• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

Rage baiting in social media: legal classification and consequences

15. January 2025
in Other
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
0
social media 936543 1280 1
Key Facts
  • Rage baiting is a trending phenomenon on LinkedIn that negatively impacts professional content.
  • It operates in a legal gray area with unclear boundaries and a lack of specific case law.
  • The balance between freedom of expression and protection against abuse in social media is crucial.
  • Content that is defamatory or offensive could violate general personal rights.
  • The dissemination of false information in the context of rage baiting could be considered defamation.
  • Rage baiting is often not illegal, which is why judicial assessments are complex and case-dependent.
  • Future case law will have to develop clear guidelines for dealing with rage baiting.

Rage baiting really annoys me personally, especially on LinkedIn, where you would actually expect professional content. Recently, however, this questionable practice seems to be getting out of hand. That’s why I sat down and took a closer look at the legal aspects of this phenomenon. What I discovered: Rage baiting, i.e. deliberately provoking anger or outrage on social media, is in quite a legal gray area. The boundaries are anything but clear, which is not surprising as it is a relatively new phenomenon. To date, there are no court rulings that deal specifically with rage baiting, which is why many legal issues in this context are still unresolved. Nevertheless, some conclusions can be drawn from existing laws and judgments on similar topics, which at least allow a preliminary legal assessment. It may well be that this practice will have legal consequences under certain circumstances. Exactly what these might look like will probably only become clear in future court proceedings. The courts will probably have a lot to do over the next few years to develop clear guidelines in this area. The main issue here will be to find a balance between the freedom of expression enshrined in the German constitution and protection against abuse in social media. A key question will be whether rage baiting is a legitimate marketing tool or rather a form of harassment. The distinction between permissible provocation and impermissible violation of personal rights is likely to be particularly tricky.

Content Hide
1. Potential legal consequences for users and coaches
2. Personal rights violations
3. Dissemination of false information
4. Legal boundaries and gray areas
5. Conclusion
5.1. Author: Marian Härtel

Potential legal consequences for users and coaches

Although rage baiting is primarily seen as a questionable marketing strategy, users and coaches could potentially face legal consequences under certain circumstances. However, these potential legal consequences are subject to considerable uncertainty due to the lack of specific case law and would have to be examined on a case-by-case basis. It is conceivable that courts would have to consider a variety of factors when assessing rage baiting cases, such as the intention of the author, the scope of the statement and the intensity of the provocation. The specific context of the respective social media platform could also play a role in the legal assessment. Courts might also differentiate between different forms of rage baiting, for example between those aimed at general social issues and those aimed at specific individuals or groups. The question of the extent to which the commercial motivation behind rage baiting influences the legal assessment could also be the subject of legal discussions. Last but not least, the reaction of the community and possible consequences of rage baiting are also likely to be included in the legal assessment.

Personal rights violations

Content that deliberately defames or insults individuals or groups could possibly violate general personal rights. Under certain circumstances, this could lead to injunctive relief and claims for damages. Drawing the exact line between permissible expression of opinion and impermissible infringement of personal rights is likely to pose a legal challenge in many cases. It is conceivable that courts would have to carry out a case-by-case assessment in which factors such as the context, scope and intensity of the statement could play a role. The question of the extent to which the person concerned is in the public eye and therefore may have a higher tolerance threshold for critical statements could also become relevant. In addition, the distinction between factual claims and value judgments could play an important role in the context of rage baiting, as the latter enjoy greater protection under freedom of expression. Last but not least, the reaction of the target group and the actual impact of the rage baiting on the person or group concerned could also be taken into account in the legal assessment.

Dissemination of false information

If rage baiting were accompanied by the dissemination of demonstrably false factual claims, this could be considered defamation under certain circumstances. The distinction between an exaggerated expression of opinion and a false statement of fact is likely to pose a legal challenge in many cases. It is conceivable that courts would have to carry out a careful examination of the individual case, in which the overall context of the statement could play an important role. The question of the extent to which the author of the rage bait content has a duty to research or can invoke the protection of freedom of expression could also become relevant. Courts might also consider whether and to what extent a correction or counterstatement has been made. The question of whether the dissemination of false information in the context of rage baiting should be assessed differently than in other contexts could also be the subject of legal discussions. Last but not least, the actual effect of the false information on public opinion is also likely to play a role in the legal assessment.

Legal boundaries and gray areas

Despite these potential risks, rage baiting is often not illegal per se, which makes the legal assessment considerably more difficult. Freedom of expression also protects provocative and polarizing statements, although the exact limits of this protection in the context of rage baiting have not yet been conclusively clarified. The legal assessment would presumably depend heavily on the individual case and would require a careful balancing of freedom of expression and personal rights. It is conceivable that courts would have to develop differentiated criteria in order to find an appropriate balance between these competing legal interests. Factors such as the author’s intention, the scope of the statement and the intensity of the provocation could play a role here. It is also possible that the specific characteristics of the respective social media platform would be included in the legal assessment. The question of the extent to which the commercial motivation behind rage baiting influences the legal assessment could also be the subject of legal discussions. Last but not least, the social debate about the impact of rage baiting on public discourse is also likely to influence future case law.

Conclusion

Rage baiting operates in a legal gray area, the contours of which are still largely unclear due to the novelty of the phenomenon. While it is primarily considered an ethically questionable marketing strategy, there could potentially be legal consequences in certain cases, although the exact nature of these consequences is likely to be the subject of legal clarification. Users and coaches should therefore act with caution and carefully weigh up the potential legal risks. It is advisable to focus on reputable and value-adding content in order to build long-term trust and loyalty without overstepping legal boundaries. Future case law will probably be required to develop clear guidelines that strike an appropriate balance between freedom of expression and protection against abusive practices in social media. Until then, the legal classification of rage baiting remains fraught with considerable uncertainty, which implies a special duty of care for all parties involved when dealing with provocative content. Legislators and platform operators may also be required to develop specific regulations for dealing with rage baiting in order to create an appropriate framework for this form of online communication.

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Weitere spannende Blogposts

Twitter account and responsibility

Twitter account and responsibility
7. November 2022

The Berlin Regional Court today ruled in the case of AfD politician Jens Maier and Boris Becker's son, Noah Becker....

Read moreDetails

“Am I fuckable?” – Women streamers should not put up with everything!

“Am I fuckable?” – Women streamers should not put up with everything!
10. February 2023

I represent a lot of streamers/influencers or the agencies and the more YouTube/Twitch or other platforms gain in importance compared...

Read moreDetails

Fake invoices with a false IBAN – what to do if you have fallen for fraudsters?

Fake invoices with a false IBAN – what to do if you have fallen for fraudsters?
14. June 2024

My law firm is seeing an increasing number of cases in which clients have become victims of bank transfer fraud...

Read moreDetails

Star rating without customer reviews = UWG violation

Star rating without customer reviews = UWG violation
3. July 2023

The Berlin Regional Court has ruled on the use of star ratings in online stores. It was ruled that advertising...

Read moreDetails

Streamer/Influencer: Address of the agency/manager in the imprint?

No more phone numbers necessary in the imprint!
18. September 2019

Imprint obligation quo vadis? I have already written a lot about the imprint obligation here on the blog. You should...

Read moreDetails

Meta must pay 20 million euros in arrears to Telekom

Meta must pay 20 million euros in arrears to Telekom
31. May 2024

Background to the legal dispute Proceedings 33 O 178/23 before the Regional Court of Cologne concerned a claim by a...

Read moreDetails

“More than just a game” in Frankfurt

7. November 2022

Tomorrow, a symposium for lawyers focusing on computer games and digital media will be held in Frankfurt. I will also...

Read moreDetails

Exciting decision on e-mail access in civil procedure law

Exciting decision on e-mail access in civil procedure law
23. April 2024

Background to the decision Digital communication has become an integral part of modern legal transactions, but the question of the...

Read moreDetails

Constitutional appeal against adblock ruling rejected

Federal Constitutional Court: Right to Be Forgotten I
8. October 2019

The Federal Constitutional Court rejected a constitutional appeal by Axel Springer against the judgment of the Federal Court of Justice...

Read moreDetails
Keine stillschweigende AGB-Änderung – Schweigen gilt nicht als Zustimnung
Online retail

Keine stillschweigende AGB-Änderung – Schweigen gilt nicht als Zustimnung

7. July 2025

Die Vertragsänderung durch Schweigen ist wieder im Fokus. In zwei aktuellen Entscheidungen (November 2024 und Juni 2025) hat der Bundesgerichtshof...

Read moreDetails
So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

3. July 2025
Dark Patterns: UX-Tricks im Visier von Gesetzgeber und Gerichten

Dark Patterns: UX-Tricks im Visier von Gesetzgeber und Gerichten

2. July 2025
Altersverifikation im Internet: Pflichten für Anbieter in Deutschland und Europa

Altersverifikation im Internet: Pflichten für Anbieter in Deutschland und Europa

30. June 2025
KI-Training und Urheberrecht: US-Gericht setzt auf Fair Use – was bedeutet das für KI und was gilt in Deutschland?

KI-Training und Urheberrecht: US-Gericht setzt auf Fair Use – was bedeutet das für KI und was gilt in Deutschland?

26. June 2025

Podcastfolge

eda7ba83 c559 4e68 8441 41159a0751f3

Blitzskalierung und rechtliche Herausforderungen: Der Balanceakt für Startups

20. April 2025

In dieser Episode sprechen Anna und Max über die rechtlichen Herausforderungen von Blitzskalierung und disruptiven Geschäftsmodellen. Am Beispiel von Plattformen...

Read moreDetails
8315f1ef298eb54dfeed2f5e55c8b9da 1

Erste Testfolge des ITMediaLaw Podcast

26. August 2024
Digitale Souveränität: Europas Weg in eine selbstbestimmte digitale Zukunft

Digitale Souveränität: Europas Weg in eine selbstbestimmte digitale Zukunft

12. November 2024
Rechtliche Beratung für Startups – Investitionen, die sich lohnen

Rechtliche Beratung für Startups – Investitionen, die sich lohnen

17. November 2024
Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

20. April 2025

Video

Mein transparente Abrechnung

Mein transparente Abrechnung

10. February 2025

In diesem Video rede ich ein wenig über transparente Abrechnung und wie ich kommuniziere, was es kostet, wenn man mit...

Read moreDetails
Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

10. February 2025
Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

10. February 2025
Was mich wirklich freut

Was mich wirklich freut

10. February 2025
Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

10. February 2025
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung