• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

Notarization in Asset Deals: A Look at Section 311b para. 3 BGB

14. June 2023
in Corporate
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
0
a book gaf8d2343d 1280
Key Facts
  • The asset deal enables the selective acquisition of assets, but avoids certain liabilities.
  • In a share deal, all assets and liabilities of the company are taken over.
  • Notarization plays a decisive role in the context of asset deals and share deals.
  • After § 311b para. 3 BGB a notarial deed is required if all the assets are sold.
  • "Catch-all clauses" can be complicated and affect the need for notarization.
  • A lack of notarization can lead to considerable legal consequences, including nullity of the contract.
  • The article emphasizes the importance of legal details in asset deals to avoid pitfalls.

Company acquisitions are part of the day-to-day business of corporate law advice. Two forms of structuring dominate practice: asset deals and share deals. Both are established, but differ considerably in their legal structure, risk distribution and tax effects.

Content Hide
1. Basics: Asset deal vs. share deal
1.1. Share Deal
1.2. Asset Deal
2. Notarization for asset deals – focus on section 311b (3) BGB
2.1. What does Section 311b (3) BGB regulate?
2.2. When is an asset deal affected by the notarization requirement?
2.3. Examples from practice
3. Legal consequences of a breach of form
4. Strategic tips for drafting contracts
5. Conclusion: Notarization in asset deals – often overlooked, but highly relevant from a legal perspective
5.1. Author: Marian Härtel

While the share deal is aimed at the transfer of company shares, the asset deal concerns the selective transfer of individual assets. For buyers and sellers, the choice of structure is not a mere formality, but strategically important – both in terms of transaction security as well as liability, financing and tax optimization.

This article highlights the differences between the two models, with a particular focus on an often overlooked but practically relevant provision: § 311b para. 3 BGBwhich also requires notarization for asset deals in certain constellations.

Basics: Asset deal vs. share deal

Share Deal

In a share deal, shares in a corporation or partnership are transferred – usually GmbH shares (Section 15 (1), (3) GmbHG) or shares (Section 67 AktG). The acquirer assumes the legal status of the shareholder and thus takes over the company in its entirety – including all assets and liabilities, contracts, employees and potential inherited liabilities.

Advantages:

  • Simple transferability through a single legal act
  • Maintaining existing contractual relationships and licenses
  • Fast implementation (with clear ownership structure)

Risks:

  • Assumption of all liabilities
  • Possible tax burdens for the seller
  • Notarial form is mandatory (Section 15 (3) GmbHG)

Asset Deal

The asset deal leads to singular succession. The object is individual assets or entire business operations, e.g. machines, customer contracts, inventories or intangible rights. The operational shell (e.g. the GmbH as a legal entity) remains in place, it is merely “cannibalized”.

Advantages:

  • Selective acquisition: targeted exclusion of risks and liabilities
  • Better tax structuring options
  • No direct acquisition of shares

Risks:

  • Individual transfer of each asset required (third party consent if necessary)
  • Complexity of the transaction structure
  • Possible consent of the works council in the event of a transfer of business (Section 613a BGB)

Important: While the share deal always requires notarization, this is only exceptionally the case with the asset deal – but it is precisely this exception that is important.

Notarization for asset deals – focus on section 311b (3) BGB

What does Section 311b (3) BGB regulate?

“If an entrepreneur undertakes to sell all of his current assets, the contract must be notarized.

”
The purpose of the standard is to protect the seller: the complete sale of his assets should not be made lightly and without legal control. Notarization serves not only as a formal requirement, but also as a legal clarification and safeguard.

When is an asset deal affected by the notarization requirement?

The notarization requirement does not apply if the economic effect is equivalent to the sale of a company. The decisive factor is whether the seller expressly undertakes to transfer all of his assets.

Indications of the obligation to notarize:

  • Catch-all clauses such as: “The seller transfers all assets owned, whether listed or not.”
  • Disposal without explicit restriction to individual assets
  • Lack of an asset reserve or intention to continue as a going concern

However, notarization is not required:

  • The transfer of expressly designated individual items (even if they in fact make up the entire assets)
  • The sale of a clearly defined business area
  • The sale of a certain fraction or percentage share, unless the entire assets are involved

Examples from practice

  • ✅ Not subject to notarization: A company sells all machines, patents and trademark rights – but only if these are listed in Annex 1. No “catch-all” clause.
  • ❌ Requires notarization: “All assets and receivables belonging to the seller are sold.” No restriction, comprehensive transfer of assets – Section 311b (3) BGB applies.

Legal consequences of a breach of form

If a contract requiring notarization pursuant to Section 311b (3) BGB is concluded without notarization, it is null and void (Section 125 BGB).

In practice, this can lead to considerable reversal and liability risks:

  • No effective transfer of ownership
  • Reclaiming the assets already transferred
  • Reversal of purchase price payments
  • Liability of the advisor for lack of information

Strategic tips for drafting contracts

  • No blanket clauses: avoid indefinite formulations (“all assets”)
  • Exact list of the assets to be transferred in the notes
  • Definition of a residual asset or continuation purpose for demarcation purposes
  • Clarify in the contract that no complete divestment is intended
  • Preparation of an asset overview to document the remaining assets

Conclusion: Notarization in asset deals – often overlooked, but highly relevant from a legal perspective

Drafting contracts for company acquisitions requires care – not only in terms of content, but also form. § 311b para. Section 3 of the German Civil Code (BGB) is a little-noticed but potentially serious standard: a supposedly simple asset deal can quickly lead to formal nullity if the wording of the contract is unclear.

If you want to act with legal certainty, you should:

  • Specify contractual objects precisely
  • Do not use general clauses
  • always check (or have checked) whether a notarization obligation exists

The extra effort is worth it – because in many cases it is not possible to cure an invalid contract retrospectively.

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: LawyerLegal certainty

Weitere spannende Blogposts

Influencer: Federal Government wants to create new regulation

Legal form as an influencer? A few hints!
12. June 2019

Although the case law around influencers is currently subject to a clear trend, which can be clearly seen in various...

Read moreDetails

§Section 44b UrhG in the context of data mining of AI

copyright
21. December 2023

Introduction Introduction The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of data mining confronts copyright law with new and...

Read moreDetails

Agile development and fixed-price projects: Contractual challenges for IT service providers

Agile development and fixed-price projects: Contractual challenges for IT service providers
14. October 2024

The combination of agile software development and fixed-price projects presents IT service providers with particular contractual challenges. On the one...

Read moreDetails

Meta must pay 20 million euros in arrears to Telekom

Meta must pay 20 million euros in arrears to Telekom
31. May 2024

Background to the legal dispute Proceedings 33 O 178/23 before the Regional Court of Cologne concerned a claim by a...

Read moreDetails

A breakthrough in data protection diplomacy: EU and US move closer to an adequacy decision

hacker 4031973 1280
4. July 2023

Introduction In a world that is increasingly networked, the protection of personal data plays a crucial role. Every day, vast...

Read moreDetails

Revocation of consent for video publication only possible to a limited extent

Legal advice with AI support: Lawyer blog now with ChatGPT-4
24. September 2024

In a recent ruling, the Koblenz Higher Regional Court (OLG) decided that consent given for the publication of videos can...

Read moreDetails

A nerd in a lawyer’s robe: How I bridge the gap between law and technology as a lawyer

A nerd in a lawyer’s robe: How I bridge the gap between law and technology as a lawyer
8. July 2023

There are moments in my career as a lawyer when I wonder if I am too nerdy for my profession....

Read moreDetails

AI-generated content: Who owns the rights?

a7476826606eddf6e6711ec857b02593
18. June 2024

Copyright for AI content: Current legal situation and open questions The nuuse of artificialartificial intelligence (AI) for thecreation of textstexts,...

Read moreDetails

The Legal Questions Bot on ITMediaLaw.com: Now even smarter and more helpful!

Key Considerations When Offering an AI-Based Chatbot
15. September 2023

What's new? Content Awareness The bot already has a content awareness feature that allows it to understand the context of...

Read moreDetails
BGH-Coaching-Urteil 2025: Online-Coachings als Fernunterricht – ZFU-Pflicht und Vertragsnichtigkeit
Law on the Internet

BGH-Coaching-Urteil 2025: Online-Coachings als Fernunterricht – ZFU-Pflicht und Vertragsnichtigkeit

18. July 2025

Ein neues BGH-Urteil sorgt für eine Schockwelle in der Coaching-Branche: Am 12. Juni 2025 hat der Bundesgerichtshof (BGH) entschieden, dass...

Read moreDetails
Eigentum an Software – Wem gehört eigentlich der Code?

Eigentum an Software – Wem gehört eigentlich der Code?

14. July 2025
Startup ohne Entwickler?

Startup ohne Entwickler?

8. July 2025
Keine stillschweigende AGB-Änderung – Schweigen gilt nicht als Zustimnung

Keine stillschweigende AGB-Änderung – Schweigen gilt nicht als Zustimnung

7. July 2025
So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

3. July 2025

Podcastfolge

Legal challenges when implementing confidential computing: data protection and encryption in the cloud

Smart Contracts und Blockchain

22. December 2024

In dieser fesselnden Podcast-Episode tauch ich tief in die Welt der Blockchain-Technologie und Smart Contracts ein. Die 25-minütige Folge beleuchtet,...

Read moreDetails
Influencer und Gaming: Rechtliche Herausforderungen in der digitalen Unterhaltungswelt

Influencer und Gaming: Rechtliche Herausforderungen in der digitalen Unterhaltungswelt

25. September 2024
Der IT Media Law Podcast. Folge Nr. 1: Worum geht es hier eigentlich?

Der IT Media Law Podcast. Folge Nr. 1: Worum geht es hier eigentlich?

26. August 2024
Leben als IT-Anwalt, Work-Life Balance, Familie und meine Karriere

Leben als IT-Anwalt, Work-Life Balance, Familie und meine Karriere

25. September 2024
Rechtliche Herausforderungen innovativer Geschäftsmodelle

Rechtliche Herausforderungen innovativer Geschäftsmodelle

26. September 2024

Video

Mein transparente Abrechnung

Mein transparente Abrechnung

10. February 2025

In diesem Video rede ich ein wenig über transparente Abrechnung und wie ich kommuniziere, was es kostet, wenn man mit...

Read moreDetails
Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

10. February 2025
Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

10. February 2025
Was mich wirklich freut

Was mich wirklich freut

10. February 2025
Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

10. February 2025
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung