• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

LG Düsseldorf and SEPA

26. June 2024
in Competition law
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0 0
A A
0
sepa logo neu
Key Facts
  • The Düsseldorf Regional Court ruled that the impression of a rejection of foreign SEPA accounts already constitutes an infringement of competition law.
  • An actual refusal is not required; the communication itself may violate the SEPA Regulation.
  • This case concerned a customer with a magazine subscription who wanted to pay from a Lithuanian account.
  • The company requested a new SEPA direct debit mandate and made it clear that only German accounts would be accepted.
  • The Federal Court of Justice had previously dealt with similar issues and rejected foreign SEPA accounts as inadmissible.
  • Companies must ensure that their practices and communications comply with the SEPA Regulation.
  • The decision has a significant impact on the competitiveness of companies in Europe.

In a recent ruling, the Düsseldorf Regional Court decided that even the impression that a company rejects foreign SEPA accounts constitutes anti-competitive discrimination. An actual rejection is therefore not necessary. The ruling highlights the importance of the correct handling of SEPA payments for companies and the need for careful communication with customers.

Content Hide
1. Background to the case
2. Violation of SEPA regulation and competition law
3. Fundamental legal question and similar judgments
3.1. Author: Marian Härtel

Background to the case

The case underlying the ruling concerned a consumer with a magazine subscription. The customer asked the company to collect the charges from his Lithuanian account in future. The defendant responded by requesting a new SEPA direct debit mandate and stating that direct debits could only be collected from German accounts, and this communication from the company was ultimately decisive for the court’s decision. Although the company had not actually rejected the direct debit from the Lithuanian account, the court considered the wording of the reply to be in breach of the SEPA Regulation.

Violation of SEPA regulation and competition law

The Düsseldorf Regional Court judged the company’s declaration to be a violation of Art. 9 para. 3 SEPA Regulation and therefore an infringement of competition law. The decisive factor is whether the consumer is given the impression that only accounts from certain countries are accepted. A de facto steering of consumer behavior by the company is sufficient for this and the infringement of competition lies in the fact that the foreign payment details should have been accepted. With the e-mail to the customer, the defendant had thus violated Art. 9 para. 2 of the SEPA Regulation. This provision prohibits payees from specifying the EU member state in which the payer’s account must be held.

Fundamental legal question and similar judgments

The decision of the Düsseldorf Regional Court is one of a series of rulings dealing with the question of whether companies may reject foreign SEPA accounts. Both the Federal Court of Justice and the Regional Court of Düsseldorf itself had already dealt with this issue in the past and classified the restriction to German bank accounts as impermissible SEPA discrimination.the fundamental legal question that arises is to what extent companies are obliged to accept foreign SEPA accounts. The SEPA Regulation provides for a clear regulation here: A rejection of foreign SEPA accounts is generally inadmissible.The recent ruling by the Düsseldorf Regional Court now clarifies that even the mere impression of such a rejection is sufficient to constitute a breach of competition law. Companies must therefore be extremely careful when communicating about the acceptance of SEPA accounts and the decision has far-reaching implications for all companies that accept SEPA payments. They must ensure that both their actual practices and their communication with customers are in line with the SEPA Regulation. Otherwise, they risk being warned or sued for breaches of competition law. Overall, the ruling shows that the correct implementation of the SEPA Regulation is not only a legal obligation for companies, but also a question of competitiveness. This is because customers today expect payments to be processed smoothly across national borders. Companies that create obstacles here run the risk of losing customers and putting themselves at a competitive disadvantage.

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: Competition lawConsumerDüsseldorf Regional CourtE‑mailEuFederal courtJudgmentJudgmentsLegal questionMailRegulation

Weitere spannende Blogposts

LG Berlin considers GDPR violations to be recalled

13. May 2019

In data protection law, the question of whether the General Data Protection Regulation contains market conduct rules and whether infringements...

Read moreDetails

Bad evaluation in online portal: Author must be able to prove facts

Bad evaluation in online portal: Author must be able to prove facts
2. August 2023

Anyone who claims negative facts to the detriment of a company in an online rating portal must prove in case...

Read moreDetails

Can I talk badly about a competitor?

Can I talk badly about a competitor?
1. July 2019

If it is public, you should be careful with it. This is especially true if the content is not true,...

Read moreDetails

Employees of the BRD-GmbH must also pay broadcasting fees

Employees of the BRD-GmbH must also pay broadcasting fees
7. November 2022

Sometimes there are judgments that are just fun to read! A citizen of the Reich brought an action before the...

Read moreDetails

Can Amazon view alternative products in search?

No more free tissues at the pharmacy?
26. June 2019

The I.E. Civil Senate of the Federal Court of Justice, which is responsible for trademark law, among other things, has...

Read moreDetails

New law for fair consumer contracts

New law for fair consumer contracts
7. November 2022

The Federal Ministry of Justice has presented a draft bill that is intended to further improve the legal position of...

Read moreDetails

Bonn Regional Court confirms fine for inadequate customer verification

Already created a processing directory?
7. November 2022

The Ninth Chamber for Administrative Fines of the Bonn Regional Court today ruled that the fine imposed by the Federal...

Read moreDetails

Esports facilities and alcohol?

Esports facilities and alcohol?
17. July 2019

Even if esports men are more likely to be the energy drink consumers, locations such as esports bars or LAN...

Read moreDetails

Groundbreaking ruling on VAT in photovoltaic system sales

Groundbreaking ruling on VAT in photovoltaic system sales
2. January 2024

Introduction: On December 5, 2023, the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court issued an important ruling that has far-reaching consequences for the...

Read moreDetails
Disturbing liability

Disturbing liability

27. June 2023

Stoererhaftung (Breach of Duty of Care) is a legal term used in various legal systems to describe the liability of...

Read moreDetails
Airdrop

Airdrop

30. June 2023

IT Law

25. June 2023
Lego brick still protected as a design patent

Ecj

25. June 2023
Federal Ministry of Economics and Climate Protection (BMWK)

Federal Ministry of Economics and Climate Protection (BMWK)

1. July 2023

Podcast Folgen

Blick in die Zukunft: Wie Technologie das Recht verändert

Blick in die Zukunft: Wie Technologie das Recht verändert

18. February 2025

In der letzten Folge der ersten Staffel des ITmedialaw.com Podcasts werfen wir einen Blick in die Zukunft des Rechts im...

eda7ba83 c559 4e68 8441 41159a0751f3

Blitzskalierung und rechtliche Herausforderungen: Der Balanceakt für Startups

20. April 2025

In dieser Episode sprechen Anna und Max über die rechtlichen Herausforderungen von Blitzskalierung und disruptiven Geschäftsmodellen. Am Beispiel von Plattformen...

Innovative Geschäftsmodelle – Risiko und Chance zugleich

Innovative Geschäftsmodelle – Risiko und Chance zugleich

10. September 2024

In dieser spannenden Folge unseres Podcasts tauchen wir tief in die Welt der innovativen Geschäftsmodelle ein. Unser Host Marian Härtel,...

Globale Herausforderungen für Startups – Ein rechtlicher Leitfaden

Globale Herausforderungen für Startups – Ein rechtlicher Leitfaden

2. October 2024

Dieser informative Podcast bietet einen umfassenden Einblick in die rechtlichen Herausforderungen, denen sich Startups bei ihrer internationalen Expansion gegenübersehen. Der...

  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung