Black Friday brand is completely deleted

17. July 2023

in Other

Reading Time: 2 mins read

Key Facts

The Federal Supreme Court has rejected the appeal of the "Black Friday" trademark.
The disputed trademark must be deleted from the DPMA register.
The brand was registered in 2016 by Super Union Holdings Ltd. from Hong Kong.
A deletion was requested by BlackFriday.de in 2017.
The BGH recognizes that "Black Friday" is a generic term.
Data declaration: "Black Friday" is not an indication of origin for the trademark owner.
This decision promotes the rights of consumers and companies.

On June 29, 2023, the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the appeal against the non-admission of the trademark owner’s appeal. This means that the cancellation ruling of the Kammergericht is legally binding and the disputed “Black Friday” trademark must finally be deleted from the register of the German Patent and Trademark Office (DPMA).

The “Black Friday” trademark had been registered in 2016 by Super Union Holdings Ltd. of Hong Kong. In 2017, the portal BlackFriday.de had applied for cancellation of the trademark. The Düsseldorf Regional Court had cancelled the trademark in 2018 for all goods and services. The trademark owner had appealed against the judgment. The Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court had dismissed the appeal in 2020. The trademark owner had appealed against the judgment.

The BGH has now rejected the trademark owner’s appeal. The BGH has ruled that the trademark “Black Friday” has expired for all goods and services. The BGH took particular account of the fact that the trademark “Black Friday” is a generic term that can be used for any type of discount promotion. The BGH also ruled that the trademark “Black Friday” is not suitable as an indication of origin for the goods and services of the trademark owner.

The cancellation of the “Black Friday” trademark is an important victory for the rights of consumers and businesses. The trademark owner had tried in the past to warn off companies that had used the term “Black Friday” in their advertising. The BGH’s decision clarifies that the term “Black Friday” is not a trademark and can be freely used by anyone.

The BGH’s decision is also an important victory for the BlackFriday.de portal. The portal had resisted the “Black Friday” brand for years. The decision of the BGH clarifies that the portal BlackFriday.de may freely use the term “Black Friday”.

The BGH’s decision is an important step towards strengthening the rights of consumers and companies. The decision clarifies that trademarks may not be used to hinder competition.

Author: Marian Härtel

Marian Härtel ist Rechtsanwalt und Fachanwalt für IT-Recht mit einer über 25-jährigen Erfahrung als Unternehmer und Berater in den Bereichen Games, E-Sport, Blockchain, SaaS und Künstliche Intelligenz. Seine Beratungsschwerpunkte umfassen neben dem IT-Recht insbesondere das Urheberrecht, Medienrecht sowie Wettbewerbsrecht. Er betreut schwerpunktmäßig Start-ups, Agenturen und Influencer, die er in strategischen Fragen, komplexen Vertragsangelegenheiten sowie bei Investitionsprojekten begleitet. Dabei zeichnet sich seine Beratung durch einen interdisziplinären Ansatz aus, der juristische Expertise und langjährige unternehmerische Erfahrung miteinander verbindet. Ziel seiner Tätigkeit ist stets, Mandanten praxisorientierte Lösungen anzubieten und rechtlich fundierte Unterstützung bei der Umsetzung innovativer Geschäftsmodelle zu gewährleisten.

Tags: Bgh Federal court Trademarks