• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

Meta must pay 20 million euros in arrears to Telekom

31. May 2024
in Law on the Internet
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0 0
A A
0
ndkp59a8al0ra2kyuwlv
Key Facts
  • In proceedings 33 O 178/23, the subsidiary of Deutsche Telekom AG sued Meta Platforms, Inc. for payments for data transport services.
  • After the termination by Meta 2020, it continued to use Telekom 's interconnects without making any payments.
  • The Cologne Regional Court ruled that a contract of employment for remuneration existed despite the termination.
  • The continued use of the interconnects was regarded as tacit acceptance of a new contract offer.
  • The ruling has important implications for the interpretation of contracts in the area of data transport services.
  • Technical terms such as "peering" are irrelevant if the contracting parties agree to the same conditions.
  • Clear communication and regular contract reviews are key to avoiding legal disputes.

Background to the legal dispute

Content Hide
1. Background to the legal dispute
2. Contractual relationship and use of interconnects
3. Judicial decision
4. Conclusion: Significance for the interpretation of contracts
5. Conclusion
5.1. Author: Marian Härtel

Proceedings 33 O 178/23 before the Regional Court of Cologne concerned a claim by a subsidiary of Deutsche Telekom AG against a subsidiary of Meta Platforms, Inc. for payment of outstanding remuneration for data transport services. The plaintiff had a contractual relationship with the defendant since 2010, which was terminated in 2020. Despite the termination, Meta continued to use the private interconnects provided by Telekom without making the payments due. Telekom provided Meta with a total of more than 20 private interconnects, through which Meta fed almost all the data traffic of its social media services into Telekom’s network. Telekom then forwarded this data traffic to the users of the social media service in its access networks. The dispute between the parties arose over the question of whether remuneration should continue to be paid to Telekom for these services or whether Meta could use the interconnects free of charge after termination.

Contractual relationship and use of interconnects

Following the termination by Meta and the standstill in negotiations on a price reduction, Telekom declared that it would continue to provide its services only for a fee. Meta, on the other hand, wanted to use the interconnects free of charge under the industry standard of “settlement-free peering”. This is an agreement between Internet service providers in which data traffic is exchanged without mutual payment as long as there is an approximate balance. However, Telekom took the view that Meta’s previous use of the interconnects for a fee continued even after the termination and that a service contract for a fee had therefore been concluded. Despite the termination, Meta continued to send data via Telekom’s private interconnects without restriction and routed its data traffic via these to Telekom’s network. However, Meta did not pay the monthly invoices issued by Telekom for this use on the basis of the most recent contractual agreements.

Judicial decision

The Regional Court of Cologne ruled in favor of Telekom and established that a contract for services against payment existed between the parties. The court argued that Meta’s use of the interconnects after the termination was to be understood as acceptance of Telekom’s offer to continue the services under the previous economic conditions. The judges emphasized that the technical name of the interconnection (peering or transit) was irrelevant, as the parties had unanimously meant the same thing. The decisive factor was that Meta had the data forwarded to its end customers via Telekom’s network in the same way as before the termination. Even in the case of free use, this is based on a contract under the law of obligations, which, in addition to the transfer of use, also includes essential information and ancillary obligations. The court considered Meta’s continued use of the interconnects to be a corresponding declaration of acceptance of Telekom’s terms and conditions until the issue of fees had been resolved by mutual agreement.

Conclusion: Significance for the interpretation of contracts

The judgment of the Regional Court of Cologne has far-reaching implications for the interpretation of contracts in the area of data transport services. It shows that the continued use of services after termination can be interpreted as tacit acceptance of a new contractual offer. This applies in particular if the use is made under the same conditions as before. The court clarified that even in the case of use free of charge, a contract under the law of obligations may exist, which includes essential information and ancillary obligations. For the interpretation of the contract, the decisive factor is what the parties intended by agreement and expressed through their actual conduct. Technical terms such as “peering” or “transit” take a back seat when the parties mean the same thing. The ruling thus strengthens the position of network operators vis-à-vis the large Internet companies and creates more clarity regarding contractual obligations when using network infrastructure.

Conclusion

The ruling highlights the importance of clear and unambiguous communication between contractual partners, particularly when terminating and continuing services. Companies should ensure that they are fully aware of and comply with their contractual obligations and the conditions of use of services in order to avoid legal disputes. Unilateral termination and simultaneous continued use of services entails considerable legal risks, as the present case shows. Even in long-term business relationships, contracts should be regularly reviewed and adapted to changing circumstances. This is the only way to create legal certainty for all parties involved. The ruling could also have a signal effect for the entire industry by shedding new light on the issue of fair cost allocation for the use of network infrastructures. It remains to be seen whether this will lead to a rethink on the part of the major Internet companies or whether there will be further legal disputes.

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: Cologne Regional CourtJudgmentKündigungLegal certaintyVerträge

Weitere spannende Blogposts

OnlyFans management contracts: What content?

OnlyFans management contracts: What content?
24. September 2024

OnlyFans has developed into one of the leading platforms for content creators in recent years. More and more artists are...

Read moreDetails

Ltd. (Limited) in Germany and #Brexit? Act now!

Ltd. (Limited) in Germany and #Brexit? Act now!
7. November 2022

Due to the introduction of the UG (limited liability company) in Germany, the Limited (under English law), with German administrative...

Read moreDetails

Triangular relationships in influencer marketing: Exciting aspects from Offenburg Regional Court

Triangular relationships in influencer marketing: Exciting aspects from Offenburg Regional Court
17. February 2024

In my legal practice in the areas of copyright law, competition law and IT law, I regularly advise management of...

Read moreDetails

Federal Constitutional Court: Right to Be Forgotten II

Federal Constitutional Court: Right to Be Forgotten I
27. November 2019

What is it all about? The decision "Right to be Forgotten II" published today, which is supplemented by the decision...

Read moreDetails

Drafting contracts for SaaS companies: Tips from an IT law expert

Drafting contracts for SaaS companies: Tips from an IT law expert
10. October 2024

Software as a Service (SaaS) has established itself as the dominant business model in the IT industry. For SaaS companies,...

Read moreDetails

Fraud through Apple Pay: A recent ruling by the Regional Court of Cologne and its implications

Fraud through Apple Pay: A recent ruling by the Regional Court of Cologne and its implications
17. May 2024

Introduction In everyday practice, there are always clients who have fallen victim to fraud through Apple Pay. These cases require...

Read moreDetails

Agent commissions in esport – Attention!

Transfer sums in esport?
13. February 2019

As a supplement to my article from yesterday , I would also like to add a brief outline of commissions...

Read moreDetails

Price adjustment clauses in general terms and conditions: A critical look at the example of the Netflix ruling

Price adjustment clauses in general terms and conditions: A critical look at the example of the Netflix ruling
24. November 2023

Introduction: In a recent ruling, the Court of Appeal in Berlin declared the price adjustment clause in Netflix's General Terms...

Read moreDetails

NFT and the copyright problem

“Invested” in tokens and nothing happened? Get money back?
30. January 2023

Already a few times I have subliminally pointed out in blog posts the problem of what NFT actually are and...

Read moreDetails
Contractual regulations for no-code/low-code software development
Other

Contractual regulations for no-code/low-code software development

21. May 2025

No-code and low-code platforms enable rapid software development without extensive manual programming. Applications are increasingly being developed on the basis...

Read moreDetails
Erotic content on OnlyFans: Copyright and personality rights protection for creators

Erotic content on OnlyFans: Copyright and personality rights protection for creators

20. May 2025
Goodbye hustle culture? Startup life between 24/7 grind and work-life balance

Goodbye hustle culture? Startup life between 24/7 grind and work-life balance

19. May 2025
Startup buzzwords 2025: Bullshit bingo in marketing German Introduction: Bullshit bingo in marketing German

Startup buzzwords 2025: Bullshit bingo in marketing German Introduction: Bullshit bingo in marketing German

18. May 2025
From the metaverse boom to AI euphoria – a tech lawyer in the hype cycle

From the metaverse boom to AI euphoria – a tech lawyer in the hype cycle

17. May 2025

Podcastfolge

Legal challenges in the gaming universe: A guide for developers, esports professionals and gamers

What will 2025 bring for start-ups in legal terms? Opportunities? Risks?

24. January 2025

In this exciting episode of the itmedialaw podcast, we take a deep dive into the legal developments that will shape...

Read moreDetails
092def0649c76ad70f0883df970929cb

Influencers and gaming: legal challenges in the digital entertainment world

26. September 2024
4f3597d5481e0f38e37bf80eaad208c7

The IT Media Law Podcast. Episode No. 1: What is this actually about?

26. August 2024
fcb134a2b3cfec5d256cf9742ecef1cd

The unconventional lawyer: a nerd in the service of the law

26. September 2024
d5e1e6cad87cb839a9e23af79034bd94

AI in the legal system: Towards a digital future of justice

16. October 2024

Video

My transparent billing

My transparent billing

10. February 2025

In this video, I talk a bit about transparent billing and how I communicate what it costs to work with...

Read moreDetails
Fascination between law and technology

Fascination between law and technology

10. February 2025
My two biggest challenges are?

My two biggest challenges are?

10. February 2025
What really makes me happy

What really makes me happy

10. February 2025
What I love about my job!

What I love about my job!

10. February 2025
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung