• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

Meta must pay 20 million euros in arrears to Telekom

31. May 2024
in Law on the Internet
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0 0
A A
0
ndkp59a8al0ra2kyuwlv
Key Facts
  • In proceedings 33 O 178/23, the subsidiary of Deutsche Telekom AG sued Meta Platforms, Inc. for payments for data transport services.
  • After the termination by Meta 2020, it continued to use Telekom 's interconnects without making any payments.
  • The Cologne Regional Court ruled that a contract of employment for remuneration existed despite the termination.
  • The continued use of the interconnects was regarded as tacit acceptance of a new contract offer.
  • The ruling has important implications for the interpretation of contracts in the area of data transport services.
  • Technical terms such as "peering" are irrelevant if the contracting parties agree to the same conditions.
  • Clear communication and regular contract reviews are key to avoiding legal disputes.

Background to the legal dispute

Content Hide
1. Background to the legal dispute
2. Contractual relationship and use of interconnects
3. Judicial decision
4. Conclusion: Significance for the interpretation of contracts
5. Conclusion
5.1. Author: Marian Härtel

Proceedings 33 O 178/23 before the Regional Court of Cologne concerned a claim by a subsidiary of Deutsche Telekom AG against a subsidiary of Meta Platforms, Inc. for payment of outstanding remuneration for data transport services. The plaintiff had a contractual relationship with the defendant since 2010, which was terminated in 2020. Despite the termination, Meta continued to use the private interconnects provided by Telekom without making the payments due. Telekom provided Meta with a total of more than 20 private interconnects, through which Meta fed almost all the data traffic of its social media services into Telekom’s network. Telekom then forwarded this data traffic to the users of the social media service in its access networks. The dispute between the parties arose over the question of whether remuneration should continue to be paid to Telekom for these services or whether Meta could use the interconnects free of charge after termination.

Contractual relationship and use of interconnects

Following the termination by Meta and the standstill in negotiations on a price reduction, Telekom declared that it would continue to provide its services only for a fee. Meta, on the other hand, wanted to use the interconnects free of charge under the industry standard of “settlement-free peering”. This is an agreement between Internet service providers in which data traffic is exchanged without mutual payment as long as there is an approximate balance. However, Telekom took the view that Meta’s previous use of the interconnects for a fee continued even after the termination and that a service contract for a fee had therefore been concluded. Despite the termination, Meta continued to send data via Telekom’s private interconnects without restriction and routed its data traffic via these to Telekom’s network. However, Meta did not pay the monthly invoices issued by Telekom for this use on the basis of the most recent contractual agreements.

Judicial decision

The Regional Court of Cologne ruled in favor of Telekom and established that a contract for services against payment existed between the parties. The court argued that Meta’s use of the interconnects after the termination was to be understood as acceptance of Telekom’s offer to continue the services under the previous economic conditions. The judges emphasized that the technical name of the interconnection (peering or transit) was irrelevant, as the parties had unanimously meant the same thing. The decisive factor was that Meta had the data forwarded to its end customers via Telekom’s network in the same way as before the termination. Even in the case of free use, this is based on a contract under the law of obligations, which, in addition to the transfer of use, also includes essential information and ancillary obligations. The court considered Meta’s continued use of the interconnects to be a corresponding declaration of acceptance of Telekom’s terms and conditions until the issue of fees had been resolved by mutual agreement.

Conclusion: Significance for the interpretation of contracts

The judgment of the Regional Court of Cologne has far-reaching implications for the interpretation of contracts in the area of data transport services. It shows that the continued use of services after termination can be interpreted as tacit acceptance of a new contractual offer. This applies in particular if the use is made under the same conditions as before. The court clarified that even in the case of use free of charge, a contract under the law of obligations may exist, which includes essential information and ancillary obligations. For the interpretation of the contract, the decisive factor is what the parties intended by agreement and expressed through their actual conduct. Technical terms such as “peering” or “transit” take a back seat when the parties mean the same thing. The ruling thus strengthens the position of network operators vis-à-vis the large Internet companies and creates more clarity regarding contractual obligations when using network infrastructure.

Conclusion

The ruling highlights the importance of clear and unambiguous communication between contractual partners, particularly when terminating and continuing services. Companies should ensure that they are fully aware of and comply with their contractual obligations and the conditions of use of services in order to avoid legal disputes. Unilateral termination and simultaneous continued use of services entails considerable legal risks, as the present case shows. Even in long-term business relationships, contracts should be regularly reviewed and adapted to changing circumstances. This is the only way to create legal certainty for all parties involved. The ruling could also have a signal effect for the entire industry by shedding new light on the issue of fair cost allocation for the use of network infrastructures. It remains to be seen whether this will lead to a rethink on the part of the major Internet companies or whether there will be further legal disputes.

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: Cologne Regional CourtJudgmentKündigungLegal certaintyVerträge

Weitere spannende Blogposts

Esport team and streamer? Legal certainty through flat rate!

Esport team and streamer? Legal certainty through flat rate!
4. December 2019

For several years I have been supersing esport teams, streamers, influencers as well as sponsors and agencies in the digital...

Read moreDetails

Do Free2Play games violate the Pricing Ordinance?

Do Free2Play games violate the Pricing Ordinance?
23. October 2018

As mentioned in the previous article, many games that use Free2Play as a distribution model may also be in breach...

Read moreDetails

OLG Cologne: Cloudflare liable as perpetrator

OLG Cologne: Cloudflare liable as perpetrator
9. November 2023

Introduction In a landmark decision, the Cologne Higher Regional Court has recalibrated the liability of service providers in the area...

Read moreDetails

NFT and esports: an additional income opportunity or high legal hurdles?

What is “digital property” and how can I benefit from it?
16. May 2023

Introduction to NFTs and Digital Assets Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are an emerging area of digital assets based on blockchain technology....

Read moreDetails

Fees on SEPA transfers for old contracts inadmissible

Fees on SEPA transfers for old contracts inadmissible
29. October 2019

In a case brought by the VZBV against Vodafone, the Munich Regional Court ruled that the ban on fees for...

Read moreDetails

News about esports, streamers and influencers

News about esports, streamers and influencers
9. July 2019

In the meantime, a large amount of information for esports teams, esports players, streamers and influencers have come together on...

Read moreDetails

LG Stuttgart: GDPR violations cannot be warned

GDPR: Download pairing with newsletter/registration?
28. May 2019

The dispute between different courts over whether data breaches can be warned by competitors is somewhat similar to whether and...

Read moreDetails

Groundbreaking ruling on VAT in photovoltaic system sales

Groundbreaking ruling on VAT in photovoltaic system sales
2. January 2024

Introduction: On December 5, 2023, the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court issued an important ruling that has far-reaching consequences for the...

Read moreDetails

LG Koblenz: Inadmissible demand for confirmation of termination by telephone

LG Koblenz: Inadmissible demand for confirmation of termination by telephone
21. March 2024

Insight into the decision of the Koblenz Regional Court In its judgment of 27.02.2024 (Ref.: 11 O 12/23), the Regional...

Read moreDetails
Startup ohne Entwickler?
Gloss / Opinion

Startup ohne Entwickler?

8. July 2025

Es ist spätabends, der Kaffee neben dem Laptop ist längst kalt, doch ich lächle zufrieden: In wenigen Stunden habe ich...

Read moreDetails
Keine stillschweigende AGB-Änderung – Schweigen gilt nicht als Zustimnung

Keine stillschweigende AGB-Änderung – Schweigen gilt nicht als Zustimnung

7. July 2025
So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

3. July 2025
Dark Patterns: UX-Tricks im Visier von Gesetzgeber und Gerichten

Dark Patterns: UX-Tricks im Visier von Gesetzgeber und Gerichten

2. July 2025
Altersverifikation im Internet: Pflichten für Anbieter in Deutschland und Europa

Altersverifikation im Internet: Pflichten für Anbieter in Deutschland und Europa

30. June 2025

Podcastfolge

Rechtliche Risiken bei langen Entwicklungszeiten und der Stornierung von Crowdfundingspielen

Rechtliche Risiken bei langen Entwicklungszeiten und der Stornierung von Crowdfundingspielen

20. April 2025

In dieser Episode erörtern wir die rechtlichen Herausforderungen, denen Spieleentwickler bei der Finanzierung durch Crowdfunding gegenüberstehen. Wir beleuchten die Verpflichtungen...

Read moreDetails
Innovative Geschäftsmodelle – Risiko und Chance zugleich

Innovative Geschäftsmodelle – Risiko und Chance zugleich

10. September 2024
Blick in die Zukunft: Wie Technologie das Recht verändert

Blick in die Zukunft: Wie Technologie das Recht verändert

18. February 2025
KI im Rechtssystem: Auf dem Weg in eine digitale Zukunft der Justiz

KI im Rechtssystem: Auf dem Weg in eine digitale Zukunft der Justiz

13. October 2024
Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

20. April 2025

Video

Mein transparente Abrechnung

Mein transparente Abrechnung

10. February 2025

In diesem Video rede ich ein wenig über transparente Abrechnung und wie ich kommuniziere, was es kostet, wenn man mit...

Read moreDetails
Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

10. February 2025
Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

10. February 2025
Was mich wirklich freut

Was mich wirklich freut

10. February 2025
Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

10. February 2025
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung