• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
Warenkorb
Plugin Install : Cart Icon need WooCommerce plugin to be installed.
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
ITMediaLaw - Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel
Home Other

Diverging OLG decisions on the release of names on Kununu

28. January 2025
in Other
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
0
judge 3678152 1280
Key Facts
  • According to the OLG Dresden, the anonymity of the reviewer has priority in many cases.
  • The OLG Hamburg emphasizes the right of companies to verify their identity.
  • The diverging rulings create legal uncertainty for platforms such as Kununu and companies.
  • Companies and platform operators must develop new review processes to take account of both court rulings.
  • The Federal Court of Justice could soon contribute to a uniform solution in this area of law.
  • Companies should rethink their strategies for contesting valuations and become more proactive.
  • Legal disputes can offer both risks and opportunities for companies.

Two recent rulings by higher regional courts show that the question of the anonymity of reviewers on employer review portals such as Kununu is anything but clear-cut. These decisions also make it clear that it is not always necessary to accept a Higher Regional Court decision if different courts come to different conclusions. The judgments of the Higher Regional Court of Dresden and the Higher Regional Court of Hamburg are exemplary of the complex legal situation in this area. While one court focuses on the protection of anonymity, the other emphasizes the companies’ right to review. This divergence reflects the challenge of finding an appropriate balance between the interests of the evaluators and the evaluated companies. Case law must weigh up the importance of employer review portals for transparency in the labor market against the protection of companies from unjustified reviews. This also highlights the need to continuously develop the legal framework for digital platforms. This results in considerable legal uncertainty for companies and platform operators, which can only be eliminated by clarification from the highest court.

Content Hide
1. The OLG Dresden: Protection of anonymity
2. The OLG Hamburg: Right to review
3. The consequences for Kununu and companies
4. Outlook
5. Conclusion

The OLG Dresden: Protection of anonymity

The Dresden Higher Regional Court took a clear position in its ruling of 17.12.2024 (Ref. 4 U 744/24): The anonymity of reviewers has priority. The court argues that Kununu, as a platform operator, is not obliged to disclose the identity of the reviewer. Instead, it is sufficient for Kununu to carry out an appropriate review in the event of complaints by companies. The OLG Dresden emphasizes:

“Unlimited disclosure of the reviewer’s identity cannot be demanded as a rule.”

The platform must respond to complaints from companies, clarify the facts and obtain evidence of an actual employment relationship. This evidence must be submitted to the company in anonymized form. The court thus recognizes the importance of anonymous reviews for freedom of expression and the flow of information. It considers the platform operator to be primarily responsible for carrying out an appropriate review without revealing the identity of the reviewer. This decision strengthens the position of employees, who can share their experiences without fear of reprisals. At the same time, the court emphasizes that companies are not defenceless against unjustified reviews by imposing verification obligations on platform operators.

The OLG Hamburg: Right to review

This contrasts with the ruling of the Higher Regional Court of Hamburg from 28.01.2025 (case no. 7 U 16/24). Here, the judges argue that companies must have the right to verify the existence of an actual employment relationship. The Hamburg judges emphasize:

“Even if § 21 TTDSG […] should have this consequence, this should not mean that a rating may be kept publicly accessible as long as the rated person is deprived of the opportunity to clarify whether it is based on a business contact with the rater at all”.

The Higher Regional Court of Hamburg argues that anonymized evidence is not sufficient if the company is unable to verify the identity as a result. The company must not be deprived of the opportunity to verify its own identity, and data protection concerns cannot override the need for identification.
The court sees the possibility of verification as an essential protection for companies against false or malicious reviews. It emphasizes that the rights of companies must not take second place to the protection of anonymity. This decision strengthens the position of employers and underlines their right to protection against unjustified reputational damage. At the same time, the court acknowledges that this can lead to a conflict with data protection regulations, but does not see this as an insurmountable obstacle.

The consequences for Kununu and companies

These divergent rulings pose considerable challenges for Kununu and similar platforms. On the one hand, they are intended to protect the anonymity of reviewers; on the other, they must give companies the opportunity to challenge unjustified reviews. For companies, this means that they could have different rights when reviewing reviews depending on the jurisdiction. This underlines the importance of not being too quick to settle for a single OLG decision, but to carefully examine the legal situation and pursue legal action if necessary. Platform operators must now develop processes that take both court decisions into account, which can lead to a complex review process. Companies should reconsider their strategies for dealing with employer reviews and possibly be more proactive in reviewing and challenging reviews. The different legal opinions may lead to inconsistent handling of reviews, which could affect the credibility and usefulness of employer review portals. At the same time, this situation offers companies the opportunity to actively defend their legal position and, if necessary, to help clarify the legal situation through further court proceedings.

Outlook

The discrepancy between the rulings shows that there is still a considerable need for clarification in this area. It is to be expected that this issue will be taken up by the Federal Court of Justice in the near future and that a uniform solution will have to be found. Until then, platforms such as Kununu are operating in a legal gray area in which they have to perform a difficult balancing act between protecting the reviewers and the rights of the companies. The BGH’s decision will point the way for the future of employer review portals and could have far-reaching consequences for the entire industry. It is conceivable that the BGH will find a middle way that guarantees both the anonymity of the reviewers and the verifiability for companies to a certain extent. It is possible that a multi-stage procedure will be developed that takes both sides into account. Until final clarification, companies should actively exercise their rights and, if necessary, take legal action. At the same time, rating platforms should make their processes as transparent and fair as possible in order to maintain the trust of all parties involved.

Conclusion

The diverging OLG rulings make it clear that the legal battle for the rights of companies and reviewers on employer review portals is far from over. Companies should be aware that a single OLG decision does not necessarily mean the end of the road. The different approaches of the Higher Regional Courts of Dresden and Hamburg show that it can be worthwhile to continue to pursue your own legal position. In such a dynamically developing area of law, another Higher Regional Court may well come to a different decision. This underlines the need to assess each situation individually and, if necessary, to take legal action up to the Federal Court of Justice in order to obtain clarity and legal certainty. Companies should reconsider their strategies for dealing with employer reviews and possibly take a more proactive approach to reviewing and challenging reviews. At the same time, they must weigh up the extent to which legal action against reviews could damage their image. Platform operators face the challenge of adapting their business models to the evolving case law and possibly implementing new procedures for verifying reviews. The current legal uncertainty also offers opportunities for innovative solutions that take into account the interests of both reviewers and companies.

 

Weitere spannende Blogposts

No “right to be forgotten” for press archives

Federal Constitutional Court: Right to Be Forgotten I
7. November 2022

The 2nd Chamber of the First Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court did not accept for decision a constitutional complaint...

Read moreDetails

BGH on Liability for Video Uploads of Third Parties

copyright
19. June 2019

The Federal Court of Justice has delivered an interesting verdict on the question of liability for video uploads of third...

Read moreDetails

Valve + 5 game publishers and violation of geoblocking/antitrust law

Valve + 5 game publishers and violation of geoblocking/antitrust law
12. April 2019

I hinted at it in this post on the geo-blocking regulation. Now the European Commission has informed Valve, as owner...

Read moreDetails

Federal Court of Justice plans landmark decision on Facebook data scandal

BGH considers Uber Black to be anti-competitive
9. November 2024

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has announced that it intends to issue a landmark ruling in the form of...

Read moreDetails

GDPR and Pseudonymization: A Surprising Ruling by the ECJ

District Court Frankfurt a.M. on the right to be forgotten
5. June 2023

Introduction The application of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) to pseudonymized data is a controversial topic that generates much...

Read moreDetails

Contracts with voice actors, streamers and test players – legal guidelines in games law

Contracts with voice actors, streamers and test players – legal guidelines in games law
10. April 2025

The development and marketing of modern video games is hardly conceivable without cooperation with external partners. Whether voice actors, streamers...

Read moreDetails

“East German” is not bullying in the workplace

“East German” is not bullying in the workplace
7. November 2022

The disparagement of an employee because of his or her East German origin does not constitute discrimination within the meaning...

Read moreDetails

Cloudflare liable for copyright infringement

ECJ: Advocate General assesses sampling as copyright infringement
7. November 2022

In a decision from October last year, the Higher Regional Court of Cologne obliged the provider Cloudflare, which many website...

Read moreDetails

Programmer in home work is subject to social insurance!

Employer may not force home office
7. November 2022

Dependent employees are subject to social security contributions. This also applies to home workers, even if their job requires a...

Read moreDetails
LogoRechteck

Aim of the knowledge base

24. June 2023

Introduction In an increasingly complex world where information and knowledge are crucial, the knowledge base on itmedialaw.com represents an ambitious...

Read moreDetails
New AI feature on ITMediaLaw: Quick check of individual contract clauses

Complementary

10. November 2024
Drag-Along Clause

Drag-Along Clause

24. June 2023
handelsregister

Commercial register

26. June 2023
Telecommunications Act (TKG)

Telecommunications Act (TKG)

27. June 2023

Podcast Folgen

Rechtliche Herausforderungen im Gaming-Universum: Ein Leitfaden für Entwickler, Esportler und Gamer

Was wird 2025 für Startups juristisch bringen? Chancen? Risiken?

24. January 2025

In dieser spannenden Episode des itmedialaw-Podcasts tauchen wir tief in die rechtlichen Entwicklungen ein, die die Startup-Welt im Jahr 2025...

Legal challenges when implementing confidential computing: data protection and encryption in the cloud

Smart Contracts und Blockchain

22. December 2024

In dieser fesselnden Podcast-Episode tauch ich tief in die Welt der Blockchain-Technologie und Smart Contracts ein. Die 25-minütige Folge beleuchtet,...

Influencer und Gaming: Rechtliche Herausforderungen in der digitalen Unterhaltungswelt

Influencer und Gaming: Rechtliche Herausforderungen in der digitalen Unterhaltungswelt

25. September 2024

In dieser fesselnden Folge nimmt Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel die Zuhörer mit auf eine spannende Reise durch die dynamische Welt der...

Das Metaverse – Rechtliche Herausforderungen in virtuellen Welten

Das Metaverse – Rechtliche Herausforderungen in virtuellen Welten

25. September 2024

In dieser faszinierenden Episode tauchen wir tief in die rechtlichen Aspekte des Metaverse ein. Als Rechtsanwalt und Technik-Enthusiast beleuchte ich...

  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung