• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Kurzberatung
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

Influencer management: Drafting contracts when influencers change agencies

13. August 2024
in Other
Reading Time: 7 mins read
0 0
A A
0
Key Facts
  • Influencers changing agencies during contract negotiations is a common problem in influencer management.
  • Contractual provisions such as sunset clauses and severance clauses are decisive for commission claims.
  • Premature termination of the contract may constitute a breach of contract, but it is difficult to prove.
  • Contractual agreements should be clearly drafted in order to avoid legal uncertainties.
  • Providing evidence of services rendered is important in order to substantiate claims.
  • A fair balance of interests between influencer and agency is essential.
  • Good cooperation and transparent communication can reduce the willingness to change.

Influencer management: Drafting contracts when influencers change agencies

Content Hide
1. Influencer management: Drafting contracts when influencers change agencies
2. Contractual regulations on changing agencies
3. Effectiveness of post-contractual commission clauses
4. Admissibility of severance clauses in influencer management contracts
5. Conclusion
5.1. Author: Marian Härtel

A common problem in influencer management that which I as a lawyerlawyer I am often confronted withtion is the change of an influencerto another agency while contract contract negotiations with ongoing with clients who the originalthe original managementhas suspected. Many me iner clients from the agency sector fask me how they protect themselves fromcan protect themselves, in such caseseer and not receiving commissions for their work.

Unfortunately I then have to often unsatisfactory answersanswers, because the legal situation is anything but aclear. There are ca to make judgments on this constellation and vieverything depends on the circumstances of the individual case. Because But of course I tryof course, with kluger contractdrafting the interests of myof my clients in the best possible true. But A residual riskunfortunately often remains. Especially with v early terminationtermination of the contract by the influencer we are moving in a legal greenzone.

Nevertheless in this article I would like toou can point out some possibilities, how agencies cancontractual precautionscan take in order to at least a at least to some extentto ensure this. Because even when there is no patent solution: If you have the typicaltypical pitfallsricks andd the contracts scarefullycontracts, you are already one one step further.

Contractual regulations on changing agencies

Cases in which influencer management contracts are deliberately terminated in order to “take away” ongoing contract negotiations and save commissions are problematic. This raises the question of what claims the agency is entitled to.

In principle, such premature termination of the contract may constitute a breach of contract. The agency would then possibly have claims for damages under §§ 280 ff. BGB for breach of contractual duties to protect. However, it may often be difficult to prove specific damage and fault on the part of the influencer.

To make matters worse, there is hardly any case law on this constellation. In the absence of clear rulings, there is considerable legal uncertainty regarding the enforceability of any claims. This makes clear contractual agreements all the more important in order to avoid disputes from the outset.

In particular, contractual penalties in the event of a premature exit of the influencer in breach of contract can be considered here. By agreeing a contractual penalty, the agency would not have to prove any specific damage. However, the contractual penalty must not be disproportionately high, as it could otherwise be invalid.

Clauses that prohibit the influencer from concluding contracts with clients with whom the agency was already in negotiations for a certain period after the end of the contract would also be conceivable. However, such provisions are legally tricky, as they restrict the influencer in the exercise of their profession. In any case, they must be moderate in terms of time and content.

Finally, the agency should ensure that the services it provides are documented as precisely as possible. In particular, it is important to prove that specific contract negotiations have already taken place with customers in order to substantiate any claims against the influencer. Regular status meetings and reports can also be helpful here.

Overall, it is clear that the agency can improve its position by drafting contracts carefully. However, risks remain due to the legal uncertainties. In the event of a dispute, it will often be necessary to weigh up the circumstances of the individual case. An agency is therefore advised not only to rely on contractual protection, but also to minimize the risk of an influencer’s premature exit from the outset through good cooperation and fair terms and conditions.

Effectiveness of post-contractual commission clauses

For post-contractual commission clauses, also known as sunset clauses, to be effective, they must meet various requirements. First of all, they may only refer to contracts that were specifically brokered by the agency. A blanket inclusion of all of the influencer’s income would be disproportionate and therefore ineffective.

In addition, sunset clauses must be limited in terms of time and money. As a rule of thumb, they should provide for a maximum commission of 25% for a period of one to three years after the end of the contract. Higher commissions or longer terms would put the influencer at an unreasonable disadvantage.

Finally, it is important that the clauses are negotiated individually between the parties. Pre-formulated contractual provisions that the management unilaterally imposes on the influencer run the risk of being invalid as surprising or inappropriate clauses. In the event of a dispute, the courts would examine very closely whether the influencer had the opportunity to influence the content of the clause.

If a post-contractual commission agreement does not meet these requirements, it is invalid. The influencer would then not be bound by the clause and could terminate the contract without having to continue making payments to the agency. The exact wording of sunset clauses therefore requires legal finesse. If in doubt, agencies should seek legal advice on this to avoid any nasty surprises.

Admissibility of severance clauses in influencer management contracts

Severance clauses in influencer management contracts are intended to regulate what payments the influencer must make to the management in the event of premature termination of the contract. Such clauses can generally be effectively agreed, but are subject to certain legal limits.

First of all, a distinction must be made between individually negotiated contracts and pre-formulated contractual provisions (GTC). Smaller influencers and agencies in particular often use standard contracts, which are then to be regarded as GTCs. These are subject to stricter content control in accordance with Sections 305 et seq. BGB. In particular, they must not unreasonably disadvantage the contractual partner (Section 307 BGB).

In the case of individually negotiated contracts, which are more common with well-known influencers and specialized management, there is more room for maneuver. However, the same principles must also be applied here. The severance clause must not lead to an excessive restriction of the influencer’s professional freedom.

There is a certain parallel to compensation claims in commercial agency agreements in accordance with Section 89b HGB. It is recognized there that claims of the commercial agent for post-contractual compensation can be waived or limited to a certain extent. However, this must also be measured against the principles of good faith (Section 242 BGB) and the protection of the weaker contracting party.

If these assessments are applied to influencer management contracts, a severance clause should be permissible if it:

  • is reasonable in amount and does not place an excessive burden on the influencer,
  • is limited in time, i.e. does not apply for life or for many years,
  • provides for exceptions in cases where the influencer is not responsible for the termination of the contract.

With pre-formulated contracts in particular, it is also important that the clause is formulated transparently and comprehensibly. The influencer must be able to recognize the financial consequences of a premature termination of the contract.

In summary, it can be said that severance clauses in influencer management contracts are generally permissible, but should be treated with caution. They must not be excessive and must ensure a fair balance of interests between the influencer and management. In the event of a dispute, it depends on the circumstances of the individual case. A blanket assessment is not possible. In case of doubt, both sides should seek legal advice to avoid unpleasant surprises.

Conclusion

Influencer management agencies are faced with the challenge of securing their commission claims in the event that an influencer moves to a competitor prematurely. Contractual provisions such as sunset clauses, post-contractual commission payments or severance clauses can be useful instruments here. However, they must be used with a sense of proportion and must not put the influencer at an unreasonable disadvantage.

Agencies often find themselves in uncertain legal territory when it comes to the specific wording of such clauses. There is little case law on these issues, meaning that many details are disputed. Even if corresponding provisions are included in the contract, there is no guarantee that they can be enforced in the event of a dispute.

In addition, the market reacts sensitively to contractual obligations that go too far. Influencers may shy away from signing if they feel too restricted. Long-term commission claims or high severance payments can also act as a deterrent and reduce the attractiveness of an agency.

Even if the contractual provisions are effective, an agency must consider carefully whether it wants to enforce them in the event of an emergency. Legal disputes are costly, lengthy and uncertain in their outcome. It can often make more sense to try to reach an amicable agreement with the influencer than to take legal action.

In addition to legal protection, agencies should therefore also take operational measures to retain influencers in the long term. Cooperation based on trust, attractive conditions and professional support can reduce the willingness to switch. Clear communication of mutual expectations and careful selection of influencers also pay off.

As a lawyer, I am happy to advise agencies on the options for drafting contracts. This is not just about sunset clauses, post-contractual remuneration or severance arrangements. Non-compete clauses, contractual penalty agreements or confidentiality obligations can also come into consideration. An individual weighing of interests is always necessary.

Ultimately, however, even the best contract cannot prevent a change of agency if the influencer absolutely wants to. Although the entrepreneurial risk can be minimized, it can never be completely ruled out. My advice to agencies is therefore: protect yourself legally as best as possible, but focus at least as much on good cooperation with your influencers. This is the only way to build a successful long-term partnership.

 

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: AGBAgenturenCase lawCommissionContract designContractual penaltyInfluencerJudgmentsLawyerManagementRiskVerträge

Weitere spannende Blogposts

Can I talk badly about a competitor?

Can I talk badly about a competitor?
1. July 2019

If it is public, you should be careful with it. This is especially true if the content is not true,...

Read moreDetails

Federal Constitutional Court: Right to Be Forgotten II

Federal Constitutional Court: Right to Be Forgotten I
27. November 2019

What is it all about? The decision "Right to be Forgotten II" published today, which is supplemented by the decision...

Read moreDetails

AI-generated videos

192×192
13. August 2024

A few days ago, I threw myself into an exciting new project: AI-generated videos for itmedialaw.com. As an avid proponent...

Read moreDetails

Esport Orga as corporation? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?

Esport Orga as corporation? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?
31. October 2019

Esport as a joint-stock company will come One of the most successful esports organisation from Europe, Astralis from Denmark, has...

Read moreDetails

BGH provides clarity: photo wallpaper in hotels is not a copyright infringement

BGH considers Uber Black to be anti-competitive
24. September 2024

In its ruling of 10.09.2024 (case no. I ZR 99/23), the Federal Court of Justice ruled that the installation of...

Read moreDetails

Podcasts and the law: What you need to know!

Podcasts and the law: What you need to know!
7. February 2023

This blog post is about the right way to handle podcasts from a legal perspective. I'll try to explain what...

Read moreDetails

BVerwG: Data retention is contrary to EU law

BVerwG: Data retention is contrary to EU law
8. September 2023

The provisions of § 175 para. 1 sentence 1 in conjunction with. § Section 176 TKG (Section 113a (1) sentence...

Read moreDetails

Artificial intelligence and the exploitation of visuals in films and games

Artificial intelligence and the exploitation of visuals in films and games
18. July 2023

Introduction With the advent and rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI), we are witnessing a revolution in the film and...

Read moreDetails

AG Munich on the “expiry” of consent to send e-mails

1. March 2023

As a lawyer, one is always surprised at how sometimes certain legal topics cyclically resurface in courts. At least this...

Read moreDetails
Modding in EULAs and contracts – what applies legally in Germany?
Law and computer games

Modding in EULAs and contracts – what applies legally in Germany?

8. September 2025

Mods add new content to video games, improve graphics or add completely new ways of playing. Hardly any major PC...

Read moreDetails
Arbitration agreements in EULAs and developer contracts

Arbitration agreements in EULAs and developer contracts

7. September 2025
Chain of title in game development: building a clean chain of rights

Chain of title in game development: building a clean chain of rights

6. September 2025
Fail-fast clauses in media productions – what are they actually?

Fail-fast clauses in media productions – what are they actually?

5. September 2025
Founder’s agreement vs. shareholder agreement: setting the course for startups at an early stage

Founder’s agreement vs. shareholder agreement: setting the course for startups at an early stage

12. August 2025

Podcastfolge

238a909c26a0302cbd4792cbd18e4922

Global challenges for start-ups – A legal guide

10. October 2024

This informative podcast offers a comprehensive insight into the legal challenges faced by start-ups when expanding internationally. The experienced lawyer...

Read moreDetails
3c671c5134443338a4e0c30412ac3270

“Digital law decoded” with lawyer Marian Härtel

26. September 2024
d5ab3414c7c4a7a5040c3c3c60451c44

The metaverse – legal challenges in virtual worlds

26. September 2024
d00527fd01b1f807a4f80c0f202069e7

Legal basics for startup founders – how to start on the safe side!

9. November 2024
c9c5d7fd380061a8018074c2ca5a81bf

Startups and innovation in Germany – challenges and opportunities

26. September 2024

Video

My transparent billing

My transparent billing

10. February 2025

In this video, I talk a bit about transparent billing and how I communicate what it costs to work with...

Read moreDetails
Fascination between law and technology

Fascination between law and technology

10. February 2025
My two biggest challenges are?

My two biggest challenges are?

10. February 2025
What really makes me happy

What really makes me happy

10. February 2025
What I love about my job!

What I love about my job!

10. February 2025
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Willkommen im ITMediaLaw Shop. Beachten Sie auch die Bundle Angebote. Dismiss

  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung