• Areas of expertise
  • |
  • About me
  • |
  • Principles as a lawyer
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Ideal partner
      • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Video series – about me
      • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
      • Principles as a lawyer
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Nerd und Rechtsanwalt
      • Ideal partner
      • How can I help clients?
    • Über die Kanzlei
      • How clients benefit from my network of colleagues, partners and service providers
      • Quick and flexible access
      • Agile and lean law firm
      • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
      • Price overview
    • How can I help clients?
    • Sonstige Informationen
      • Einwilligungen widerrufen
      • Privatsphäre-Einstellungen ändern
      • Historie der Privatsphäre-Einstellungen
      • Privacy policy
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Leistungen
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Support with the foundation
      • Games law consulting
      • Advice in e-commerce
      • Support and advice of agencies
      • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
      • Legal compliance and expert opinions
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Arbeitsschwerpunkte
      • Games and esports law
        • Esports. What is it?
      • Corporate law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Consulting for influencers and streamers
        • Influencer & Streamer
      • Contract review and preparation
      • DLT and Blockchain consulting
        • Blockchain Overview
      • Investment advice
      • AI and SaaS
  • Artikel/News
    • Langartikel / Guides
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Law on the Internet
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Online retail
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Labour law
    • Tax
    • Kanzlei News
    • Other
  • Videos/Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Kurz-Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Ideal partner
      • About lawyer Marian Härtel
      • Video series – about me
      • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
      • Principles as a lawyer
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Nerd und Rechtsanwalt
      • Ideal partner
      • How can I help clients?
    • Über die Kanzlei
      • How clients benefit from my network of colleagues, partners and service providers
      • Quick and flexible access
      • Agile and lean law firm
      • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
      • Price overview
    • How can I help clients?
    • Sonstige Informationen
      • Einwilligungen widerrufen
      • Privatsphäre-Einstellungen ändern
      • Historie der Privatsphäre-Einstellungen
      • Privacy policy
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Leistungen
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Support with the foundation
      • Games law consulting
      • Advice in e-commerce
      • Support and advice of agencies
      • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
      • Legal compliance and expert opinions
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Arbeitsschwerpunkte
      • Games and esports law
        • Esports. What is it?
      • Corporate law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Consulting for influencers and streamers
        • Influencer & Streamer
      • Contract review and preparation
      • DLT and Blockchain consulting
        • Blockchain Overview
      • Investment advice
      • AI and SaaS
  • Artikel/News
    • Langartikel / Guides
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Law on the Internet
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Online retail
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Labour law
    • Tax
    • Kanzlei News
    • Other
  • Videos/Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Podcast
      • ITMediaLaw Kurz-Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Contact
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
Home Data protection Law

Transparency in the use of AI: do users need to be informed?

14. June 2024
in Data protection Law
Reading Time: 7 mins read
0 0
A A
0
lwkgk1lmmzlpjhqxpc78
Key Facts
  • Artificial intelligence is crucial for business processes and requires transparent data protection information for users.
  • Companies must fulfill information obligations regarding the use of AI in order to avoid discrimination and wrong decisions.
  • The AI Regulation of 2024 defines special transparency obligations for high-risk AI systems.
  • Companies risk competition law claims in the event of non-transparent use of AI, which can be asserted as misleading.
  • Users often find data protection declarations incomprehensible; companies need to communicate information clearly and concisely.
  • New approaches such as layered notices and interactive elements can increase transparency and promote understanding.
  • A continuous dialog between various stakeholders is necessary for the ethical and legally compliant use of artificial intelligence.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become an integral part of our everyday lives. More and more companies are using AI systems to optimize processes, make decisions or analyze user behaviour. But what does this mean for data protection? Do users have to be informed when AI evaluates their data, makes assessments or even initiates blocks? These questions are becoming increasingly important in view of the rapid development of AI technologies. After all, users have a right to know how their personal information is processed. At the same time, companies are faced with the challenge of explaining complex AI processes in an understandable way without revealing their business secrets. It is therefore important to find a balance between transparency and competitiveness. Not only data protection regulations play a role here, but also competition law aspects and industry-specific regulations such as the Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG) for social networks. The issue of transparency in the use of AI is therefore complex and requires a differentiated approach.

Content Hide
1. Transparency as a fundamental principle of data protection
2. Information obligations when using AI
3. Competition law claims and NetzDG
4. The challenge of comprehensible information
5. Conclusion

Transparency as a fundamental principle of data protection

Transparency is a central principle of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR ). Data controllers must inform data subjects clearly and comprehensibly about what happens to their data. Only in this way can users decide for themselves whether they consent to data processing and exercise their rights. This results from Art. 12 et seq. GDPR, according to which the information must be provided in a “concise, transparent, intelligible and easily accessible form, using clear and plain language”. The specific purposes of the processing must also be stated (Art. 13 para. 1 lit. c GDPR). This also and especially applies to the use of AI. This is because AI systems often make decisions that are incomprehensible to the individual. There is also a risk of discrimination and wrong decisions. This makes it all the more important for companies to communicate openly when they use AI. Only in this way can those affected assess what consequences the processing may have for them. It is not enough to simply make general reference to the use of AI. Rather, the essential functionalities and decision criteria of the AI systems must be explained, insofar as this is possible without disclosing business secrets (see Recital 58 GDPR).

Information obligations when using AI

The AI Regulation (Artificial Intelligence Act) adopted by the European Parliament in April 2024 provides for special transparency obligations for high-risk AI systems. These include AI applications that are crucial for access to education, employment, justice or law enforcement. Providers of such systems must, among other things, disclose that AI is being used and explain how it works. This is to ensure that those affected understand the basis on which decisions are made. Art. 1 and Annex III AI systems are considered high-risk systems if they are used as a safety component of products that are subject to third-party conformity assessment or if they are used in certain sensitive areas such as employment, education, law enforcement or justice. Users must also be informed about their rights, e.g. the right to object to automated decisions(Art. 22 GDPRHowever, information obligations are also sensible and necessary for less risky AI systems. After all, any form of automated analysis encroaches on users’ rights. Companies should therefore be transparent in their privacy policies if they use AI to analyze user behavior and create profiles, evaluate or categorize users and make automated decisions, e.g. blocking or refusal. They must state the purposes of AI-supported processing and explain what impact this may have on users. They should also state whether the AI systems were obtained from third parties or developed in-house. The ECJ ruling of 13/05/2014 (C-131/12 – Google Spain), according to which the search engine operator must provide information about the functioning of its ranking algorithm insofar as this is possible without disclosing business secrets.

Competition law claims and NetzDG

In addition to data protection obligations, competition law claims may also arise if companies conceal the use of AI. For example, a misleading privacy policy can be considered a violation of Sections 5, 5a UWG. Anyone who misleads users about data processing is acting unfairly and can be sued by competitors for injunctive relief. This was clarified by the BGH in its decision “Customer card bonus program” of 29.07.2021 (I ZR 40/20). Accordingly, misleading information is deemed to exist if material information on data processing is concealed or embellished. A non-transparent design of the privacy policy can also be anti-competitive if it obscures the scope of the consent (cf. OLG Frankfurt, Urt. v. 27.06.2019 – 6 U 6/19The provisions of the Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG) also apply to social networks.) Accordingly, platforms must inform their users in general terms and conditions and community standards about whether and how they review and remove content(Section 3b NetzDG). If they use AI, this must also be made transparent. Otherwise, fines may be imposed by the Federal Office of Justice. The judgment of the Higher Regional Court of Karlsruhe of 28.02.2022(15 W 4/22) is relevant here, according to which Facebook must disclose its deletion practice. The court found that the community standards did not provide sufficient information about the criteria for removing posts. The use of AI to detect hate speech and other prohibited content was also not sufficiently explained.

The challenge of comprehensible information

The crux of the matter is that many users don’t even read privacy policies because they are too long and complicated. Companies are therefore faced with the challenge of communicating the necessary information on the use of AI as concisely and comprehensibly as possible. In addition, AI systems are often perceived as a “black box” whose decision-making process is difficult to understand, even for experts. This makes it all the more important to highlight the key points and explain them in plain language, which requires new, user-friendly approaches such as layered notices, icons and videos. Interactive elements such as chatbots can also help to answer questions. It is crucial that the core messages can be grasped quickly and that users can find out more details if required. At the same time, the information must not be too superficial, but must cover all essential aspects. Creativity is required here in order to present complex issues clearly without overwhelming the user. The information should also be updated regularly if the use of AI changes. The Data Protection Conference’s guidance on AI and data protection from 06.05.2024 can serve as a guideline. It outlines best practices for the design of data protection notices when using AI, e.g. the use of pictograms and traffic light colors to visualize the level of risk.

Conclusion

AI offers great opportunities, but also harbors risks for fundamental rights and data protection. This makes transparency all the more important. Companies that use AI should actively inform users about it – not only because it is required by law, but also because it creates trust. Because only if people understand what happens to their data can they trust AI systems and benefit from their advantages, and data protection is not a brake on this, but an enabler for AI that is geared towards the common good. At the same time, the information obligations must be implemented with a sense of proportion. It does no one any good if data protection declarations become ever longer and more incomprehensible. Instead, we need a new “information culture” that reconciles transparency and usability. If this succeeds, all sides benefit: Companies can exploit the potential of AI, users retain control over their data and data protection becomes a quality feature for trustworthy AI applications. This requires a continuous dialog between business, science, politics and civil society in order to jointly develop standards for the ethically responsible and legally compliant use of AI. The EU’s AI regulation can provide important impetus here, but it must be brought to life in practice.

Tags: Artificial intelligenceBghDevelopmentEntscheidungenEuFacebookFrankfurtFrankfurt Higher Regional CourtGDPRGeneral Data Protection RegulationGoogleHate speechInformationJudgmentKarlsruheKINetwork Enforcement ActolgPrivacyRegulationrightTransparencyUwg

Beliebte Beträge

Legally compliant archiving of emails: legal requirements and practical implementation

Legally compliant archiving of emails: legal requirements and practical implementation
14. March 2025

It is impossible to imagine modern corporate communication without e-mail. It is not only used for the rapid exchange of...

Read moreDetails

Risks when hosting personal data on US cloud servers

Risks when hosting personal data on US cloud servers
18. February 2025

Hosting personal data on cloud servers from US providers poses significant risks for European companies, particularly with regard to compliance...

Read moreDetails

SaaS contract for marketing tools

da785cff1bca5b6897d0d4cacf7359ff
15. November 2024

When I helped set up CPMStar, one of the first major gaming marketing agencies in Germany, a few years ago,...

Read moreDetails

BGH ruling on damages for data protection breaches

BGH: Women also gamble on first-person shooters
8. December 2024

The ruling by the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) on November 18, 2024 has put an abrupt end to...

Read moreDetails

New cookie regulation: a step towards simplifying digital consent?

Esport: Sports Committee of the BT meets Wednesday
8. December 2024

On September 4, 2024, the Federal Government adopted the Consent Management Ordinance (EinwV). This new ordinance is based on Section...

Read moreDetails

Multi-tenant architectures in the SaaS sector: data separation and compliance requirements

6e405ef66c83bf9de2066fb73a1deafc
9. November 2024

Multi-tenant architectures are the backbone of modern SaaS solutions, as they enable efficient use of resources and scalability. However, they...

Read moreDetails

Federal Court of Justice plans landmark decision on Facebook data scandal

BGH considers Uber Black to be anti-competitive
9. November 2024

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has announced that it intends to issue a landmark ruling in the form of...

Read moreDetails

Legally compliant integration of biometric authentication systems: Data protection and security requirements for FinTech start-ups

Legally compliant integration of biometric authentication systems: Data protection and security requirements for FinTech start-ups
21. October 2024

Biometric authentication systems are revolutionizing the way FinTech start-ups ensure security and user-friendliness. However, the integration of this technology also...

Read moreDetails

Legally compliant integration of biometric authentication systems: Data protection and security requirements for FinTech start-ups

Legally compliant integration of biometric authentication systems: Data protection and security requirements for FinTech start-ups
21. October 2024

Biometric authentication systems are revolutionizing the way FinTech start-ups ensure security and user-friendliness. However, the integration of this technology also...

Read moreDetails

5.0 60 reviews

  • Avatar Lennart Korte ★★★★★ vor 2 Monaten
    Ich kann Herrn Härtel als Anwalt absolut weiterempfehlen! Sein Service ist erstklassig – schnelle Antwortzeiten, effiziente … Mehr Arbeit und dabei sehr kostengünstig, was für Startups besonders wichtig ist. Er hat für mein Startup einen Vertrag erstellt, und ich bin von seiner professionellen und zuverlässigen Arbeit überzeugt. Klare Empfehlung!
  • Avatar R.H. ★★★★★ vor 3 Monaten
    Ich kann Hr. Härtel nur empfehlen! Er hat mich bei einem Betrugsversuch einer Krypto Börse rechtlich vertreten. Ich bin sehr … Mehr zufrieden mit seiner engagierten Arbeit gewesen. Ich wurde von Anfang an kompetent, fair und absolut transparent beraten. Trotz eines zähen Verfahrens und einer großen Börse als Gegner, habe ich mich immer sicher und zuversichtlich gefühlt. Auch die Schnelligkeit und die sehr gute Erreichbarkeit möchte ich an der Stelle hoch loben und nochmal meinen herzlichsten Dank aussprechen! Daumen hoch mit 10 Sternen!
  • Avatar P! Galerie ★★★★★ vor 4 Monaten
    Herr Härtel hat uns äusserst kompetent in einen lästigen Fall mit META betreut. Er war effizient, beharrlich, aber auch mit … Mehr uns geduldig. Menschlich top, bis wir am Ende Dank ihm erfolgreich zum Ziel gekommen sind. Können wir wärmstens empfehlen. Und nochmals danke. P.H.
  • Avatar Philip Lucas ★★★★★ vor 8 Monaten
    Wir haben Herrn Härtel für unser Unternehmen konsultiert und sind äußerst zufrieden mit seiner Arbeit. Von Anfang an hat … Mehr er einen überaus kompetenten Eindruck gemacht und sich als ein sehr angenehmer Gesprächspartner erwiesen. Seine fachliche Expertise und seine verständliche und zugängliche Art im Umgang mit komplexen Themen haben uns überzeugt. Wir freuen uns auf eine langfristige und erfolgreiche Zusammenarbeit!
  • Avatar Doris H. ★★★★★ vor 10 Monaten
    Herr Härtel hat uns bezüglich eines Telefonvertrags beraten und vertreten. Wir waren mit seinem Service sehr zufrieden. Er … Mehr hat stets schnell auf unsere E-mails und Anrufe reagiert und den Sachverhalt einfach und verständlich erklärt. Wir würden Herrn Härtel jederzeit wieder beauftragen.Vielen Dank für die hervorragende Unterstützung
  • Avatar Mikael Hällgren ★★★★★ vor einem Monat
    I got fantastic support from Marian Härtel. He managed to get my wrongfully suspended Instagram account restored. He was … Mehr incredibly helpful the whole way until the positive outcome. Highly recommended!
  • Avatar Mosaic Mask Studio ★★★★★ vor 5 Monaten
    Die Kanzlei ist immer ein verlässlicher Partner bei der Sichtung und Bearbeitung von Verträgen in der IT Branche. Es ist … Mehr stets ein professioneller Austausch auf Augenhöhe.
    Die Ergebnisse sind auf hohem Niveau und haben die interessen unsers Unternehmens immer bestmöglich wiedergespiegelt.
    Vielen Dank für die sehr gute Zusammenarbeit.
  • Avatar Philipp Skaar ★★★★★ vor 8 Monaten
    Als kleines inhabergeführtes Hotel sehen wir uns ab und dann (bei sonst weit über dem Durchschnitt liegenden Bewertungen) … Mehr der Herausforderung von aus der Anonymität heraus agierenden "Netz-Querulanten" gegenüber gestellt. Herr Härtel versteht es außerordentlich spür- und feinsinnig, derartige - oftmals auf Rufschädigung ausgerichtete - Bewertungen bereits im Keim, also außergerichtlich, zu ersticken und somit unseren Betrieb vor weiteren Folgeschäden zu bewahren. Seine Umsetzungsgeschwindigkeit ist beeindruckend, seine bisherige Erfolgsquote = 100%.Ergo: Unsere erste Adresse zur Abwehr von geschäftsschädigenden Angriffen aus dem Web.
  • ●
  • ●
  • ●
  • ●

Video-Galerie

Legal advice for AI start-ups and SaaS providers: Lawyer Marian Härtel explains
Legal advice for AI start-ups and SaaS providers: Lawyer Marian Härtel explains
How do I help clients?
How do I help clients?
Investment advice for innovative start-ups and investors: lawyer Marian Härtel explains
Investment advice for innovative start-ups and investors: lawyer Marian Härtel explains
Forfeiture

Forfeiture

16. October 2024

Definition and legal basis: Forfeiture is a legal institution of German civil law based on the principle of good faith...

Read moreDetails
European Cooperative Society (SCE)

European Cooperative Society (SCE)

16. October 2024
Beware of fake streaming offers

Deepfake

29. March 2025

Personality law

25. June 2023
Open source license

Open source license

27. June 2023

Podcast Folgen

Web3, Blockchain und Recht – Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme

Web3, Blockchain und Recht – Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme

25. September 2024

  In dieser aufschlussreichen Episode des ITmedialaw-Podcasts wird ein tiefgehender Blick auf die Schnittstelle von Web3, Blockchain-Technologie und Recht geworfen....

Rechtliche Herausforderungen innovativer Geschäftsmodelle

Rechtliche Herausforderungen innovativer Geschäftsmodelle

26. September 2024

In dieser fesselnden Podcast-Episode tauche ich als IT- und Medienrechtsanwalt tief in die Welt der rechtlichen Herausforderungen ein, die mit...

Rechtliche Beratung für Startups – Investitionen, die sich lohnen

Rechtliche Beratung für Startups – Investitionen, die sich lohnen

17. November 2024

In dieser Episode des ITmedialaw.com Podcasts dreht sich alles um die Bedeutung rechtlicher Beratung für Startups. Host Marian Härtel spricht...

Auf der dunklen Seite? Ein Rechtsanwalt im Spannungsfeld innovativer Startups

Auf der dunklen Seite? Ein Rechtsanwalt im Spannungsfeld innovativer Startups

25. September 2024

In dieser persönlichen und fesselnden Episode taucht der erfahrene IT- und Medienrechtsanwalt tief in die Grauzone seiner beruflichen Tätigkeit ein....

  • Home
  • Imprint
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • Agile and lean law firm
  • Ideal partner
  • Contact
  • Videos
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Contact
  • Leistungen
    • Support with the foundation
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Games law consulting
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
    • Investment advice
    • Booking as speaker
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Contract review and preparation
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Focus on start-ups
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus on start-ups
    • How can I help clients?
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Testimonials
    • Imprint
  • Videos
    • Video series – about me
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos on services
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Shorts
    • Third-party videos
    • Podcast format
    • Other videos
  • Knowledge base
  • Podcast
  • Blogposts
    • Lange Artikel / Ausführungen
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Labour law
    • EU law
    • Corporate
    • Competition law
    • Copyright
    • Tax
    • Internally
    • Other
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung