• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

LG Cologne on the liability of hotel images on booking platforms

22. February 2023
in Copyright
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
0
copyright
Key Facts
  • The Regional Court of Cologne ruled on the liability of hotel owners for the use of copyrighted photo wallpaper.
  • The photo of a room is a reproduction according to § 16 UrhG, which can lead to legal problems.
  • Purchase of the wallpaper does not lead to a license for reproduction or making available to the public without a contractual agreement.
  • The photo wallpaper was a central element of the room design, not just an insignificant accessory.
  • According to Section 57 UrhG, a work is only immaterial if its omission is not conspicuous or does not change the overall effect.
  • An atmospheric photo wallpaper cannot simply be left out, it is part of the design concept.
  • The decision has implications for hotel operators and the use of images in online advertising.

The Regional Court of Cologne recently issued an exciting ruling on the question of a hotelier’s liability if he posts a photo of a room on a booking platform and if a copyrighted floral wallpaper can be seen in this photo.

According to the court, the photo of the hotel room, which (among other things) depicted the photo wallpaper, is a pure reproduction according to the German Copyright Act. § 16 para. 1 UrhG of the photograph or photographic work visible on the wallpaper. The use of this photograph on Internet booking platforms then constitutes public disclosure pursuant to Section 19a UrhG. However, in the absence of a contractual agreement, the mere purchase of the photo wallpaper (which leads to copyright exhaustion with regard to the use of the same in the hotel room) does not in principle contain a (possibly implied) license for the reproduction of the photo wallpaper in the form of a photograph, nor for making it available to the public. According to the concept of transfer of purpose, only the necessary rights of use are granted upon purchase, which in the present case would not include the rights to reproduce and make available to the public on the Internet.

In the case in dispute, the photo wallpaper is not only an insignificant accessory pursuant to Art. § Section 57 UrhG, if it is a central element in the room design and is placed prominently on the rear wall. So hoteliers can quickly fall into expensive traps here, since a “normal thinking” person would probably not have thought of this problem. There are similar problems in other cases, for example, in the case of photos of business premises, on the walls of which hang well-known, copyrighted, photos, which are then clearly visible in the photos of the premises.

The court on this:

According to Section 57 UrhG, the reproduction, distribution and communication to the public of works is permissible if they are to be regarded as an insignificant accessory to the actual object of the reproduction, distribution or communication to the public. The provision also covers the right of making available to the public within the meaning of Section 19 a UrhG (BGH, GRUR 2015, 667, 668, marginal no. 15 – Möbelkatalog). The question of whether a copyrighted work is to be regarded merely as an insignificant accessory with respect to the actual subject matter of use pursuant to Section 57 UrhG shall be answered from the perspective of an objective average observer, taking into account all circumstances of the individual case. It follows that the qualification of a work as an insignificant accessory within the meaning of Section 57 UrhG is determined by the context of the statement, which can be easily perceived and judged as a whole by the average observer under the circumstances. The specifics of the medium in which the copyrighted work is used must be taken into account. Since the assessment as an insignificant accessory within the meaning of Section 57 UrhG presupposes the assessment of the content-related connection between the work and the main subject matter, the scope of the subject matter of a uniform assessment by the average observer also depends on whether and to what extent content-related references determine the message content of the subject matter of the reproduction, distribution or communication to the public in the individual case (BGH, GRUR 2015, 667, 668, marginal no. 22 – Möbelkatalog).

For the affirmation of the protective barrier of Section 57 UrhG, it is not sufficient that the copyrighted work is in the background from the point of view of the objective observer in relation to the main object of exploitation. According to the wording of the limitation provision, it is rather required that the work is insignificant in relation to the main subject matter of the reproduction. Immateriality in this sense is to be assumed if the work could be omitted or replaced without this being noticeable to the average viewer or without the overall effect of the main object being influenced in any way. However, even a work that is actually perceived as such by the viewer when considering the main subject matter of the exploitation may be regarded as an insignificant accessory if, according to the circumstances of the individual case, it cannot be accorded any substantive relationship, however slight, to the main subject matter of the exploitation, but is of no significance whatsoever for the latter due to its randomness and arbitrariness. A merely subordinate relationship is not sufficient for this purpose. In the required narrow interpretation of the limitation provision, insignificant within the meaning of Section 57 UrhG is rather only a work which, apart from the object of the actual exploitation itself, does not attain a minor or incidental significance.

Such a subordinate significance can no longer be attributed to the co-exploited work as soon as it is recognizably included in the actual subject matter of the exploitation in a stylistic or atmospheric manner or underlining a certain effect or statement, fulfills a dramaturgical purpose or is otherwise characteristic (BGH, GRUR 2015, 667, 670, marginal no. 27 – Möbelkatalog). bb) Applying these principles, the photographs at issue cannot be regarded in the present case in their specific use as an insignificant accessory to the guest room. Rather, the photographs in dispute are recognizably used to create the atmosphere of the advertised guest room. The photos are a central element in the room design and are prominently placed there on the back wall, which makes up the main part of the photo image posted on the Internet for advertising purposes.

The photo wallpaper with the photos of the plaintiff depicted on it on a large scale can also not be omitted or replaced without this being noticeable to the average viewer (BGH, judgment of November 17, 2014 – I ZR 177/13 – Möbelkatalog, marginal no. 27, juris). This shows already conspicuously the comparison made by the plaintiff of the room of the defendant with the photo wallpaper and the further room without a photo wallpaper with only white painted walls (page 11 and 12 of the pleading of 25.03.2022, sheet 199 f. of the file). The wall with the photo wallpaper attracts the eye of the beholder, which is not the case with the white wallpaper. The wallpaper with the tulip motifs is rather perceived by the viewer as belonging to the overall concept (compare BGH, judgment of November 17, 2014 – I ZR 177/13 -, marginal no. 31, juris), according to which the room is designed.

The judgment can be found here(Landgericht Köln, 14 O 350/21 (nrw.de)). I prefer not to use the pictures here on the blog 😉

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: BghBlogCologne Regional CourtHaftunginternetLizenzUrheberrecht

Weitere spannende Blogposts

BGH suspends proceedings against Facebook gaming center

7. November 2022

The First Civil Senate of the German Federal Court of Justice, which is responsible among other things for claims under...

Read moreDetails

The OLG Frankfurt fathoms the “shitstorm

The OLG Frankfurt fathoms the “shitstorm
7. November 2022

There are always judgments that make even a longtime lawyer smile. For example, the Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am...

Read moreDetails

Unity Media and WLAN hotspot: customers do not have to agree

Unity Media and WLAN hotspot: customers do not have to agree
7. November 2022

The First Civil Senate of the Federal Court of Justice, which is responsible among other things for claims under the...

Read moreDetails

EUGH: No second right of withdrawal if trial subscription turns into paid subscription!

Lego brick still protected as a design patent
12. October 2023

A consumer has a single right to cancel a subscription taken out at a distance, which is initially free and...

Read moreDetails

Landmark ruling on AI training data – Hamburg Regional Court sets standards

*Breaking?* First decision of the BGH on AI
1. October 2024

On September 27, 2024, the Hamburg Regional Court issued a groundbreaking ruling (case no. 310 O 227/23) in the area...

Read moreDetails

Legal challenges for start-ups

Legal challenges for start-ups
10. October 2024

Legal basis for start-ups As the founder of a start-up, you are confronted with a multitude of legal issues that...

Read moreDetails

ECJ: Facebook must elicit same and similar comments?

Publication of sales advertisements and classification as a trader
7. November 2022

According to ECJ Advocate General Szpunar, Facebook can be forced to elicit and identify all comments that are word-for-word identical...

Read moreDetails

Semi-fungible tokens (SFTs) in a legal context

Fractionalized Digital Assets and their Position in German and European Regulatory Law
19. March 2024

Introduction: The distinction between SFTs and NFTs As a lawyer specializing in advising clients in the blockchain sector, I am...

Read moreDetails

Establish a blockchain limited liability company? Does that

Establish a blockchain limited liability company? Does that
1. February 2023

What is it all about? As we have often read here on the blog, blockchains (no matter from which provider...

Read moreDetails
BGH-Coaching-Urteil 2025: Online-Coachings als Fernunterricht – ZFU-Pflicht und Vertragsnichtigkeit
Law on the Internet

BGH-Coaching-Urteil 2025: Online-Coachings als Fernunterricht – ZFU-Pflicht und Vertragsnichtigkeit

18. July 2025

Ein neues BGH-Urteil sorgt für eine Schockwelle in der Coaching-Branche: Am 12. Juni 2025 hat der Bundesgerichtshof (BGH) entschieden, dass...

Read moreDetails
Eigentum an Software – Wem gehört eigentlich der Code?

Eigentum an Software – Wem gehört eigentlich der Code?

14. July 2025
Startup ohne Entwickler?

Startup ohne Entwickler?

8. July 2025
Keine stillschweigende AGB-Änderung – Schweigen gilt nicht als Zustimnung

Keine stillschweigende AGB-Änderung – Schweigen gilt nicht als Zustimnung

7. July 2025
So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

3. July 2025

Podcastfolge

Blick in die Zukunft: Wie Technologie das Recht verändert

Blick in die Zukunft: Wie Technologie das Recht verändert

18. February 2025

In der letzten Folge der ersten Staffel des ITmedialaw.com Podcasts werfen wir einen Blick in die Zukunft des Rechts im...

Read moreDetails
Influencer und Gaming: Rechtliche Herausforderungen in der digitalen Unterhaltungswelt

Influencer und Gaming: Rechtliche Herausforderungen in der digitalen Unterhaltungswelt

25. September 2024
Legal challenges when implementing confidential computing: data protection and encryption in the cloud

Smart Contracts und Blockchain

22. December 2024
Innovative Geschäftsmodelle – Risiko und Chance zugleich

Innovative Geschäftsmodelle – Risiko und Chance zugleich

10. September 2024
Rechtliche Herausforderungen innovativer Geschäftsmodelle

Rechtliche Herausforderungen innovativer Geschäftsmodelle

26. September 2024

Video

Mein transparente Abrechnung

Mein transparente Abrechnung

10. February 2025

In diesem Video rede ich ein wenig über transparente Abrechnung und wie ich kommuniziere, was es kostet, wenn man mit...

Read moreDetails
Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

10. February 2025
Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

10. February 2025
Was mich wirklich freut

Was mich wirklich freut

10. February 2025
Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

10. February 2025
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung