• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

Rage baiting in social media: legal classification and consequences

15. January 2025
in Other
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
0
social media 936543 1280 1
Key Facts
  • Rage baiting is a trending phenomenon on LinkedIn that negatively impacts professional content.
  • It operates in a legal gray area with unclear boundaries and a lack of specific case law.
  • The balance between freedom of expression and protection against abuse in social media is crucial.
  • Content that is defamatory or offensive could violate general personal rights.
  • The dissemination of false information in the context of rage baiting could be considered defamation.
  • Rage baiting is often not illegal, which is why judicial assessments are complex and case-dependent.
  • Future case law will have to develop clear guidelines for dealing with rage baiting.

Rage baiting really annoys me personally, especially on LinkedIn, where you would actually expect professional content. Recently, however, this questionable practice seems to be getting out of hand. That’s why I sat down and took a closer look at the legal aspects of this phenomenon. What I discovered: Rage baiting, i.e. deliberately provoking anger or outrage on social media, is in quite a legal gray area. The boundaries are anything but clear, which is not surprising as it is a relatively new phenomenon. To date, there are no court rulings that deal specifically with rage baiting, which is why many legal issues in this context are still unresolved. Nevertheless, some conclusions can be drawn from existing laws and judgments on similar topics, which at least allow a preliminary legal assessment. It may well be that this practice will have legal consequences under certain circumstances. Exactly what these might look like will probably only become clear in future court proceedings. The courts will probably have a lot to do over the next few years to develop clear guidelines in this area. The main issue here will be to find a balance between the freedom of expression enshrined in the German constitution and protection against abuse in social media. A key question will be whether rage baiting is a legitimate marketing tool or rather a form of harassment. The distinction between permissible provocation and impermissible violation of personal rights is likely to be particularly tricky.

Content Hide
1. Potential legal consequences for users and coaches
2. Personal rights violations
3. Dissemination of false information
4. Legal boundaries and gray areas
5. Conclusion
5.1. Author: Marian Härtel

Potential legal consequences for users and coaches

Although rage baiting is primarily seen as a questionable marketing strategy, users and coaches could potentially face legal consequences under certain circumstances. However, these potential legal consequences are subject to considerable uncertainty due to the lack of specific case law and would have to be examined on a case-by-case basis. It is conceivable that courts would have to consider a variety of factors when assessing rage baiting cases, such as the intention of the author, the scope of the statement and the intensity of the provocation. The specific context of the respective social media platform could also play a role in the legal assessment. Courts might also differentiate between different forms of rage baiting, for example between those aimed at general social issues and those aimed at specific individuals or groups. The question of the extent to which the commercial motivation behind rage baiting influences the legal assessment could also be the subject of legal discussions. Last but not least, the reaction of the community and possible consequences of rage baiting are also likely to be included in the legal assessment.

Personal rights violations

Content that deliberately defames or insults individuals or groups could possibly violate general personal rights. Under certain circumstances, this could lead to injunctive relief and claims for damages. Drawing the exact line between permissible expression of opinion and impermissible infringement of personal rights is likely to pose a legal challenge in many cases. It is conceivable that courts would have to carry out a case-by-case assessment in which factors such as the context, scope and intensity of the statement could play a role. The question of the extent to which the person concerned is in the public eye and therefore may have a higher tolerance threshold for critical statements could also become relevant. In addition, the distinction between factual claims and value judgments could play an important role in the context of rage baiting, as the latter enjoy greater protection under freedom of expression. Last but not least, the reaction of the target group and the actual impact of the rage baiting on the person or group concerned could also be taken into account in the legal assessment.

Dissemination of false information

If rage baiting were accompanied by the dissemination of demonstrably false factual claims, this could be considered defamation under certain circumstances. The distinction between an exaggerated expression of opinion and a false statement of fact is likely to pose a legal challenge in many cases. It is conceivable that courts would have to carry out a careful examination of the individual case, in which the overall context of the statement could play an important role. The question of the extent to which the author of the rage bait content has a duty to research or can invoke the protection of freedom of expression could also become relevant. Courts might also consider whether and to what extent a correction or counterstatement has been made. The question of whether the dissemination of false information in the context of rage baiting should be assessed differently than in other contexts could also be the subject of legal discussions. Last but not least, the actual effect of the false information on public opinion is also likely to play a role in the legal assessment.

Legal boundaries and gray areas

Despite these potential risks, rage baiting is often not illegal per se, which makes the legal assessment considerably more difficult. Freedom of expression also protects provocative and polarizing statements, although the exact limits of this protection in the context of rage baiting have not yet been conclusively clarified. The legal assessment would presumably depend heavily on the individual case and would require a careful balancing of freedom of expression and personal rights. It is conceivable that courts would have to develop differentiated criteria in order to find an appropriate balance between these competing legal interests. Factors such as the author’s intention, the scope of the statement and the intensity of the provocation could play a role here. It is also possible that the specific characteristics of the respective social media platform would be included in the legal assessment. The question of the extent to which the commercial motivation behind rage baiting influences the legal assessment could also be the subject of legal discussions. Last but not least, the social debate about the impact of rage baiting on public discourse is also likely to influence future case law.

Conclusion

Rage baiting operates in a legal gray area, the contours of which are still largely unclear due to the novelty of the phenomenon. While it is primarily considered an ethically questionable marketing strategy, there could potentially be legal consequences in certain cases, although the exact nature of these consequences is likely to be the subject of legal clarification. Users and coaches should therefore act with caution and carefully weigh up the potential legal risks. It is advisable to focus on reputable and value-adding content in order to build long-term trust and loyalty without overstepping legal boundaries. Future case law will probably be required to develop clear guidelines that strike an appropriate balance between freedom of expression and protection against abusive practices in social media. Until then, the legal classification of rage baiting remains fraught with considerable uncertainty, which implies a special duty of care for all parties involved when dealing with provocative content. Legislators and platform operators may also be required to develop specific regulations for dealing with rage baiting in order to create an appropriate framework for this form of online communication.

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Weitere spannende Blogposts

Lupedi UG: Warning notice received?

Online retailer: Notice of warranty of defects
7. November 2022

In recent months, Lupedi UG, represented by the law firm Bleischwitz & Schierer, has been issuing warnings to Ebay users,...

Read moreDetails

Affiliate links must be marked – otherwise sneaky advertising!

Affiliate links must be marked – otherwise sneaky advertising!
16. July 2019

When I reported on influencers and streamers, I keep hearing that courts would treat new media unfairly and that veteran...

Read moreDetails

Vision of contract execution: how smart contracts could shape the future of payments and legal processes

Vision of contract execution: how smart contracts could shape the future of payments and legal processes
19. October 2023

Introduction Technology is rapidly evolving and opening doors to new opportunities in the legal field, a development that always fascinates...

Read moreDetails

EUGH: An effective notice of withdrawal needs a telephone number?

Online shops: Attention to advertising with EIA
7. November 2022

The ECJ has ruled that in a withdrawal notice, the telephone number of the provider must be present. In doing...

Read moreDetails

Google changes privacy officer

LG Munich: Data protection consent on dating platform
7. November 2022

For all operators of websites and apps that use Google services in any way, be it Analytics, Maps, ReCAPTCHA or...

Read moreDetails

Relocation of the office and other updates

Will there soon be material defects for digital content? Obligation to update software is coming!
7. November 2022

In the last two months it was a bit quieter on the blog and the website. The main reason is...

Read moreDetails

Google doesn’t have to remove illegal search results worldwide

Publication of sales advertisements and classification as a trader
25. September 2019

The ECJ has ruled that Google is not obliged to make a delisting in all versions of its search engine,...

Read moreDetails

Corona: Federal government wants to help solo self-employed!

Corona: Federal government wants to help solo self-employed!
7. November 2022

There is considerable need for unbureaucratic emergency assistance in favor of microenterprises from all economic sectors as well as solo...

Read moreDetails

Advice on Corona regarding legal issues and governmental assistance – regular updates

Advice on Corona regarding legal issues and governmental assistance – regular updates
7. November 2022

The Corona crisis, or Covid-19, is hitting us all. And also many clients from the IT sector inform me this...

Read moreDetails
So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an
Internally

So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

3. July 2025

Mein neuer ITMediaLaw-Shop füllt sich stetig mit Inhalten und Angeboten – von praxisnahen E-Books über umfassende Bundle-Pakete bis hin zu...

Read moreDetails
Dark Patterns: UX-Tricks im Visier von Gesetzgeber und Gerichten

Dark Patterns: UX-Tricks im Visier von Gesetzgeber und Gerichten

2. July 2025
Altersverifikation im Internet: Pflichten für Anbieter in Deutschland und Europa

Altersverifikation im Internet: Pflichten für Anbieter in Deutschland und Europa

30. June 2025
KI-Training und Urheberrecht: US-Gericht setzt auf Fair Use – was bedeutet das für KI und was gilt in Deutschland?

KI-Training und Urheberrecht: US-Gericht setzt auf Fair Use – was bedeutet das für KI und was gilt in Deutschland?

26. June 2025
KI-Codetools und Open-Source-Lizenzen: Risiken für Entwickler

KI-Codetools und Open-Source-Lizenzen: Risiken für Entwickler

25. June 2025

Podcastfolge

Die Rolle des IT-Rechtsanwalts

Die Rolle des IT-Rechtsanwalts

5. September 2024

In dieser spannenden Podcast-Episode tauchen wir ein in die faszinierende Welt der IT-Startups und erfahren, warum ein erfahrener Rechtsanwalt für...

Read moreDetails
Der IT Media Law Podcast. Folge Nr. 1: Worum geht es hier eigentlich?

Der IT Media Law Podcast. Folge Nr. 1: Worum geht es hier eigentlich?

26. August 2024
Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

20. April 2025
Rechtliche Risiken bei langen Entwicklungszeiten und der Stornierung von Crowdfundingspielen

Rechtliche Risiken bei langen Entwicklungszeiten und der Stornierung von Crowdfundingspielen

20. April 2025
Legal challenges when implementing confidential computing: data protection and encryption in the cloud

Smart Contracts und Blockchain

22. December 2024

Video

Mein transparente Abrechnung

Mein transparente Abrechnung

10. February 2025

In diesem Video rede ich ein wenig über transparente Abrechnung und wie ich kommuniziere, was es kostet, wenn man mit...

Read moreDetails
Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

10. February 2025
Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

10. February 2025
Was mich wirklich freut

Was mich wirklich freut

10. February 2025
Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

10. February 2025
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung