• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

Notarization in Asset Deals: A Look at Section 311b para. 3 BGB

14. June 2023
in Corporate
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
0
a book gaf8d2343d 1280
Key Facts
  • The asset deal enables the selective acquisition of assets, but avoids certain liabilities.
  • In a share deal, all assets and liabilities of the company are taken over.
  • Notarization plays a decisive role in the context of asset deals and share deals.
  • After § 311b para. 3 BGB a notarial deed is required if all the assets are sold.
  • "Catch-all clauses" can be complicated and affect the need for notarization.
  • A lack of notarization can lead to considerable legal consequences, including nullity of the contract.
  • The article emphasizes the importance of legal details in asset deals to avoid pitfalls.

Company acquisitions are part of the day-to-day business of corporate law advice. Two forms of structuring dominate practice: asset deals and share deals. Both are established, but differ considerably in their legal structure, risk distribution and tax effects.

Content Hide
1. Basics: Asset deal vs. share deal
1.1. Share Deal
1.2. Asset Deal
2. Notarization for asset deals – focus on section 311b (3) BGB
2.1. What does Section 311b (3) BGB regulate?
2.2. When is an asset deal affected by the notarization requirement?
2.3. Examples from practice
3. Legal consequences of a breach of form
4. Strategic tips for drafting contracts
5. Conclusion: Notarization in asset deals – often overlooked, but highly relevant from a legal perspective
5.1. Author: Marian Härtel

While the share deal is aimed at the transfer of company shares, the asset deal concerns the selective transfer of individual assets. For buyers and sellers, the choice of structure is not a mere formality, but strategically important – both in terms of transaction security as well as liability, financing and tax optimization.

This article highlights the differences between the two models, with a particular focus on an often overlooked but practically relevant provision: § 311b para. 3 BGBwhich also requires notarization for asset deals in certain constellations.

Basics: Asset deal vs. share deal

Share Deal

In a share deal, shares in a corporation or partnership are transferred – usually GmbH shares (Section 15 (1), (3) GmbHG) or shares (Section 67 AktG). The acquirer assumes the legal status of the shareholder and thus takes over the company in its entirety – including all assets and liabilities, contracts, employees and potential inherited liabilities.

Advantages:

  • Simple transferability through a single legal act
  • Maintaining existing contractual relationships and licenses
  • Fast implementation (with clear ownership structure)

Risks:

  • Assumption of all liabilities
  • Possible tax burdens for the seller
  • Notarial form is mandatory (Section 15 (3) GmbHG)

Asset Deal

The asset deal leads to singular succession. The object is individual assets or entire business operations, e.g. machines, customer contracts, inventories or intangible rights. The operational shell (e.g. the GmbH as a legal entity) remains in place, it is merely “cannibalized”.

Advantages:

  • Selective acquisition: targeted exclusion of risks and liabilities
  • Better tax structuring options
  • No direct acquisition of shares

Risks:

  • Individual transfer of each asset required (third party consent if necessary)
  • Complexity of the transaction structure
  • Possible consent of the works council in the event of a transfer of business (Section 613a BGB)

Important: While the share deal always requires notarization, this is only exceptionally the case with the asset deal – but it is precisely this exception that is important.

Notarization for asset deals – focus on section 311b (3) BGB

What does Section 311b (3) BGB regulate?

“If an entrepreneur undertakes to sell all of his current assets, the contract must be notarized.

”
The purpose of the standard is to protect the seller: the complete sale of his assets should not be made lightly and without legal control. Notarization serves not only as a formal requirement, but also as a legal clarification and safeguard.

When is an asset deal affected by the notarization requirement?

The notarization requirement does not apply if the economic effect is equivalent to the sale of a company. The decisive factor is whether the seller expressly undertakes to transfer all of his assets.

Indications of the obligation to notarize:

  • Catch-all clauses such as: “The seller transfers all assets owned, whether listed or not.”
  • Disposal without explicit restriction to individual assets
  • Lack of an asset reserve or intention to continue as a going concern

However, notarization is not required:

  • The transfer of expressly designated individual items (even if they in fact make up the entire assets)
  • The sale of a clearly defined business area
  • The sale of a certain fraction or percentage share, unless the entire assets are involved

Examples from practice

  • ✅ Not subject to notarization: A company sells all machines, patents and trademark rights – but only if these are listed in Annex 1. No “catch-all” clause.
  • ❌ Requires notarization: “All assets and receivables belonging to the seller are sold.” No restriction, comprehensive transfer of assets – Section 311b (3) BGB applies.

Legal consequences of a breach of form

If a contract requiring notarization pursuant to Section 311b (3) BGB is concluded without notarization, it is null and void (Section 125 BGB).

In practice, this can lead to considerable reversal and liability risks:

  • No effective transfer of ownership
  • Reclaiming the assets already transferred
  • Reversal of purchase price payments
  • Liability of the advisor for lack of information

Strategic tips for drafting contracts

  • No blanket clauses: avoid indefinite formulations (“all assets”)
  • Exact list of the assets to be transferred in the notes
  • Definition of a residual asset or continuation purpose for demarcation purposes
  • Clarify in the contract that no complete divestment is intended
  • Preparation of an asset overview to document the remaining assets

Conclusion: Notarization in asset deals – often overlooked, but highly relevant from a legal perspective

Drafting contracts for company acquisitions requires care – not only in terms of content, but also form. § 311b para. Section 3 of the German Civil Code (BGB) is a little-noticed but potentially serious standard: a supposedly simple asset deal can quickly lead to formal nullity if the wording of the contract is unclear.

If you want to act with legal certainty, you should:

  • Specify contractual objects precisely
  • Do not use general clauses
  • always check (or have checked) whether a notarization obligation exists

The extra effort is worth it – because in many cases it is not possible to cure an invalid contract retrospectively.

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: LawyerLegal certainty

Weitere spannende Blogposts

Advertising labeling for influencers soon only with real consideration?

Advertising labeling for influencers soon only with real consideration?
7. November 2022

One of the biggest topics here on the blog is certainly the question of when influencers, streamers, etc. have to...

Read moreDetails

Extraordinary termination options for influencer contracts

1. October 2024

In my practice as a lawyer for IT and media law, I encounter the challenges of the digital age on...

Read moreDetails

The Future of Influencer Regulation in Germany: A Look at the French Model and the 2022 Changes

9. June 2023

Introduction: Influencers are individuals who play a significant role in the modern advertising landscape due to their strong presence and...

Read moreDetails

FDP wants to change TMG in line with cookie ruling

ECJ: Cookies require explicit consent of users
23. October 2019

The FDP parliamentary group has tabled an entry to amend the Telemedia Act in response to the ECJ's cookie ruling:...

Read moreDetails

KSK levy obligation for agencies and marketers in the influencer sector: What applies and what does not?

KSK levy obligation for agencies and marketers in the influencer sector: What applies and what does not?
20. October 2023

Numerous articles on the topic of influencers have already been published on this blog. The search function can be used...

Read moreDetails

Influencer management: Drafting contracts when influencers change agencies

13. August 2024

Influencer management: Drafting contracts when influencers change agencies A common problem in influencer management that which I as a lawyerlawyer...

Read moreDetails

BGH with exciting decision in the area of tension of the imprint duty

Social media accounts and imprint
12. September 2023

Introduction The digital world is an ever-changing playing field where influencers and streamers play an increasingly important role. In the...

Read moreDetails

LG Wuppertal: Payment via PayPal to online casinos

Gambling vs. Skillgaming, a small demolition
7. November 2022

For individuals who thought in the past that they could participate in online casinos and get their money back later,...

Read moreDetails

AI & Copyright: An Analysis

AI & Copyright: An Analysis
10. December 2022

AI & copyright is a new and important topic that worries many people. It is important to understand this issue...

Read moreDetails
Post-Money-Bewertung

Post-Money-Bewertung

15. October 2024

Die Post-Money-Bewertung ist ein fundamentales Konzept in der Startup-Finanzierung und bezeichnet den Wert eines Unternehmens unmittelbar nach einer Investition oder...

Read moreDetails
Share Deal

Share Deal

26. June 2023
Competition law in digital marketing

Competition law

24. June 2023
Provider liability

Limitation of liability in contracts

11. April 2025
Strong Customer Authentication (SCA)

Strong Customer Authentication (SCA)

15. October 2024

Podcast Folgen

Rechtliche Risiken bei langen Entwicklungszeiten und der Stornierung von Crowdfundingspielen

Rechtliche Risiken bei langen Entwicklungszeiten und der Stornierung von Crowdfundingspielen

20. April 2025

In dieser Episode erörtern wir die rechtlichen Herausforderungen, denen Spieleentwickler bei der Finanzierung durch Crowdfunding gegenüberstehen. Wir beleuchten die Verpflichtungen...

eda7ba83 c559 4e68 8441 41159a0751f3

Blitzskalierung und rechtliche Herausforderungen: Der Balanceakt für Startups

20. April 2025

In dieser Episode sprechen Anna und Max über die rechtlichen Herausforderungen von Blitzskalierung und disruptiven Geschäftsmodellen. Am Beispiel von Plattformen...

Der unkonventionelle Anwalt: Ein Nerd im Dienste des Rechts

Der unkonventionelle Anwalt: Ein Nerd im Dienste des Rechts

25. September 2024

In dieser fesselnden Episode des Podcasts "Der Unkonventionelle Anwalt" tauchen wir ein in die Welt eines Juristen, der die traditionellen...

Rechtskette beim Spieleentwickler

Rechtskette beim Spieleentwickler

19. April 2025

In dieser kurzen Episode diskutieren Anna und Max die Bedeutung der Rechtekette im Game Development – ein zentraler Aspekt für...

  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung