• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • in**@********aw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

OLG Hamm and e-mail

10. July 2024
in Law on the Internet
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
0
olg hamm and e mail
Key Facts
  • OLG Hamm ruling confirms the challenges of proving email receipt, impacting businesses and individuals.
  • The burden of proof lies with the sender, especially if the recipient denies receipt.
  • Mere sending and absence of errors do not prove actual receipt of an email.
  • Requesting acknowledgements of receipt is essential for important messages.
  • Consider alternative delivery methods for critical communications, like registered mail.
  • Implement internal guidelines and employee training on email communication and legal risks.
  • Regularly update technical infrastructure to minimize delivery issues.

OLG Hamm: Proof of e-mail access remains a challenge

Content Hide
1. OLG Hamm: Proof of e-mail access remains a challenge
2. Arguments of the Regional Court of Hagen
3. Similar rulings and practical consequences
3.1. Author: Marian Härtel

In a recent ruling (case no. 26 W 13/23 dated 10.08.2023), the Hamm Higher Regional Court (OLG) confirmed the requirements for proof of receipt of an email. The case underlines the legal challenges of electronic communication, especially when it comes to proving access to important documents. The decision is one of a series of similar rulings dealing with the issue of e-mail access. For companies and private individuals, this has important consequences for business transactions. The decision of the Higher Regional Court of Hamm shows that despite the widespread use of e-mails, the legal uncertainty regarding proof of access persists. It is clear that special precautions should be taken with important messages. The decision underlines the need to be aware of the legal risks involved in electronic communication.

This case concerned a decision on costs in the context of civil proceedings. The plaintiff had claimed that he had sent the defendants the documents required to verify the claim by e-mail before filing the lawsuit. However, the defendants denied receiving this e-mail. The Higher Regional Court of Hamm confirmed the decision of the lower court, the Regional Court of Hagen (case no. 10 O 328/22), according to which the plaintiff had not provided sufficient proof of receipt of the email. The court clarified that the burden of proof for the receipt of an email lies with the sender, especially if the recipient denies receipt. It emphasized that the mere sending of an e-mail and the absence of an error message do not constitute sufficient proof of actual receipt by the recipient. The Higher Regional Court of Hamm thus followed the reasoning of the Regional Court of Hagen, which had already set out the principles for proving e-mail access in the previous instance. The decision underlines the importance of careful documentation and preservation of evidence for important electronic communications.

Arguments of the Regional Court of Hagen

The Hagen Regional Court cited several important arguments in its decision of March 31, 2023. The court emphasized that prima facie evidence does not apply to the receipt of an e-mail and that the technical possibility of receipt alone is not sufficient to prove actual receipt. It pointed out that the sender bears the full burden of presentation and proof of receipt and that the absence of an error message is not sufficient proof of receipt. The Regional Court emphasized the need for additional measures to ensure access to important messages and pointed out the possibility of requesting acknowledgements of receipt or read receipts. It stated that alternative delivery methods should be considered for particularly important messages and emphasized the importance of careful documentation of the dispatch. The court recommended asking promptly if there is any doubt about the receipt of an e-mail.

Similar rulings and practical consequences

The Hamm Higher Regional Court’s decision is one of a series of similar rulings. The Regional Labor Court (LAG) of Cologne ruled on 11.01.2022 (case no. 4 Sa 315/21) that the sender of an email bears the full burden of presentation and proof of receipt. The Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main ruled on March 16, 2021 (case no. 13 U 13/20) that the receipt of an email cannot be proven solely by the sending and absence of an error message. The Federal Labor Court (BAG) clarified in a ruling from 12.08.2021 (Ref. 2 AZR 543/20) that the recipient is generally responsible for proving receipt of an email if they claim to have received it. The Higher Regional Court of Dresden ruled on March 9, 2022 (case no. 4 U 2108/21) that additional measures are required to ensure access in the case of important notifications. The Nuremberg Higher Labor Court ruled on November 2, 2020 (case no. 7 Sa 404/19) that a confirmation of receipt can prove the receipt of an email.

The decision of the Higher Regional Court of Hamm and similar rulings illustrate the risks involved in transmitting important documents by e-mail. The following recommendations apply in practice: An acknowledgement of receipt or read receipt should be requested for important messages. Alternatively, declarations of intent can be written directly in the e-mail text instead of sending them as attachments. In particularly critical cases, traditional delivery methods such as registered mail should be used. It is advisable to keep careful documentation of the dispatch and any feedback. If there are any doubts about access, enquiries should be made promptly. The use of qualified electronic signatures can increase the probative value. It is advisable to draw up internal guidelines for dealing with important electronic communication. Training for employees on the subject of e-mail communication and legal risks can be helpful. The use of delivery services or special platforms for the secure exchange of documents should be considered. Finally, it is important to regularly check and update the technical infrastructure in order to minimize delivery problems.

The ruling by the Higher Regional Court of Hamm underlines the continuing legal uncertainty surrounding e-mail traffic. It shows that despite the widespread use of e-mails in business transactions, proving the receipt of an electronic message is still a challenge. Companies and private individuals should be aware of this problem and take appropriate precautions when making important communications. The decision highlights the need to carefully consider the legal and technical aspects of electronic communication. It is clear that it may be necessary to adapt case law to technological developments. Until then, it remains essential for senders of important e-mails to take additional steps to secure and document access. The Hamm Higher Regional Court’s decision can be seen as an opportunity to review existing communication processes and adapt them if necessary. Finally, the case underlines the importance of a holistic view of communication strategies in the digital age.

 

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: Burden of proofCase lawCustomizationDresdenE-mailEmployeesFederal Labor CourtFrankfurtFrankfurt Higher Regional CourtJudgmentJudgmentsMailolg

Weitere spannende Blogposts

Competition law in digital marketing

Competition law in digital marketing
10. October 2024

Digital marketing offers start-ups a wide range of opportunities to advertise their products and services and reach their target groups...

Read moreDetails

YouTube is only liable under Art. 6 DSA if the infringement is reported with sufficient specificity

YouTube: What to do about copyright extortion?
26. August 2024

The Digital Services Act (DSA) is an EU law that aims to control and restrict the distribution of illegal content...

Read moreDetails

Twitter must not block accounts for no reason

Lupus in Saxonia
14. November 2019

The topic of how US social networks such as Twitter, Facebook or Instagram deal with German law has become increasingly...

Read moreDetails

False statement on Facebook can be banned in court

Facebook pages, data protection and August 1, 2019
11. December 2019

The press chamber of the Frankfurt am Main Regional Court has ruled that the impression may not be created that...

Read moreDetails

What about liability with a Discord server?

What about liability with a Discord server?
26. December 2022

For many people, Discord is an indispensable tool for communicating and sharing content online. But who is responsible for the...

Read moreDetails

OLG Frankfurt on Influencer & Sneaky Advertising

Brief reminder: Influencer as target of warning letters
4. July 2019

If an influencer recommends a product without specifying its commercial purpose, this constitutes prohibited disguised advertising if he or she...

Read moreDetails

E-commerce law: legally compliant design of online stores for the self-employed

E-commerce law: legally compliant design of online stores for the self-employed
10. October 2024

Creating an online store offers self-employed people enormous opportunities, but also harbors numerous legal pitfalls. A legally compliant design is...

Read moreDetails

GDPR and Legal Entities: The ruling of the OLG Dresden

BGH: Women also gamble on first-person shooters
5. June 2023

Legal entities are entities recognized by law as separate legal entities. They can own property, enter into contracts, and sue...

Read moreDetails

Can I talk badly about a competitor?

Can I talk badly about a competitor?
1. July 2019

If it is public, you should be careful with it. This is especially true if the content is not true,...

Read moreDetails
lizenzvertrag

Contract for work

26. June 2023

Introduction A contract for work is a form of contract in which one party (the contractor) undertakes to create a...

Read moreDetails
drafting contracts for saas companies tips from an it law expert

Software-as-a-Service contract (SaaS contract)

11. April 2025

Supervisory Board

25. June 2023
Contractual penalty clause

Contractual penalty clause

16. October 2024
c8cb7c2c03f212e63dd27dbfd5d1814c

German Limited Liability Companies Act (GmbHG)

9. November 2024

Podcast Folgen

Rechtliche Grundlagen und Praxis von Open Source in der Softwareentwicklung

Rechtliche Grundlagen und Praxis von Open Source in der Softwareentwicklung

19. April 2025

In dieser Episode werfen Anna und Max einen Blick auf die rechtlichen Grundlagen rund um den Einsatz von Open-Source-Software in...

Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

20. April 2025

In diese Episode wird die komplexe Beziehung zwischen dem 'Fail Fast'-Prinzip und den Verantwortlichkeiten der Gründer gegenüber Investoren und Mitarbeitern...

Globale Herausforderungen für Startups – Ein rechtlicher Leitfaden

Globale Herausforderungen für Startups – Ein rechtlicher Leitfaden

2. October 2024

Dieser informative Podcast bietet einen umfassenden Einblick in die rechtlichen Herausforderungen, denen sich Startups bei ihrer internationalen Expansion gegenübersehen. Der...

Der IT Media Law Podcast. Folge Nr. 1: Worum geht es hier eigentlich?

Der IT Media Law Podcast. Folge Nr. 1: Worum geht es hier eigentlich?

26. August 2024

Yeah, die erste richtige Folge mit mir selbst! In diesem Podcast tauchen wir ein in die spannende Welt des IT-Rechts...

  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung