• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
SAVED POSTS
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

Legal consequences of violations of poaching rules in e-sports

31. January 2023
in Law and Esport
Reading Time: 18 mins read
0 0
A A
0
pexels soumil kumar 735911 scaled
Key Facts
  • The poaching of players in esports is referred to as poaching, which raises legal conflicts.
  • There are no binding rules for coaching in esports, which makes poaching easier.
  • In many countries, the legal situation regarding poaching is unclear and varies.
  • Teams should create contracts and policies to protect their rights.
  • Depending on the country, violations of poaching guidelines may have legal consequences.
  • The International Esports Federation has issued guidelines to promote fair conditions.
  • Poaching can lead to claims for damages and contractual consequences.

Introduction

Content Hide
1. Introduction
2. What is poaching in esports?
3. What legal consequences can arise from this?
4. Legal implications of poaching in esports
5. How is poaching defined and what are the rules regarding the same?
6. Liability risks for players, teams and organizers
7. Examples of court cases for poaching in esports
8. Conclusion
8.1. Author: Marian Härtel

Esports is a growing phenomenon that is attracting more and more followers worldwide. However, as its popularity grows, various legal questions arise that need to be answered. One of these issues concerns the so-called poaching or poaching of players and teams. But what exactly is poaching and what are the legal consequences? Poaching in esports refers to the practice of poaching players or teams by other organizations. This can be either directly to a player or team or indirectly through certain agencies, intermediaries or sponsors. Unlike other sports where certain rules apply to poaching players, there are no such rules in esports. This means that teams and players are no longer bound to specific agreements and can therefore be poached more easily. From a legal point of view, however, the question arises whether or not poaching in esports is considered a legal act. In many countries, there is disagreement about whether poaching is considered legal or illegal, particularly with regard to contractual obligations between teams and players. Although there is no universally accepted definition of poaching in esports, it is generally considered an illegal act, even if there are no direct legal consequences.

In recent years, some esports organizations have addressed the issue of poaching and attempted to establish rules for poaching players. These guidelines not only help teams and players protect their rights, but also limit potential conflicts between organizations. However, these guidelines are not binding laws, so it is up to organizations to set and follow their own guidelines. Although it is difficult to determine whether or not poaching is legal in esports, teams and players should always consider all possible consequences when signing contracts. It is therefore advisable to seek professional help, whether in legal matters or to obtain support in evaluating offers. This is the only way teams and players can protect their rights and avoid conflicts. This is also true, by the way, because some tournament providers and game suppliers have direct rules about poaching that can have massive contractual repercussions in the team’s relationship with the game supplier if you violate poaching requirements.

What is poaching in esports?

Poaching in esports is an increasingly large and frequent challenge that impacts the recruiting process of talented players. Although poaching is generally considered illegal, in esports it is often unclear whether it can be legally prosecuted. There are many factors that influence the legal classification of poaching in esports. For example, Is the player under contract? Has the player received a clear offer of transfer opportunities? Have both parties agreed on the terms of the change? Can these conditions be confirmed by applicable law? There is no clear answer to the question whether poaching in esports can be considered illegal or not. The question must be answered on the basis of the specific circumstances of the individual case.

However, it has become apparent that it is very difficult for teams and organizations to legally enforce player commitments. Teams and organizations must therefore develop strategies to protect their interests and ensure that they do not fall victim to “poaching.” Some teams use contracts with exclusion clauses to protect their interests and prevent players from moving prematurely to other teams or organizations. Others seek to make reciprocal commitments to prevent potential poaching. However, this is only possible to a limited extent and does not provide absolute protection against poaching. Finally, it is important to note that many countries have or want to introduce specific regulations for esports. This means that teams and organizations must comply with their local laws and follow certain legal requirements to prevent poaching or take legal action. In summary, while poaching remains a problem in esports, teams and organizations have options to protect their interests. It is their responsibility to analyze the legal situation in detail and, if necessary, to take appropriate countermeasures.

What legal consequences can arise from this?

Esports has become one of the fastest growing areas of the entertainment industry in recent years. With high prize money and a growing number of enthusiastic spectators, it is becoming increasingly difficult to find qualified players. While some organizations try to retain their existing teams or build new teams, other organizations try to poach qualified players from other teams – known as poaching. In the legal classification of this topic, it is important to precisely define the role of the individual components. In terms of esports, potential coaches can be considered competitors as they try to poach the most talented players for their team. In this case, the player himself is a kind of coveted asset; he has the right to make his decision and express his loyalty to the team. After all, the organizations involved also have an interest in the player and want not only to maintain their existing team, but also to find new talent. Therefore, if another organization attempts to poach a player from an existing team, this may be considered illegal and thus have legal consequences.

In such cases, the affected player may claim damages. This may be particularly relevant if the organization in question has persuaded the player to terminate his contract with the previous team, or at least to terminate it early. In addition, contractual penalties may also have been agreed in the event that the player in question leaves the team or makes unreasonable demands on the coaching. Given the rapid growth of the esports market, it is therefore important for all parties involved – both organizations and talented esports players – to ensure that legal regulations are adhered to and respected. In this way, both the legal and financial consequences of poaching can be minimized, thus avoiding uncertainty and confusion. This is the only way to maintain general standards in esports and promote long-term growth.

Legal implications of poaching in esports

Not surprisingly, the legal implications of coaching in esports have recently gained prominence. With the increasing popularity and professionalization of Esports, some legal questions arise: Can players be protected from poaching? How can it be ensured that players’ rights are protected? The legal classification of coaching in esports is not clear. In some cases, it is classified as unlawful breach of contract or unethical conduct; in others, it is classified as unfair competition. Since poaching is in many cases a breach of a player’s fiduciary duty to his team, it can also be considered a breach of contract. This means that the player can be held liable for his actions. There are also situations where poaching is considered a form of unfair competition. In this case, organizations or teams try to harm other teams by hiring their best players. This can have serious consequences for the affected teams, as they have made significant investments in building their teams and may lose their competitive advantages as a result. To prevent such unfair competition, the International Esports Federation (IESF) has issued guidelines to protect teams from poaching. These guidelines contain provisions to protect the rights of players and provide clarity on the limits of coaching.

In addition, each player must give his consent to a change of team and accept all the details of the renegotiated contract, especially in terms of financial compensation, before proposing a transfer. This is to ensure that breaches of trust are avoided within Esports and that every player is treated fairly. Overall, esports has a lot to offer with increasing professionalization – but at the same time, you have to deal with the legal aspects of this sport. While there is not yet a legal system developed specifically for esports, guidelines and rules and regulations do exist, although much is derived from traditional sports, to ensure the protection of players’ rights and minimize the negative effects of coaching in esports.

How is poaching defined and what are the rules regarding the same?

Esport poaching is a touchy subject. Not only for the players, but also for the teams and organizers. Therefore, certain guidelines must be followed to create a fair and equitable gaming environment. To achieve this, it is important to have a basic understanding of what exactly poaching means in esports. By definition, poaching is the poaching or poaching of players or teams by another organization or group. Generally, those who coach try to lure a team or player away from the current organization/group by offering more attractive terms. This can come in the form of better salary offers, bonuses and other perks. In Esport there are certain rules for poaching. Some relate to protection against unauthorized solicitation of players or teams by other organizations and groups.

For example, the relevant league may specify what type of contract clauses apply and whether there are specific templates for such contracts. In addition, special rules for dealing with poaching may be established to ensure player protection and prevent abuse. However, there are also legal aspects that need to be considered when poaching in esports – especially in the bigger leagues. For example, all participants must be informed of their rights as participants in a league; this applies not only to the individual rights of players and teams, but also to the rights of the leagues themselves. In some cases, it may be necessary to enter into contracts or agreements to ensure the protection of all parties involved; these should be legally binding and take into account the applicable rules of Esports.

To sum up: Poaching in esports is a sensitive topic, so both the respective leagues and the players and teams must follow certain guidelines to create a fair environment for all involved and to prevent abuse. If all parties fulfill their obligations and adhere to the legal framework, poaching in esports can be made fair – both for those who are coaching and those who are being coached.

Liability risks for players, teams and organizers

It is important that players, teams and organizers understand the legal implications of coaching in Esports. Poaching refers to the exploitation of a player’s or team’s non-renewable contract in conjunction with a move to another competitor. In sports, this can be considered a violation of labor law, but what about esports? The exchange of services between a company and an esports player will often also be considered service contracts. Accordingly, both the player and the organizer are responsible for compliance with the respective legal requirements. Therefore, in principle, there is a liability of the esports player if they violate the provisions of the service contract. In addition, poaching in Esports can lead to disputes over the amount of compensation. In such cases, it may be necessary to consult a lawyer in order to clarify the legal situation and, if necessary, minimize liability risks. It is therefore advisable to carefully examine every aspect of coaching in advance and to record all relevant rights and obligations of all parties involved in writing.

Examples of court cases for poaching in esports

Esports have become a billion-dollar professional business in recent years. Gradually, it is becoming a legal reality that is gaining importance not only at the national level, but also at the global level. In esports, however, it’s more complicated than in other sports because it’s almost impossible to tie talented players to a specific place or team. To solve this problem, both companies and players are attempting to enter into contractual obligations, but the enforceability of these obligations has not yet been conclusively determined. Nevertheless, there are already court cases aimed at punishing poaching players and or teams. In 2017, Riot Games sued two professional League of Legends players for breach of contract before their contracts expired. In addition, Riot Games tried to set the amount of damages at $1 million for each player. The case was eventually settled out of court, with the details of the settlement kept secret. In 2019, League of Legends team Fnatic sued its former player Bora “YellOwStaR” Kim for poaching and violating his contract with the team. The team demanded damages from the player in the amount of 50,000 euros. Here, too, the case was settled out of court without any further details reaching the public. There are many other examples of poaching in esports that have come to light, but whether and to what extent esports participants can actually be held liable – especially with regard to the enforceability of contractual clauses – is difficult to assess, as there is still a considerable need for research in this area. However, it is evident that companies and teams are trying to effectively defend their rights and punish players who break the rules, indicating that they are placing more importance on the rules than in the past.

In the past, however, many issues, including those involving my clients, have been resolved without litigation. Let’s see if it stays that way in the future or if the disputes expand and intensify. I’m almost guessing the latter!

Conclusion

It is obvious that poaching in esports is a complex issue that affects many different areas. In order to seriously discuss the legal classification of poaching in esports, it is important to consider all aspects of the problem. While there is no clear case law on the subject yet, there is no doubt that the behavior of teams is increasingly guided by the legal aspects. To protect teams and players from inappropriate and unsafe poaching practices, sports leagues should set their policies and establish clear rules. It is also important that leagues comply with the law to avoid unfair competitive practices. Players should also be informed of their rights so that they can protect their interests and be treated fairly. Finally, both teams and players need to be able to properly discuss the legal classification of poaching in esports and support the development of the sport with fair-play-based practices. Such an approach will allow esports teams to create sustainable frameworks and ensure the protection of their players, which will ultimately benefit the growth of esports as a whole.

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: AgenturenCase lawCompetitive advantageContractual penaltyDamagesDevelopmentE-sportsEsportEsportsHaftungInvestmentKILabour lawLawsLegal systemLigaSicherheitSponsorTestVerträge

Weitere spannende Blogposts

OLG Munich: Additional fees for PayPal and instant transfer allowed

Online shops: Attention to advertising with EIA
15. October 2019

In a procedure of the Competition Centre, the OLG Munich has allowed the calculation of payment fees both when using...

Read moreDetails

How writing blog articles helps with my continuing education

How writing blog articles helps with my continuing education
14. February 2023

By now I have written almost 1000 blog articles here on the blog about IT law, copyright law, competition law,...

Read moreDetails

Start my youtube channel

Start my youtube channel
7. November 2022

I had planned to do it a few times last year, but in the end my little, newborn daughter, and...

Read moreDetails

Federal Constitutional Court: Right to Be Forgotten II

Federal Constitutional Court: Right to Be Forgotten I
27. November 2019

What is it all about? The decision "Right to be Forgotten II" published today, which is supplemented by the decision...

Read moreDetails

Attorney Härtel in the metaverse – so somehow: The chatbot

Attorney Härtel in the metaverse – so somehow: The chatbot
12. January 2023

AIs are currently on everyone's lips. And all tech-savvy lawyer who is an IT nerd myself and primarily advises and...

Read moreDetails

Choice of law by general terms and conditions not surprising per se

Choice of law by general terms and conditions not surprising per se
14. December 2018

Yesterday, the Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt ruled that a choice of law by means of general terms and conditions...

Read moreDetails

Misconceptions about the Copyright Directive – by MEP!

copyright
7. November 2022

I just came across a couple of misconceptions that are haunting the minds of politicians after the approval of the...

Read moreDetails

New law for fair consumer contracts

New law for fair consumer contracts
7. November 2022

The Federal Ministry of Justice has presented a draft bill that is intended to further improve the legal position of...

Read moreDetails

Renate Künast is successful at the Court of Appeal

30. March 2020

In response to Renate Künast's appeal, the Berlin Court of Appeal issued a ruling on 11 March 2020 that partially...

Read moreDetails
EU Inc: Warum Europa jetzt eine einheitliche Startup-Gesellschaft braucht
EU law

EU Inc: Warum Europa jetzt eine einheitliche Startup-Gesellschaft braucht

22. July 2025

Bürokratie-Frust: Ein Praxisbeispiel aus Deutschland Stellen Sie sich vor, Sie schließen eine Series-A-Finanzierungsrunde für Ihr Startup in Deutschland ab –...

Read moreDetails
BGH hält Uber Black für wettbewerbswidrig

BGH erschüttert Coachingbranche – Was gilt nun?

21. July 2025
Growth Hacking und virales Marketing – Juristische Anforderungen

Games-Förderung 2025 – endlich zurück!

20. July 2025
Eigentum an Software – Wem gehört eigentlich der Code?

Eigentum an Software – Wem gehört eigentlich der Code?

14. July 2025
Startup ohne Entwickler?

Startup ohne Entwickler?

8. July 2025

Podcastfolge

Rechtssichere Influencer-Agentur-Verträge: Strategien zur Vermeidung unerwarteter Kündigungen

Rechtssichere Influencer-Agentur-Verträge: Strategien zur Vermeidung unerwarteter Kündigungen

19. April 2025

Anna und Max sprechen in dieser Episode über typische Fallstricke und Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten bei Verträgen zwischen Influencern und Agenturen. Im Mittelpunkt...

Read moreDetails
Web3, Blockchain und Recht – Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme

Web3, Blockchain und Recht – Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme

25. September 2024
Blick in die Zukunft: Wie Technologie das Recht verändert

Blick in die Zukunft: Wie Technologie das Recht verändert

18. February 2025
Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

20. April 2025
Legal challenges when implementing confidential computing: data protection and encryption in the cloud

Smart Contracts und Blockchain

22. December 2024

Video

Mein transparente Abrechnung

Mein transparente Abrechnung

10. February 2025

In diesem Video rede ich ein wenig über transparente Abrechnung und wie ich kommuniziere, was es kostet, wenn man mit...

Read moreDetails
Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

10. February 2025
Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

10. February 2025
Was mich wirklich freut

Was mich wirklich freut

10. February 2025
Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

10. February 2025
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung