Marian Härtel
Filter nach benutzerdefiniertem Beitragstyp
Beiträge
Wissensdatenbank
Seiten
Filter by Kategorien
Archive
Archive - Old blogposts
Blockchain and law
Blockchain and web law
Blockchain Law
Competition law
Copyright
Corporate
Data protection Law
Esport and politics
Esport Business
Esports
EU law
Featured
Internally
Investments
Labour law
Law and Blockchain
Law and computer games
Law and Esport
Law on the Internet
Law on the protection of minors
News in brief
Online retail
Other
Tax
Uncategorized
Warning
Web3 Law
Youtube video
Just call!

03322 5078053

ECJ on the definition of communication services and regulation

In response to a request from the Higher Administrative Court of Münster, the ECJ delivered its ruling on the question whether Gmail is an electronic communications service within the meaning of the Framework Directive 2002/21 for electronic communications networks and services and would therefore be subject to the regulation of the Federal Network Agency in accordance with Section 6 of the TKG 2004.

The ECJ’s response is likely to interest many similar providers of communication, including chats and the like. Art. 2 Buchst. c RL 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive), as amended by RL 2009/140/EC, must be interpreted as meaning that an internet-based e-mail service which, like the Gmail service provided by Google, does not provide access to the Internet, is not entirely or predominantly the transmission of signals over electronic communications networks and therefore none ‘electronic communications service’ within the meaning of this provision.

In the ECJ’s view, the provider of an internet-based e-mail service such as Gmail does indeed transmit signals. However, it cannot be concluded from this that the activities carried out by Google in order to ensure the functioning of its internet-based e-mail service constitute an ‘electronic communications service’ in the form of a framework directive, since that directive is service does not consist entirely or predominantly in the transmission of signals over electronic communications networks. On the one hand, it is the Internet access providers of the senders and recipients of e-mails and, where appropriate, the providers of internet-based e-mail services and, on the other hand, the operators of the various networks which make up the open Internet, which are essentially The
ensure the transmission of the signals necessary for the functioning of any Internet-based e-mail service and which are responsible for this.

The fact that the provider of an Internet-based e-mail service is actively involved in the sending and receipt of messages is by assoring the IP addresses of the relevant terminal devices to the e-mail addresses or by disasarising the messages into data packets and disasaring them into the to feed in or receive open internet from the open Internet in order to be forwarded to its recipients is not sufficient to classify that service as consisting entirely or predominantly in the transmission of signals over electronic communications networks.

Picture of Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel is a lawyer and entrepreneur specializing in copyright law, competition law and IT/IP law, with a focus on games, esports, media and blockchain.

Phone

03322 5078053

E‑mail

info@rahaertel.com