• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • in**@********aw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

OLG Cologne: Jameda partially inadmissible

15. November 2019
in Competition law, Law on the Internet
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
0
Horsch, Willy GNU Free Documentation License

Horsch, Willy GNU Free Documentation License

To the overview

Content Hide
1. To the overview
2. The problematic functions
3. In detail
3.1. Author: Marian Härtel

Yesterday, the Higher Regional Court of Cologne issued an exciting ruling that also provides information on the permissible design of many other comparison and rating platforms in all other sectors based on the relevant BGH case law. In this case, two doctors successfully sued Jameda for deletion of the profile they had created without their consent. The OLG considered numerous functions to be inadmissible, with which Jameda leaves the permissible role of “neutral information broker” and grants paying doctors “hidden advantages” in an inadmissible manner.

The problematic functions

The court objected to the fact that the profile of the plaintiff , which was set up without consent, referred to a list of other doctors, while the profiles of the doctors who pay contributions to Jemeda did not contain such a reference. It was also inadmissible that the paying doctors were shown in listings with a picture, while only a gray silhouette was shown for the other doctors. The same applies to the reference to specialist articles by paying doctors, while no such reference is made on the profiles of platinum customers. Finally, the reference to a list of doctors for special treatment areas, which is also not visible on the profiles of paying doctors, is also inadmissible. Unlike the Regional Court, which had deemed the entire design of the platform to be inadmissible at first instance, the Higher Regional Court examined the various functions on a case-by-case basis. According to the case law of the BGH, the decisive factor was whether the platform had abandoned its fundamentally protected position as a “neutral information intermediary” by providing paying customers with “hidden benefits”. This would be the case if the basic customers who were added to the portal without their consent were used as an “advertising platform” for premium customers and the latter were granted an advantage through the presentation that was not recognizable to the users.

Then the portal is no longer just for the exchange of information between patients. In this case, doctors would not have to accept being listed as basic customers without their consent.

With the functions described above, the portal is leaving its function as a “neutral information intermediary”.

In detail

The button, which has since been removed and was used to display “other” doctors in the immediate vicinity on the profile of basic customers, but not for premium customers, gave the incorrect impression that premium customers had no local competition. The button displayed for basic customers was to be seen as a “jump-off platform” to the profiles of other doctors. It was not clear to users why a reference to local competition was displayed for a basic profile, but not for a premium profile. Even if the platform had removed the button in the meantime, it could be ordered to cease and desist, as there was a risk of repetition. The different visual presentation between basic and premium customers in listings also constitutes a hidden advantage – in contrast to the visual presentation on the individual profiles. This creates a considerable “visual gap” between basic and premium customers, whereby the platform interferes with competition between local competitors in the run-up to the final choice of doctor. The fact that users are referred to specialist articles by other doctors on the profile of basic customers, which is not the case for platinum customers, is also an impermissible hidden advantage. This gives users the incorrect impression that basic customers do not want to or cannot publish corresponding specialist articles. In fact, however, this function can only be used if the doctor books a premium package. In any case, if the displayed articles came from paying doctors who practiced at a distance of up to 100 km from non-paying doctors, a possible competitive situation would arise. Finally, the reference on the profile of the basic customers to doctors with special areas of treatment in the same specialist field was also an impermissible hidden advantage. The hyperlink could give the user the impression that the doctor may not be sufficiently qualified because his profile refers to other colleagues for the “special” medical field, whereas in the case of premium customers, no reference could encourage patients to continue their search for the most qualified doctor possible. In legal terms, the court based the plaintiffs’ claim for deletion of the profile set up without consent and for injunctive relief against the specific forms of infringement on Sections 823 para.

2, 1004 BGB analogous in conjunction with Art. 1 f) GDPR. In this context, it decided that the review platform cannot rely on the so-called media privilege of the General Data Protection Regulation (Art. 85 para. 2 GDPR). The platform’s business model could not be seen as an opinion-forming activity in its own right, but at best as an auxiliary service for the better dissemination of (third-party) information. However, the Senate did not object to other functions of the portal, such as the option for premium customers to specify the medical services offered on their profile to a greater extent than for basic customers. In this respect, the Senate dismissed the actions of the two plaintiffs following the successful appeal by the rating platform. The Senate allowed an appeal on points of law for both sides in both proceedings, as the question of the cases in which a rating platform abandons its role as a “neutral information intermediary” has not yet been fully clarified in supreme court case law and will be important for a large number of future proceedings. The decision of the Federal Court of Justice from 20.02.2019 (VI ZR 301/17) only referred to an individual case regarding the design of the review platform.

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: BghButtonCase lawChatFederal courtInformationLawsuitModelPortalPrivacyRegulation

Weitere spannende Blogposts

New info on the status of the State Media Treaty

New info on the status of the State Media Treaty
7. November 2022

Right now, information on the Interstate Treaty on the Media in the form of the 23rd Amendment to the Interstate...

Read moreDetails

Vesting at startups for esports, social media, games?

Vesting at startups for esports, social media, games?
7. November 2022

Here on the blog, I regularly try to familiarize young startups from the esports, social media or games sector with...

Read moreDetails

BGH limits the warning mania!

Online retailer: Notice of warranty of defects
7. November 2022

I have already dealt with the topic of abusive cease-and-desist letters here on the blog a few times, and the...

Read moreDetails

NFT and esports: an additional income opportunity or high legal hurdles?

What is “digital property” and how can I benefit from it?
16. May 2023

Introduction to NFTs and Digital Assets Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are an emerging area of digital assets based on blockchain technology....

Read moreDetails

Interview with Esport.com: Esportsanwalt in Germany

Interview with Esport.com: Esportsanwalt in Germany
4. February 2020

February 2020: More topical than ever, therefore repost ;) With the colleagues of Freaks4u I gave an interview for the...

Read moreDetails

The power of arbitration: key benefits and potential pitfalls for contracts

The power of arbitration: key benefits and potential pitfalls for contracts
26. June 2023

Arbitration plays an essential role in the modern business world. Arbitration can be used to resolve disputes between parties outside...

Read moreDetails

Is a new Privacy Shield coming in 2023?

Valve + 5 game publishers and violation of geoblocking/antitrust law
2. January 2023

Will the European Commission's new adequacy decision finally promote transatlantic data transfers between the U.S. and the EU? On 13/12/2022,...

Read moreDetails

Blockchain and AI in law – new territory or proven terrain?

blockchain und ki im recht neuland oder bewaehrtes terrain
9. November 2023

Introduction: Discourses at the interface of technology and law Last week, there was an exciting discussion with a doctoral student...

Read moreDetails

Digitization in medium-sized businesses: opportunities and legal hurdles

Digitization in medium-sized businesses: opportunities and legal hurdles
4. September 2023

Introduction Digitization has become a central topic in business in recent years, which is also manifested in the increasing number...

Read moreDetails
Age verification systems (AVS)

Age verification systems (AVS)

16. October 2024

Age verification systems (AVS) are technical solutions for verifying the age of users of digital services. They are used to...

Read moreDetails
687bb676d2ed8fd9b78bd26509d72140

Media State Treaty

26. June 2023
earn out klausel

Earn-out clause

26. June 2023
force majeure

Limited partner

10. November 2024
Advance sales tax return

Advance sales tax return

16. October 2024

Podcast Folgen

Innovative Geschäftsmodelle – Risiko und Chance zugleich

Innovative Geschäftsmodelle – Risiko und Chance zugleich

10. September 2024

In dieser spannenden Folge unseres Podcasts tauchen wir tief in die Welt der innovativen Geschäftsmodelle ein. Unser Host Marian Härtel,...

Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

20. April 2025

In diese Episode wird die komplexe Beziehung zwischen dem 'Fail Fast'-Prinzip und den Verantwortlichkeiten der Gründer gegenüber Investoren und Mitarbeitern...

Das Metaverse – Rechtliche Herausforderungen in virtuellen Welten

Das Metaverse – Rechtliche Herausforderungen in virtuellen Welten

25. September 2024

In dieser faszinierenden Episode tauchen wir tief in die rechtlichen Aspekte des Metaverse ein. Als Rechtsanwalt und Technik-Enthusiast beleuchte ich...

Blick in die Zukunft: Wie Technologie das Recht verändert

Blick in die Zukunft: Wie Technologie das Recht verändert

18. February 2025

In der letzten Folge der ersten Staffel des ITmedialaw.com Podcasts werfen wir einen Blick in die Zukunft des Rechts im...

  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung