Provider liability

Provider liability

Insolvenzverwalter und Zugang zu Finanzamtdaten?
iStock 1405433207 scaled
Streaming-Setup, Influencer und Vertragsrecht
Platform Cooperatives als Finanzierungs- und Geschäftsmodell
Landgericht Frankfurt a.M weicht Influencer-Rechtsprechung auf
Kammergericht zu Unterlassungspflichten bei Handlungen Dritter
Neue Infos zum Status des Medienstaatsvertrages
BGH hält Uber Black für wettbewerbswidrig
marianregel
DPMA
Ist ein 8jähriger als Esport Spieler zulässig?
Was ist eigentlich eine IP? In der Games, Musik und Film-Industrie!
Affiliate-Links bei Streamern und Influencern
Reverse Vesting
ai generated g63ed67bf8 1280
KI-generierte Musik in Filmen, Games und auf Streaming-Plattformen
Cold Contacting auf LinkedIn: Aktuelles Urteil des OLG Hamm und was es für Sie bedeutet
Key Learnings aus meinem Vortrag: Navigieren durch die komplexe Welt der KI und des Rechts
Kryptowert
Lego-Baustein weiterhin als Geschmacksmuster geschützt

Es befinden sich keine Produkte im Warenkorb.

Skip to main content
< Alle Themen
Drucken

Provider liability is a central topic in Internet law and deals with the question of the extent to which providers of Internet services (providers) can be held liable for illegal content or actions of their users. This issue is becoming increasingly relevant with the growing importance of the internet and the variety of online services on offer.

Wichtigste Punkte
  • Provider liability is a critical issue affecting Internet service providers regarding illegal user content and actions.
  • Key laws, like the German Telemedia Act and E-Commerce Directive, shape the liability framework for providers.

Legal basis

The legal basis for provider liability can be found in various laws and guidelines: 1. German Telemedia Act (TMG): In Germany, Sections 7-10 TMG in particular regulate the liability of service providers. 2 E-Commerce Directive: At EU level, Directive 2000/31/EC provides the framework for the liability of providers. 3 Copyright Service Provider Act (UrhDaG): This act transposes the EU Copyright Directive into German law and regulates the liability of upload platforms.

Types of providers

The law distinguishes between different types of providers, each of which is subject to specific liability rules: 1. access providers: They merely provide access to the internet. 2. caching providers: they temporarily store information in order to speed up transmission. 3. hosting providers: They store third-party content for users. 4. content providers: They provide their own content.

Principles of provider liability

The liability of providers follows some basic principles: 1. liability privilege: Access, caching and hosting providers enjoy liability privileges under certain conditions. They are generally not liable for third-party content as long as they have no knowledge of its illegality. (2) Notice and takedown: As soon as a provider becomes aware of illegal content, it must remove it immediately or block access to it. 3. no general monitoring obligation: Providers are not obliged to generally monitor the information they transmit or store. 4. fault-based liability: Even if there is no direct liability, providers can be held liable for injunctive relief if they have violated reasonable monitoring obligations.

Special features of various infringements

Provider liability can vary depending on the type of infringement: 1. copyright infringements: Special rules apply here, in particular for upload platforms under the UrhDaG. 2. violations of personal rights: In the case of violations of personality rights, for example through insults or untrue factual claims, there may be stricter review obligations for providers. 3. trademark infringements: In the area of trademark law, the liability of platform operators for infringements by their users may be stricter under certain circumstances.

Current developments and challenges

Provider liability faces various challenges: 1. technological development: new services and technologies are constantly raising new questions about the liability of providers. 2. international dimension: the cross-border nature of the internet makes it difficult to enforce liability rules uniformly. 3) Balancing act between law enforcement and freedom of expression: A balance must be struck between protecting rights and guaranteeing freedom of expression. 4. increasing regulation: New laws such as the Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG) or the EU’s planned Digital Services Act (DSA) lead to new obligations for providers.

Importance for companies

For companies acting as providers, provider liability has far-reaching consequences: 1. compliance: systems and processes must be implemented to identify and remove illegal content. 2. risk management: potential liability risks must be assessed and minimized through appropriate measures. 3. user conditions: Terms and conditions and usage guidelines must be carefully designed to limit liability risks. 4. international aspects: Companies must take into account the different liability regimes in different countries.

Conclusion

Provider liability remains a complex and dynamic area of law. It attempts to strike a balance between the interests of rights holders, providers and users. For companies acting as providers, it is essential to know the legal framework in detail and to design their services accordingly. In view of the ongoing technological development and increasing regulation, it can be assumed that the rules on provider liability will continue to evolve. Companies should follow these developments closely and adapt their business models and compliance strategies accordingly.

 

Inhaltsverzeichnis