• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

Prepayment in the online store: Attention to your own terms and conditions

14. June 2024
in Online retail
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
0
Alena Piatrova | Shutterstock

Alena Piatrova | Shutterstock

Key Facts
  • The Higher Regional Court of Nuremberg ruled that advance payment without a purchase contract is ineffective in order to protect consumers.
  • A contradictory provision in the GTC leads to a disadvantage for the consumer and a lack of transparency.
  • Violations of fundamental principles of the German Civil Code were found, in particular §§ 307 and 311.
  • Online retailers must make their general terms and conditions transparent and clearly regulate the time at which the contract is concluded.
  • Inadmissible approximate figures or unspecific time periods must be avoided in order to ensure legal clarity.
  • Adjustments to ERP systems and ordering processes are necessary in order to comply with legal requirements.
  • Online store operators should seek legal advice in order to protect customer rights and minimize legal risks.

As a lawyer specializing in IT law and contract law, I regularly draft general terms and conditions for various SaaS providers, services and online stores. Especially with online stores, I keep noticing that the terms and conditions directly or indirectly stipulate that payment should be made in advance (whether by credit card, PayPal or other payment methods). However, due to the problem of “invitatio ad offerendum”, it is stated elsewhere in the GTC that the contract is allegedly only concluded when the goods are sent. This contradictory provision puts consumers at a disadvantage, as they have to make advance payments before the contract is concluded without having the certainty that the contract will actually be concluded and the goods delivered.

Content Hide
1. OLG Nuremberg: Prepayment regulation without purchase contract is invalid
2. Basic ideas of the legal regulation violated
3. Consequences for online store operators: adapt general terms and conditions and systems
4. Conclusion
4.1. Author: Marian Härtel

OLG Nuremberg: Prepayment regulation without purchase contract is invalid

In the past, I have considered such provisions to be inadmissible, but they persist in many online stores’ general terms and conditions. The Nuremberg Higher Regional Court has now confirmed my assessment in its ruling of 30.01.2024 (Ref. 3 U 1594/23). It ruled that a clause in the general terms and conditions of an online store stating that the contract is only concluded when the goods are sent, while an advance payment is required elsewhere, is invalid. The court based its decision on the fact that such a clause unreasonably disadvantages the consumer (Section 307 BGB). The advance payment obligation suggests to the customer that a contract has already been concluded. The contradictory regulation on the conclusion of the contract leads to a lack of transparency and ambiguity to the detriment of the consumer.

Basic ideas of the legal regulation violated

The OLG Nuremberg saw the combination of an advance payment agreement and late conclusion of the contract as a violation of the fundamental principles of the statutory regulation within the meaning of Section 307 (1) No. 1 BGB. According to this, services should only be provided if there is a legal basis. A demand for performance may only be expressed if an effective legal obligation has already been established. The Senate stated: “In any case, the applicable civil law system is based on the principle that contracts are concluded by a consensus of the parties and that mutual obligations arise from this (Section 311 (1) BGB). Conversely, it is inherent in services that are not owed that they do not have to be provided; the legal system also does not recognize cases in which it is provided that such services (although not owed) are provided in order to persuade the other party to accept the contract. “The request for payment before the contract is concluded puts consumers at a disadvantage, as they can demand their money back if the retailer does not deliver, but cannot insist on delivery or claim damages. They have to forgo the money paid over a longer period of time without being certain that the goods will be delivered. With regard to their claims for performance and compensation, they are largely unprotected. The court emphasized: “In this respect, the effects of the provision in No. 1 of the General Terms and Conditions are much more significant for the ‘prepayment’ option than in the other cases. The customer, who will typically be in a poor financial position anyway if he chooses the ‘advance payment’ option, has to forgo liquidity for a period of around 2 weeks without having any certainty that the goods will be delivered.”

Consequences for online store operators: adapt general terms and conditions and systems

This ruling has far-reaching consequences for operators of online stores. It is now necessary to revise the GTCs to ensure that the time of contract conclusion is regulated clearly and transparently. An advance payment obligation must not contradict the conclusion of the contract. In addition, the delivery periods must be specifically stated so that the consumer can see how long he is bound by his offer and until when the trader can accept the offer. In particular, approximate information or time periods that do not allow a clear determination of the acceptance period are not permitted, and in addition to the adaptation of the GTC, the ERP systems and store programming must also be adapted accordingly. The ordering process and payment processing must be designed in such a way that they comply with the legal requirements for the conclusion of the contract. In particular, it must be ensured that the contract is concluded before or at the latest with the request for payment in order not to unreasonably disadvantage the customer. Communication with the customer, e.g. through order confirmations, must also be checked to see whether it gives the impression that a contract has already been concluded.

Conclusion

The decision of the Higher Regional Court of Nuremberg has significant implications for the design of general terms and conditions and ordering processes in online retail. Online store operators should promptly review their contractual conditions and processes and, if necessary, adapt them in order to minimize legal risks and protect the rights of consumers. as a lawyer for IT law and contract law, I strongly recommend that affected online store operators seek legal advice. An expert review and adaptation of the general terms and conditions as well as an optimization of the ordering process can help to avoid warnings and lawsuits and increase customer satisfaction, and I would be happy to support you in bringing your general terms and conditions and processes up to date with the current legal status and adapting them to the requirements of the OLG Nuremberg. Contact me without obligation to discuss your situation and find individual solutions. Together we will ensure that your online store is legally compliant and customer-friendly.

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: AGBConsumerContract lawCredit cardCustomizationDamagesIT LawJudgmentLawyerolgrightSaasSicherheitVerträge

Weitere spannende Blogposts

Defense clause on websites: Not a good idea

New info on the status of the State Media Treaty
12. March 2019

Because I just stumbled across an imprint of a page and had to smile again, another post today at a...

Read moreDetails

Agency to delete Google reviews problematic

Agency to delete Google reviews problematic
28. October 2019

Although there are now numerous services that enable ratings of services, Google is still one of the most important sources...

Read moreDetails

LG Düsseldorf: “Malle” as a trademark has legal status

International trademark application at WIPO
29. November 2019

By judgment of 29 November 2019, the 8th Chamber of Commercial Matters of the Regional Court of Düsseldorf ruled that...

Read moreDetails

Information security as a success factor: Why it pays off!

Information security as a success factor: Why it pays off!
3. January 2023

What does information security mean? Information security refers to the entirety of technical and organizational measures that serve to protect...

Read moreDetails

Data leakage can be expensive, DSGVO breach in a different way

LG Munich: Data protection consent on dating platform
7. November 2022

Last year, British Airways suffered a data leak that allegedly affected more than 250,000 customers and involved highly sensitive data...

Read moreDetails

Mixer and imprint as well as other questions

Mixer and imprint as well as other questions
25. October 2019

Currently, Microsoft has started a real battle of the streaming giants with its streaming platform Mixer, as the software giant...

Read moreDetails

Gambling vs. Skillgaming, a small demolition

Gambling vs. Skillgaming, a small demolition
1. July 2019

Skillgaming? I have just completed an expert opinion on the admissibility of Skillgaming under Section 284 of the German Criminal...

Read moreDetails

AI can do more, where else is it going?

What is the Artificial Intelligence Act?
17. January 2023

In the last few weeks, I've been getting more and more involved with AI and what else SaaS platforms can...

Read moreDetails

Trade Secrets Protection Act in April

Trade Secrets Protection Act in April
7. November 2022

With a 10-month delay, Directive (EU) 2016/943 on the protection of confidential know-how and confidential business information against unlawful acquisition,...

Read moreDetails
Eigentum an Software – Wem gehört eigentlich der Code?
Copyright

Eigentum an Software – Wem gehört eigentlich der Code?

14. July 2025

Während ich an meinem eigenen WordPress-Plugin code, taucht immer wieder eine Frage auf: Gehört mir diese Software wirklich? Im Alltagsverständnis...

Read moreDetails
Startup ohne Entwickler?

Startup ohne Entwickler?

8. July 2025
Keine stillschweigende AGB-Änderung – Schweigen gilt nicht als Zustimnung

Keine stillschweigende AGB-Änderung – Schweigen gilt nicht als Zustimnung

7. July 2025
So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

3. July 2025
Dark Patterns: UX-Tricks im Visier von Gesetzgeber und Gerichten

Dark Patterns: UX-Tricks im Visier von Gesetzgeber und Gerichten

2. July 2025

Podcastfolge

KI im Recht: Chancen, Risiken und Regulierung – der IT Media Law Podcast Episode 3

KI im Recht: Chancen, Risiken und Regulierung – der IT Media Law Podcast Episode 3

28. August 2024

Willkommen zur dritten Episode unseres Podcasts "IT Media Law"! In dieser Folge tauchen wir ein in die faszinierende Welt der...

Read moreDetails
Auf der dunklen Seite? Ein Rechtsanwalt im Spannungsfeld innovativer Startups

Auf der dunklen Seite? Ein Rechtsanwalt im Spannungsfeld innovativer Startups

25. September 2024
Rechtliche Herausforderungen innovativer Geschäftsmodelle

Rechtliche Herausforderungen innovativer Geschäftsmodelle

26. September 2024
Influencer und Gaming: Rechtliche Herausforderungen in der digitalen Unterhaltungswelt

Influencer und Gaming: Rechtliche Herausforderungen in der digitalen Unterhaltungswelt

25. September 2024
Die Rolle des IT-Rechtsanwalts

Die Rolle des IT-Rechtsanwalts

5. September 2024

Video

Mein transparente Abrechnung

Mein transparente Abrechnung

10. February 2025

In diesem Video rede ich ein wenig über transparente Abrechnung und wie ich kommuniziere, was es kostet, wenn man mit...

Read moreDetails
Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

10. February 2025
Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

10. February 2025
Was mich wirklich freut

Was mich wirklich freut

10. February 2025
Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

10. February 2025
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung