transparent beraten. Trotz eines zähen Verfahrens und einer großen Börse als Gegner, habe ich mich immer sicher und zuversichtlich gefühlt. Auch die Schnelligkeit und die sehr gute Erreichbarkeit möchte ich an der Stelle hoch loben und nochmal meinen herzlichsten Dank aussprechen! Daumen hoch mit 10 Sternen!
  • Avatar P! Galerie ★★★★★ vor 4 Monaten
    Herr Härtel hat uns äusserst kompetent in einen lästigen Fall mit META betreut. Er war effizient, beharrlich, aber auch mit … Mehr uns geduldig. Menschlich top, bis wir am Ende Dank ihm erfolgreich zum Ziel gekommen sind. Können wir wärmstens empfehlen. Und nochmals danke. P.H.
  • Avatar Mosaic Mask Studio ★★★★★ vor 5 Monaten
    Die Kanzlei ist immer ein verlässlicher Partner bei der Sichtung und Bearbeitung von Verträgen in der IT Branche. Es ist … Mehr stets ein professioneller Austausch auf Augenhöhe.
    Die Ergebnisse sind auf hohem Niveau und haben die interessen unsers Unternehmens immer bestmöglich wiedergespiegelt.
    Vielen Dank für die sehr gute Zusammenarbeit.
  • Avatar Philip Lucas ★★★★★ 9 months ago
    Wir haben Herrn Härtel für unser Unternehmen konsultiert und sind äußerst zufrieden mit seiner Arbeit. Von Anfang an hat … Mehr er einen überaus kompetenten Eindruck gemacht und sich als ein sehr angenehmer Gesprächspartner erwiesen. Seine fachliche Expertise und seine verständliche und zugängliche Art im Umgang mit komplexen Themen haben uns überzeugt. Wir freuen uns auf eine langfristige und erfolgreiche Zusammenarbeit!
  • Avatar Doris H. ★★★★★ 11 months ago
    Herr Härtel hat uns bezüglich eines Telefonvertrags beraten und vertreten. Wir waren mit seinem Service sehr zufrieden. Er … Mehr hat stets schnell auf unsere E-mails und Anrufe reagiert und den Sachverhalt einfach und verständlich erklärt. Wir würden Herrn Härtel jederzeit wieder beauftragen.Vielen Dank für die hervorragende Unterstützung
  • Avatar Philipp Skaar ★★★★★ 9 months ago
    Als kleines inhabergeführtes Hotel sehen wir uns ab und dann (bei sonst weit über dem Durchschnitt liegenden Bewertungen) … Mehr der Herausforderung von aus der Anonymität heraus agierenden "Netz-Querulanten" gegenüber gestellt. Herr Härtel versteht es außerordentlich spür- und feinsinnig, derartige - oftmals auf Rufschädigung ausgerichtete - Bewertungen bereits im Keim, also außergerichtlich, zu ersticken und somit unseren Betrieb vor weiteren Folgeschäden zu bewahren. Seine Umsetzungsgeschwindigkeit ist beeindruckend, seine bisherige Erfolgsquote = 100%.Ergo: Unsere erste Adresse zur Abwehr von geschäftsschädigenden Angriffen aus dem Web.
  • ●
  • ●
  • ●
  • ●

Video-Galerie

Commercial use of Discord: legal pitfalls and solutions
Commercial use of Discord: legal pitfalls and solutions
Startups and high investments: a critical view
Startups and high investments: a critical view
Exciting everyday life as an IT lawyer
Exciting everyday life as an IT lawyer
Non-Participating Preferred

Non-Participating Preferred

16. October 2024

Non-Participating Preferred, also known as Straight Preferred, is a form of preferred stock commonly used in startup and venture capital...

Read moreDetails
asset deal

Asset Deal

26. June 2023
98b343eb e2c4 445a 93ee 0358fd3c6da6 20245689

Abstraction principle

29. March 2025
Beware of fake streaming offers

Deepfake

29. March 2025
Vindication

Vindication

16. October 2024

Podcast Folgen

Rechtliche Basics für Startup-Gründer – So startest du auf der sicheren Seite!

Rechtliche Basics für Startup-Gründer – So startest du auf der sicheren Seite!

1. November 2024

In dieser Episode des Itmedialaw Podcasts nimmt euch Rechtsanwalt und Unternehmer Marian Härtel mit auf eine Reise durch den rechtlichen...

Legal challenges when implementing confidential computing: data protection and encryption in the cloud

Smart Contracts und Blockchain

22. December 2024

In dieser fesselnden Podcast-Episode tauch ich tief in die Welt der Blockchain-Technologie und Smart Contracts ein. Die 25-minütige Folge beleuchtet,...

Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

20. April 2025

In diese Episode wird die komplexe Beziehung zwischen dem 'Fail Fast'-Prinzip und den Verantwortlichkeiten der Gründer gegenüber Investoren und Mitarbeitern...

Der IT Media Law Podcast. Folge Nr. 1: Worum geht es hier eigentlich?

Der IT Media Law Podcast. Folge Nr. 1: Worum geht es hier eigentlich?

26. August 2024

Yeah, die erste richtige Folge mit mir selbst! In diesem Podcast tauchen wir ein in die spannende Welt des IT-Rechts...

  • Home
  • Imprint
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • Agile and lean law firm
  • Ideal partner
  • Contact
  • Videos
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Contact
  • Leistungen
    • Support with the foundation
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Games law consulting
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
    • Investment advice
    • Booking as speaker
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Contract review and preparation
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Focus on start-ups
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus on start-ups
    • How can I help clients?
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Videos
    • Video series – about me
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos on services
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Shorts
    • Third-party videos
    • Podcast format
    • Other videos
  • Knowledge base
  • Podcast
  • Blogposts
    • Lange Artikel / Ausführungen
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Labour law
    • EU law
    • Corporate
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • Tax
    • Internally
    • Other
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung