Filter nach benutzerdefiniertem Beitragstyp
Filter by Kategorien
Archive - Old blogposts
Blockchain and law
Blockchain Law
Competition law
Data protection Law
Esport and politics
Esport Business
EU law
Labour law
Law and Blockchain
Law and computer games
Law and Esport
Law on the Internet
Law on the protection of minors
News in brief
Online retail
Web3 Law
Youtube video
Just call!

03322 5078053

Warned off by a competition association?

This post is also available in: Deutsch

As you can see from my blog posts, there are many things to consider when it comes to warning letters, even aside from the question of whether the accusation actually made is justified. You should take a particularly close look when a so-called competition association issues a warning. These often generate a large part of their revenues by sending warnings to other competitors.

Here it is not only important to consider whether one should issue a cease-and-desist declaration at all (see this article), even if the accusation is justified, but one should also look very closely at whether the association was allowed to issue a warning at all.

The requirements for this are regulated in the UWG in Section 8 (3) No. 2. The warning is in fact only

associations with legal capacity for the promotion of commercial or independent professional interests, insofar as a considerable number of entrepreneurs belong to them who sell goods or services of the same or a related kind on the same market, if they are able, in particular according to their personnel, material and financial resources, to actually perform their statutory tasks of pursuing commercial or independent professional interests and insofar as the infringement affects the interests of their members;

Numerous court rulings have further specified these requirements; for example, the Karlsruhe Regional Court recently ruled, with reference to supreme court case law, that such a competition association must present its list of members in court proceedings without blackening. The submission of an anonymized list is not sufficient, even if the association presents conflicting confidentiality interests.

Since the plaintiff here refused to disclose its members, the case was dismissed. The requirements have become more and more restrictive in recent years, especially with regard to the question of whether the number of members is material. You can also read this article.

Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel is a lawyer and entrepreneur specializing in copyright law, competition law and IT/IP law, with a focus on games, esports, media and blockchain.


03322 5078053


Share via
Cookie Consent with Real Cookie Banner
Send this to a friend