Virtual employees, AI influencers and synthetic content – legal classification and international perspectives
Pay-to-win or pay-to-lose? Monetization in gaming between business and consumer deception
Flash scaling and aggressive business models: Innovation between progress and evasion
The romanticization of the “fail fast” principle in startups – When does failure become deception towards stakeholders?
Automated pricing and dynamic pricing in e-commerce
Growth hacking and viral marketing – legal requirements
Liability when using VibeCoding and no-code platforms – implications for legal due diligence
Alternative financing models in Germany and other countries – admissibility and design
Legal organization and entrepreneurial structuring of influencer start-ups and personal brands
Taking on investors in a startup: timing, risks and legal framework
81aec81e ad3a 49cd b1b1 8d43b8e59145 24528606
Startups in the legal gray area: permissibility and limits of innovative business models
Moral and legal aspects of “Trust among founders”
Honesty and fair pricing for start-ups (SaaS, mobile apps and digital services)
Creating contracts with face models and voice models: A guide for the gaming industry
Legally compliant archiving of emails: legal requirements and practical implementation
License agreements for software start-ups
iStock 1405433207 scaled
Support with the foundation
Arbitration and alternative dispute resolution in corporate disputes

Dual representation at influencer agencies: can it affect you?

Key Facts
  • Klare Trennung der Vertretung ist entscheidend für die Vermeidung von Interessenkonflikten.
  • Transparenz gegenüber allen Parteien ist notwendig für informierte Entscheidungen der Influencer und Werbetreibenden.
  • Agenturen sollten interne Compliance-Richtlinien erarbeiten, um Konflikte zu vermeiden.
  • Rechtliche Risiken bei ignorierter doppelter Vertretung können zu Schadenersatzforderungen führen.

Watch out, influencer agencies!
The dual representation of influencers and advertising companies can quickly become a legal minefield.
In this video, lawyer Marian Härtel explains what agencies need to look out for in order to avoid conflicts of interest and be on the safe side legally.

Clear separation of representation

The be-all and end-all is a clear separation of the representation of influencers and advertisers.
Agencies should draw up clear contracts that specify who they represent and to what extent.
This is the only way to avoid conflicts of interest.

Transparency is mandatory

Agencies must act transparently towards all parties involved.
Influencers and advertisers have a right to know if the agency is working for both sides.
This is the only way they can make an informed decision as to whether they agree with this constellation.

Internal compliance guidelines

To avoid conflicts of interest, agencies should draw up internal compliance guidelines.
These can, for example, stipulate that different employees are responsible for influencers and advertisers or that certain information may not be passed on.
## Be aware of liability risks Agencies that ignore the legal pitfalls of dual representation expose themselves to considerable liability risks.
In an emergency, there is a risk of claims for damages and the loss of customers.
Read the detailed blog post to find out how you as an influencer agency can structure dual representation in a legally compliant manner and benefit from the advantages without exposing yourself to legal risks.
Click here for the full article . Marian Härtel – your contact for all legal questions relating to influencer marketing and agency activities.  


Beliebte Beträge aus der gleichen Kategorie

Podcast Folgen

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.