• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
SAVED POSTS
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

OLG Düsseldorf: In the B2C sector, no inclusion of general terms and conditions for offline orders and mere reference to website

13. August 2024
in Other
Reading Time: 5 mins read
0 0
A A
0
Alena Piatrova | Shutterstock

Alena Piatrova | Shutterstock

Key Facts
  • Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court ruled that general terms and conditions for offline orders do not become effective by referring to the website.
  • Companies must inform consumers comprehensively about the applicable general terms and conditions in order to ensure contract transparency.
  • A mere reference to the website is not sufficient; the GTC must be actively made available for inspection.
  • Consumers need special support as they are often less experienced in business.
  • In the B2B sector, the requirements are less stringent; a reference to the website is often sufficient.
  • The decision affects numerous sectors, e.g. tradesmen and service companies, which must correctly incorporate general terms and conditions.
  • Companies should adapt their sales processes to meet legal requirements and avoid disputes.

In its ruling of 25.04.2024, the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf decided that a company’s General Terms and Conditions (GTC) do not become part of the contract for offline orders by consumers if there is only a reference to the company’s website. This decision has far-reaching implications for the drafting of contracts between companies and consumers. It underlines the importance of informing consumers comprehensively about the applicable general terms and conditions. The ruling makes it clear that a mere reference to the website is not sufficient to effectively include the GTC in the contract. Instead, companies must ensure that consumers actually have the opportunity to take note of the GTC. This can be done, for example, by sending the T&Cs by email or post. The ruling thus creates more transparency and security for consumers when concluding contracts.

Content Hide
1. Facts
2. Decision of the OLG Düsseldorf
3. Differences to the B2B sector
4. Practical relevance and examples
5. Conclusion
5.1. Author: Marian Härtel

Facts

In this case, a consumer had concluded a contract with a company by telephone. During the telephone call, the company employee pointed out that the GTCs could be viewed on the company’s website. The consumer neither received a copy of the GTC nor did he confirm that he had taken note of them. This situation is typical of many distance selling contracts where there is no direct contact between the company and the consumer. In such situations in particular, it is important that consumers have the opportunity to obtain comprehensive information about their rights and obligations. This includes, in particular, taking note of the general terms and conditions, which often contain important provisions on the content of the contract, liability and warranty rights. Without an effective opportunity to read the GTC, there is a risk that consumers will conclude contracts without being aware of the exact terms and conditions.

Decision of the OLG Düsseldorf

The Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf ruled that the company’s GTC were not effectively included in the contract. According to Section 305 Para. 2 No. 2 BGB, the user must provide the opportunity to reasonably take note of the GTC when concluding the contract outside its business premises. A mere reference to the website is not sufficient for this. The court based its decision on the need to protect consumers. In contrast to entrepreneurs, consumers are often not experienced in business and therefore require special support in order to be able to exercise their rights. This also includes the opportunity to obtain comprehensive information about the terms and conditions of the contract. A mere reference to the website is not sufficient to meet this requirement, as it cannot be assumed that all consumers have internet access or the possibility to access the terms and conditions online.the court emphasized that strict requirements must be placed on the inclusion of terms and conditions for consumers. The trader must ensure that the consumer actually had the opportunity to take note of the GTC. This could be done, for example, by sending the GTCs by email or post. An explicit confirmation from the consumer that they have received and read the T&Cs could also serve as proof. The decisive factor is that the consumer has a real opportunity to deal with the terms and conditions of the contract. This is the only way to ensure that the consumer can make an informed decision on the conclusion of the contract. The ruling thus strengthens the position of consumers and creates clear guidelines for companies that want to effectively include their general terms and conditions in contracts.

Differences to the B2B sector

In contrast, significantly lower requirements are placed on the inclusion of GTC in business-to-business transactions (B2B). In this case, a reference to the validity of the GTC with a link to the website may be sufficient. This is due to the fact that contracts between entrepreneurs are assumed to be based on greater business experience and a higher degree of professionalism. Entrepreneurs are used to dealing with GTCs and know what to look out for. As a rule, they also have the technical means to access and check the GTC online. In addition, contract negotiations in the B2B sector are often more individualized, meaning that GTCs play a lesser role than in standardized consumer contracts. Nevertheless, the GTCs should also be formulated clearly and comprehensibly in business transactions and the opportunity to take note of them should be given. the reason for this distinction is that contracts between entrepreneurs are assumed to be negotiated “at eye level”. In contrast to consumers, entrepreneurs are experienced in business and therefore require less protection. As a rule, they can protect their interests themselves and are not equally reliant on statutory protective provisions. Nevertheless, the principle of good faith also applies in the B2B sector. Surprising or unusual clauses in general terms and conditions can also be invalid between entrepreneurs if they unreasonably disadvantage the contractual partner. Overall, however, the requirements for the inclusion of GTCs in the B2B sector are significantly lower than in relation to consumers. This takes into account the different protection requirements and the greater contractual freedom in business transactions.

Practical relevance and examples

The decision of the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf has far-reaching implications for a wide range of sectors in which contracts are concluded outside of business premises. In addition to traditional online stores and distance selling contracts, this also affects many service companies that often conclude their contracts directly at the customer’s premises. One example of this is tradespeople who carry out repairs or installations on the customer’s premises. Here too, the GTCs must be effectively included if they are to form part of the contract. A mere reference to the craftsman’s website, whether verbally or on the invoice or order confirmation, is not sufficient according to current case law. Instead, the GTC must be provided to the customer in text form, for example by handing out a copy or sending it by email. The same applies to other service providers such as IT technicians, cleaning companies or gardening firms, who also frequently provide their services on the customer’s premises. They too must ensure that their GTC are effectively included in the contract by providing the customer with an opportunity to take note of them in text form. Another example is contracts concluded at trade fairs or exhibitions. Here, it is not sufficient to display the GTC at the trade fair stand or refer to them on the registration form. Instead, the GTC must be actively provided to the customer, for example by handing out a copy or sending it by email after the trade fair. The effective inclusion of GTCs is also an important issue in other sectors such as the insurance industry or in contracts for the supply of energy. Here, contracts are often concluded on the telephone or at the front door, where the GTCs must also be made available in a proper manner. A reference on the policy or the contract confirmation is not sufficient here either. Companies should therefore critically review their sales processes and ensure that they meet the legal requirements for the inclusion of GTCs in all sales channels. Otherwise, they run the risk that important contractual clauses are invalid and cannot be enforced in the event of a dispute.

Conclusion

The ruling of the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf shows that companies must exercise particular care when concluding contracts with consumers outside their business premises if they wish to effectively include their general terms and conditions. A mere reference to their own website does not meet the strict requirements of Section 305 (2) No. 2 BGB. Instead, they must ensure that the consumer actually had the opportunity to take note of the GTC. This can be done by sending the GTC by email or post. An explicit confirmation from the consumer that they have received and read the T&Cs can also serve as proof. Companies should adapt their processes accordingly in order to create legal certainty and avoid subsequent disputes. Consumers, on the other hand, can rest assured that they are not bound by terms and conditions that have not been properly provided to them when ordering offline, whereas the hurdles are much lower in the B2B sector. As a rule, simply providing a link to the GTC is sufficient to effectively incorporate them into the contract. Nevertheless, entrepreneurs should make sure that the GTC are formulated clearly and comprehensibly and do not contain any surprising clauses. The principle of good faith also applies in commercial business transactions. Overall, the ruling by the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf shows that the inclusion of GTCs is subject to different requirements depending on the contractual partner. Companies must adapt their processes accordingly and take the protection needs of their customers into account. This is the only way they can conclude legally compliant contracts and remain successful on the market in the long term.

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: AGBbillCase lawConsumerE‑mailEmployeesHaftungJudgmentLegal certaintyMailolgSicherheitTransparencyVerträge

Weitere spannende Blogposts

Discount promotions may not be extended

Discount promotions may not be extended
7. November 2022

Since I have currently just seen the opposite, I would like to briefly point out the following circumstance in the...

Read moreDetails

Public consultation on copyright reform

copyright
7. November 2022

The Federal Ministry of Justice and for Consumer Protection (BMJV) is conducting a public consultation on the implementation of the...

Read moreDetails

Attention craftsmen and service providers: Unresolved consumer revocation – a long-term consequence without value replacement!

Attention craftsmen and service providers: Unresolved consumer revocation – a long-term consequence without value replacement!
25. May 2023

Note on the long withdrawal period: In the absence of information, it can be up to 1 year and 14...

Read moreDetails

AirBNB is not a real estate agent

Just do not insult the lawyer
27. December 2019

An important decision that could have a signal effect for similar mediation platforms came just before Christmas from the ECJ....

Read moreDetails

How startups get funded: An overview from seed to venture capital

How startups get funded: An overview from seed to venture capital
28. April 2023

Every startup needs financial support to grow and implement its ideas. There are several ways to fund startups, from seed...

Read moreDetails

Contracts for Influencers: What you need to know before you sign!

Contracts for Influencers: What you need to know before you sign!
6. July 2023

Introduction In the world of social media, influencers have become a driving force. With the growing importance of influencers, more...

Read moreDetails

Data protection when using cloud services

Data protection when using cloud services: what startups need to know
10. October 2024

Cloud services offer start-ups numerous advantages such as flexibility, scalability and cost efficiency. However, the use of cloud services also...

Read moreDetails

Judgment on World Of Warcraft & Account Suspension due to GTC Violation

Judgment on World Of Warcraft & Account Suspension due to GTC Violation
8. September 2019

In a case I represent, the District Court of Neukölln has ruled that an account in the World of Warcraft...

Read moreDetails

Misconceptions about the Copyright Directive – by MEP!

copyright
7. November 2022

I just came across a couple of misconceptions that are haunting the minds of politicians after the approval of the...

Read moreDetails
EU Inc: Warum Europa jetzt eine einheitliche Startup-Gesellschaft braucht
EU law

EU Inc: Warum Europa jetzt eine einheitliche Startup-Gesellschaft braucht

22. July 2025

Bürokratie-Frust: Ein Praxisbeispiel aus Deutschland Stellen Sie sich vor, Sie schließen eine Series-A-Finanzierungsrunde für Ihr Startup in Deutschland ab –...

Read moreDetails
BGH hält Uber Black für wettbewerbswidrig

BGH erschüttert Coachingbranche – Was gilt nun?

21. July 2025
Growth Hacking und virales Marketing – Juristische Anforderungen

Games-Förderung 2025 – endlich zurück!

20. July 2025
Eigentum an Software – Wem gehört eigentlich der Code?

Eigentum an Software – Wem gehört eigentlich der Code?

14. July 2025
Startup ohne Entwickler?

Startup ohne Entwickler?

8. July 2025

Podcastfolge

7c0b449a651fe0b81e5eec2e23515012 2

Urheberrecht im Digitalen Zeitalter

22. December 2024

In dieser aufschlussreichen knapp 20-minütigen Podcast-Episode von und mit mir wird das komplexe Thema des Urheberrechts im digitalen Zeitalter beleuchtet....

Read moreDetails
Der IT Media Law Podcast. Folge Nr. 1: Worum geht es hier eigentlich?

Der IT Media Law Podcast. Folge Nr. 1: Worum geht es hier eigentlich?

26. August 2024
Influencer und Gaming: Rechtliche Herausforderungen in der digitalen Unterhaltungswelt

Influencer und Gaming: Rechtliche Herausforderungen in der digitalen Unterhaltungswelt

25. September 2024
Innovative Geschäftsmodelle – Risiko und Chance zugleich

Innovative Geschäftsmodelle – Risiko und Chance zugleich

10. September 2024
Rechtliche Herausforderungen und Chancen durch KI-Influencer und virtuelle Mitarbeitende

Rechtliche Herausforderungen und Chancen durch KI-Influencer und virtuelle Mitarbeitende

19. April 2025

Video

Mein transparente Abrechnung

Mein transparente Abrechnung

10. February 2025

In diesem Video rede ich ein wenig über transparente Abrechnung und wie ich kommuniziere, was es kostet, wenn man mit...

Read moreDetails
Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

10. February 2025
Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

10. February 2025
Was mich wirklich freut

Was mich wirklich freut

10. February 2025
Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

10. February 2025
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung