• Mehr als 3 Millionen Wörter Inhalt
  • |
  • info@itmedialaw.com
  • |
  • Tel: 03322 5078053
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

No products in the cart.

  • en English
  • de Deutsch
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Kurzberatung
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
Rechtsanwalt Marian Härtel - ITMediaLaw

Important decision by the OLG Dresden on the termination of user accounts in social networks

12. February 2024
in Law on the Internet
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
0
ChatGPT Image 25. Apr. 2025 09 29 43
Key Facts
  • The Dresden Higher Regional Court has placed the burden of proof for account terminations on the platform operators.
  • A general allegation of a breach of the terms of use is insufficient for termination.
  • The fundamental rights of users must be carefully weighed up before accounts are terminated.
  • Operators must examine individual cases and make informed decisions.
  • The loss of data alone does not justify immaterial damage or claims for damages.
  • The ruling provides valuable guidance for the legal assessment of blocking.
  • The ruling gives users a stronger legal basis against unlawful blocking.

Introduction: The challenge of unlawful account suspensions

Content Hide
1. Introduction: The challenge of unlawful account suspensions
2. Burden of proof and balancing fundamental rights
3. Requirements for termination
4. Conclusion: A groundbreaking clarification in IT law
4.1. Author: Marian Härtel

In my legal practice, I regularly encounter cases in which clients are affected by the unlawful blocking of their accounts on platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, TikTok or in online games. These situations not only represent a significant impairment for those affected, but also raise complex legal issues, particularly with regard to the rights of users and the obligations of platform operators. The dynamics of the digital space and the constant development of the terms of use of social networks and online platforms lead to a constant challenge to explore the legal limits and possibilities for my clients.

In this context, the recent ruling by the Higher Regional Court of Dresden (Ref.: 4 U 1049/23) from December 12, 2023 is of particular importance. It not only offers insightful findings for practical use, but also sets new legal standards in dealing with the termination and blocking of user accounts. This ruling is an important milestone that has a significant impact on the legal situation with regard to digital communication and interaction, a core topic of my work as a lawyer. It reflects the need for a balanced approach between the interests of users and the operators of digital platforms and could be groundbreaking for future decisions in similar cases.

Burden of proof and balancing fundamental rights

In its ruling, the court specifies that the burden of proof for the requirements for termination lies with the operator of the social network. Although this clarification does not represent a fundamental change in case law, it is nevertheless of great importance. The court clearly states: “According to general principles of presentation and burden of proof, it is incumbent on the defendant, which invokes a breach of its community standards by the plaintiff, to present and prove that there was good cause for the permanent deactivation of the user account.” This statement underlines the need for platform operators to provide sound and detailed justification and evidence when terminating user accounts.

In the grounds for the ruling, the court emphasizes that a general allegation of a breach of the terms of use is not sufficient for termination. Instead, concrete evidence or proof of the alleged infringement must be provided. This requirement for evidence is also reflected in similar rulings, such as the decision of the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) on Facebook account blocking (case no. III ZR 179/20), which emphasized the importance of sound decision-making when blocking user accounts.

Furthermore, the OLG Dresden emphasizes the importance of users’ fundamental rights. It is clarified that the decision to terminate a user account requires careful consideration of the fundamental rights involved. This aspect of balancing fundamental rights is a central point in the case law on digital platforms and social networks and has already been addressed in previous rulings, such as that of the Federal Constitutional Court on internet platforms (BVerfG, decision of 27.02.2018 – 1 BvR 967/15).

In summary, the judgment of the Higher Regional Court of Dresden provides an important clarification with regard to the burden of proof when terminating user accounts. It strengthens the position of users and requires digital platform operators to exercise greater care and transparency in their decisions. This development is of great importance for the future of digital communication and interaction and underlines the need for a balanced approach in the area of IT law.

Requirements for termination

The ruling of the Higher Regional Court of Dresden emphasizes the importance of a differentiated and fair approach when terminating user accounts. It is clarified that a lawful termination or deactivation of an account requires a detailed examination and consideration of the respective circumstances. This means that social network operators cannot simply block or delete user accounts due to general or unspecified violations of terms of use. Rather, they must consider each case individually and make the decision on a sound and comprehensible basis.

Equally important is the court’s finding on the subject of compensation for loss of data. The court makes it clear that the loss of data alone does not automatically constitute immaterial damage. This finding is crucial for the assessment of claims resulting from the blocking of user accounts. It suggests that users who wish to assert claims for damages must present concrete and verifiable damage that goes beyond the mere loss of data.

Overall, the ruling provides valuable points of reference for the practice of terminating user accounts and sets standards for the assessment of claims for damages in the context of digital platforms. It underlines the need for a balanced and legally sound approach that takes into account the interests of both users and platform operators.

Conclusion: A groundbreaking clarification in IT law

Although the judgment of the Higher Regional Court of Dresden does not represent a turning point in the field of IT law, it does provide an exciting and important clarification. It strengthens the rights of users by setting clear requirements for social network operators regarding the termination of user accounts. This ruling forces operators to rethink their practices and processes and adapt them to the more precise legal requirements. For users, the ruling offers new starting points and a stronger legal basis for taking action against unlawful blocking.

The court’s decision opens new doors for mandates in the area of blocked accounts and offers fresh perspectives for legal disputes in this dynamic field. As a lawyer specializing in copyright law, competition law and IT law, I see this ruling as an important impetus for the future advice and representation of my clients. It underlines the importance of sound legal advice at a time when digital presence and the use of social networks are becoming increasingly central.

If you are affected by an unlawful blocking of your account or have questions about your rights and options in this area, please contact me. With my expertise and experience, I am at your side to effectively represent and protect your interests.

Marian Härtel
Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: BeratungBghBurden of proofCase lawCompetition lawDamagesDevelopmentDresdenEntscheidungenFacebookInstagramIT LawJudgmentKündigungolgReviewrightTikTokTransparencyUrheberrecht

Weitere spannende Blogposts

What is “digital property” and how can I benefit from it?

What is “digital property” and how can I benefit from it?
8. December 2022

Attention The term "Digital Property" refers to digital content created or acquired by a person and owned by that person....

Read moreDetails

New OLG rulings on product descriptions in online trade

New OLG rulings on product descriptions in online trade
5. October 2023

Misleading product descriptions: New OLG rulings reveal pitfalls for online retailers Anyone who sells products in online stores naturally wants...

Read moreDetails

EU directive on the right to repair

Privacy policy
18. June 2024

On April 23, 2024, the EU Parliament adopted a groundbreaking directive to strengthen the right to repair in the European...

Read moreDetails

OLG Hamburg: Kunuu must delete anonymous reviews

OLG Hamburg: Kunuu must delete anonymous reviews
17. February 2024

Introduction As a lawyer specializing in copyright law, competition law and IT law, I regularly face the challenge of protecting...

Read moreDetails

Digitization of contract creation and client communication

Digitization of contract creation and client communication
7. November 2022

Currently, I am working and planning on a major change that I hope will roll out in 2021. Although I...

Read moreDetails

What are NFT? A small overview

What are NFT? A small overview
7. November 2022

What exactly NFTs (or digital assets) are is still a matter of considerable dispute among legal experts. And it sometimes...

Read moreDetails

Ever heard of it? Cyber Resilence Act!

Ever heard of it? Cyber Resilence Act!
6. January 2023

Suppliers of modern technologies and products in particular must always be up to date with regard to current case law...

Read moreDetails

BGH: Generally accessible data may be stored on information portal

BGH considers Uber Black to be anti-competitive
8. March 2023

I have just become aware of a ruling of the Federal Court of Justice from last year that answers an...

Read moreDetails

EU Commission takes positive stock of the GDPR

eu komission zieht positive bilanz zur dsgvo
7. November 2022

Almost one year after the entry into force of the General Data Protection Regulation, the European Commission today published a...

Read moreDetails
Startup ohne Entwickler?
Gloss / Opinion

Startup ohne Entwickler?

8. July 2025

Es ist spätabends, der Kaffee neben dem Laptop ist längst kalt, doch ich lächle zufrieden: In wenigen Stunden habe ich...

Read moreDetails
Keine stillschweigende AGB-Änderung – Schweigen gilt nicht als Zustimnung

Keine stillschweigende AGB-Änderung – Schweigen gilt nicht als Zustimnung

7. July 2025
So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

So langsam nimmt der Shop Form an

3. July 2025
Dark Patterns: UX-Tricks im Visier von Gesetzgeber und Gerichten

Dark Patterns: UX-Tricks im Visier von Gesetzgeber und Gerichten

2. July 2025
Altersverifikation im Internet: Pflichten für Anbieter in Deutschland und Europa

Altersverifikation im Internet: Pflichten für Anbieter in Deutschland und Europa

30. June 2025

Podcastfolge

Rechtssichere Influencer-Agentur-Verträge: Strategien zur Vermeidung unerwarteter Kündigungen

Rechtssichere Influencer-Agentur-Verträge: Strategien zur Vermeidung unerwarteter Kündigungen

19. April 2025

Anna und Max sprechen in dieser Episode über typische Fallstricke und Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten bei Verträgen zwischen Influencern und Agenturen. Im Mittelpunkt...

Read moreDetails
Rechtliche Risiken bei langen Entwicklungszeiten und der Stornierung von Crowdfundingspielen

Rechtliche Risiken bei langen Entwicklungszeiten und der Stornierung von Crowdfundingspielen

20. April 2025
Startups und Innovation in Deutschland – Herausforderungen und Chancen

Startups und Innovation in Deutschland – Herausforderungen und Chancen

25. September 2024
KI im Recht: Chancen, Risiken und Regulierung – der IT Media Law Podcast Episode 3

KI im Recht: Chancen, Risiken und Regulierung – der IT Media Law Podcast Episode 3

28. August 2024
Rechtskette beim Spieleentwickler

Rechtskette beim Spieleentwickler

19. April 2025

Video

Mein transparente Abrechnung

Mein transparente Abrechnung

10. February 2025

In diesem Video rede ich ein wenig über transparente Abrechnung und wie ich kommuniziere, was es kostet, wenn man mit...

Read moreDetails
Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

Faszination zwischen und Recht und Technologie

10. February 2025
Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

Meine zwei größten Herausforderungen sind?

10. February 2025
Was mich wirklich freut

Was mich wirklich freut

10. February 2025
Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

Was ich an meinem Job liebe!

10. February 2025
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • About lawyer Marian Härtel
Marian Härtel, Rathenaustr. 58a, 14612 Falkensee, info@itmedialaw.com

Marian Härtel - Rechtsanwalt für IT-Recht, Medienrecht und Startups, mit einem Fokus auf innovative Geschäftsmodelle, Games, KI und Finanzierungsberatung.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • Informationen
    • Ideal partner
    • About lawyer Marian Härtel
    • Quick and flexible access
    • Principles as a lawyer
    • Why a lawyer and business consultant?
    • Focus areas of attorney Marian Härtel
      • Focus on start-ups
      • Investment advice
      • Corporate law
      • Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Games
      • AI and SaaS
      • Streamers and influencers
      • Games and esports law
      • IT/IP Law
      • Law firm for GMBH,UG, GbR
      • Law firm for IT/IP and media law
    • The everyday life of an IT lawyer
    • How can I help clients?
    • Testimonials
    • Team: Saskia Härtel – WHO AM I?
    • Agile and lean law firm
    • Price overview
    • Various information
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Imprint
  • Services
    • Support and advice of agencies
    • Contract review and preparation
    • Games law consulting
    • Consulting for influencers and streamers
    • Advice in e-commerce
    • DLT and Blockchain consulting
    • Legal advice in corporate law: from incorporation to structuring
    • Legal compliance and expert opinions
    • Outsourcing – for companies or law firms
    • Booking as speaker
  • News
    • Gloss / Opinion
    • Law on the Internet
    • Online retail
    • Law and computer games
    • Law and Esport
    • Blockchain and web law
    • Data protection Law
    • Copyright
    • Labour law
    • Competition law
    • Corporate
    • EU law
    • Law on the protection of minors
    • Tax
    • Other
    • Internally
  • Podcast
    • ITMediaLaw Podcast
  • Knowledge base
    • Laws
    • Legal terms
    • Contract types
    • Clause types
    • Forms of financing
    • Legal means
    • Authorities
    • Company forms
    • Tax
    • Concepts
  • Videos
    • Information videos – about Marian Härtel
    • Videos – about me (Couch)
    • Blogpost – individual videos
    • Videos on services
    • Shorts
    • Podcast format
    • Third-party videos
    • Other videos
  • Contact
  • en English
  • de Deutsch
Kostenlose Kurzberatung