• Areas of expertise
  • |
  • About me
  • |
  • Principles as a lawyer
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Ideal partner
      • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Video series – about me
      • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
      • Principles as a lawyer
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Nerd und Rechtsanwalt
      • Ideal partner
      • How can I help clients?
    • Über die Kanzlei
      • How clients benefit from my network of colleagues, partners and service providers
      • Quick and flexible access
      • Agile and lean law firm
      • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
      • Price overview
    • How can I help clients?
    • Sonstige Informationen
      • Einwilligungen widerrufen
      • Privatsphäre-Einstellungen ändern
      • Historie der Privatsphäre-Einstellungen
      • Privacy policy
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Leistungen
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Support with the foundation
      • Games law consulting
      • Advice in e-commerce
      • Support and advice of agencies
      • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
      • Legal compliance and expert opinions
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Arbeitsschwerpunkte
      • Games and esports law
        • Esports. What is it?
      • Corporate law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Consulting for influencers and streamers
        • Influencer & Streamer
      • Contract review and preparation
      • DLT and Blockchain consulting
        • Blockchain Overview
      • Investment advice
      • AI and SaaS
  • Artikel/News
    • Langartikel / Guides
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Law on the Internet
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Online retail
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Labour law
    • Tax
    • Kanzlei News
    • Other
  • Videos/Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Kurz-Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Ideal partner
      • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Video series – about me
      • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
      • Principles as a lawyer
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Nerd und Rechtsanwalt
      • Ideal partner
      • How can I help clients?
    • Über die Kanzlei
      • How clients benefit from my network of colleagues, partners and service providers
      • Quick and flexible access
      • Agile and lean law firm
      • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
      • Price overview
    • How can I help clients?
    • Sonstige Informationen
      • Einwilligungen widerrufen
      • Privatsphäre-Einstellungen ändern
      • Historie der Privatsphäre-Einstellungen
      • Privacy policy
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Leistungen
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Support with the foundation
      • Games law consulting
      • Advice in e-commerce
      • Support and advice of agencies
      • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
      • Legal compliance and expert opinions
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Arbeitsschwerpunkte
      • Games and esports law
        • Esports. What is it?
      • Corporate law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Consulting for influencers and streamers
        • Influencer & Streamer
      • Contract review and preparation
      • DLT and Blockchain consulting
        • Blockchain Overview
      • Investment advice
      • AI and SaaS
  • Artikel/News
    • Langartikel / Guides
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Law on the Internet
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Online retail
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Labour law
    • Tax
    • Kanzlei News
    • Other
  • Videos/Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Kurz-Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Contact
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
Home Law on the Internet

Liability of website operators for user comments – When and how operators are responsible for their users’ content

15. March 2025
in Law on the Internet
Reading Time: 7 mins read
0 0
A A
0
7ea4e7c2 5426 4530 9505 15c40e2e0832 172626378
Key Facts
  • Website operators are liable for user-generated content in accordance with the German Telemedia Act and must remove illegal content quickly.
  • The liability privilege protects operators, but only in the event of a specific infringement and a swift response to information.
  • The distinction between content providers and host providers is decisive for the question of liability.
  • Damage caused by inadequate complaint management can be considerable for operators, so introduce clear processes.
  • Regular training and compliance measures are essential for operators in order to minimize liability risks.
  • A proactive approach to user feedback and transparent guidelines strengthen the basis of trust in the community.
  • Collaboration with legal advisors helps to effectively design platform guidelines and comply with legal frameworks.

Introduction

Content Hide
1. Introduction
2. Legal framework and principles of operator liability
3. Liability privileges and differentiation between pure host providers and content providers
4. Limits of the limitation of liability and obligations to delete or block
5. Practical recommendations for start-ups and online services to minimize liability risk
6. Conclusion

The responsibility of website operators for user-generated content has become much more important in recent years, both in case law and in the public debate. A single comment with unlawful content can have considerable consequences for the operator of a platform and lead to injunctive relief, damages or even criminal prosecution. In Germany, the Telemedia Act (TMG) and the relevant regulations on data protection and freedom of expression play a central role here. The tension between freedom of expression and the protection of personal rights in particular shows how important it is to handle online comments clearly and with legal certainty. Various courts, including the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH), have issued decisive rulings on the question of when a provider is liable for third-party content. These rulings emphasize that the line between permissible expression of opinion and punishable insults or defamation must be carefully observed. In addition, website operators are increasingly confronted with demands to delete content that is allegedly unlawful, although they often lack an overview of all statements. It is therefore essential for founders of start-ups and operators of SaaS or online services to know their rights and obligations in order to avoid legal disputes and strengthen the trust of their users. This blog post highlights the key aspects of operator liability in order to provide a comprehensive overview. It also shows which measures can be implemented to minimize the risk of legal disputes and to meet the high requirements of a professional platform.

Legal framework and principles of operator liability

In Germany, the question of the liability of website operators for user comments is primarily governed by Sections 7 et seq. of the German Telemedia Act (TMG). Accordingly, operators are generally not obliged to actively monitor the information provided by users or to investigate circumstances that indicate illegal activity. This so-called liability privilege stems from the European E-Commerce Directive (2000/31/EC), which laid the foundation for the far-reaching limitation of liability of host providers. Nevertheless, the liability privilege does not mean that operators are completely free of responsibility: As soon as they become aware of a specific infringement, they must react immediately and remove the illegal content or block access to it. If they fail to do so, they may be liable for interference, which leads to injunctive relief and claims for damages. In several decisions, such as the “Blogspot ruling” (BGH, ruling of October 25, 2011 – VI ZR 93/10), the Federal Court of Justice has made it clear that providers cannot rely solely on automated monitoring once they have been notified of a specific infringement. This means a balancing act for operators: on the one hand, they should not be forced to carry out a general prior check; on the other hand, they must not remain inactive once they become aware of an infringement. Platforms with large numbers of users in particular quickly run into liability risks if they do not implement effective mechanisms for deleting illegal content. General civil law also plays a role in the area of personal rights violations, as claims for injunctive relief and damages can be quickly asserted here. In addition, criminal law provisions can apply if, for example, incitement to hatred, insult or defamation is involved. Section 185 et seq. of the German Criminal Code (StGB) provides for severe penalties for insult and defamation. Not only natural persons, but also companies whose economic reputation is impaired can take action against the operator. In practice, this complex legal situation means that operators should seek advice at an early stage in order to develop tailor-made protective measures. A sound knowledge of the relevant laws and case law is essential for any company that offers user-generated content.

Liability privileges and differentiation between pure host providers and content providers

The German Telemedia Act distinguishes between content providers and host providers, which is of considerable importance for the question of liability. A content provider provides content itself and can therefore be held liable for unlawful statements or representations, whereas a host provider primarily provides the technical infrastructure. However, case law has made it clear that the distinction is by no means always clear, as operators of social networks or forums, for example, sometimes act editorially and sometimes only take on hosting functions. As soon as the operator intervenes editorially in the content or adds its own comments, it can be classified as a content provider. However, the privileges for host providers apply if the operator only stores the content and does not actively control it. This classification also has an impact on the auditing obligations: Pure host providers are not obliged to check all content before publication. They only have to act if they are notified of a specific infringement. This has been confirmed several times by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and has already been implemented in numerous rulings in Germany. For start-ups and SaaS providers who operate a portal with a lot of user-generated content, the classification into these categories is of great practical relevance. As the business model often revolves around the provision of online platforms, it is important to design the processes in such a way that the liability privilege can be invoked in case of doubt. However, operators must be professionally set up with regard to automated filter systems and reporting mechanisms in order to be able to react immediately if they become aware of a specific infringement. If they neglect this duty, the liability privilege does not apply and they may be liable like a content provider. For your own risk management, it is therefore advisable to document all points properly and to establish a clear process for handling reported infringements. Finally, it is advisable to define transparent rules on comment culture in the terms of use so that users can adhere to a legally secure framework from the outset.

Limits of the limitation of liability and obligations to delete or block

Although the liability privileges aim to protect innovation and freedom of expression, they are limited in their scope. A website operator who does not promptly remove illegal content despite a specific notice can no longer invoke the liability limitations. The Federal Court of Justice has clarified in several rulings that there is an actual obligation to check content from the time it becomes known. If this obligation to check remains unused, there is a risk of being held liable as a disturber or even as a contributory disturber if one continues to tolerate unlawful statements. Furthermore, injunctions can quickly become a financial burden if operators do not immediately block or delete the comments. In this context, it is important to know that operators do not have to actively intervene in every dispute, but should only remove the illegal content. However, complete inaction is not an option either, as it can result in liability. The so-called “notice-and-takedown” procedure, in which a rights holder or affected person informs the operator of an infringement and requests removal, has become the international standard. For forums and blogs, these requirements mean that a functioning complaints management system is essential. Operators should carefully weigh up when a report is plausible and when it is possibly an expression of opinion that is protected by the fundamental right to freedom of expression. To minimize abuse and the pretence of illegal content, it is advisable to introduce clear guidelines for reporting comments and a fair review process. The GDPR can also become relevant at this point if personal data is disclosed in comments or processed without authorization. Those who pay attention to this interplay of data protection law, personal rights and telemedia law can keep their platform within the legal framework and significantly reduce the risk of warnings. Ultimately, the challenge is to find a practicable balance between user freedom and legal protection for the operator.

Practical recommendations for start-ups and online services to minimize liability risk

For young companies and SaaS service providers in particular, which often rely on innovative business models, it is crucial to deal with the legal requirements for user-generated content at an early stage. A first step is to set out clear requirements and rules of conduct in the General Terms and Conditions (GTC) and in a separate commentary guideline. This way, users know exactly what content is permitted and what the consequences are if the guidelines are violated. It is advisable to appoint an internal moderation team or at least a person who can intervene quickly in case of doubt as soon as an illegal comment is reported. Technical filter systems that intercept certain swear words or defamatory expressions in advance can be a useful tool, but are no substitute for a legal review in individual cases. In addition, operators should conduct regular training on compliance and digital law to ensure that all team members understand the importance of their responsibilities. The “notice and takedown” procedure plays a central role and should be clearly structured and easily accessible so that those affected can report infringements quickly and effectively. Transparency in communication with reporting parties is also important in order to avoid escalation and maintain a professional image. It is also advisable to document every report, including the measures taken, in order to be able to prove that you have properly fulfilled your obligations in the event of an emergency. It is often worthwhile for start-ups to work with external legal advisors who can help with the design of platform guidelines and the implementation of effective complaints procedures. In addition, start-ups should keep up to date with the latest developments in case law so that they can adapt their processes on an ongoing basis. It can be useful to carry out regular monitoring in which conspicuous discussions or content are identified and reviewed in good time. A proactive approach to feedback and criticism demonstrates responsibility and strengthens the community’s trust in the startup or service. Even if it involves effort, a well thought-out and legally compliant comment moderation strategy can protect the company from costly disputes in the long term and at the same time ensure a positive user experience.

Conclusion

Liability for user comments is a complex topic that is closely linked to personal rights, data protection and media law. Platform operators who create clear structures and guidelines from the outset not only minimize the legal risk, but also ensure a professional image. Start-ups and providers of innovative SaaS models in particular benefit from designing their platform responsibly, as this strengthens their credibility and market position. As a lawyer specializing in business consulting and contract drafting in the field of digital business models, I offer tailor-made solutions to meet the individual requirements of online services. Practical advice and forward-looking planning can significantly reduce liability risks and avoid reputational damage. In this way, platform operators create a secure environment for their users and at the same time position themselves as serious market participants. If you have any questions about specific cases or your business model, I will be happy to provide you with expert advice.

Beliebte Beträge

Social media accounts as a company: who keeps followers when employees change?

Social media accounts as a company: who keeps followers when employees change?
4. May 2025

Social media have become valuable assets for modern companies. Followers, profiles and reach can determine customer relationships, employer image and...

Read moreDetails

Digital Services Act (DSA): What creators, influencers and agencies need to know now

Digital Services Act (DSA): What creators, influencers and agencies need to know now
16. May 2025

Key Facts: Stricter transparency obligations for platforms: The Digital Services Act (DSA) forces Very Large Online Platforms (VLOPs) such as...

Read moreDetails

Legally compliant contract drafting for software development on no-code platforms

Legally compliant contract drafting for software development on no-code platforms
26. April 2025

No-code and low-code platforms enable start-ups and agencies to develop software and digital products quickly and without in-depth programming knowledge....

Read moreDetails

Automated pricing and dynamic pricing in e-commerce

automatisierte preisgestaltung und dynamic pricing im ee28091commerce 1
2. April 2025

In the digital economy, automated pricing and dynamic pricing strategies are now part of everyday life. Whether for online shopping,...

Read moreDetails

Growth hacking and viral marketing – legal requirements

growth hacking und virales marketing juristische anforderungen 1
1. April 2025

Growth hacking and viral marketing promise start-ups rapid growth and a wide reach with a low budget. In the digital...

Read moreDetails

AI editing of OnlyFans content & Instagram campaigns: Important legal tips!

ai generated g63ed67bf8 1280
23. February 2025

Copyright and original material Copyright regulations protect the intellectual property of those who create photo and video material. The OnlyFans...

Read moreDetails

Digitalization and contract law: Electronic signature in accordance with the eIDAS Regulation

Digitalization and contract law: Electronic signature in accordance with the eIDAS Regulation
3. March 2025

Introduction: Digitalization and modern contract law Advancing digitalization is changing all business processes, especially in the area of contract design....

Read moreDetails

Liability under Art. 82 GDPR for sending forged invoices!

Liability under Art. 82 GDPR for sending forged invoices!
17. February 2025

Recently, I have been able to successfully represent my clients in several similar cases that were affected by security breaches...

Read moreDetails

Right of reply on social media: Differences and comparison to press law

Right of reply on social media: Differences and comparison to press law
11. February 2025

The right of reply is a key instrument in the German legal system that enables those affected to respond to...

Read moreDetails

5.0 60 reviews

  • Avatar Mikael Hällgren ★★★★★ vor einem Monat
    I got fantastic support from Marian Härtel. He managed to get my wrongfully suspended Instagram account restored. He was … Mehr incredibly helpful the whole way until the positive outcome. Highly recommended!
  • Avatar Lennart Korte ★★★★★ vor 2 Monaten
    Ich kann Herrn Härtel als Anwalt absolut weiterempfehlen! Sein Service ist erstklassig – schnelle Antwortzeiten, effiziente … Mehr Arbeit und dabei sehr kostengünstig, was für Startups besonders wichtig ist. Er hat für mein Startup einen Vertrag erstellt, und ich bin von seiner professionellen und zuverlässigen Arbeit überzeugt. Klare Empfehlung!
  • Avatar R.H. ★★★★★ vor 3 Monaten
    Ich kann Hr. Härtel nur empfehlen! Er hat mich bei einem Betrugsversuch einer Krypto Börse rechtlich vertreten. Ich bin sehr … Mehr zufrieden mit seiner engagierten Arbeit gewesen. Ich wurde von Anfang an kompetent, fair und absolut transparent beraten. Trotz eines zähen Verfahrens und einer großen Börse als Gegner, habe ich mich immer sicher und zuversichtlich gefühlt. Auch die Schnelligkeit und die sehr gute Erreichbarkeit möchte ich an der Stelle hoch loben und nochmal meinen herzlichsten Dank aussprechen! Daumen hoch mit 10 Sternen!
  • Avatar P! Galerie ★★★★★ vor 4 Monaten
    Herr Härtel hat uns äusserst kompetent in einen lästigen Fall mit META betreut. Er war effizient, beharrlich, aber auch mit … Mehr uns geduldig. Menschlich top, bis wir am Ende Dank ihm erfolgreich zum Ziel gekommen sind. Können wir wärmstens empfehlen. Und nochmals danke. P.H.
  • Avatar Mosaic Mask Studio ★★★★★ vor 5 Monaten
    Die Kanzlei ist immer ein verlässlicher Partner bei der Sichtung und Bearbeitung von Verträgen in der IT Branche. Es ist … Mehr stets ein professioneller Austausch auf Augenhöhe.
    Die Ergebnisse sind auf hohem Niveau und haben die interessen unsers Unternehmens immer bestmöglich wiedergespiegelt.
    Vielen Dank für die sehr gute Zusammenarbeit.
  • Avatar Philip Lucas ★★★★★ 9 months ago
    Wir haben Herrn Härtel für unser Unternehmen konsultiert und sind äußerst zufrieden mit seiner Arbeit. Von Anfang an hat … Mehr er einen überaus kompetenten Eindruck gemacht und sich als ein sehr angenehmer Gesprächspartner erwiesen. Seine fachliche Expertise und seine verständliche und zugängliche Art im Umgang mit komplexen Themen haben uns überzeugt. Wir freuen uns auf eine langfristige und erfolgreiche Zusammenarbeit!
  • Avatar Doris H. ★★★★★ 11 months ago
    Herr Härtel hat uns bezüglich eines Telefonvertrags beraten und vertreten. Wir waren mit seinem Service sehr zufrieden. Er … Mehr hat stets schnell auf unsere E-mails und Anrufe reagiert und den Sachverhalt einfach und verständlich erklärt. Wir würden Herrn Härtel jederzeit wieder beauftragen.Vielen Dank für die hervorragende Unterstützung
  • Avatar Philipp Skaar ★★★★★ 9 months ago
    Als kleines inhabergeführtes Hotel sehen wir uns ab und dann (bei sonst weit über dem Durchschnitt liegenden Bewertungen) … Mehr der Herausforderung von aus der Anonymität heraus agierenden "Netz-Querulanten" gegenüber gestellt. Herr Härtel versteht es außerordentlich spür- und feinsinnig, derartige - oftmals auf Rufschädigung ausgerichtete - Bewertungen bereits im Keim, also außergerichtlich, zu ersticken und somit unseren Betrieb vor weiteren Folgeschäden zu bewahren. Seine Umsetzungsgeschwindigkeit ist beeindruckend, seine bisherige Erfolgsquote = 100%.Ergo: Unsere erste Adresse zur Abwehr von geschäftsschädigenden Angriffen aus dem Web.
  • ●
  • ●
  • ●
  • ●

Video-Galerie

Lean office structures and quickly accessible
Lean office structures and quickly accessible
Prize money from esports tournaments
Prize money from esports tournaments
Making freemium models legally compliant - the ultimate guide for SaaS start-ups
Making freemium models legally compliant – the ultimate guide for SaaS start-ups
Completion Bond

Completion Bond

16. October 2024

A completion bond, also known as a completion guarantee, is an insurance policy used in film and media production to...

Read moreDetails
Airdrop

Airdrop

30. June 2023
Fraudulent misrepresentation

Fraudulent misrepresentation

16. October 2024
e1b22941 8541 4953 98a5 7858790f09a7 20191530

Patent troll

29. March 2025
Sales representative

Sales representative

1. July 2023

Podcast Folgen

052c2ca5ca0421f0316b42073ce61791

Innovative business models – risk and opportunity at the same time

10. September 2024

In this exciting episode of our podcast, we take a deep dive into the world of innovative business models. Our...

Legal challenges in the gaming universe: A guide for developers, esports professionals and gamers

What will 2025 bring for start-ups in legal terms? Opportunities? Risks?

24. January 2025

In this exciting episode of the itmedialaw podcast, we take a deep dive into the legal developments that will shape...

Looking to the future: How technology is changing the law

Looking to the future: How technology is changing the law

18. February 2025

In the final episode of the first season of the ITmedialaw.com podcast, we take a look at the future of...

d5ab3414c7c4a7a5040c3c3c60451c44

The metaverse – legal challenges in virtual worlds

26. September 2024

In this fascinating episode, we dive deep into the legal aspects of the metaverse. As a lawyer and tech enthusiast,...

  • Home
  • Imprint
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • Agile and lean law firm
  • Ideal partner
  • Contact
  • Videos
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Contact
  • Leistungen
    • Support with the foundation
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Games law consulting
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
    • Investment advice
    • Booking as speaker
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Contract review and preparation
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Focus on start-ups
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus on start-ups
    • How can I help clients?
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Videos
    • Video series – about me
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos on services
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Shorts
    • Third-party videos
    • Podcast format
    • Other videos
  • Knowledge base
  • Podcast
  • Blogposts
    • Lange Artikel / Ausführungen
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Labour law
    • EU law
    • Corporate
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • Tax
    • Internally
    • Other
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung