• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

Drone footage and panorama freedom: a legal about-face

13. June 2023
in Copyright
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
0
copyright
Key Facts
  • Freedom of panorama allows you to take pictures of buildings and works of art in public places without the permission of the creators.
  • In Germany, freedom of panorama is laid down in Section 59 of the Copyright Act (UrhG).
  • Exceptions apply: temporary installations or interior spaces are not covered by the freedom of panorama.
  • In 2020, the Frankfurt Regional Court confirmed that drone shots of public places fall under the freedom of panorama.
  • In April 2023, the Hamm Higher Regional Court ruled that drone footage is not covered by freedom of panorama.
  • The case law on freedom of panorama is complex and requires a balance between copyright and public interest.
  • The legal implications of freedom of panorama for 3D modeling software are still unclear, particularly with regard to drone footage.

Introduction: What is the freedom of panorama?

Content Hide
1. Introduction: What is the freedom of panorama?
2. Frankfurt Regional Court: Drone footage falls under the freedom of panorama
3. Hamm Higher Regional Court: Drone footage does not fall under the freedom of panorama
4. Conclusion: Legal consensus?
4.1. Author: Marian Härtel

The freedom of panorama, also known as street image freedom, is a central concept from copyright law. It allows anyone to photograph or film buildings and works of art that are permanently positioned on public paths, streets or squares. This also includes the publication and distribution of these recordings, whether in print media, on the Internet or in television broadcasts.

In Germany, freedom of panorama is laid down in Section 59 of the Copyright Act (UrhG) and represents an important exception to the basic protection of copyright. It allows the cityscape and public landscape to be captured and shared in their current form without the need to obtain permission from the creators or owners of the works depicted.

However, it is important to note that the freedom of panorama only applies to works that are “permanently” located in public places. This means that temporary installations or exhibitions are generally not covered by the freedom of panorama. Likewise, interiors of buildings, even if they are publicly accessible, are generally not covered by the freedom of panorama.

Freedom of panorama is an important aspect of the balance between the protection of the rights of authors and the public interest in the free use and circulation of images and recordings of public space. It allows us to document and share the visual culture of our cities and communities without running afoul of copyright laws.

Frankfurt Regional Court: Drone footage falls under the freedom of panorama

In 2020, the Frankfurt Regional Court issued a remarkable ruling stating that freedom of panorama also applies to aerial photography using drones. The case involved a drone image of a property that was taken and published without the owner’s consent. The court ruled that such photographs are covered by the freedom of panorama as long as they are taken from a public place and the object depicted is visible from there.

However, this decision raises new questions, particularly with respect to other types of recordings. One example is footage taken from boats. Although a boat may be on public waters, it is unclear whether such shots are covered by the freedom of panorama. This depends on whether the water is considered a public place under the Copyright Act, which has not yet been conclusively determined.

In addition, the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has already ruled that photographs taken from a ladder are not covered by the freedom of panorama. The BGH argued that the freedom of panorama only covers the perspectives that a normal pedestrian has from the ground. Using a ladder to gain a higher perspective goes beyond what the freedom of panorama allows. Photographs taken from a window are therefore also not covered by the freedom of panorama.

These cases show that the application of the freedom of panorama in practice is often complex and depends on many factors. They also emphasize the need for clear and consistent case law in this area to ensure legal certainty for photographers and other creators.

Hamm Higher Regional Court: Drone footage does not fall under the freedom of panorama

In April 2023, the Higher Regional Court of Hamm ruled in a landmark decision that drone footage is not covered by the freedom of panorama. The case concerned a legal dispute between the collecting society Bild-Kunst and a publisher from the Ruhr area. The publisher had published drone photos of artworks on tailings piles in the Ruhr region in two books without acquiring a license from the collecting society.

The court ruled that the freedom of panorama only includes perspectives that exist from public ways, streets or squares. It clarified that the airspace is not part of it. The use of aids such as drones to obtain a different perspective is therefore not covered by the freedom of panorama.

In its reasoning, the court emphasized that the freedom of panorama is an exception to copyright and must therefore be interpreted narrowly. It pointed out that with the freedom of panorama, the legislator intended to allow only the gratuitous use of perspectives that exist from public ways, streets or squares. The airspace is not part of this.

The court also noted that the use of drones provides a completely different perspective than that which a pedestrian has from the ground. It argued that allowing the use of such perspectives would go far beyond what the legislature intended with the freedom of panorama.

In addition, the court pointed out that the Federal Court of Justice has already ruled that the use of a ladder is not covered by the freedom of panorama. It saw no reason why the use of a drone should be any different.

This decision by the Higher Regional Court of Hamm marks a significant turnaround in the case law on freedom of panorama and has far-reaching implications for the use of drone footage. It underscores the need for a careful balance between the rights of creators and the interests of the public in the use and dissemination of visual material.

Conclusion: Legal consensus?

Despite the decision of the Hamm Higher Regional Court, the last word has not yet been spoken on this matter. Since there is still no supreme court case law on drone photography in the context of freedom of panorama, the court allowed the defendant’s appeal. The defendant has appealed to the Federal Court of Justice, so the judgment of the Higher Regional Court of Hamm is not yet final. It remains to be seen how the Federal Court of Justice will rule on this matter. Until then, the legal situation regarding drone footage and panorama freedom remains unclear.

Interestingly, I came across the OLG Hamm ruling while doing research on the newly announced “Blender Earth Modeller Add-on”. This add-on, featured in a YouTube video, allows you to integrate 3D city and terrain models from almost anywhere in the world into Blender projects. It represents an impressive development in the world of 3D modeling and has the potential to revolutionize the way we create and interact with digital environments.

However, the legal implications, especially with regard to freedom of panorama, could be complex for computer game developers and other users of the add-on. While the use of satellite imagery and similar data sources is in many cases governed by appropriate licensing agreements, the use of drone imagery and other forms of aerial photography could present legal challenges. This is especially true in countries like Germany, where case law regarding panorama freedom and drone footage is still evolving.

I plan to present these and other issues in a future article.

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: Case lawFederal courtUrheberrecht

Weitere spannende Blogposts

BGH to decide on Yelp reviews in January

No more free tissues at the pharmacy?
20. November 2019

Facts The applicant claims that Yelp is injunctive relief, determination and damages for its assessment representations. As many will know,...

Read moreDetails

Trade Secrets Protection Act: Act now!

Trade Secrets Protection Act: Act now!
10. September 2019

Since 26 April 2019, the new Trade Secrets Act has implemented an EU directive that has so far received little...

Read moreDetails

Artificial intelligence in moderation: legal limits when blocking social media and gaming accounts

Artificial intelligence in moderation: legal limits when blocking social media and gaming accounts
21. November 2023

In the digital world of social media and online gaming, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to moderate content and...

Read moreDetails

BGH with exciting decision in the area of tension of the imprint duty

Social media accounts and imprint
12. September 2023

Introduction The digital world is an ever-changing playing field where influencers and streamers play an increasingly important role. In the...

Read moreDetails

Are so-called private servers “illegal”?

Small summary – Blizzard vs. Bossland
23. February 2023

Recently, the GVU made headlines in the scene of private server operators, those who offer game servers outside the original...

Read moreDetails

Whatsapp: family members may offend each other

7. November 2022

The Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt ruled that within the closest family circle, there is a space free of dishonor...

Read moreDetails

Ever heard of it? Cyber Resilence Act!

Ever heard of it? Cyber Resilence Act!
6. January 2023

Suppliers of modern technologies and products in particular must always be up to date with regard to current case law...

Read moreDetails

BGH confirms conviction for incitement of the people by online videos

Abusive warnings are punishable by law
7. November 2019

The Regional Court of Munich II sentenced the accused to a total prison sentence of three years and two months...

Read moreDetails

Constitutional appeal against adblock ruling rejected

Federal Constitutional Court: Right to Be Forgotten I
8. October 2019

The Federal Constitutional Court rejected a constitutional appeal by Axel Springer against the judgment of the Federal Court of Justice...

Read moreDetails

Obligation to file for insolvency

11. April 2025

Most important points The obligation to file for insolvency is the legal obligation of the company management (managing director, board...

Read moreDetails
Term clause

Term clause

16. October 2024
Sole proprietor / sole proprietorship

Work types

10. November 2024
Organschaft

Organschaft

16. October 2024
General partnership (OHG)

General partnership (OHG)

25. June 2023

Podcast Folgen

eda7ba83 c559 4e68 8441 41159a0751f3

Blitzskalierung und rechtliche Herausforderungen: Der Balanceakt für Startups

20. April 2025

In dieser Episode sprechen Anna und Max über die rechtlichen Herausforderungen von Blitzskalierung und disruptiven Geschäftsmodellen. Am Beispiel von Plattformen...

Digitale Souveränität: Europas Weg in eine selbstbestimmte digitale Zukunft

Digitale Souveränität: Europas Weg in eine selbstbestimmte digitale Zukunft

12. November 2024

In dieser spannenden Episode des itmedialaw.com Podcasts tauchen wir tief in das hochaktuelle Thema der digitalen Souveränität ein. Vor dem...

Die Rolle des IT-Rechtsanwalts

Die Rolle des IT-Rechtsanwalts

5. September 2024

In dieser spannenden Podcast-Episode tauchen wir ein in die faszinierende Welt der IT-Startups und erfahren, warum ein erfahrener Rechtsanwalt für...

KI im Rechtssystem: Auf dem Weg in eine digitale Zukunft der Justiz

KI im Rechtssystem: Auf dem Weg in eine digitale Zukunft der Justiz

13. October 2024

In dieser faszinierenden Podcastfolge tauchen wir tief in die Welt der künstlichen Intelligenz (KI) und ihre Auswirkungen auf unser Rechtssystem...

  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung