• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

GDPR: OLG stick to alleged loss of control not sufficient for claim for damages

17. May 2024
in Data protection Law
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0 0
A A
0
dsgvo 3589608 1280
Key Facts
  • Recent rulings by German higher regional courts set new standards for claims for damages in the event of GDPR violations
  • Article 82 GDPR grants anyone who is harmed the right to compensation.
  • ECJ ruling confirms that fear of data misuse can give rise to non-material damage.
  • The OLG Hamm requires concrete proof of the damage for claims for damages.
  • Dresden Higher Regional Court confirms the need to demonstrate concrete damages and not just GDPR violations
  • Decisions of other OLGs show a restrictive attitude towards claims for damages.
  • Companies need to rethink compliance strategies in order to minimize liability risks.

Introduction:

Content Hide
1. Introduction:
2. Article 82 GDPR and the ECJ ruling:
3. OLG Hamm: Clear line for claims for damages
4. OLG Dresden: Confirmation of the necessity of concrete damage
5. Further OLG rulings and their significance
6. Conclusion: Practical implications for legal practice
6.1. Author: Marian Härtel

As a lawyer who deals intensively with the facets of data protection law, I would like to highlight a significant development in this area today. Recent rulings by various higher regional courts in Germany have set new standards for the assertion of claims for damages in the event of violations of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). These judgments are particularly relevant as they concern the interpretation and application of Article 82 GDPR, which regulates liability and rights to compensation.

Article 82 GDPR and the ECJ ruling:

Article 82 GDPR provides that any person who suffers material or non-material damage as a result of a breach of the Regulation is entitled to compensation from the controller or processor. In its ruling of December 14, 2023 (C-340/21), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that even the fear of future data misuse can give rise to a non-material claim for damages. This ruling has far-reaching implications for the liability risks of companies and authorities.

OLG Hamm: Clear line for claims for damages

In its decisions, the Hamm Higher Regional Court has drawn a clear line regarding claims for damages in the event of violations of the GDPR. The judges emphasized that concrete proof of damage is essential for the assertion of claims for damages. They clarified that a mere breach of the GDPR does not automatically lead to claims for damages. Rather, the plaintiff must demonstrate and prove actual damage. This approach of the Higher Regional Court of Hamm aims to prevent an inflationary assertion of claims for damages without a substantiated basis and thus represents an important change of course in data protection law.

OLG Dresden: Confirmation of the necessity of concrete damage

The Dresden Higher Regional Court agreed with the opinion of the Hamm Higher Regional Court and also emphasized the importance of concrete proof of damage. In its rulings, the court rejected claims for damages that were based solely on an alleged loss of control without any evidence of actual damage. This decision underlines the need for plaintiffs to demonstrate in detail not only a GDPR infringement, but also the specific damages resulting from it. The OLG Dresden thus contributes to clarity and predictability in the application of the GDPR and prevents the claim for damages from being overstretched.

Further OLG rulings and their significance

In addition to the Higher Regional Court of Hamm and the Higher Regional Court of Dresden, the Higher Regional Court of Cologne and the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart have also ruled in a similar manner. These rulings form a consistent body of case law indicating that German courts are taking a more restrictive stance towards claims for damages for GDPR infringements. They emphasize the need for concrete proof of damage and thus prevent an expansion of the liability risks for companies and authorities that could result from an overly broad interpretation of Article 82 GDPR.

Conclusion: Practical implications for legal practice

The latest decisions of the German courts signal an important development in data protection law, which is of great significance for both companies and data protection officers. They make it clear that not every breach of the GDPR automatically leads to claims for damages. Rather, a differentiated approach is required that takes into account both the rights of the data subjects and the interests of the data processing bodies.

In legal practice, this means that when advising clients affected by a data breach, particular attention must be paid to proving concrete damage. This requires careful analysis and documentation of the facts. Similarly, companies that work with personal data need to rethink their compliance strategies and ensure that they implement effective measures to minimize risk and protect data.

In conclusion, these rulings send a clear message: Careful compliance with the GDPR and an appropriate risk assessment are essential to minimize potential liability risks. In this dynamic area of law, it is crucial to stay up to date and to keep an eye on developing case law. As a lawyer specializing in data protection law, I am ready to advise and support you in these complex issues.

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: AnalyseBeratungCase lawComplianceDamagesData protection LawDevelopmentDresdenEntscheidungenGDPRGeneral Data Protection RegulationGermanyHaftungHigher Regional Court DresdenJudgmentJudgmentsLegal fieldolgPrivacyRegulation

Weitere spannende Blogposts

File sharing and instruction by parents

File sharing and instruction by parents
7. November 2022

An interesting, but in this respect, based on the case law of the Federal Court of Justice (BGH), consistent ruling...

Read moreDetails

Liability for unsecured WLAN/gate exit node

ECJ: Advocate General assesses sampling as copyright infringement
7. November 2022

The German Federal Court of Justice has ruled that the operator of an Internet access via WLAN and a Tor...

Read moreDetails

Attention: Grace period in the Whistleblower Protection Act has expired!

Attention: Grace period in the Whistleblower Protection Act has expired!
18. December 2023

The Whistleblower Protection Act, which has been in force since July 2, 2023, has reached a new phase. With the...

Read moreDetails

Ltd. (Limited) in Germany and #Brexit? Act now!

Ltd. (Limited) in Germany and #Brexit? Act now!
7. November 2022

Due to the introduction of the UG (limited liability company) in Germany, the Limited (under English law), with German administrative...

Read moreDetails

Age restriction: What YouTubers can learn from the latest OLG Schleswig ruling

YouTube: What to do about copyright extortion?
30. May 2023

A new precedent: what was the starting point? YouTube provides us with a powerful platform to share thoughts and ideas,...

Read moreDetails

Management for OnlyFans artists: what to consider and how it differs from traditional influencer management

OnlyFans management contracts: What content?
24. October 2023

Management in the influencer sector is no longer uncharted territory. Numerous success stories have already been written with platforms such...

Read moreDetails

Invoice for fake order? BGH says: Is anti-competitive

Online shops: Attention to advertising with EIA
23. September 2019

The Federal Court of Justice has passed a judgment that could well have the potential to cause headaches for many...

Read moreDetails

New concept of material defects and computer games – what do you have to consider from 2022?

judge plays videogames in his spare time
7. November 2022

In a somewhat longer blog article, I just reported information about the new material defect concept for digital content, which...

Read moreDetails

BGH suspends proceedings against Facebook gaming center

7. November 2022

The First Civil Senate of the German Federal Court of Justice, which is responsible among other things for claims under...

Read moreDetails
Eigentum an Software – Wem gehört eigentlich der Code?
Copyright

Eigentum an Software – Wem gehört eigentlich der Code?

14. July 2025

Während ich an meinem eigenen WordPress-Plugin code, taucht immer wieder eine Frage auf: Gehört mir diese Software wirklich? Im Alltagsverständnis...

Read moreDetails
Startup ohne Entwickler?

Startup ohne Entwickler?

8. July 2025
Keine stillschweigende AGB-Änderung – Schweigen gilt nicht als Zustimnung

Keine stillschweigende AGB-Änderung – Schweigen gilt nicht als Zustimnung

7. July 2025
So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

3. July 2025
Dark Patterns: UX-Tricks im Visier von Gesetzgeber und Gerichten

Dark Patterns: UX-Tricks im Visier von Gesetzgeber und Gerichten

2. July 2025

Podcastfolge

Digitale Souveränität: Europas Weg in eine selbstbestimmte digitale Zukunft

Digitale Souveränität: Europas Weg in eine selbstbestimmte digitale Zukunft

12. November 2024

In dieser spannenden Episode des itmedialaw.com Podcasts tauchen wir tief in das hochaktuelle Thema der digitalen Souveränität ein. Vor dem...

Read moreDetails
eda7ba83 c559 4e68 8441 41159a0751f3

Blitzskalierung und rechtliche Herausforderungen: Der Balanceakt für Startups

20. April 2025
Das Metaverse – Rechtliche Herausforderungen in virtuellen Welten

Das Metaverse – Rechtliche Herausforderungen in virtuellen Welten

25. September 2024
Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

Die Romantisierung des Prinzips ‘Fail Fast’ in Startups – Wann wird Scheitern zur Täuschung gegenüber Beteiligten?

20. April 2025
Rechtliche Basics für Startup-Gründer – So startest du auf der sicheren Seite!

Rechtliche Basics für Startup-Gründer – So startest du auf der sicheren Seite!

1. November 2024

Video

Mein transparente Abrechnung

Mein transparente Abrechnung

10. February 2025

In diesem Video rede ich ein wenig über transparente Abrechnung und wie ich kommuniziere, was es kostet, wenn man mit...

Read moreDetails
Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

10. February 2025
Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

10. February 2025
Was mich wirklich freut

Was mich wirklich freut

10. February 2025
Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

10. February 2025
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung